![]() |
Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Makes me wonder if Sky get these channels are we going to see another spat between the two of them.
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Virgin would be extremely stupid to sell them to Sky at any price. They would be completely at the mercy of a company that runs not only the most successful pay-TV delivery platform, but also the most successful channels. Virgin would be left with only a delivery platform, and totally reliant on its major competitor to provide any decent content to show on it.
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
It's the old NTL business plan. NTL made up their minds many years ago that they just wanted to deliver the service over their network. Viritually all of the TV side of things came over with Telewest, and I don't think it has sat well ever since. I also agree, I don't think VM need to be a content provider. |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
Do VM take the lower bid risking little if any ofcom oversight (assuming the buyer wouldn't come under ofcom), or do they go for the big money and a lengthy wait for the cheque to clear whilst ofcom take their time? :) |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
I doubt Sky sees any opportunity to improve the viewer experience with those channels. At Sky, controlling and dominating the market are considered valid business objectives.
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
There are some hours in the day when Sky don't have enough capacity to screen episodes of the Simpsons. Perhaps they could utilise the purchased channels to ensure Simpsons is always available. :erm:
Seriously though, I'm sure Chris is correct regards Sky's objectives. I'm not so sure Sky would have it all their own way. The recent dispute showed that, despite being the dominant pay TV provider, Sky need VM more than VM need Sky. |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
I'm surprised Sky has the cash available with the loss it made on buying ITV shares..
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Sky has alot of money and will make it back if it does buy the channels.
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
Sky buying won't really change things too much I don't think. |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
VM has supposedly been selling its channels for what, 3 years now? So, I'll believe it when it happens.
Berkett said last year, that he was trying to find out the value of the channels and the only way to do that is to see what someone else is prepared to pay for them by putting them up for auction. The value of the actual channels is pretty minimal, I believe it's the Sky EPG slots that is where the real value is gleamed from. |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Given the new contracts for the Sky Basics now I suspect Sky wouldn't do much, but thinking long term it does mean that in the not so distant future Sky would have the opportunity to deprive VM of a much bigger portion of the available content.
Don't forget Sky is the company that was prepared to throw away millions purely to stop VM buying something that would potentially make them more competitive against Sky (ITV). I'm sure that ethos of throwing money at things, accepting they may lose it, to hurt VM hasn't changed. |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
Makes perfect sense to me and I suspect to both companies. |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
This would affect TNA Wrestling programming such as, TNA Impact, TNA Epics and TNA pay-per-view broadcasts. Sky airs WWE programming, hence the problem. It is doubtful World Wrestling Entertainment's deal would negatively affect UFC, but there is a good chance it would negatively affect TNA.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:14. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum