![]() |
Virgin high definition content
Dear group....I am soon to move home I am contemplating moving to a Virgin cabled area mainly for the broadband speed...One thing I would like to know is....is it worth while me getting a full high definition television....in other words what high definition content does Virgin have?....would Ibe better served by Sky?many thanks to the group.Barrie g4yjs
|
Re: Virgin high definition content
Virgin have currently 1 HD Channel (That is BBC HD) and Sky have about 33 HD channels, however Virgin does have things like 4od, ITV and BBC iPlayer so if you don't mind waiting for HD channels and prefer TV on Demand then Virgin it is, but if it's HD content you want more then Sky is the logical choice however their ADSL speeds will always be 'upto' and no matter if they say 16mbps, you may only get 8 as it depends on how far away you live from the exchange.
|
Re: Virgin high definition content
No is the quick answer.
Sky have 32 official HD channels (which rather unfairly includes the box office service) and have 2 launching imminently - Nat Geo Wild and Animal Planet. Sky also have a superior catch up HD service, 'cos virgin still haven't got one yet. Virgin have BBC HD, filmflex and various VOD HD content such as BBC stuff like Cranford and 5 episodes of Planet Earth and from other channels a page or two such as The History Channel's The Universe (6 episodes) through to a few episodes of The Sopranos. So that's 30 v 1 2 box office channels v filmflex Sky anytime HD v nothing from cable nothing v <100hrs TV Choice VOD More HD channels definitely launching v "coming soon" and a string of lies and broken promises Virgin will be getting more HD content but while they've spent time "thinking" about it Sky have already added/adding another 5 HD channels in that time period. |
Re: Virgin high definition content
WOW that what I call a speedy respone......many thanks for the answers.......I have just re read the web site for the apartment I am contemplating moving into and it apppers that it has already been pre installed with multimedia cabling for audi/computer and Sky+already catered for so that will be my logical choice...once again many thanks Barrie g4yjs.
|
Re: Virgin high definition content
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin high definition content
I said less than 100 hours, which is the quoted figure. This obviously compares very well to Sky's big fat 0 in that department, but then again if it's catch up content you want Sky is ahead (shockingly) on that as they have a barebones anytime HD offering whereas we're still waiting for (a) iPlayer HD (b) this C4 HD stuff (c) ITV HD content (probably not likely to include any catch up). I don't think my comparisons are unfair as I compare both linear HD channels, other HD services such as movies and both types of HD vod - catch up or archived.
Virgin Media obviously wins hands down and several trips round the block if we're talking SD VOD. |
Re: Virgin high definition content
Quote:
Sky certainly has more, but I do dispair when this debate constantly degenerates to a numbers game. Crap is still crap, no matter how big the heap. Had I the choice, I'd be opting for Virgin any day, as I am more likely to find HD material I actually want to watch on the VOD service than on most of the dodgy channels Sky has rushed into service just so the gullible muppets can brag about how much more they have. ---------- Post added at 15:32 ---------- Previous post was at 15:29 ---------- Quote:
It's just another aspect of Sky's blunt marketing strategy, which is meant to convince people they're the best bet because of the amount of stuff they do without paying much attention to how useful it actually is. |
Re: Virgin high definition content
Quote:
I know sky like to say they are reinventing the wheel and virgin and their predecessors don't like to blow their trumpet/keep quiet/bad communication on good services they offer but virgin really do lack a catch up on demand in HD section. When it does launch I expect it'll be wildly popular. |
Re: Virgin high definition content
I hear what you're saying, but you're comparing a service delivered via a PC with Virgin's TV service. IMO that makes the comparison invalid as they are different distribution platforms.
|
Re: Virgin high definition content
I'm not mentioning that PC Sky Player or whatever it's called service at all (which I'm not impressed by)I'm talking about the push vod to the Sky+ HD box variant that comes off the transponders sharing with some of the other HD channels overnight. Yes push VOD isn't the same thing and virgin (and freesat) will probably always win out in that one vs sky and freeview but it's still catch up. In SD the anytime tv service is completely pants in comparison to VMs VOD. Catch up HD is an oversight by Virgin. Sky have an absolutely minimum HD service on there so could claim victory on that one (not that they do seem very interesting in that, they seem more interested in advertising multiroom and the sky player through the PC or saying they have more than 30HD channels).
|
Re: Virgin high definition content
Aha, gotcha now :tu:
|
Re: Virgin high definition content
Quote:
---------- Post added at 16:13 ---------- Previous post was at 16:12 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Virgin high definition content
It is a generalisation, however what else have I to go on? The only argument that ever seems to be advanced on here for Sky+HD is the quantity. That, in my view, is a very poor argument.
|
Re: Virgin high definition content
Most HD VOD has cobwebs on it - surely they will be pensioning some of those programs off soon?
H |
Re: Virgin high definition content
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:03. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum