![]() |
The Inquiries Act
Once more our Government demonstrates its concern about human rights and Justice... :rolleyes:
Quote:
|
Re: The Inquiries Act
Crap, but to be expected of Blair & co.
Some Judges speak out... http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardianpo...470198,00.html |
Re: The Inquiries Act
All I can say is I hope the tories and lib dems win enough seats to erode labour's majority if they can't oust them from power.
|
Re: The Inquiries Act
Quote:
|
Re: The Inquiries Act
Just another example that this government have manifested themselves into Orwells Pigs.
You need no more evidence that this is not a Labour government. I don't know what they should call themselves but they are not Labour. |
Re: The Inquiries Act
Quote:
|
Re: The Inquiries Act
Quite right, Pierre. Throw in the CCA and the anti-terrorism legislation and it all looks part of a very unpleasant pattern.
What's interesting is that this didn't start until the second Labour administration - the first (1997) lot with Straw in the Home Office and Irvine as Lord Chancellor actuallsy swung the other way, in favour of human rights, the rule of law and judicial independence. Falconer and Blunkett are therefore the bad boys here, particularly Blunkett, who has deeply authoritarian instincts akin to those in Burma or Belarus. Blunkett was on Radio 5 again yesterday afternoon with that smarmy spurs supporting git Simon Mayo - he's been on there about three times since he was forced to resign in disgrace, and always gets a worryingly easy ride (particularly on ID cards, which he blatantly lies about every time I hear him). I'm not sure it's in the BBC's charter to rehabilitate Tony Blair's friends. According to Private Eye, Blunkett has earned £70,000 since resigning from these appearances and other media work. Coincidentally that's the rental he hasn't paid on his ministerial house, which he's allowed to live in rent-free by Mr. Tony. Didn't see that one in the Labour manifesto - get caught breaking the rules and get a free house. I must try fiddling my expenses and see if it works for me. |
Re: The Inquiries Act
Once again our government proves that it considers the words open, honest and fair to be meaningless buzz words.
This is bad. |
Re: The Inquiries Act
Yeah lets get the tories in....hahahaha the same set of idiots who gave you the poll tax, who introduced you to the word reccesion, who closed all our manufacturing output, yay! lets get them in.......get real.
|
Re: The Inquiries Act
Quote:
Actually, this thread isn't about those policies. It's about the government hiding it's own procedures from the public (thereby reducing the chance the public will catch them doing something dodgy, like, say, going to war illegally) while making noise about being open, honest and transparent about how it works. What do you think of these changes? |
Re: The Inquiries Act
Quote:
Hmm. Manufacturing isn't exactly a sparkling success story under Labour, for that matter. From today's Guardian. Quote:
The Tories are indeed idiots, but they aren't going to win, and besides the existence of muppets in opposition isn't a reason not to point out the disturbing trend towards erosion of civil liberties under Labour, which is what this thread is about. |
Re: The Inquiries Act
Quote:
There are *plenty* of other threads to go to if you want to wave the red flag. :nono: |
Re: The Inquiries Act
Wonder how long this will take to get here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asi...ic/4510521.stm
|
Re: The Inquiries Act
Quote:
|
Re: The Inquiries Act
Quote:
However, I've been aware of the work 'recession' for quite a while but, to be fair, that's mostly with regarsd to the state of my hairline ;) |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 13:49. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum