Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Updated: Boris resigns as party leader (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710650)

Paul 18-04-2022 17:31

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Did Starmer get one ?

Damien 18-04-2022 18:08

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36119392)
Did Starmer get one ?

Stamer's one was a year later when the rules was a bit looser. But the police did investigate and found he didn't break it: https://www.theguardian.com/politics...er-office-beer

If Johnson admitted back in December 'Yes, there was that cake' and this was the only incident things would be been easier for him much like it was for Starmer. But Johnson is under investigation for other events and he kept lying about it all the time.

Chris 18-04-2022 18:45

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36119389)
Seems like you only get Covid fines if you are a Conservative.

https://www.gbnews.uk/news/nicola-st...onfirms/274641

Scotland First Minister Nicola Sturgeon will not be prosecuted after viral footage showed her breaching face mask law.

Actually it seems you only get them if there’s evidence of wilful rule-breaking.

I am by no means a Sturgeon fan but if she was papped without a mask on in the first 30 seconds of entering a building before remembering to put one on, that’s quite obviously not the same thing as attending a party with cake or stopping in the office for drinks.

Itshim 18-04-2022 18:57

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36119353)
You forgot

6. If the police decide Boris broke the law, the police are wrong.

And the met is a baston of truth and honesty, their officers can be so so trusted to be honest and upright . :erm:

papa smurf 18-04-2022 19:10

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36119400)
Actually it seems you only get them if there’s evidence of wilful rule-breaking.

I am by no means a Sturgeon fan but if she was papped without a mask on in the first 30 seconds of entering a building before remembering to put one on, that’s quite obviously not the same thing as attending a party with cake or stopping in the office for drinks.

I didn't realise the law said you get a 30 seconds grace period before the face mask law kicked in.

heero_yuy 18-04-2022 19:13

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36119402)
I didn't realise the law said you get a 30 seconds grace period before the face mask law kicked in.

You do if you're a Krankie. :D

papa smurf 18-04-2022 19:15

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 36119403)
You do if you're a Krankie. :D

And everyone else in the barbers shop who wasn't wearing a mask.

Mad Max 18-04-2022 20:19

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
She looks a damn sight better with a mask on. :D

Hugh 18-04-2022 20:21

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Amazing how all the people slamming the Met’s record in policing & veracity never felt the necessity to mention their doubts and concerns when it was people other than Johnson being on the receiving end of the Cockernee Plods long arm of the law… :shrug:

pip08456 18-04-2022 21:57

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
The Met Police have proven to be corrupt over many years, here's just one example. There are many more if you care to look.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60832186

That said can the majority of the Met be called corrupt? Personally no, certainally at the lower levels and I knew a few of regular officers when I lived in the Met area for a few years (I framed a few advanced driving certificates for some of them). They had no respect for their superiors.

Maggy 19-04-2022 09:19

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36119400)
Actually it seems you only get them if there’s evidence of wilful rule-breaking.

I am by no means a Sturgeon fan but if she was papped without a mask on in the first 30 seconds of entering a building before remembering to put one on, that’s quite obviously not the same thing as attending a party with cake or stopping in the office for drinks.

:tu:

Hugh 19-04-2022 10:16

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36119350)
That sounds like a challenge to the Forum. May I suggest it be defended by one or all of the following:
  1. Let's wait for the full Sue Gray report and give Johnson's party the benefit of the doubt in the May elections.
  2. Who didn't break the draconian and inconsistent rules?
  3. Starmer had a beer one year later too. I'm sure government rules did not alter throughout the pandemic.
  4. Where in the pandemic regulations did it mention not eating cake or drinking wine?
  5. You boring Boris-bashers really do need to move on. We need a strong and stable government to manage our response to the Ukraine war and cost of living crisis.
:D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris View Post
You forgot

6. If the police decide Boris broke the law, the police are wrong.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1650359774

[/img]

Hugh 19-04-2022 10:17

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36119412)
The Met Police have proven to be corrupt over many years, here's just one example. There are many more if you care to look.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60832186

That said can the majority of the Met be called corrupt? Personally no, certainally at the lower levels and I knew a few of regular officers when I lived in the Met area for a few years (I framed a few advanced driving certificates for some of them). They had no respect for their superiors.

Quote:

The HMICFRS report said "it would not describe the Met as institutionally corrupt" based on this inspection but it did say the force's approach to tackling corruption was "not fit for purpose"
Anyway, the point I was trying to make was that some posters never seemed to previously had an issue with the Met’s "form" until it affected someone they supported…

Carth 19-04-2022 12:29

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
In hindsight, it may have been much better if the Met had received a tip off about the birthday bash.

They then could have barged in, shot everyone in attendance and confiscated the cake and booze.

Obviously the officers involved would then need to be suspended on full pay whilst awaiting the results of an investigation of 'over the top' policing at the behest of the Labour party

:D

1andrew1 19-04-2022 15:53

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
As many have said, Johnson is extremely likely to win this vote but it won't look good for the Conservatives on May 5th.

Quote:

The Commons Speaker says MPs will vote on Thursday on whether the PM should be investigated for knowingly misleading Parliament over breaching Covid laws
Sir Lindsay Hoyle says he will allow MPs time to debate a motion from Labour on whether to refer Boris Johnson to Parliament's Privileges Committee.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-61143220


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:20.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.