Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Lifestyle (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   Animal testing - Wilkinson razors (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33633598)

Russ 28-05-2008 16:41

Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
Does anyone know if Wilkinson test their products on animals?

Derek 28-05-2008 16:45

Re: Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
Dunno. Gillette do...

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

---------- Post added at 16:45 ---------- Previous post was at 16:43 ----------

In seriousness though from this it looks like they do.

http://www.shac.net/ACTION/newslette...yfreeguide.pdf

Saaf_laandon_mo 28-05-2008 17:00

Re: Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
That cat needs some botox

Alien 28-05-2008 20:22

Re: Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34561627)

LMAO! I had the exact same thought, but you beat me to it. :D

Derek 28-05-2008 20:25

Re: Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alien (Post 34561860)
LMAO! I had the exact same thought, but you beat me to it. :D

Suffice to say it wasn't the first picture that came up in Google images. I really must put safe search back on. :D

Alien 28-05-2008 20:29

Re: Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34561865)
Suffice to say it wasn't the first picture that came up in Google images. I really must put safe search back on. :D

I wouldn't have needed Google, I've got a copy of it on my drive [I think I posted it in the Funny pics thread ages ago, or else maybe that's where I originally found it... :shrug:], was thinking of looking for it when I saw your post. ;)

Wicked_and_Crazy 28-05-2008 20:41

Re: Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
Red skin, owned by Gillette, must be a Liverpool player ;)

greencreeper 29-05-2008 03:14

Re: Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
Why would you test a razor on an animal :erm: Hair is completely different.

I thought you just did waxing and polishing, Russ? :D

:Sprint:

Russ 29-05-2008 08:32

Re: Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by greencreeper (Post 34562154)
Why would you test a razor on an animal :erm: Hair is completely different.

I thought you just did waxing and polishing, Russ? :D

:Sprint:

Well, dragging this thread back on topic......:D

It's not the razors themselves, Wilkinsons do shaving foam, deoderant etc.

I'm trying to move away from animal-testing and unethical products and want to make sure as much as possible that the stuff I buy is ethically-sourced. So it's bye-bye to Gillette and lynx :D

greencreeper 29-05-2008 10:37

Re: Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
Lush?

http://www.lush.co.uk/products/Ambrosia_2164.aspx

Russ 29-05-2008 10:43

Re: Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
Been using them for several weeks now - but shhh, don't tell anyone ;)

They don't do razors though unfortunately :(

greencreeper 29-05-2008 10:50

Re: Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
Mate at Uni - his girlfriend used one of their glitter massage bars on him. Come the morning, certain parts of him, um, were apparently discovered to be iridescent in the sunlight shining through the window :rofl: Kept finding bits of glitter for weeks.

Suppose you could always email one or two razor companies and ask about their ethical policies. Failing that, it would have to be a cut throat razor - wouldn't fancy it myself :erm:

nomadking 29-05-2008 11:00

Re: Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
If a company says it does not test on animals, it's just because they are using the same formula/composition as another company that has tested on animals.

Saaf_laandon_mo 29-05-2008 11:30

Re: Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 34562310)
If a company says it does not test on animals, it's just because they are using the same formula/composition as another company that has tested on animals.


I have heard that too.

Stuart W 29-05-2008 11:37

Re: Animal testing - Wilkinson razors
 
Animal testing isn't what it used to be guys, most animal testing is medical rather than retail.

We don't spray deodorant into cute bunny's eyes any more because groups like PETA kept blowing up and burning down research labs (when they weren't busy digging up peoples grandparents)

Personaly, I think testing on animals is a perfectly rational thing to do PROVIDED it's for beneficial medical reasons.
Testing on animals for consumers is just wrong on every level.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:49.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum