For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

just wondering eny gamers out there who are on Be* on the fast path thingy can u post a ping result pls

ping 82.133.85.65 -n 10

Re: For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

I'll be joining BE shortly, and hopefully will be able to get put on fastpath.

I'll try and remember to post a ping then if no one else has in the meantime.

But thats over a week away...

Re: For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

K thanks hope you remember

Re: For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

I've posted on the BE forums so maybe one of the people there will do it for you in the meantime.

Re: For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

Here's the results.

From: smaugy
From rich1068 (pinged CF by mistake)

From: matt-s From: Siteguru

Additonal Notes: Via wi-fi


From: ntriantafyllou

From: gillyallan

Thanks to the people at the BE forums.

Re: For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

thankyou dragon your that appreciated

Re: For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

Heres mine from BT broadband.

C:\Users\Dragon>ping 82.133.85.65 -n 10

Pinging 82.133.85.65 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=298ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 298ms, Average = 73ms

C:\Users\Dragon>

Although

C:\Users\Dragon>ping 192.168.1.1 -n 10

Pinging 192.168.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 4ms, Maximum = 87ms, Average = 23ms

C:\Users\Dragon>

Quite a bit of that variation can be attributed to my UPA (powerline) adaptors.

---------- Post added at 23:14 ---------- Previous post was at 22:57 ----------

C:\Users\Dragon>ping 192.168.1.1 -n 10

Pinging 192.168.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 29ms, Average = 11ms

C:\Users\Dragon>ping 82.133.85.65 -n 10

Pinging 82.133.85.65 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 15ms, Maximum = 24ms, Average = 17ms

C:\Users\Dragon>

That made a slight difference (Swapped the UPA adaptors for a pair of homeplugs I had handy)

Re: For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

Be* fastpath

C:\Users\Dragon>ping 82.133.85.65 -n 10

Pinging 82.133.85.65 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=53
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 34ms, Average = 27ms

C:\Users\Dragon>

Re: For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

Thanks Dragon glad u remembered btw were are you

Re: For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

basingstoke

Re: For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

i used to be with an entanet reseller titanadsl and i was averging sub 20ms on most sites well impressed.

Re: For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

My powerline adaptors can add 5ms + and if i get a bit of noise on the mains it can go waay up.

Re: For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

Are we talking about ADSL or LLU here?

Re: For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

llu is adsl :)

llu is simply unbundled adsl I think it stands for local loop unbundling but not sure. Typically an isp like ukonline or be who are unbundled have much lower traffic costs as they dont have to pay for expensive bt centrals and in addition they use their own dslam equipment so can offer adsl2+ services, in addition they are also not subject to bras automatic profiling so synch speed is the speed you get. Not all llu isps rock of course, tiscali who utilise llu decide to take advantage of the lower costs by cramming customers in and charge them minimal prices so the contention ratio is too high.

Re: For enyone on Be* on fast path
 

From my Be Fastpath connection at work:

HTH

Dave