![]() |
toughest spending cuts in 20 years
In a dramatic shift in Labour's election strategy the Chancellor conceded the Government would have to go much further in curbing public spending than Gordon Brown has previously admitted.
are they finally admitting to the bust part of the equation ??"an end to the cycle of boom and bust" was a quote i remember from ex chancellor brown. Mr Darling's comments provide fresh evidence that he and Lord Mandelson successfully used this week's Labour leadership crisis to secure concessions from the Prime Minister over the party's approach to tackling Britain's dire public finances.[ by dire i assume they mean bust] Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz0c6f6IqU8 |
Re: toughest spending cuts in 20 years
In any Government where there's a boom there's got to be a bust. The pre recession spending couldn't carry on without something going belly up, someone on here said something about it a year before it all went Pete Tong, he got shouted down because there was to much money in the economy.
|
Re: toughest spending cuts in 20 years
Does that mean they are going to have to curb the employment of the black, one-legged, lesbian, dwarf community outreach officers?
I am gutted. |
Re: toughest spending cuts in 20 years
Quote:
The cuts will be in frontline services, and frontline staff. The quality of the services provided will go down hill, which will in turn lead to resentment from the tax paying public. Discretionary services will be dropped completely, and statutory services will be trimmed to the bone. |
Re: toughest spending cuts in 20 years
Is it just me though or is this still not thw whole truth from labour. Now i concede i am extremely cynical these days because of the last twelve years but everytime labour has to admit something bad they only ever seem to admit half of it till forced to admit the rest. Either way it is clear they have known this for a while (well we all did) and it has yet again made a monkey of GB and what he has been saying upto this point.
Sorry i just want the election so we can relieve mr darling and gordon of the worry of having to deal with their own mess with the nice certainty that whoever gets in will in a few years be despised enough by the electorate because of what they will have to do to get us back on the straight and narrow that labour will be voted back in to balls everything up again. |
Re: toughest spending cuts in 20 years
Yep, story from the Beeb.
To think they were at one time going to use 'Tory austerity' as a vote winner. I suspect Darling / Mandelson have impressed upon Gordon Brown that denial, BS and attacking the social class of some of the opposition isn't a great vote winner and honesty does have its' place in politics. They probably started trying to impress the point about honesty a while ago, must've taken some time to sink in given Gordon appears to have never quite gotten out of the cynical politicking and backstabbing that eventually unseated Tony Blair. Actually maybe not. http://order-order.com/2010/01/08/go...om-the-bunker/ |
Re: toughest spending cuts in 20 years
Quote:
Honestly, just think how much more control we'd have over our finances if we weren't saddled with that useless shower in Brussels. |
Re: toughest spending cuts in 20 years
Quote:
|
Re: toughest spending cuts in 20 years
Quote:
Second part of your post: No arguments there at all:) |
Re: toughest spending cuts in 20 years
HMG's spinners will only choose honesty as an option when their preferred strategy of lying through their teeth no longer serves their purposes!
The truth is that savage cuts are going to be made and jobs are going to be lost. That's the price we're going to pay for all the years of profligacy, borrowing, spin and denial. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 17:11. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum