Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Time to throw in the towel?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7331493.stm Quote:
From day one I have viewed RIPA as the protection we have. The DPA reads more like a memorandum of understanding and so naturally this is what Phorm have used to defend themselves. RIPA on the other hand is clear in that it states that it is illegal to intercept my communications full stop. No woolly get out clauses - the very act of interception itself is illegal, how long the interception lasts or what is done with the results is irrelevant . Neither Phorm nor my ISP has any safe harbour for their interception under RIPA. Here's the problem they have then. In order to discover that I have refused consent to the intercept they have to intercept my communication. The "spokesperson for Phorm" (and Presumably Phorm as a whole) seem to have now recognised this flaw in their system. Sorry boys, "It is not designed to criminalise legitimate business activities" is your opinion and you are welcome to test it against what the law actually states. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
I'm sure many of the laws regarding the postal system were originated in the 1800's, but we still use them to lock up postal workers who open our letters.
-- Thinking about things, 121Media must have scoured the planet a couple of years ago to find a dodgy ISP partner. They found BT and that's why we are the guinae pigs. How could we find out if BT is a major institutional shareholder in Phorm? |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
The Downing Street Petition is at number 10 and in the next month or so, six petitions above are due to close.
It's going to be quite prominent on that site then. ;) |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
To be listed in a Notification of Holding needs a shareholding of 3% or more - So no, does not look like BT have a share of Phorm... |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
As many of us have said, the whole Phorm thing is the thin end of the wedge, if we don't do something now our internet services will be at a crawl, no matter what speed we have, as dozens of companies intercept our usage for their own money making ends.
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Mind you, some of the blurb on their website reads very similar to the Phorm BS to me! At Hitwise, our DNA is based on three values: Integrity, Innovation and Exceptional Client Service. These values form the basis of everything we do – including how we interact with our clients - and are detailed in the Hitwise Client Commitment statement: |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
This could be useful for concerned website owners (linked to from Richard Clayton's blog)
http://www.cs.washington.edu/researc...tripwires.html |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
The analogy for our telephones would be if BT entered into a mutual contract with a firm that installed wire-tapping (bugging equipment) into the local telephone exchanges, so that they could monitor the number of BT customers that rang up businesses asking questions (i.e. our search terms) about product and services that we are interested in. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Alexander Hanff |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
The difference that I'd consider makes Hitwise less dangerous than Phorm is that they only receive amalgamated data from the ISPs (rather than 'personalised and maybe anonymous' data for Phorm) and, for their saleable statistics, they're only interested in very large datasets. I've no objection to, say, Amazon knowing that 10% of all VM users visited a bbc.co.uk webpage every day. Or that only 0.0001% (me) reads my blog every week... I'd put that on about the same level as Google knowing almost every move I make! ;) Go on, burst my security bubble? :o: |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
I wonder if something similar could be used to setup a webpage that could detect if a browser request was being hijacked by an ISP's Phorm server? (I mean, Phorm repeatedly redirecting the request and forging cookies rather than it's ad server substituting adverts onto target webpages.) All those of us who've sent in DPA notices will need a verifiable way to check that VM *aren't* processing our data! |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
I have a much simpler method of making a web tripwire. With the beauty of AJAX it should be simple enough to generate an MD5 checksum for each individual web page then use AJAX to check if the page matches the MD5 checksum when it arrives at the users browser. If it doesn't match, simply place a HUGE RED "YOU ARE BEING SPIED ON!" banner at the top of the page :)
In fact it should be possible to create a firefox extension/addon to do it. Alexander Hanff ---------- Post added at 11:43 ---------- Previous post was at 11:38 ---------- On a side note, I slept soooooooooooo fine last night so I am nice and refreshed. I think I came up with an angle for the UK version of Computer Misuse Act 1990 in one of my dreams, I will be adding it to my article this afternoon. (Yes I actually dream about Phorm, I will do my penance later) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:27. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.