Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black people.
Talking Pictures have again been reprimanded by Ofcom for broadcasting words which were in everyday use at the time the material was made, but are not acceptable today:
http://www.a516digital.com/2018/01/m...es-in.html?m=1 The question is, should we still show material that contains dated language, or should we censor it (or bleep out the words)? It would be interesting to know if it was someone black that was offended, or if someone white was offended on their behalf. I doubt that they will have done anything on purpose as, on the one occasion that I contacted them about something I found offensive to disabled people on their EPG, they were polite, friendly and amended it immediately. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
It's PC gone mad, Richard, if we cannot watch material from the past, which was the norm then, we are losing our freedom to watch/view whatever we like, censorship akin to the banning of the Daily Mail by Virgin trains!
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
So nobody even complained, the stupid morons just took it upon themselves to be "offended".
We live in a world of PC mad hopelessly fragile idiots. Its a wonder they dont get offended by their own shadows, after all - they are grey/black. :rolleyes: |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Here we go again PC gone mad it's only offensive to those who try and take offence to it.
I was just reading an article about a company accused of being racist because their advert featured a child wearing a top that said "biggest monkey in the jungle" it's just getting pathetic next what next take offence at coal? |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
This link shows that someone complained that the word 'Sambo' was used;I believe that the previous word was 'Coon'.
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom...cast-bulletins This link explains why black people find these words offensive: https://ferris.edu/jimcrow/coon/ In my younger days I remember people using the word 'sambo', but not 'coon'. It's telling that these terms have fallen out of use as the man charged with reviewing content before it was broadcast didn't flag them up as potentially offensive because he'd never heard of them! |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
The use of swear words probably offends more people than the words Ofcom have picked up on, but they choose to pick on words that offend fewer people! Crazy situation. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Yet South Park and other modern shows use words like this all the time.
Cartmen dresses as a superhero called Coon. Based on a raccoon but you know that show pushes the boundaries of taste. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
If this >.< offends anyone, then tough luck.
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
What annoys me is the amount of classic old TV series which won't ever get shown on TV ever again because of the PC brigade..
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
There was a case in Scotland a few years ago where a mother refused to send her child to a school which had a wall mural painted in 1936. The mural contained a representation of an item that we all saved jam jars towards in my childhood.
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Thy_Neighbour (the sidespiltting comedy of having a black neighbour) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curry_and_Chips (a blacked up Spike Milligan played an Asian immigrant shop worker who went by the name of Kevin O'Grady !) However think they mostly don't get repeated because they were crap. (however that hasn't stopped them repeating 'On the buses', which is full of sexist/racist stuff) Till Death Do Us Part was another dodgy one, but I liked it. People seem to have missed were supposed to be laughing at Alf Garnett's views, not laughing with him. Guess it depends whether people are genuinely offended, and only they can say that. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
They're ruining the world and the language. I mean now I have to say: A gentleman of dark countenance lurking in my winter fuel. :D |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
When the people that grew up with these series/film have passed on then perhaps they can be quietly consigned to the archives. But I see no point in trying to un-invent the past while they are still alive. The important thing is that people are being respected IN THE PRESENT. The past is what it is & cant be changed.
What happened to the days when if something offended you then you just changed the channel & moved on? |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
I think we're talking about the 'N' word here. Its not an over reaction - they shouldn't have broadcast it.
Do have some sympathy for Talking Pictures. It's a great channel run on a shoestring, but they should have picked this up. However if we're not careful we'll just end up with vomit inducing channels like True Movies just broadcasting made for tv american 'wholesome' crap. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
It was not the 'N' word - it was the name of the little boy who was chased round the tree by tigers in the story many of us were told at school.
The book is still on open sale on Amazon and many other places. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
And from a 1950's tv series.
---------- Post added at 19:35 ---------- Previous post was at 19:31 ---------- Good old Mary Whitehouse - let's follow her example. Give Jimmy Saville and award and disown our children. Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Lots of 60s and 70s shows that were sexist,homophobic and racist appear on various cable tv shows..No one seems to be objecting to them.
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Personally l think people should be given the choice on TV of watching or not watching a programme rather then something not being shown at all as there are many other channels they can watch if they don't like it as its called freedom and choice.
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
Quote:
"Till Death Do Us Part" and "In Sickness and In Health". I can see how they would be considered racist, if you only glance at them. Why do I say that? Because, if you only glanced at it, you would only see one white man calling other races all sorts of names. You wouldn't see the other characters (of all colours) criticising, fighting, ignoring or trying to placate him. You also wouldn't see that the one person who loses out in all this racist man's plotting, scheming and ranting is the racist himself. Alf Garnet said some truly awful things, but the only person negatively impacted by his actions and statements was him. The author of both actually said that the idea was that Alf was the only person who comes off badly as a result of Alf's actions. There is one important point above that haters of TDOUP and ISAIH miss. In both shows a fairly large, fairly racially diverse (for the time) of both men and women are actually shown getting along with each other. Yes, some racial stereotypes are shown, but IIRC, these are only use when they are talking to Alf, so they could be trying to wind him up (Winston certainly used his Racial stereotype, and the fact he was gay, to wind Alf up). As said above, we were supposed to laugh at Alf's ideas and views, not with them. Still, I think as a people, we have become far too easily offended. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Talking Pictures do have an annoucement before some programmes indicating that some people may now be offended by language used.
Thing is - the PC brigade use that to select their (if there is more than one of them) viewing. Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
This thread is incredible
What a shame we don’t live in the good old days when you could be racist without being called out on it, eh lads |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
"lads" ? LOL.
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
I'm not sure that many of the old comedies were really that funny. I often watch dated material and think, did people really find that funny? Some of the material is absolutely dreadful. We moved away from a lot of the poor quality comedy but it is still alive and well in Germany. I think the real point is that much of this content predates the various Race Relations Acts and the Broadcasting codes they gave birth to. The reason that such content didn't continue to be produced comes from the protection offered by these Acts and codes. It amuses me that Ofcom is frequently referred to as a toothless regulator, but when it does step up to enforce the Broadcasting Code, it is accused of overstepping its remit. ---------- Post added at 15:41 ---------- Previous post was at 15:37 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
The topic is not Brexit. There is a thread for Brexit.
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
So an interesting interjection. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
But, that is off topic. I think people (especially now) are too quick to get offended, and in my experience, both left and right wing people are too quick to get offended. Do I wish for a return of the old days when we could happily walk down the street calling people various combinations of words beginning with N, P and F (all of which are now offensive) while wolf whistling all the women? No. Nor do I wish to be in a situation where we have potentially innocent people losing their career because someone said they said something someone was offended by. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
I am really non-plussed about the fuss over Talking Pictures. Clearly, culture and standards change over the years. Are we going to ban everything from the 1990s and before? We really need to get a grip and get over ourselves. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
Quote:
The issue isn't whether or not a programme has caused offence, it is whether or not a broadcast complies with current broadcasting standards. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
AFAIK archive material is treated in exactly the same way as new material, so by default, any now deemed inappropriate is effectively banned.
Probably why Love Thy Neighbour has only had one selective repeat in many, many years. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
Maybe they should blare out a siren at 8 to ensure everyone understands that. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
As much as certain individuals may wish to divert the focus specifically on to Brexit, that is just a red herring. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
Ah I see, so you didn't hijack the thread by casually just throwing the word "Brexit " in? All makes sense now! |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
I don't think the point requires further explanation. You simply reinforced my point "certain individuals may wish to divert the focus specifically on to Brexit". It's still a red herring! |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-an...broadcast-code Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
The original comment was not about "Brexit", the comment was "A sad reflection of "Brexit" Britain." As you still pretend not to understand the comment, it relates to elements such as certain BNP, EDL etc members who hijacked the sentiment in an attempt to reintroduce their own racist agenda back into the mainstream. Your herring is still very red! |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Talking Pictures is an 'old movie' channel. And one that l like to watch.
I just wish this PC brigade would get a life. Yes, there are words that are used 'could' be used as racist. But, please, l have been called names in the past that could be branded as racist. It goes in one ear and out the other. Isn't strange that people such as the late Mary Whitehouse started all this. And now its all about. My opinion is that, if you don't like what you are watching on Tv, then turn over. Remember, there are over three hundred channels to watch these days. If TP, didn't show these films due to the PC brigade. Then they might as well pack up. All the films and Tv series l watch was Alf Garnett, Love thy Neighbour etc. Its part of life. Trouble is that there used to be a great Tv show called the Black and White Show many years ago. This was axed as the stars sang songs with black paint on the face. And people got offended by this. Didn't two years ago a famous Tv star complain about the nickname for Spurs, and people were getting arrested because of it. All the case got thrown out of court Yet the nickname was came from many years ago. And is still being used today Get a life people |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
---------- Post added at 21:13 ---------- Previous post was at 21:10 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
Says the person who is repeating the same old, same old, keep believing in your own hype! |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Enough - take it to PM.
Any more bickering will invoke the Infraction System. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
It saddens me that an Englishman, Irishman and Scotsman will never ever walk into a bar again.
The Vicar, Rabbi and Priest won't be playing golf together anymore, and I doubt the chicken crossing the road will last much longer. You have to chuckle at the madness or we'd all go . . . well, you know, *nudge nudge wink wink* say no more :D |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
Your link only goes back to 2005, which is probably when Ofcom was created. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
It could be they don’t feel the need to show ‘offensive’ material ‘that was acceptable and broadcast years ago’, or they don’t think there is a market for it - those option also exist... Ofcom was founded in 2003. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Any more references to the B word will result in deletions.
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
To be honest, I get offended by the inane tripe shown on mainstream TV - the 'soaps' especially try to outdo each other with controversial stories that touch on 'sensitive and current' issues.
Reality TV and Celebrity shows . . what's that all about then if not poking fun and embarrassing people in front of the whole viewing public? Comedy? you're having a laugh, good sitcoms are rare now, as are true comedians. You get the odd Drama that's ok for a series or two, but then usually falls flat or too repetitious. Many of you out there will disagree with the above, I could well be the 1 in 10,000 minority . . . but what happens if I (and others like me) suddenly start writing in saying I'm offended by the awful, sometimes childish, often cheap viewing that is being offered to me? How long before everything on TV has a warning before, during, and after its viewing? We currently have pay-to view sport, pay-to-view porn etc . . so why can't we have a pay-to-view channel which features the old classic shows that are now deemed 'offensive' to some . . As you can maybe guess, I don't watch much TV . . but I do trawl Youtube for the (few remaining) classics that made me laugh or held my attention longer than 23 seconds. * If the above has caused distress, worry, or affected you in any way, please call the official helpline number which is displayed on page 26 of the new TV regulations booklet you were given upon purchase of your TV * |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
If only the authorities took a step back from this oppressive regime of control over everything to 'protect' us. There are far more urgent problems for the government to be dealing with, such as people rough sleeping. Of course, that's more difficult to deal with than pushing out more and more dictats for people to be subject to! |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
oppressive regime of control over everything to 'protect' us Oh I like that, very much so. Are we in danger of becoming paranoid about having to conform to every little subtle nuance of todays society? Is freedom of choice something that will also be outlawed in the next few years? Stay tuned for next weeks thrilling installment :D |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Well that looks like 3 of us, now where do we complain? :D:D
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
Now, anyone going for the 5 in 10,000? :D |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Hey steady on people, at this rate we will have to be forming a committee, having a spokesperson (for media interviews), starting a facebook group and applying for a Government grant (as a minority) :D
Isn't it amazing though, that an initial post mentioning my distaste for mainstream TV has brought out a few of the 'silent majority' in agreement. We are on the march against oppression - today Cable Forum, tomorrow the World ;) . . . anyone else remember the Tooting Popular Front? :naughty: |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
But if I complain about the use of "Jesus" as a swear word it would be ignored as common usage so why not show material that uses "offensive phrasing" because it is in use (or was). Just because it's used doesn't mean that the makers agree with the usage.
There is also a difference between racist and racial that depends a lot on the intent but the law as stands is on how the "listener" perceives the usage. This is what's led to many people finding themselves in hot water because some comment is felt to be "hate speech". Even innocent comments can be said to be hateful because someone hearing is in some unique circumstance that possibly the speaker isn't aware of. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
I'm just waiting for some idiot to issue a complaint about New Zealand rugby team being call the All Blacks.
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
TP is the most inoffensive of channels, showing films your granny went to see. Tbh theres much more violence bad language in the soaps each night. They probably have limited resources to check for every potentially offensive word. If we don't want the giants like Sky to dominate everything, these smaller channels need to be encouraged, otherwise we'll just end up with no choice.
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
I think the reason OFCOM got involved is contained in the very first sentence, "It follows the pre-watershed broadcast." I Suspect if it had have been after nothing would have happened.
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
Is the snowflake generation unable to function without this protective mechanism in place? Bless! |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
Also the terms objected to are not in common use these these days is there any point in adding them to the playground lexicon. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
I just wish these programmes would return
Till Death us do Part Love thy neighbour Etc etc Its about time the PC brigade got off the fence and let life continue as it should I have been called some really offensive words such as W**** H**** by various people - l am not allowed to mention who they are. As this is how stupid the system is now getting. I am just waiting for someone to be taken top court over an offensive remark. We are talking about telly from the past, which is extremely popular today. So please get a life. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
It must have been particularly hard for your brother at this time when it was deemed socially acceptable to make insulting remarks. |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
Almost as bad as being accused of Morris Dancing... ;) |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
Frankly, it's pathetic. I remember in one of the Star Trek series, the crew of the starship were called 'pinkskins' by these white aliens. I was so offended. Not! |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
(They were Blue btw, not White) |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Times change - we don't find it acceptable to ban Irish and dogs from boarding houses any more, or put homosexuals in prison or mental hospital, make women endure marital rape, or make women in offices make the tea/coffee as an expected part of their roles; society evolves.
Regarding the word that is at the basis of this thread, I think Charles M. Blow put it very well, about how it's the context and the person using a word (not just that one) that's important. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/24/op...etType=opinion Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
Can anyone here remember if this is actually correct or not? Edit: Someone who works in the industry said yesterday that Talking Pictures hope to start subtitling their programmes from March. I wonder if this is because they think that they might as well do this for those with hearing difficulties if they have to check all dialogue anyway to ensure no more words slip through?? |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
In the 1958 movie The Defiant Ones, Tony Curtis' character John "Joker" Jackson refers to himself as "a honky".
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
So it seems that what I was told was incorrect.
My own research has come up with a few explanations as to where it originated from, but all seem to agree that it's a derogatory term used by black people against white people. There are also different spellings of the term. I find this odd as I could have sworn that the two neighbours in Love Thy Neighbour called each other black and white honkey :confused: The two most common ones are that black people wanted something to use in response to being called a nigger and that the insult was used towards white men who went into black areas looking for prostitutes. They would honk their horns to summon a black prostitute that caught their eye, so any passing black men would call them "honkeys". |
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
|
Re: Talking Pictures in trouble again for broadcasting words offensive to black peopl
This issue is now starting to piss me off.
Talking Pictures is about old Films. And yes in films from before the 60's quite often had many comments that would be offensive today. For Christ sake can't these people get a life. I am sending an email today stating that l support them in what ever film they show. If they edit any part of a film from before the 60's amd 70's.It wont be worth having the channel. IF, people don't like what they hear or see on Tv / Film. Turn over the channel. And get a life |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:32. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.