Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Updated: Boris resigns as party leader (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710650)

mrmistoffelees 08-12-2021 09:07

Updated: Boris resigns as party leader
 
Not sure if this belongs here or it should be in it's own thread.

The Christmas Party shenanigans, should heads roll? if so, whose?

Mod edit (Chris): A new thread, I think. Lots of posts moved.

Sephiroth 08-12-2021 09:14

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Boris.

mrmistoffelees 08-12-2021 09:24

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36104719)
Boris.

As much as I would love to see that happen, i think it's more likely a sacrifice will be made.

The government hiding this morning is interesting. I'd have a lot more time for them if they came out and said. yes, we did it, we apologise (which we know means nowt) and we're going to donate 20k each personally to insert x charity here.

Looks like there was another party as well, and reese mogg has been caught out as well

Damien 08-12-2021 09:25

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
What makes that video worse, other than that they spent a week denying it ever took place, is that they clearly knew what they were doing.

I can understand if a few staffers who had to work in No 10 anyway, were in close proximity anyway, decided to have a few drinks after work. Yes it still would have been illegal under their own rules but you can sort of understand how it naturally comes about.

But the video shows an intentional understanding they would flaunt their own rules and then laugh about it. They really are quite brazen about it all.

mrmistoffelees 08-12-2021 09:27

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36104721)
What makes that video worse, other than that they spent a week denying it ever took place, is that they clearly knew what they were doing.

I can understand if a few staffers who had to work in No 10 anyway, were in close proximity anyway, decided to have a few drinks after work. Yes it still would have been illegal under their own rules but you can sort of understand how it naturally comes about.

But the video shows an intentional understanding they would flaunt their own rules and then laugh about it. They really are quite brazen about it all.

Indeed, If Starmer can't capitalise on this then he should be gone... it's an open goal

---------- Post added at 09:27 ---------- Previous post was at 09:26 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36104721)
What makes that video worse, other than that they spent a week denying it ever took place, is that they clearly knew what they were doing.

I can understand if a few staffers who had to work in No 10 anyway, were in close proximity anyway, decided to have a few drinks after work. Yes it still would have been illegal under their own rules but you can sort of understand how it naturally comes about.

But the video shows an intentional understanding they would flaunt their own rules and then laugh about it. They really are quite brazen about it all.

Watching Sky News and they're stating Boris was there... as he gave a speech

Hugh 08-12-2021 09:38

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
I think that was a "leaving do", the previous week.

papa smurf 08-12-2021 09:40

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Boris is expected to lie cheat and manipulate the rules, will it hurt him? no.
He will just waffle out some gibberish at pmq's that bares no resemblance to the subject under question as he usually does.

Hugh 08-12-2021 09:46

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
They had the party to test their eyesight.

papa smurf 08-12-2021 09:48

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Who didn't break the rules a little on xmas gatherings :shrug:

Hugh 08-12-2021 09:52

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FGEywBnX...jpg&name=small

mrmistoffelees 08-12-2021 10:01

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36104730)
Who didn't break the rules a little on xmas gatherings :shrug:

Why does that justify the behaviour ?

papa smurf 08-12-2021 10:11

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36104733)
Why does that justify the behaviour ?

I didn't claim it did.

jfman 08-12-2021 10:15

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Anyone still think Boris will make it past 2022?

papa smurf 08-12-2021 10:19

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36104736)
Anyone still think Boris will make it past 2022?

They'll probably ditch Charles and make him the next king.

mrmistoffelees 08-12-2021 10:22

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36104734)
I didn't claim it did.

Then if not an attempt as justification what was the point of your question?

papa smurf 08-12-2021 10:28

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36104738)
Then if not an attempt as justification what was the point of your question?

Is asking a question not allowed now? it seems reasonable to ask if others have broken the rules even if it was just a little bit.

mrmistoffelees 08-12-2021 10:31

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36104739)
Is asking a question not allowed now? it seems reasonable to ask if others have broken the rules even if it was just a little bit.


To what relevance ?

Sephiroth 08-12-2021 10:35

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Now it gets interesting. If Boris is in an untenable position, a leadership contest would have to follow Party rules. The Cabinet (some) are on manoeuvres and will want to boil it down to last person standing in order to avoid a membership vote (see May for details).

The membership are in none-of-the-above mood as far as I can glean and would like other candidates for leadership to come forward. Exciting (I hope).

Hugh 08-12-2021 10:38

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36104738)
Then if not an attempt as justification what was the point of your question?

To be fair, he was probably asking rhetorically…

Which, by pure coincidence, is an anagram of "hairy troll (CE)"…

---------- Post added at 10:38 ---------- Previous post was at 10:36 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36104742)
Now it gets interesting. If Boris is in an untenable position, a leadership contest would have to follow Party rules. The Cabinet (some) are on manoeuvres and will want to boil it down to last person standing in order to avoid a membership vote (see May for details).

The membership are in none-of-the-above mood as far as I can glean and would like other candidates for leadership to come forward. Exciting (I hope).

By pure chance…

https://www.chathamhouse.org/events/...icy-priorities
Quote:

In her first major speech as the UK Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Affairs, Liz Truss outlines her areas of focus and the UK’s foreign policy priorities.

Pierre 08-12-2021 10:41

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36104731)
[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2021/12/3.jpg

Sephiroth 08-12-2021 10:41

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Liz Truss would not be my choice. She has no public persona and her jokes fall flat.

mrmistoffelees 08-12-2021 10:48

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
So, now the Department of Education admits to a gathering as well


'It was first revealed by the Daily Mirror last night, which said up to two dozen staff of former Education Secretary Gavin Williamson got together for drinks and canapes in the office on 10 December.

At the time, London was in Tier 2 restrictions which banned any indoor household mixing.

The department has admitted that a "gathering" was held for those who were already in the office and couldn't work from home.

"Drinks and snacks were brought by those attending and no outside guests or supporting staff were invited or present," a spokeswoman said.

"While this was work-related, looking back we accept it would have been better not to have gathered in this way at that particular time."''

From https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/59575030

jfman 08-12-2021 10:49

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36104737)
They'll probably ditch Charles and make him the next king.

And then we can do what the French did. Job done.

Hugh 08-12-2021 10:53

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36104745)

Quote:

The legal system we have and the rule of law are far more responsible for our traditional liberties than any system of one man one vote. Any country or Government which wants to proceed towards tyranny starts to undermine legal rights and undermine the law.

Margaret Thatcher, Iain Dale (1997). “As I said to Denis--: the Margaret Thatcher book of quotations”, Robson Book Ltd
Speech to the European Foundation ("Freedom, Economic Liberty and the Rule of Law")

Quote:

You know we can't have freedom without a rule of law. This is a thing I'm always saying to countries who come out of tyranny. You can't have unconstrained freedom, you have to have a rule of law. And you know, my friends, the most difficult thing is to explain what a rule of law is, as distinct from just an oppressive law. They say, well we've got a lot of regulations, the government makes them, the government dictates to us. That's not what a rule of law is, I say. It's having wise judges who decide fairly and whose decisions are taken and honoured. It's having your laws made in a parliament which is accountable to the people and which you know are going to be honourably administered. That's why we don't just call it law, we call it a rule of law. You cannot have freedom without a rule of law, and that is the most difficult thing, I think, to get into countries that have never known it. And if you don't have it, what you tend to get is corruption and that is death to freedom, it's death to truth, it's death to honour, it's death to democracy.

Pierre 08-12-2021 11:00

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36104752)
Speech to the European Foundation ("Freedom, Economic Liberty and the Rule of Law")

I know she made speeches on law and order, just not the one in the picture you posted.

Hugh 08-12-2021 11:01

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36104756)
I know she made speeches on law and order, just not the one in the picture you posted.

We all make mistakes - except, in this case...

Quote:

I come last to what many would put first. The Rule of Law.

The first people to uphold the law should be governments. It is tragic that the Socialist Government, to its lasting shame, should have lost its nerve and shed its principles over the People's Republic of Clay Cross. And that a group of the Labour Party should have tried to turn the Shrewsbury pickets into martyrs.

On both occasions the law was broken. On one, violence was done. [end p41] No decent society can live like that. No responsible party should condone it. (Applause).

The first duty of Government is to uphold the law. If it tries to bob and weave and duck around that duty when its inconvenient, if government does that, then so will the governed, and then nothing is safe—not home, not liberty, not life itself.
https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/102777

1975 Oct 10
Margaret Thatcher
Speech to Conservative Party Conference

Maggy 08-12-2021 11:08

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
It’s all fudge. It’s all sleight of hand. It’s all bare faced lying. It’s all hypocritical. It’s all move along nothing happening here.

Pierre 08-12-2021 11:09

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36104757)
We all make mistakes - except, in this case...



https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/102777

1975 Oct 10
Margaret Thatcher
Speech to Conservative Party Conference

Damn! well done. Black belt googling.

mrmistoffelees 08-12-2021 11:11

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36104759)
It’s all fudge. It’s all sleight of hand. It’s all bare faced lying. It’s all hypocritical. It’s all move along nothing happening here.

And the worst of it? It's all either ignored. Or attempted to be justified and accepted by a large percentage of the public.

daveeb 08-12-2021 11:54

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36104761)
And the worst of it? It's all either ignored. Or attempted to be justified and accepted by a large percentage of the public.

Aided and abetted by the majority of the tabloids, although tellingly even the Mail had the knives out today.

Carth 08-12-2021 12:06

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36104761)
And the worst of it? It's all either ignored. Or attempted to be justified and accepted by a large percentage of the public.

I think 'a large percentage of the public' don't give two hoots about 'Partygate'.

Many of the general public don't give a fig about lots of stuff . .

mrmistoffelees 08-12-2021 12:11

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36104765)
I think 'a large percentage of the public' don't give two hoots about 'Partygate'.

Many of the general public don't give a fig about lots of stuff . .

Oh i agree, I'd argue they perhaps should?

Pierre 08-12-2021 12:16

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36104765)
I think 'a large percentage of the public' don't give two hoots about 'Partygate'.

Many of the general public don't give a fig about lots of stuff . .

I get all the "should be held to higher standard" etc etc, but they evidence by their actions that most don't have any standards.

The output of this is apathy, and referring to that wonderful quote the Hugh researched from Thatcher, if they tried to impose any further restrictions I think most people would just flout them now.

Carth 08-12-2021 12:20

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36104767)
Oh i agree, I'd argue they perhaps should?

It all depends on what they perceive to be 'important' in their everyday lives . . .

Is the TV still working? *yes*
Is Facebook still working? *yes*
Is my car still working? *yes*
Can I still shop online? *yes*

jfman 08-12-2021 12:21

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36104769)
It all depends on what they perceive to be 'important' in their everyday lives . . .

Is the TV still working? *yes*
Is Facebook still working? *yes*
Is my car still working? *yes*
Can I still shop online? *yes*

Very true, but elections are won and lost in the margins. One per cent here, two per cent there.

The knives will be out.

Carth 08-12-2021 12:28

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Yes the knives will be out, but it won't be the 'general public' wielding them.

mrmistoffelees 08-12-2021 12:30

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36104768)
I get all the "should be held to higher standard" etc etc, but they evidence by their actions that most don't have any standards.

The output of this is apathy, and referring to that wonderful quote the Hugh researched from Thatcher, if they tried to impose any further restrictions I think most people would just flout them now.

I can't argue with that to be honest. If any sort of household mixing were to be introduced I'd like to think i'd go along with it, but if i'm honest I'd just carry on as normal.

Decisive action was required to nip this in the bud, they've not done that, the moral authority if not gone is in in question. and yet STILL Keir Starmer can't get a fatal blow in

Hugh 08-12-2021 13:41

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
So Johnson has thrown his staff under the bus - that could come back to haunt him…

btw, "I apologise for the impression that was given" is up there with "I’m sorry you felt you were offended" as far as fauxpologies go…

Damien 08-12-2021 14:36

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36104774)
Decisive action was required to nip this in the bud, they've not done that, the moral authority if not gone is in in question. and yet STILL Keir Starmer can't get a fatal blow in

What kind of fatal blow are you expecting? His questions were good and awkward for Johnson, and he got a commitment for No 10 to hand over details of any parties (plural) to the police.

The story has enough traction on it's own though.

jfman 08-12-2021 15:11

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Scottish Conservative leader and bang average lineo Douglas Ross has called for Boris Johnson to resign if he misled Parliament. A caveat that, unless he’s completely forgotten about a party he was actually at, doesn’t mean much.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla...5Bpost+type%5D

mrmistoffelees 08-12-2021 15:16

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36104784)
What kind of fatal blow are you expecting? His questions were good and awkward for Johnson, and he got a commitment for No 10 to hand over details of any parties (plural) to the police.

The story has enough traction on it's own though.


To me, it appeared that Boris managed to brush off his questioning quite easily.

The police according to some media sources were already aware of what was going on.

Any inquiry is either going to end in

a. going to be forgotten about
b. a small sacrificial lamb will be offered
c. the police will say not enough evidence

IMHO

Hugh 08-12-2021 15:40

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-new...gives-12469075

Premise 1 - we have been repeatedly told "there was no party"

Quote:

In repeatedly denying a bash ever took place ("there was no Christmas party", we were told), the prime minister, his senior ministers and spokespeople seem to have lied albeit unwittingly.

During a tense briefing of journalists this afternoon, Boris Johnson's two spokespeople refused to say who was responsible for giving the PM incorrect "assurances" that no event had taken place.

They were also unable to confirm whether top civil servant Simon Case was in attendance at the bash, even though he is the man tasked with investigating it.

Government sources later clarified he (Simon Case) was not present.

Boris Johnson's spokespeople did say, however, that the PM was not a guest at the party.
In summary, it has been confirmed by Government sources that both Simon Case and Boris Johnson did not attend the party that the Government sources said didn’t happen…

(I wonder if these "No. 10 spokespeople who seem to have lied albeit unwittingly" were attendees at the party that didn’t happen, as the (non-)party was held at No. 10?)

Chris 08-12-2021 15:42

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36104774)
I can't argue with that to be honest. If any sort of household mixing were to be introduced I'd like to think i'd go along with it, but if i'm honest I'd just carry on as normal.

Decisive action was required to nip this in the bud, they've not done that, the moral authority if not gone is in in question. and yet STILL Keir Starmer can't get a fatal blow in

There could only really be a fatal blow to Boris from this if he were directly implicated, and (so far at least) he doesn’t appear to be. This further erodes his moral authority as a leader but it isn’t the coup de grace. I actually thought Starmer got a good line in for once, referencing the Queen at Philip’s funeral, but he was working the moral authority line, not trying to claim direct culpability.

There is a larger plan at work here, by well-placed persons unknown, to drip-feed material into the public domain that will eventually fatally undermine Boris even without a smoking gun directly implicating him in something. It’s the death of a thousand cuts, nipping and slicing away until everyone is left wondering why on earth he’s still in charge. At that point someone will challenge him for the leadership.

mrmistoffelees 08-12-2021 15:46

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36104790)
There could only really be a fatal blow to Boris from this if he were directly implicated, and (so far at least) he doesn’t appear to be. This further erodes his moral authority as a leader but it isn’t the coup de grace. I actually thought Starmer got a good line in for once, referencing the Queen at Philip’s funeral, but he was working the moral authority line, not trying to claim direct culpability.

There is a larger plan at work here, by well-placed persons unknown, to drip-feed material into the public domain that will eventually fatally undermine Boris even without a smoking gun directly implicating him in something. It’s the death of a thousand cuts, nipping and slicing away until everyone is left wondering why on earth he’s still in charge. At that point someone will challenge him for the leadership.

I'll give you the queen line, i'd forgotten about that....

Allegra Stratton resigns, the sacrificial lamb?

Chris 08-12-2021 15:48

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36104791)
I'll give you the queen line, i'd forgotten about that....

Allegra Stratton resigns, the sacrificial lamb?

I think they have no choice but to give her the boot. That recording is absolutely damning. I’m not certain it will draw a line under things though. It’s open season on Boris and his administration now, and every hack in Westminster will be hunting for the next morsel.

Damien 08-12-2021 15:56

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36104790)
There is a larger plan at work here, by well-placed persons unknown, to drip-feed material into the public domain that will eventually fatally undermine Boris even without a smoking gun directly implicating him in something. It’s the death of a thousand cuts, nipping and slicing away until everyone is left wondering why on earth he’s still in charge. At that point someone will challenge him for the leadership.

Got to wonder who leaked that video. There can't be too many people who had access to it.

mrmistoffelees 08-12-2021 16:19

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Interesting that in her resignation speech, she didn't deny the party happened...

Pierre 08-12-2021 17:08

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36104793)
Got to wonder who leaked that video. There can't be too many people who had access to it.

And the Hancock video…………..

There are definitely people embedded in the Tory party happy to see Rome burn.

jfman 08-12-2021 17:39

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
It’s Johnson’s populism that’s tearing the party apart. He’s some distance from traditional conservative values. By attempting to be all things to all people he’s made it a broad church from red wall former Labour voters to the left and UKIP voters to the right somewhere in there it becomes a difficult balancing act.

As a Brexit Government they’ve culled almost anyone who campaigned to remain from the Cabinet and many from the Parliamentary party haven’t sought re-election. A Conservative Government is traditionally pale, male, stale. But broadly considered to a sizeable proportion of the electorate a safe pair of hands.

Leaping from chaotic event to chaotic event isn’t something that traditional, non-red wall, non-UKIP types find appealing.

Hugh 08-12-2021 17:47

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36104800)
And the Hancock video…………..

There are definitely people embedded in the Tory party happy to see Rome burn.

And who are in charge of GCHQ and SIS…

Itshim 08-12-2021 18:38

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Guess I must be the only person in the country that is not interested in if it happened or not. To me there far more important matters happening in the world , afgainistan ,lran ,Brexit ( n.i ) and even Joe Biden and his total waste is of a VP

pip08456 08-12-2021 18:48

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36104812)
Guess I must be the only person in the country that is not interested in if it happened or not. To me there far more important matters happening in the world , afgainistan ,lran ,Brexit ( n.i ) and even Joe Biden and his total waste is of a VP

No, I'm not interested either.

heero_yuy 08-12-2021 18:57

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Quote from The Sun: BORIS Johnson's top aide Allegra Stratton resigned in tears this afternoon just hours after bombshell footage showed her laughing about a lockdown-busting Christmas party at No10.

The PM earlier said he was "sickened" by the leaked video of his senior advisers joking about the alleged illegal gathering last year.

In an sobbing statement outside her home Ms Stratton said she will regret her actions "for the rest of my days" and apologised to the British public.
She's fallen on her sword. Is this enough to take the heat off Boris?

Mr K 08-12-2021 18:58

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Interesting.
https://mobile.twitter.com/BritainEl...7Ctwgr%5Etweet

Westminster voting intention:

LAB: 38% (+2)
CON: 34% (-4)
LDEM: 11% (+2)
GRN: 6% (-)
REFUK: 5% (+1)

I wonder what's caused this?! Party poopers I guess...

Maggy 08-12-2021 21:22

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36104812)
Guess I must be the only person in the country that is not interested in if it happened or not. To me there far more important matters happening in the world , afgainistan ,lran ,Brexit ( n.i ) and even Joe Biden and his total waste is of a VP

However all of that isn't in our remit and personally I actually care what's happening HERE because what happens here has a much more direct effect on me and mine.Yes what's happening elsewhere is important and worrying but here and now will always have MY attention.

TheDaddy 08-12-2021 21:48

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 36104816)
She's fallen on her sword. Is this enough to take the heat off Boris?

What was it Dennis Skinner who said, when posh boys are in trouble it's always the servant's that are sacrificed

---------- Post added at 21:48 ---------- Previous post was at 21:46 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36104814)
No, I'm not interested either.

I'm always interested in lies and corruption being exposed, imo to many people are happy to let them get away with one rule for us no rules for them

Paul 08-12-2021 21:54

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36104761)
And the worst of it? It's all either ignored. Or attempted to be justified and accepted by a large percentage of the public.

I suspect a large percentage of the public will not really care about a party that may (or may not) have happened 12 or so months ago.

In fact most are probably fed up of the constant media attention of something that really doesnt affect them at all.

I know I am, and dont care about it at all - did they or didnt they, either way it will have zero effect on my day to day life.

I had my Christmas then, pretty much the same as all previous ones (and the same again this year). The Turkey is in the freezer, waiting, and the family is invited (and coming).

---------- Post added at 21:54 ---------- Previous post was at 21:52 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36104812)
Guess I must be the only person in the country that is not interested in if it happened or not.

You are not (see above).

nffc 08-12-2021 22:00

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36104859)
I suspect a large percentage of the public will not really care about a party that may (or may not) have happened 12 or so months ago.

In fact most are probably fed up of the constant media attention of something that really doesnt affect them at all.

I know I am, and dont care about it at all - did they or didnt they, either way it will have zero effect on my day to day life.

I had my Christmas then, pretty much the same as all previous ones (and the same again this year). The Turkey is in the freezer, waiting, and the family is invited (and coming).

---------- Post added at 21:54 ---------- Previous post was at 21:52 ----------


You are not (see above).

My main objection to it is that they had seen fit to impose restrictions which prevented the general public from doing so.


Also, rather than making the event seemingly low-key (a few drinks from people working in an office together at the end of the day would be minimal covid risk) they not only went to town on it (apparently) but also completely mocked the event with the videos in the press conference room.


And all this comes to light as they try and put new restrictions, albeit much milder, on the rest of us.



it's double standards, love the Thatcher quote, now she is one who acted with integrity.

Hugh 08-12-2021 23:59

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
You know what they say…

"If you can’t remember the Downing Street Christmas party, you were really there."

h/t @danielmaier

jfman 09-12-2021 07:59

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36104819)
Interesting.
https://mobile.twitter.com/BritainEl...7Ctwgr%5Etweet

Westminster voting intention:

LAB: 38% (+2)
CON: 34% (-4)
LDEM: 11% (+2)
GRN: 6% (-)
REFUK: 5% (+1)

I wonder what's caused this?! Party poopers I guess...

Dear Sir Graham…

mrmistoffelees 09-12-2021 08:04

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36104859)
I suspect a large percentage of the public will not really care about a party that may (or may not) have happened 12 or so months ago.

In fact most are probably fed up of the constant media attention of something that really doesnt affect them at all.

I know I am, and dont care about it at all - did they or didnt they, either way it will have zero effect on my day to day life.

I had my Christmas then, pretty much the same as all previous ones (and the same again this year). The Turkey is in the freezer, waiting, and the family is invited (and coming).

---------- Post added at 21:54 ---------- Previous post was at 21:52 ----------


You are not (see above).

The party isn’t the issue, it’s the potential breaching of rules yet again by the government whose members have been flagrantly breaching rules for the past eighteen to twenty four months.

That should concern us all surely ? Unless of course it doesn’t matter how those people behave ?

heero_yuy 09-12-2021 11:03

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Quote from The Sun: Boris Johnson and wife Carrie have today welcomed their second child after she gave birth to a baby girl.

The couple announced the 33-year-old was pregnant again in July with an adorable Instagram snap of a pram.

It came just two months after they secretly wed in Westminster Cathedral on May 29, 2021.

A statement released today said: "Prime Minister Boris Johnson and wife Carrie have announced “the birth of a healthy baby girl at a London hospital earlier today.

"Both mother and daughter are doing very well. The couple would like to thank the brilliant NHS maternity team for all their care and support."

It is understood Boris, 57, was with Carrie throughout the birth.
That's timed conveniently.

1andrew1 09-12-2021 11:09

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36104859)
I suspect a large percentage of the public will not really care about a party that may (or may not) have happened 12 or so months ago.

In fact most are probably fed up of the constant media attention of something that really doesnt affect them at all.

I know I am, and dont care about it at all - did they or didnt they, either way it will have zero effect on my day to day life.

I had my Christmas then, pretty much the same as all previous ones (and the same again this year). The Turkey is in the freezer, waiting, and the family is invited (and coming).

The trouble is this does affect people. As we saw yesterday, Johnson strove to distract from the party by announcing further restrictions.

No 10 has repeatedly insisted it would not have enough evidence about the Omicron variant until next week to decide if new restrictions were needed. And only this Tuesday Raab had said “We don’t think Plan B is required.”

Damien 09-12-2021 11:46

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36104859)
I suspect a large percentage of the public will not really care about a party that may (or may not) have happened 12 or so months ago.

In fact most are probably fed up of the constant media attention of something that really doesnt affect them at all.

I know I am, and dont care about it at all - did they or didnt they, either way it will have zero effect on my day to day life.

I had my Christmas then, pretty much the same as all previous ones (and the same again this year). The Turkey is in the freezer, waiting, and the family is invited (and coming).


I think a large percentage of people do care.

It's the double standard, the hypocrisy and the 'one rule for them, another for us' that upsets people. It's the same reason why the Barnard Castle story had an impact. People expect politicians to be a bit corrupt and dishonest but the feeling of unfairness really angers people.

You had your Christmas, fine, but this same Government had passed laws that could have you seen prosecuted for inviting people. There are people now awaiting court cases for breaching social distancing laws last Christmas. Videos of police breaking up parties. Students were fined £10,000 for having a student party during the lockdown. Yet some of the people who worked on those laws had their own party.

Those people will still end up with criminal records, those students will not be refunded their fines and you're lack of interest in the Government having a party would not have stopped the Government being very interested in you having a party use the law to prosecute for it.

It really doesn't matter what side of the argument you're on when it comes to if those regulations were reasonable or not. What matters is the Government thought they were for you but not for them.

I have said it before. Brexit or Remain, Tory or Labour, us pleps have more in common with each other than the politicians who claim to represent our side because those politicians will screw you and me over to further their own needs any change they get.

daveeb 09-12-2021 11:49

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36104901)
The trouble is this does affect people. As we saw yesterday, Johnson strove to distract from the party by announcing further restrictions.

No 10 has repeatedly insisted it would not have enough evidence about the Omicron variant until next week to decide if new restrictions were needed. And only this Tuesday Raab had said “We don’t think Plan B is required.”

Exactly. The obfuscation and misdirection machinery has kicked in to full swing once again. However a Savantacomres poll shows 54% think he should resign including a third of Conservative responders, so people clearly do care about law makers being law breakers whenever it occured.

Hugh 09-12-2021 11:50

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
What Damien said…

And the fact that people couldn’t visit relatives/friends in Care Homes & Hospitals because of the rules that were implemented (and ignored, seemingly, by those who set the rules), has really pissed a lot of people off.

daveeb 09-12-2021 11:51

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36104905)
I think a large percentage of people do care.

It's the double standard, the hypocrisy and the 'one rule for them, another for us' that upsets people. It's the same reason why the Barnard Castle story had an impact. People expect politicians to be a bit corrupt and dishonest but the feeling of unfairness really angers people.

You had your Christmas, fine, but this same Government had passed laws that could have you seen prosecuted for inviting people. There are people now awaiting court cases for breaching social distancing laws last Christmas. Videos of police breaking up parties. Students were fined £10,000 for having a student party during the lockdown. Yet some of the people who worked on those laws had their own party.

Those people will still end up with criminal records, those students will not be refunded their fines and you're lack of interest in the Government having a party would not have stopped the Government being very interested in you having a party use the law to prosecute for it.

It really doesn't matter what side of the argument you're on when it comes to if those regulations were reasonable or not. What matters is the Government thought they were for you but not for them.

I have said it before. Brexit or Remain, Tory or Labour, us pleps have more in common with each other than the politicians who claim to represent our side because those politicians will screw you and me over to further their own needs any change they get.

Spot on.

1andrew1 09-12-2021 11:56

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36104905)
I have said it before. Brexit or Remain, Tory or Labour, us pleps have more in common with each other than the politicians who claim to represent our side because those politicians will screw you and me over to further their own needs any change they get.

Exactly. United we stand, divided we fall. Every time someone mentions someone is a Leaver or Remainer, just remember the trap they've fallen into and avoid falling into it yourself.

Carth 09-12-2021 12:40

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
I'm pretty sure that the best way to resolve an issue you have with the Government is to keep posting about it on a forum, twitter, facebook etc . .

alternatively, if you feel that isn't helping with your issue, you can complain direct

https://www.gov.uk/government/organi...ints-procedure

Quote:

How to complain
You can make a complaint by email or post.

You can send an email to publiccorrespondence@cabinetoffice.gov.uk or in writing to Public Correspondence Team, Cabinet Office, 70 Whitehall, London SWA 2AS.

We have a 2-stage complaints procedure. At each stage it will help us to resolve your complaint quickly if you can give us as much clear detail as possible, including any documents and correspondence and stating that you are making a complaint in line with our procedure.
If however, you think that complaining directly to the very people you're complaining about will get you nowhere, here are a few other alternatives:

*Glue your head to the road outside parliament.
*Climb onto a carriage on the District line, refuse to come down until you receive a full apology and £10k compensation.
*Burn effigies of Boris (attendance of local media is a must).
*Organize a protest march
*Write to the Queen and ask her what she's going to do about the corrupt people she 'employs'
*Wait until the next GE, and then vote for anyone but Conservative (apologies if this hasn't worked in the past)

hope this helps ;)

daveeb 09-12-2021 12:47

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36104918)
I'm pretty sure that the best way to resolve an issue you have with the Government is to keep posting about it on a forum, twitter, facebook etc . .

alternatively, if you feel that isn't helping with your issue, you can complain direct

https://www.gov.uk/government/organi...ints-procedure



If however, you think that complaining directly to the very people you're complaining about will get you nowhere, here are a few other alternatives:

*Glue your head to the road outside parliament.
*Climb onto a carriage on the District line, refuse to come down until you receive a full apology and £10k compensation.
*Burn effigies of Boris (attendance of local media is a must).
*Organize a protest march
*Write to the Queen and ask her what she's going to do about the corrupt people she 'employs'
*Wait until the next GE, and then vote for anyone but Conservative (apologies if this hasn't worked in the past)

hope this helps ;)

Are you suggesting that the government doesn't look at political threads on CF as a barometer of public opinion? I'm shocked :erm:

Carth 09-12-2021 12:58

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by daveeb (Post 36104919)
Are you suggesting that the government doesn't look at political threads on CF as a barometer of public opinion? I'm shocked :erm:

Not any more, no.

They did for a while, but then found there were 'political activists' who had realised that, by carefully posting subjective material, they could influence the way others posted and therefore bend Government policies their way ;)

daveeb 09-12-2021 13:00

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36104920)
Not any more, no.

They did for a while, but then found there were 'political activists' who had realised that, by carefully posting subjective material, they could influence the way others posted and therefore bend Government policies their way ;)

Wow I didn't realise Mr Putin was a member on here ;)

Carth 09-12-2021 13:03

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by daveeb (Post 36104921)
Wow I didn't realise Mr Putin was a member on here ;)

I'm not at liberty to either confirm or deny that, or the presence of Lizard people

Sephiroth 09-12-2021 13:07

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36104901)
The trouble is this does affect people. As we saw yesterday, Johnson strove to distract from the party by announcing further restrictions.

No 10 has repeatedly insisted it would not have enough evidence about the Omicron variant until next week to decide if new restrictions were needed. And only this Tuesday Raab had said “We don’t think Plan B is required.”

I think that's what you and likely a good few others would like to believe.

But the Covid announcement was indeed a necessary step, and, I believe, induced by the chief scientists.


---------- Post added at 13:07 ---------- Previous post was at 13:03 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36104922)
I'm not at liberty to either confirm or deny that, or the presence of Lizard people

Harry Turtledove proved the existence of lizard people and how they saved the world against Hitler.

1andrew1 09-12-2021 13:10

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36104923)
I think that's what you and likely a good few others would like to believe.

But the Covid announcement was indeed a necessary step, and, I believe, induced by the chief scientists.

There were no new cabinet papers. It was driven by No. 10 I'm afraid Seph with no scientists to be seen.

Sephiroth 09-12-2021 14:00

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36104925)
There were no new cabinet papers. It was driven by No. 10 I'm afraid Seph with no scientists to be seen.

But Whitty and Vallance (scientists) officiated at the news conference. What have I misunderstood?

pip08456 09-12-2021 14:22

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36104927)
But Whitty and Vallance (scientists) officiated at the news conference. What have I misunderstood?

Not forgetting Sage met the day before.

daveeb 09-12-2021 14:56

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36104927)
But Whitty and Vallance (scientists) officiated at the news conference. What have I misunderstood?

They need to be there to make it a bit more grown up and believable.

Hugh 09-12-2021 14:58

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36104927)
But Whitty and Vallance (scientists) officiated at the news conference. What have I misunderstood?

Supported, rather than officiated, methinks…

Scientists/Advisers advise, Ministers direct.

papa smurf 09-12-2021 15:00

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by daveeb (Post 36104934)
They need to be there to make it a bit more grown up and believable.

Every dictator has a couple of well paid henchmen watching his back.

daveeb 09-12-2021 15:02

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36104936)
Every dictator has a couple of well paid henchmen watching his back.

Judging by the body language they're rather reluctant henchmen.

Paul 09-12-2021 16:08

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36104901)
The trouble is this does affect people.

An alleged party, 12 months ago ?
Nope it had no efect on me at all, how did it affect you ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36104905)
I think a large percentage of people do care.

Im sure a percentage think they should becasue the media make such a fuss about it, and the [anti] social media warriors tell them they should.

They'll just move onto whatever they are told to care about next, no doubt with equal "outrage".

Carth 09-12-2021 16:45

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36104946)
An alleged party, 12 months ago ?
Nope it had no efect on me at all, how did it affect you ?


Im sure a percentage think they should becasue the media make such a fuss about it, and the [anti] social media warriors tell them they should.

They'll just move onto whatever they are told to care about next, no doubt with equal "outrage".

exactly . . . no boat people this last week then?

stir the shit, move on, the way of the anarchist :D

peanut 09-12-2021 17:36

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
No doubt that if it was Labour that had the party/parties then I don't think we'd here the end of it on here. :D

Carth 09-12-2021 17:43

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Labour wouldn't even consider having a Christmas party in case it offended someone :D

Paul 09-12-2021 20:03

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36104957)
No doubt that if it was Labour that had the party/parties then I don't think we'd here the end of it on here. :D

Not from me, I think everyone deserved a party last year (and this year).

:xmas:

Hugh 09-12-2021 21:50

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Perhaps we need to change the thread title to "parties"…

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-59601447

Quote:

Downing Street's press chief addressed No 10 staff at a party last Christmas that is now under investigation, it is understood.

Jack Doyle, then deputy director of communications, gave a speech to 20-30 people at the gathering on 18 December.

A source told the BBC there were food, drinks and games at the event.
Downing Street said: "There is an ongoing review, and we won't be commenting further while that is the case".

This is one of three government staff events currently being investigated by the UK's top civil servant, Simon Case.

Mr Doyle, now Downing Street's director of communications, is understood to have also given out awards to the No 10 press team at the gathering.

Pierre 09-12-2021 22:06

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36104959)
Labour wouldn't even consider having a Christmas party in case it offended someone :D

As long as it was inclusive to the LGBTQXTYBSXKOG. Community.

nffc 09-12-2021 22:12

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36104995)
As long as it was inclusive to the LGBTQXTYBSXKOG. Community.

But not Jews

1andrew1 09-12-2021 22:54

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
More potential bad news for Johnson, from the Telegraph.

Quote:

Boris Johnson’s standards adviser on brink of quitting over Downing Street flat

Boris Johnson's standards adviser was on the brink of quitting on Thursday night following accusations that the Prime Minister misled him over the refurbishment of his Downing Street flat.

The Telegraph understands Lord Geidt will consider his position if Mr Johnson does not satisfactorily explain why he did not share vital evidence with him when he investigated the affair earlier this year.

On Thursday, the Electoral Commission fined the Conservative Party £17,800 for breaking rules on reporting donations after its own investigation – which included the "missing" evidence – found Mr Johnson had asked a Tory donor to fund the makeover.

The potential resignation of Lord Geidt would put Mr Johnson's leadership under even greater pressure.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...?ocid=msedgntp

daveeb 09-12-2021 23:28

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36105010)
More potential bad news for Johnson, from the Telegraph.


https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...?ocid=msedgntp

I'm beginning to think the prime minister isn't very truthful. :rolleyes:

Blackshep 10-12-2021 01:13

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Boris Johnson has always been a liar he's incapable of taking any personal responsibility until he's forced to the man has the integrity and honour of a slug. The fact his backstabbing and games got him into downing street is a sad reflection on the quality of our political system and perfectly highlights why I'm not bothering at the next election I don't think I'll be alone.

TheDaddy 10-12-2021 01:25

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Blackshep (Post 36105027)
Boris Johnson has always been a liar he's incapable of taking any personal responsibility until he's forced to the man has the integrity and honour of a slug. The fact his backstabbing and games got him into downing street is a sad reflection on the quality of our political system and perfectly highlights why I'm not bothering at the next election I don't think I'll be alone.

Politicians rely on that, their reasoning will be if enough people give up, are turned off and don't bother it'll be down to the hard-core sociopaths that see no wrong in anything they do to decide it, it'll be worse than some two bit dictatorship

1andrew1 10-12-2021 10:09

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36105028)
Politicians rely on that, their reasoning will be if enough people give up, are turned off and don't bother it'll be down to the hard-core sociopaths that see no wrong in anything they do to decide it, it'll be worse than some two bit dictatorship

Yes, it's part of the problem and not part of the solution. But a very understandable gut reaction.

ianch99 10-12-2021 10:39

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36104946)
An alleged party, 12 months ago ?
Nope it had no efect on me at all, how did it affect you ?

Im sure a percentage think they should becasue the media make such a fuss about it, and the [anti] social media warriors tell them they should.

They'll just move onto whatever they are told to care about next, no doubt with equal "outrage".

I am sure those who, on that day a year ago, followed the rules and were unable to be with their loved ones when they died in hospital are "affected". I suspect that they are bloody livid.

Carth 10-12-2021 11:05

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Blackshep (Post 36105027)
Boris Johnson has always been a liar he's incapable of taking any personal responsibility until he's forced to the man has the integrity and honour of a slug. The fact his backstabbing and games got him into downing street is a sad reflection on the quality of our political system and perfectly highlights why I'm not bothering at the next election I don't think I'll be alone.



Regarding the bold part, the turnout for elections is, and has been for a long time, quite low. It's almost as if the general public have, over the years, sussed out that it doesn't matter who gets in, nothing ever changes.

The only time there's a decent voter turnout is when something 'big' is on offer . . like the Brexit referendum . . where people could see that a vote for what they wanted, or didn't want, could actually make a difference to the outcome.

Politics, and the Governance of the country, is tied up by large businesses and political correctness . . no matter who is in power, the public are a fair way down the ladder of importance . . . and they know it ;)

My wife and daughter have never, to my knowledge, ever voted for anything, and I - at 67 years of age - have only voted about 5 times . . . and once was a 'protest' vote for BNP :D

Hom3r 10-12-2021 12:48

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36104730)
Who didn't break the rules a little on xmas gatherings :shrug:


I know people that met family over Christmas, are ironically calling for Boris to go, yet they refuse themselves to quit their jobs

---------- Post added at 12:48 ---------- Previous post was at 12:39 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blackshep (Post 36105027)
Boris Johnson has always been a liar, he's incapable of taking any personal responsibility until he's forced to, the man has the integrity and honour of a slug. The fact his backstabbing and games got him into Downing Street is a sad reflection on the quality of our political system and perfectly highlights why I'm not bothering, at the next election I don't think I'll be alone.


I will vote as god help us if Liebour gets in, as they would immediately rejoin the EU and surrender Stirling

Damien 10-12-2021 13:56

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36105081)
I know people that met family over Christmas, are ironically calling for Boris to go, yet they refuse themselves to quit their jobs

They aren't the ones who set the laws forbidding others to do so.

Paul 10-12-2021 16:29

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36105059)
I am sure those who, on that day a year ago, followed the rules and were unable to be with their loved ones when they died in hospital are "affected". I suspect that they are bloody livid.

Yes, I'm sure its right up there as one of their top concerns this week.

BenMcr 10-12-2021 16:51

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36105113)
Yes, I'm sure its right up there as one of their top concerns this week.

Yes, there have been several people in the news who lost loved ones who have said it is a concern for them

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co...price-22397641
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co...no-10-22350533


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:33.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.