Re: Wandavision
TBH, seen enough previews etc now, just going to watch the actual show.
|
Re: Wandavision
Yeah, i dont want to jinx it but normally when films get advertised to desth like this and the advertising includes quotes from 5* star reviews in the media the film is shit and they know they have got to do their very best to persuade people to watch it.
They know that the MCU stands on its own feet and people are gagging for their next dose so all this desparation does beg the question :confused: |
Re: Wandavision
Just watched both of them there. It's certainly a good show and I am interested in what the hell is actually going on. I hope it doesn't all end up all just being a dream or something.
|
Re: Wandavision
Quote:
Also in theory it could only be Wanda in there as Vision to all intense and purpose is dead |
Re: Wandavision
Wanda seems to know what’s going on, on some level at least. The advert in episode 2 also name checked Strucker (as a watch manufacturer) ... and the watch said ‘Hydra’ on it. I’m enjoying the teasing of the mystery, but to be honest Paul Bettany and Elizabeth Olsen are just so darned good at the American sitcom pastiche it is really entertaining on its own merits. I’m looking forward to next week.
|
Re: Wandavision
Wanda seems to have some control, as she did a nice little time rewind.
I wonder if its something constructed to save Vision, or at least a version of him. Certainly an interesting (and different) start, 7 more episodes to see where it goes. |
Re: Wandavision
Quote:
|
Re: Wandavision
Yes because it is a fantastic setting with actors who are nailing their roles. They are giving bits in each episode which is fine. We know who is watching them already atleast.
|
Re: Wandavision
Quote:
It functions perfectly well as a mystery-fantasy drama even if it wasn’t set somewhere in the MCU. The slow burn approach, drip-feeding minor clues from week to week, is well tried and tested not just in full-season network shows like Lost but also in more recent streaming material with an 8-10 week run. In fact it having “Marvel” slapped on it may be making you impatient to get on to the sort of high-kicking superhero action I strongly suspect is not going to be a major feature of this show. They’re clearly trying to use the TV format to do something a bit different. Something they wouldn’t be able to attempt in a single feature-length story (which is why I think you trying to compare the time spent on anything to what would be devoted to it in a film is redundant). |
Re: Wandavision
Quote:
|
Re: Wandavision
I think you'll end up missing out massively if that is the case. There are giving bits in each episode, or would you rather be told everything straight away and have no mystery? Also we know who is watching them. We just don't know how this reality is happening yet.
|
Re: Wandavision
Quote:
|
Re: Wandavision
It needs to start going somewhere soon, I expect a lot more events in the next 2 or 3 episodes, to keep people interested.
|
Re: Wandavision
Quote:
|
Re: Wandavision
The thing is, what some could see as easter eggs actually is the story so far. We keep seeing the logo for who is overseeing everything, but it could be seen as an easter egg. I think that may be the problem with the MCU, everyone assumes something is an easter egg rather than a future plot point.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:28. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.