WRC (Rally) vs F1 (Circuit) vs Moto GP (bikes)
 

Just wondering which of these 3 motor sports people find more enjoyable, I know F1 gets alot more coverage, but pound for pound has the same amount of "supporters" around the world.

Personally im a WRC guy, just better than going round the same track, over and over with basically no challenge, hence why schumacher is walking away with everything, no real driver skill involved, where as WRC you have gravel, crashes, driver skill, more choices in way of gear box, tyres...

added Moto GP as of a friends request ;-) damn bikers!

Personally I think that F1 is :zzz:

even if my brother DOES help to build the ferrari cars in woking, i still prefer to watch WRC :erm:

tho getting freebies off him is always welcome :D

Which do you think I prefer? ;)

WRC rules...

nuff said :)

Exxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxcellent :-D

WRC and F1 though my prefrence would be WRC i dont mind either :)

I like the intense feeling of WRC, you can feel the ground shaking as the cars go past, anti-lag system bursting your eardrums...it's great. :D

i love the way take corners and the noise of the cars and especially the in car views :D :p

Formula 1 to me is just like a large scalelectrix, where WRC is much more involving... more of a lottery who will win, not really based on how good the car is, or the driver... but theres luck involved.

oh yeh, and the loud noise of those monster turbos :) and the gravel spitting in your face when they take a corner.

Indy 500. Nothing like half a million people in one stadium...

MotoGP riders are unbelievably skilled, do yourselves a favour and watch a race on telly one Sunday, the overtaking, the closeness of the racing, the crashes, it makes the car stuff look like what it is, a procession

says lot about those half a million people if they are happy to see cars do over 100 laps on a circuit that has 2 straights and 2 corners :erm: