Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
So, why don't we all move to https? There's a commercial opportunity, if ever I saw one!
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Nope -my website content is my intellectual property, and it does not belong to my ISP or to Kent Ertugrul. He may be able to see it - but that is all. He can see it but he has no right to copy it, make derivative works from it, and no right to commercially exploit it without my consent and without paying ME the appropriate amount of dosh. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
OK NoDPI is back up had some problems with the page caching plugin which is now disabled until I can figure wtf happened.
Alexander Hanff |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
http://torrentfreak.com/youre-caught...w-or-go-broke/ dave. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
PS - Stick to your guns on the latest BT demand to remove the comments you have made questioning if they have misled the ICO. Hank |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
OK here
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Hank |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Yeah I was experimenting trying a few things, it is back now.
http://cryptome.org <- I never knew that was there til just now. Alexander Hanff |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Alex don't give in on this Emma is desperate I think she has realised with Ian moving up she might be the fall guy or women, if this goes bad for BT.
Personally I think Ian also brought BT's name into disrepute thinking about adding Phorm to the network so both should resign or AGM vote a no confidance in them. Sadly the last might not be that easy since they increased the company shares to almost match the voting shareholders shares. This is a sign of a company desp. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
There was also the issue of 'hidden' URLs not designed to be linked to. And of course the blacklists of webmail services, and agent types that we have never been allowed to see. Maybe we should re-visit some of the original key issues lest they are forgotten. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
After the Leaked Report, I have noticed the possible re-immergence of some of these "dog in the mangers", trying some damage limitation around the WWW. ---------- Post added at 11:42 ---------- Previous post was at 11:35 ---------- [QUOTE=vicz;34570098]Did they ever answer the question over exactly how they will supposedly avoid processing password protected forums? I remember K*nt saying they would not process password protected content, but I don't remember him saying how. The reason I bring this up is that it is one area where consent to view can be definitely shown to have been denied. (There is always the argument of a reasonable expectation of consent for 'published' website even if subsequently found to have disclaimers). In order to guarantee that they have not visited a Password Protected Site, I believe they would have to look at the Form Fields. I thought I read or heard in one of the interviews, that this is something this system is supposed to avoid? (could be wrong though, it's difficult to keep up with this thread & others.) |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Where can I but an anorak anyone? Tarquin;) |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Nope - I've had no answers on that. They have said they won't do it, "and of course BT is an honourable company" so of course I believe them (Julius Caesar, apologies to Brutus, at least he's dead and won't sue me for defamation). Of course you can just copy the details of the official ADMISSION that Phorm were hosting the contact page, which several of us have received, and the Dephormation logs about bt.com cookies, and the details of the overseas hosting, and the lack of listings of US partners on Safe Harbor, and then ask if all that was explained to the ICO - and I suspect the correspondence might dry up - or end with the "it's all legal cos Ernst and Young said so". And Ernst and Young of course are honourable men too, just got some dodgy friends and a few US judges who don't like them. Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Added a few things to the NoDPI website including a Poll on whether or not people think BT should be prosecuted. Please complete the poll.
Privacy Policy is now up also. Can someone who has a forum account please check what cookies you have on your system for NoDPI.Org You should have no more than 2-3 cookies from the site as follows: Poll Cookie (only if you participate in a poll) Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks Alexander Hanff ---------- Post added at 13:33 ---------- Previous post was at 12:32 ---------- Just going for a bit of a nap, I will be back later. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:12. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.