Re: Brexit(New).
I think the problem with the 30th June extension is what will our politicians, devoid of ideas for two years, come up with in the 'final' three months?
The EU have given us two options (and the ECJ a further one). Britain needs to sort out what type of Brexit it wants and select it, allowing everyone else in the EU to get on with it. The persistent arguments over "what type of Brexit" have to be resolved in some way. |
Re: Brexit(New).
Quote:
I think you're right though that if there is no sign of anything being different then they will probably pull the plug. Although thinking about it a long extension will change the dynamic since May would not survive that and nor, imo, would Parliament so an election would be very likely. |
Re: Brexit(New).
How does a 2 year extension and leaving with no deal compare with the Malthouse proposal?
|
Re: Brexit(New).
Quote:
“No Brexit” is a bluff to get the ERG on side. I think it’s either her deal or no deal. The problem for her is I think the ERG are willing to call her bluff because they also think it’s her deal or no deal, and they want to bring about the latter. All these machinations aside, I think the EU27 are likely to end the uncertainty for us by refusing a long extension. |
Re: Brexit(New).
Quote:
---------- Post added at 19:34 ---------- Previous post was at 19:30 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Brexit(New).
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit(New).
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit(New).
Quote:
---------- Post added at 19:42 ---------- Previous post was at 19:40 ---------- Quote:
Personally, I'd just let 29 March happen. They had their chance. |
Re: Brexit(New).
Quote:
No deal will be catastrophic, with illegal tariffs and no leverage in any future negotiations with anyone. I’m not convinced letting no deal happen because of ineptitude, and essentially sabotage by the ERG, is a price the country should pay. Members of the ERG are on record saying it could be 50 years before we see the economic benefit. |
Re: Brexit(New).
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit (New).
As a separate post- the timescale for changing “exit day” and confirmation that failure to do so would leave the UK in breach of international treaty obligations as an EU member state if the Government extends and Parliament doesn’t.
https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/bl...ory-instrument ---------- Post added at 20:27 ---------- Previous post was at 20:25 ---------- Quote:
They didn’t back it because they don’t want any deal. |
Re: Brexit (New).
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit (New).
Quote:
That’s how the game works week in week out. Why would Brexit be any different? Tory MPs plus confidence and supply partners plus Labour leavers = majority. Remainers are under no obligation to deliver Brexit. Nor should they be. On no other matter would such a ludicrous situation apply. |
Re: Brexit (New).
Quote:
Are you saying that Labour etc are simply playing politics and putting the country at great risk, which you claim the Leave side are doing? |
Re: Brexit (New).
Quote:
Leave MPs cost Theresa May her deal. The fact it could have been voted on three times with three drastically different results shows who is playing games. It’s either a good deal or a bad deal. There’s no unicorn. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:40. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.