Re: Brexit (New).
As i posted in the old thread. Why at this point would the EU27 grant extension?
Now that parliament can’t vote on the deal, and the EU wont change the deal. Where is there any way to go? Tell me what you think are the possible options. Given those constraints. |
Re: Brexit (New).
Quote:
Alternatively they could grant a longer one if there was a referendum or a general election. I think a long extension would lead to a general election anyway. |
Re: Brexit (New).
A General Election throws everything back up as an option. It’d be loads of fun.
|
Re: Brexit (New).
Sorry, John Bercow used a 415 year old precedent yesterday and the same concept cannot be voted on twice. That rules out Extending A50 for 2nd Referendum, this was Amendment H from The Independent Group that was voted heavily against.
|
Re: Brexit(New).
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit (New).
Quote:
Or Parliament can override his decision. |
Re: Brexit (New).
He has allowed things to be voted on twice, it’s how he defines “substantively different” that has varied. If he accepts a deal or proposal is different, then the principle should apply to putting any amendments to a new proposal.
Also only applies during a session of Parliament. The two year session ends this summer. |
Re: Brexit (New).
Quote:
---------- Post added at 22:16 ---------- Previous post was at 22:16 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Brexit (New).
Quote:
In the end who knows? None of these are immutable laws of physics. |
Re: Brexit (New).
Quote:
If the arithmetic allows smaller “2nd referendum“ parties prop up old Jezza and his “jobs first Brexit” on condition he puts it to the vote vs remain then that’s what happens. That’s the sovereign power we want to wrestle from Brussels to Westminster. Note: that’s not what I think would happen just an example. In another hypothetical if May treats it as a referendum on her deal and returns 400 MPs then the ERG/DUP would struggle to legitimately block her. Note: I don’t think that’ll happen either. ---------- Post added at 22:47 ---------- Previous post was at 22:35 ---------- Quote:
Equally if there’s a reasonable period to a new deadline and it’s obvious that the ERG/DUP would back a deal (plus Labour leavers) he could take the view the protocols aren’t there to deny Parliament from ruling on matters it has come to an opinion on under less onerous circumstances. As you say, without being a mind reader... |
Re: Brexit (New).
Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 22:52 ---------- Previous post was at 22:47 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Brexit (New).
I’m unsure ramblings of a madman fits the respectful discussion we’ve been asked for on multiple occasions so I’ll not respond to that. Already had three holidays thanks to others.
Nobody can predict the next General Election if it happens pre-Brexit. Both main parties would be at risk of imploding from their divisions and everyone treating it as a leadership contest. The two biggest parties will still be the two biggest parties, but who is the next PM in waiting after JC/TM is disposed of, and if it requires smaller parties to cobble over the finish line could see plenty of unexpected outcomes. Parliament can vote to waive the standing orders used by Bercow. In essence a vote to permit a vote. You seem to let your opinion of your desired outcome cloud objectivity. |
Re: Brexit (New).
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit (New).
No long delay.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47636011 Quote:
|
Re: Brexit (New).
A long delay would be impractical. I cannot see the EU granting any delay beyond the European elections. Maybe that, at last, will focus minds. It means we have to get either deal or no deal through before then, leaving sufficient time to pass the necessary legislation.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:40. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.