![]() |
Sybase databases
Hi.
I am currently evaluating a number of Recruitment database solutions for the company I work for and there is one in particular I like. It runs on Sybase as opposed to SQL Server on pretty much all the others and I was wondering if anyone could give me any advice as to the pros and cons. We run XP SP2 with Office 2003. The outlay will be around £5k so I need to make the right decision here. Thanks very much. |
Re: Sybase databases
Here's a little secret... Microsoft didn't write SQL Server from scratch, it was pretty much bought from Sybase ;)
|
Re: Sybase databases
Quote:
Sybase is pretty damned good as Databases go, don't think you'll go far wrong. |
Re: Sybase databases
I know... hard to believe, ain't it? :D
One thing I do know about Sybase... they pay really badly. I went for an interview at their UK office in Maidenhead a few years ago. The job seemed really interesting, and the guys doing the interview were great (even the director-type bloke I met), but the pay really, really sucked - even more so considering Maidenhead is a stupidly expensive place to live. I would have taken the job if they'd paid a decent salary. Sorry, didn't mean to drag the thread off topic ;) |
Re: Sybase databases
I realise that SQL Server was developed by Sybase and Microsoft, I was just concerned about investing in a non-industry standard technology.
Thanks for the replies so far. |
Re: Sybase databases
What is industry standard these days anyway?
|
Re: Sybase databases
The problem with standards is that there's so many of them.
|
Re: Sybase databases
My thought exactly AntiSilence :) It's a well targeted DB Suite McGraw, I can't see you going wrong with it.
|
Re: Sybase databases
My two-pennorth worth, for what little it's worth, is to ask a couple of questions.
How many users/records do you have at present? What growth in users/records do your forecast? How much support will you need? I don't know how much Sybase will scale, but when we were looking at CRM systems, the choices came down to Oracle, SQL Server on WinTel, and IBM DB2 running on pSeries - SQL Server can really scale up now to compete with Oracle. There's probably a lot more SQL Server bods out there than Sybase. Hope this helps. |
Re: Sybase databases
It's really not about the database backend though, it's what's available as the frontend that you need to look at, as long as its not using a Microsoft Access (I LOL) Database then you're alright.
I've also seen some pretty huge databases on MySQL (Open Source) before. |
Re: Sybase databases
Well, from what I remember about what I was told during the interviews I had with Sybase, it scales extermely well. They had some very impressive customers doing some very impressive stuff with Sybase, so I'd not be worried about the back-end side of things.
Foreverwar is probably right... SQL Server DBAs are two-a-penny these days. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:48. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum