![]() |
Oh dear someone's in trouble
Official notification in the post from Virgin Media about the new price changes.
Quote:
from the 1st May 2007. There's no small print to say otherwise. |
Re: Oh dear someone's in trouble
I don't think that excuse will cut any ice with CS when you complain :)
If its 90p a min, then it will be rounded up to another 90p |
Re: Oh dear someone's in trouble
In an age of per-second billing, this is a retrograde, money-grabbing step by VM, coining in pennies here and there in the hope the customers won't notice. :td:
|
Re: Oh dear someone's in trouble
Quote:
The managing director wouldn't say so if it wasn't true ;) Where's the rolling head icon? |
Re: Oh dear someone's in trouble
Yeah, OK, if you say so, 3p a min applies to 09 numbers then...
Best of luck arguing your case with CS with "Well, Sir Richard said so..." |
Re: Oh dear someone's in trouble
Aren't the price plans restricted to numbers beginning 01 & 02?
|
Re: Oh dear someone's in trouble
Quote:
|
Re: Oh dear someone's in trouble
Quote:
Quote:
Is he a 'Managing Director' anyway? |
Re: Oh dear someone's in trouble
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Oh dear someone's in trouble
It's what the letter implies. It's very misleading.
---------- Post added at 14:40 ---------- Previous post was at 13:28 ---------- Quote:
This is what the letter is trying to say, it can't be any clearer than "there is a £5 charge if you don't pay by direct debit" |
Re: Oh dear someone's in trouble
Quote:
|
Re: Oh dear someone's in trouble
Quote:
The thing about Virgin being a communications company, they're not very good at communicating. They're not very good at wording stuff very well either. many times they have been unclear with the meaning of things, and they have to be changed so that they are not misleading to customers. The one about the £25 charge to upgrade the modem being one of the latest ones. Everyone thought it was a cheek to charge a customer a charge for a modem that is owned by them. then all of a sudden it was announced that it's badly worded guys. it's only if an engineer has to be sent out, otherwise we'll post you one free of charge. That has still not been corrected on the website. It's misleading you said so yourself. so why not change it? They managed to change the one about the phone charges changing, from 'the nearest minute' to 'the next minute' but not this confusion about the £25 charge. It seems that they go out of their way to publish misleading information all the time. Otherwise there wouldn't be so much confusion all the time. |
Re: Oh dear someone's in trouble
Quote:
|
Re: Oh dear someone's in trouble
Quote:
Paul |
Re: Oh dear someone's in trouble
Quote:
So is the letter sent out to everyone meant to be misleading? If I read it like that, he and she reads it like that, they read it like that. Then that is how it's meant to be read. It's meant to be misleading. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:12. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum