Cable Forum
Page 4 of 16 123 4 567814 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33654059)

Sirius 14-08-2009 15:55
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
This is the usual lets make a mountain out of a mole hill, Whats up nothing better to do today kids :rolleyes:

Just done it on purpose and opted out, There that's not hard is it

Dephormation 14-08-2009 15:56
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamiefrost (Post 34853950)
Do google and Microsoft etc automatically acvtivate this search functionality, beacuse I don't remember telling the google toolbar to automatically give me a response including a search option.

For Virgin to be wrong so are Google, Microsoft etc until you explicitly ask for the functionality to be turn on. Whcih for most people will not happen.

My resonse seeing the google search appear the first time was 'that's a good idea, don't to manually search for the web address'

Is it really that bad to have 1 DNS response redirected.

JJ
If you installed the Google toolbar, I'd guess that's because you chose to download and install it? And the reason you kept it was because you though 'that's a good idea'.

If you have a Microsoft OS, presumably that's because you bought a machine that had Microsoft OS installed? You had other choices.

I don't think many Virgin customers were aware (until today) that their DNS requests were going to be hijacked. It certainly didn't get much publicity. If you're still with Virgin tomorrow, I suppose you might argue those people had made a decision to stay with Virgin despite this change to their terms of service.

Is it really that bad? For me, yes. It demonstrates that Virgin are a lousy choice of ISP (but then, I've already 'opted out', or should I say 'opted in' to a decent provider who doesn't do things like that).

(<<< see).

For you, perhaps you see it differently.

Traduk 14-08-2009 15:59
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamiefrost (Post 34853944)
Or alternatively they don't upgrade anyone and both the 2Mb and 10Mb tariffs would have gone up by £2.

Still don't see the lack of integrity, they have provide some functionality that will be of help to a lot of users. With an easy way to not use it.

JJ
They obviously wanted XXX100,000's more 2 quids a month and judged that resistance would be mitigated by a speed increase. Bean counters probably assessed that churn could a devastating development if one part happened without the other as ADSL providers can easily under-cut a 2Meg supply on price.

Integrity in my book is being transparently upfront and honest in a manner that is designed to pro actively inform. They have my e-mail and contact me when they have something to sell but leave me and millions of others to find out by my own actions what they would rather I didn't question.

It should be OPT-IN and all users informed of this wonderful new helpful add-on via e-mail and then allowed to die on the vine as it most likely would.

Sirius 14-08-2009 16:00
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dephormation (Post 34853962)
If you installed the Google toolbar, I'd guess that's because you chose to download and install it? And the reason you kept it was because you though 'that's a good idea'.

If you have a Microsoft OS, presumably that's because you bought a machine that had Microsoft OS installed? You had other choices.

I don't think many Virgin customers were aware (until today) that their DNS requests were going to be hijacked. It certainly didn't get much publicity. If you're still with Virgin tomorrow, I suppose you might argue those people had made a decision to stay with Virgin despite this change to their terms of service.

Is it really that bad? For me, yes. It demonstrates that Virgin are a lousy choice of ISP (but then, I've already 'opted out', or should I say 'opted in' to a decent provider who doesn't do things like that).

(<<< see).

For you, perhaps you see it differently.
Then if you are not a customer why make such a big fuss about it, Again nothing better to do today ????

jamiefrost 14-08-2009 16:02
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
But I never asked google or microsoft to mess around with my DNS response either so whats the difference? The goggle toolbar provides a search button on the response page I didn't explicitly ask them to do that, just a usefull by product of installing the toolbar. If I didn't want I could remove it(opt out).

Just the same as Virgin, see it the first time then opt out.

Yes I did chose to install the toolbar just the same as I chose Virgin Media to supply my BB and DNS queries.

JJ

Dephormation 14-08-2009 16:09
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 34853966)
Then if you are not a customer why make such a big fuss about it
I've got every sympathy with people who were surprised by this change in their existing service. The reason for commenting is Virgins attempt to misrepresent this money making DNS hijack as a feature.

For people who understand it for what it is, and still choose to use Virgin, I'm not all concerned. Good luck.

jamiefrost 14-08-2009 16:10
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traduk (Post 34853965)
It should be OPT-IN and all users informed of this wonderful new helpful add-on via e-mail and then allowed to die on the vine as it most likely would.

Does this then hold true for all areas for example should virgin have left customers on 512kb internet connections until they they ask for a free upgrade. Personally I'd rather get the free upgrade without having to ask for it.

Most users getting an email about search options in a DNS query response wouldn't have a clue about what Virgin were talking about.

For the majority of users couldn't care less, for those who do notice either they aren't bother or they opt out.

JJ

webcrawler2050 14-08-2009 16:11
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamiefrost (Post 34853973)
Does this then hold true for all areas for example should virgin have left customers on 512kb internet connections until they they ask for a free upgrade. Personally I'd rather get the free upgrade without having to ask for it.

Most users getting an email about search options in a DNS query response wouldn't have a clue about what Virgin were talking about.

For the majority of users couldn't care less, for those who do notice either they aren't bother or they opt out.

JJ
Seriously, who cares?

Ben B 14-08-2009 16:12
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by webcrawler2050 (Post 34853974)
Seriously, who cares?
The OP should add a poll to see who does :D

Dephormation 14-08-2009 16:14
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamiefrost (Post 34853968)
But I never asked google or microsoft to mess around with my DNS response either so whats the difference? The goggle toolbar provides a search button on the response page I didn't explicitly ask them to do that, just a usefull by product of installing the toolbar. If I didn't want I could remove it(opt out).

Just the same as Virgin, see it the first time then opt out.

Yes I did chose to install the toolbar just the same as I chose Virgin Media to supply my BB and DNS queries.

JJ
Key point: Google and Microsoft are not doing anything to your DNS response. DNS hijack affects the way every application on your machine interacts with DNS.

From tomorrow, if you're still with Virgin... good luck to you. I guess there is an argument for saying you have made an informed choice (despite a change in the terms of service) to continue.

But others who don't should have the facility to cancel their contract (given the apparent change to the contract that now requires you to opt out of DNS hijacking).

webcrawler2050 14-08-2009 16:15
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben B (Post 34853977)
The OP should add a poll to see who does :D
Yep - he will probably get more a "response" :D

---------- Post added at 16:15 ---------- Previous post was at 16:14 ----------

Quote:
From tomorrow, if you're still with Virgin... good luck to you. I guess there is an argument for saying you have made an informed choice (despite a change in the terms of service) to continue.
ACTUALLY: it doesn't interfear with your DNS - Plonker..

It simply, directs you to a "VM" Branded" page, when you get a 404 - it's very simple to edit....

Ben B 14-08-2009 16:16
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
It's not DNS hijacking, it's "Oops, the DNS server can't find the website you typed, here's a search page to help you " there aint anything malicious about it.

Sirius 14-08-2009 16:17
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dephormation (Post 34853978)

From tomorrow, if you're still with Virgin... good luck to you. I guess there is an argument for saying you have made an informed choice (despite a change in the terms of service) to continue.

.
I will be. Wait no i better phone up and cancel my broadband so i can jump on a crappy slow adsl connection, There now don't i feel better :LOL:

webcrawler2050 14-08-2009 16:18
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
It's simply a 404....

Sir John Luke 14-08-2009 16:19
Re: Virgin Media Hijack customers browser search options
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben B (Post 34853982)
It's not DNS hijacking, it's "Oops, the DNS server can't find the website you typed, here's a search page to help you " there aint anything malicious about it.
Since you may have missed it the first time

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS_hijacking


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:58.
Page 4 of 16 123 4 567814 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.