Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
And one more makes a 1000
Still quite slow here for 300k Mon, 9 Aug 2004 00:02:21 UTC 1st 128K took 6370 ms = 20576 Bytes/sec = approx 171 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 6760 ms = 19389 Bytes/sec = approx 161 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 6700 ms = 19563 Bytes/sec = approx 163 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 6310 ms = 20772 Bytes/sec = approx 173 kbits/sec Its as if the limiter is kicking in too much.. now ive got.. Mon, 9 Aug 2004 00:07:16 UTC 1st 128K took 3620 ms = 36208 Bytes/sec = approx 301 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 3630 ms = 36108 Bytes/sec = approx 300 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 6320 ms = 20739 Bytes/sec = approx 173 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 6310 ms = 20772 Bytes/sec = approx 173 kbits/sec Traceroutes and ping are good.. 1 10 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.***.*.* 2 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms oldh-t2cam1-b-ge-wan42-112. 4.177] 3 8 ms 10 ms 10 ms mant-t2core-b-ge-wan64.inet .181] 4 11 ms 10 ms 9 ms man-bb-b-so-130-0.inet.ntl. 5 14 ms 16 ms 14 ms win-bb-a-so-300-0.inet.ntl. 6 16 ms 18 ms 16 ms gfd-bb-b-so-500-0.inet.ntl. 7 34 ms 23 ms 30 ms tele-ic-2-so-100-0.inet.ntl 8 19 ms 16 ms 17 ms 212.58.239.217 9 16 ms 16 ms 17 ms 212.58.238.129 10 16 ms 17 ms 21 ms 212.58.238.33 11 19 ms 18 ms 20 ms pos6-0.rt1.mh.bbc.co.uk [21 :p: |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Rebooted etc and got
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 10:11:12 UTC 1st 128K took 3840 ms = 34133 Bytes/sec = approx 284 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 3850 ms = 34045 Bytes/sec = approx 283 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 3890 ms = 33695 Bytes/sec = approx 280 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 3900 ms = 33608 Bytes/sec = approx 280 kbits/sec Any one know if that is upgraded or not? lol |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 10:22:32 UTC
1st 128K took 313 ms = 418760 Bytes/sec = approx 3484 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 578 ms = 226768 Bytes/sec = approx 1887 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 437 ms = 299936 Bytes/sec = approx 2495 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 703 ms = 186447 Bytes/sec = approx 1551 kbits/sec sorry folks :( work connection. i wish i had this at home . cheers big sinky |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
The reason I was asking Stu is because on a good day I was getting those speeds through my STB any way before any upgrade :erm: |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
STB speed change is 256k to 300k as the original cap was set (deliberately) too high. Hence you shouldn't notice all that much difference.
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Just phoned NTL Tech Support as my service went from 600 to 750 then back to 600k last week, they checked my modem config files and said that they had put up the speed but taken it back down to local area problems. Interesting! Anyone else in Derby experienced this? I actually thought that Derby was connected as part of the Nottingham network? Can someone set me straight on that?
Cheers |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
I'm in Hitchin as well (I think someone else in the thread said they were too) and I haven't received the upgrade.
I first did the postcode checker on the 1st August and they said it would "Your service is due to be upgraded during the month of August". I tried again on 2nd August and it now says "Congratulations your service has been upgraded. SG4 *** was upgraded in August." Surely this means that I should have had the new config file? I've rebooted the modem every day since the 2nd and nothing has happened, even tried a few times at 1-1:30am and nothing, still on 600k. DocsDiag says "QoS max downstream bandwidth = 600000bps" and "Configuration filename: tntlhm120-silver.cm", all indicating that I'm still on 600kbps and on a temporary config file. Anyone got any idea what I can do? I called ntl's broadband support line this morning and got told that there was nothing they could do to tell me whether I'd been done or not, because "our computers won't get that information until September." Great ntl, just great. |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Does anyone know when the 1Meg STB customers in bromley are due to be upgraded. I already have the Samsung STB.
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
where is the config file! i dont see it when i got to the modem page thingy! but do get the Maximum Downstream Data Rate : 1024000 bps Maximum Upstream Data Rate : 256000 bps stuff on the page which means no quicker for me at the moment.
I live near Hitchin mate (shefford) and seen no increase as yet! Using the postcode tracker it says that my area is already upgraded!! Does this mean i have a duff modem or sumin? |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
You know I can't help feeling the poll that has been added to this thread is not helping in any way.It seems to have added to the sense of impatience that has increased since the 2nd of August. :(
Incog. |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Not being funny but NTL are working hard from what i hear and are having issues so they will be giving you a upgrade very soon, i was lucky and got mine but i have mates in other areas who don't and moaning wont get you it any quicker, sorry to be harsh.
As for NTL they was swift in when they replaced our STB ( i use a cable modem stand alone to connection ) to provide a new tv keyboard as our exisiting one did not work, I am impressed good work. :beer: have one on me NTL |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Anyone in Rochdale should be done I was on 2nd August and same for Oldham and heywood?
Anyone not done in them areas? |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Yeah, sg17,but no upgrade, will contact them tomorrow to set what is happening!!
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Swindon done at last!.Just logged on and found I'm now upgraded to 300k.
WHOOPEE :) :) The postcode checker still says September!? |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
I rang them to say that I'd not been upgraded and I got fobbed off - if they give you anything better then I'll call them again!
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Nikko,
I'm connected via a SACM. Yes, we are ex-C&W - should this make a difference to the upgrade? Timmy P. |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
Just wondering has all of Manchester, Rochdale, Bury and Oldham been upgraded? if so would that mean that the new modem files could be sent out for the 1.5meg stb service? |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Calm down people. Not everyone is due to get the upgrade straight away. There are still 20 days left in august!
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
I'm in the SN3 area. |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
But when it says the upgrade's been done, and in fact it hasn't...
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:33:55 UTC
1st 128K took 1452 ms = 90270 Bytes/sec = approx 751 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 1452 ms = 90270 Bytes/sec = approx 751 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 1462 ms = 89653 Bytes/sec = approx 746 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 1462 ms = 89653 Bytes/sec = approx 746 kbits/sec done here im swindon too:D |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
1st 128K took 3406 ms = 38483 Bytes/sec = approx 320 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 3641 ms = 35999 Bytes/sec = approx 300 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 3640 ms = 36009 Bytes/sec = approx 300 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 3516 ms = 37279 Bytes/sec = approx 310 kbits/sec I'm SN2 and everything seems fine |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Any one in Luton been upgraded yet?...
I needs it... I wants my upgrade... My precious... :banghead: |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
It's interesting how everyone on the Luton UBRs seems not to have been upgraded - at least it's not just me :)
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Im in London Colney, and am on the Luton Proxy, and have been upgraded to 1.5
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:45:41 UTC 1st 128K took 651 ms = 201339 Bytes/sec = approx 1675 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 711 ms = 184349 Bytes/sec = approx 1534 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 711 ms = 184349 Bytes/sec = approx 1534 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 701 ms = 186979 Bytes/sec = approx 1556 kbits/sec |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Cyclone - have you had to reboot your modem to get the improved speed?
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Im in Hemel Hempstead and have a Luton IP Address and Ive also been upgraded :)
Heres my speeds (leeching at same time tho a little, hence not full speed) Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:32:34 UTC 1st 128K took 1092 ms = 120029 Bytes/sec = approx 999 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 761 ms = 172237 Bytes/sec = approx 1433 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 771 ms = 170003 Bytes/sec = approx 1414 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 931 ms = 140786 Bytes/sec = approx 1171 kbits/sec |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
staffords done
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:36:40 UTC 1st 128K took 711 ms = 184349 Bytes/sec = approx 1534 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 711 ms = 184349 Bytes/sec = approx 1534 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 711 ms = 184349 Bytes/sec = approx 1534 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 711 ms = 184349 Bytes/sec = approx 1534 kbits/sec |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
While i admit 500k for £3+ is a bargain, my connection has been terrible since the upgrade.
Its constant for a while, then its up and down like my 1meg never was. |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
I am just amazed in the variation of upgrade speeds from 128K
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Maybe it's just people on SG postcodes then...?
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
I have a STB and IMb connection. Apparently NTL have to change my STB before I can get the 1.5Mb speed.
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
My wife has just informed me that she came home to find a card through the door saying that the engineer had come to swap our STB for the Samsung one.
What happened to my phone call to arrange an appointment then NTL? Sigh! :rolleyes: |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Has anyone with a STB been upgraded yet? I've got a Samsung and the postcode chescker is now reporting that the upgrade is done. After a re-boot stilll on 1Mb though, although the postcode checker has only just changed in the last couple of hours so maybe it will take some time to come through or is it a case of waiting till Sep 1st still?
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Congratulations your service has been upgraded. HG2 7DN was upgraded in August.
--- 1Mb via Samsung STB - not upgraded yet though. |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
The checker does state about if your a 1 meg STB customer then ntl will be in touch blah blah blah... (<- goes to reboot STB just in case though !!) |
speed dropping in da1 area
I had my new set top box installed 2weeks ago and now via the ntl web site speedupgrade understand that the 1.5meg is now available in this area. I checked my speed tonight (wednesday) and its only 813kb/s, phoned the tchnical helpline, waited for 20 minutes to speak to an engineer only to be told that the 1.5mb upgrade for stb has been delayed untill october.
anyone else having problems with ntl giving out false information mandrake |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Mine states that mine was upgraded in August.....1meg customer with a new samsung box and still on 1meg.....
OT i know but whats CAK Callback Connection Failure all about?? its in the event log on the box, never had this with the pace ones |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Mine states that I was upgraded in August as well.....do these figures look like upgraded speeds to anyone? :confused:
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
im on a 600k service through a STB and am getting about 702k
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
It also says that I'm already upgraded, I'm not though (stoke). I've rebooted my SACM and left it off for an hour also, it's status page still say 6000bps download though:(
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
It's good to know other people are affected. Hopefully NTL will get round to us soon.
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Well according to the Postcode checker I'm supposed to have been upgraded today.
Does this look like I've been upgraded? Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:57:01 UTC 1st 128K took 4230 ms = 30986 Bytes/sec = approx 258 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 6540 ms = 20042 Bytes/sec = approx 167 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 6310 ms = 20772 Bytes/sec = approx 173 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 4840 ms = 27081 Bytes/sec = approx 225 kbits/sec Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:58:07 UTC 1st 128K took 12690 ms = 10329 Bytes/sec = approx 86 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 3790 ms = 34584 Bytes/sec = approx 288 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 9390 ms = 13959 Bytes/sec = approx 116 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 17910 ms = 7318 Bytes/sec = approx 61 kbits/sec Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:01:40 UTC 1st 128K took 15540 ms = 8434 Bytes/sec = approx 70 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 18680 ms = 7017 Bytes/sec = approx 58 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 3680 ms = 35617 Bytes/sec = approx 296 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 9500 ms = 13797 Bytes/sec = approx 115 kbits/sec Incog. |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Yeah, apparantly I've been upgraded too!! Whatever NTL, they can't even get this right.
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Mind using the old blueyonder BB speed test I get this
Speed Test Report Broadband Speed Test - for ntl:World - 128k service By Daniel Elwell ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ These results are only a snapshot of this particular moment. They are dependant on any other Internet use on this computer and any delays on the Internet. To improve accuracy, run the test several times. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 1: General Ping Results A Ping test is the time taken for a server to reply to a request ntl:World Server: 14ms - Excellent - better than expected UK Server 1 (www.demon.net): 0ms - *** PING timed out *** Tracert to specified location: Tracing route to 194.159.254.213 over a maximum of 20 hops 1 13 ms <10 ms 14 ms 10.67.64.1 2 13 ms <10 ms 14 ms 80.3.162.161 3 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms 80.3.161.133 4 <10 ms 27 ms 14 ms 62.253.188.253 5 13 ms 14 ms 14 ms 62.253.185.74 6 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms 195.66.226.12 7 14 ms 14 ms <10 ms 194.159.36.233 8 * * * Request timed out. 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 * * * Request timed out. 11 * * * Request timed out. 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 * * * Request timed out. 14 * * * Request timed out. 15 * * * Request timed out. 16 * * * Request timed out. 17 * * * Request timed out. 18 * * * Request timed out. 19 * * * Request timed out. 20 * * * Request timed out. Trace complete. UK Server 2 (www.bbc.co.uk): 0ms - *** PING timed out *** Tracert to specified location: Tracing route to 194.159.254.213 over a maximum of 20 hops 1 13 ms <10 ms 14 ms 10.67.64.1 2 13 ms <10 ms 14 ms 80.3.162.161 3 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms 80.3.161.133 4 <10 ms 27 ms 14 ms 62.253.188.253 5 13 ms 14 ms 14 ms 62.253.185.74 6 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms 195.66.226.12 7 14 ms 14 ms <10 ms 194.159.36.233 8 * * * Request timed out. 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 * * * Request timed out. 11 * * * Request timed out. 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 * * * Request timed out. 14 * * * Request timed out. 15 * * * Request timed out. 16 * * * Request timed out. 17 * * * Request timed out. 18 * * * Request timed out. 19 * * * Request timed out. 20 * * * Request timed out. Trace complete. UK Server 3 (www.ic24.net): 14ms - Excellent - better than expected USA East Coast Server (www.yahoo.com): 0ms - *** PING timed out *** Tracert to specified location: Tracing route to 64.58.76.176 over a maximum of 20 hops 1 13 ms <10 ms 14 ms 10.67.64.1 2 13 ms 14 ms <10 ms 80.3.162.161 3 13 ms 14 ms <10 ms 80.3.161.133 4 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms 62.253.188.253 5 14 ms <10 ms <10 ms 166.63.211.149 6 96 ms 82 ms 83 ms 195.2.1.3 7 82 ms 83 ms 82 ms 206.24.207.17 8 96 ms 82 ms 97 ms 206.24.226.99 9 206.24.227.106 reports: Destination host unreachable. Trace complete. USA West Coast Server (www.lycos.com): 0ms - *** PING timed out *** Tracert to specified location: Tracing route to 209.202.192.26 over a maximum of 20 hops 1 41 ms 55 ms 42 ms 10.67.64.1 2 <10 ms 14 ms * 80.3.162.33 3 13 ms 14 ms 14 ms 80.3.161.5 4 <10 ms 14 ms 14 ms 62.253.188.249 5 27 ms 14 ms 13 ms 166.63.161.229 6 14 ms 14 ms <10 ms 166.63.209.205 7 82 ms 83 ms 96 ms 195.2.1.3 8 82 ms 83 ms 82 ms 206.24.207.17 9 82 ms 83 ms 83 ms 208.172.50.61 10 208.172.51.58 reports: Destination host unreachable. Trace complete. European Server (www.marcopoly.com): 17ms - Excellent - better than expected ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 2: Custom Server Ping Results These results are to four user-definable servers. Blueyonder Counter-Strike 1: 0ms - *** PING timed out *** Tracert to specified location: Tracing route to 194.117.138.249 over a maximum of 20 hops 1 41 ms 14 ms <10 ms 10.67.64.1 2 14 ms <10 ms <10 ms 80.3.162.161 3 14 ms <10 ms <10 ms 80.3.161.133 4 14 ms 14 ms 13 ms 62.253.188.253 5 <10 ms 14 ms 13 ms 213.105.172.5 6 14 ms 14 ms 13 ms 62.253.185.78 7 194.117.147.69 reports: Destination host unreachable. Trace complete. Blueyonder Team-Fortress Leage 1: 0ms - *** PING timed out *** Tracert to specified location: Tracing route to 194.117.138.225 over a maximum of 20 hops 1 14 ms <10 ms 14 ms 10.67.64.1 2 14 ms 14 ms <10 ms 80.3.162.161 3 14 ms 14 ms <10 ms 80.3.161.133 4 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms 62.253.188.253 5 14 ms <10 ms 13 ms 213.105.172.5 6 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms 62.253.185.78 7 194.117.147.69 reports: Destination host unreachable. Trace complete. BarrysWorld Master Server (all games): 0ms - *** PING timed out *** Tracert to specified location: Tracing route to 213.221.174.165 over a maximum of 20 hops 1 14 ms 14 ms <10 ms 10.67.64.1 2 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms 80.3.162.33 3 <10 ms 13 ms 14 ms 80.3.161.5 4 <10 ms 14 ms 13 ms 62.253.188.249 5 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms 213.105.172.130 6 <10 ms 13 ms 14 ms 213.105.172.5 7 13 ms 14 ms <10 ms 62.253.185.78 8 * * * Request timed out. 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 * * * Request timed out. 11 * * * Request timed out. 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 * * * Request timed out. 14 * * * Request timed out. 15 * * * Request timed out. 16 * * * Request timed out. 17 * * * Request timed out. 18 * * * Request timed out. 19 * * * Request timed out. 20 * * * Request timed out. Trace complete. Barrysworld Quake III Arena: 0ms - *** PING timed out *** Tracert to specified location: Tracing route to 213.221.176.6 over a maximum of 20 hops 1 <10 ms <10 ms 13 ms 10.67.64.1 2 14 ms <10 ms 14 ms 80.3.162.33 3 14 ms 14 ms <10 ms 80.3.161.5 4 14 ms 14 ms 13 ms 62.253.188.249 5 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms 213.105.172.130 6 <10 ms <10 ms 14 ms 213.105.172.5 7 13 ms 14 ms 14 ms 62.253.185.78 8 * * * Request timed out. 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 * * * Request timed out. 11 * * * Request timed out. 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 * * * Request timed out. 14 * * * Request timed out. 15 * * * Request timed out. 16 * * * Request timed out. 17 * * * Request timed out. 18 * * * Request timed out. 19 * * * Request timed out. 20 * * * Request timed out. Trace complete. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 3: Download Speed Results Three downloads are tested; one from one of your ISPs servers, one through your Transparent Cache and one through an alterntive cache. This will give you an idea of how capable your connection is. Note: You should take the highest download speed into account. ntl:World - 128k service Server Download: 31KB/s (248Kb/s) - Superb - much higher than expected Download through Transparent Cache: 28KB/s (224Kb/s) - Superb - much higher than expected Download through alternative Cache (webcache.bt.net): 0KB/s (0Kb/s) - **** SERVER ERROR: Unexpected error from Server**** ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 4: Packet Loss 50 Ping Requests are sent to your server. The packet loss is measured by how many of the packets don't bounce back to the client. High packet loss may slow down your connection. 50 packets were sent, 46 bounced back; 8% loss (estimated) Normal - to be expected ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 5: Transparent Cache Page Fetch Time This test times how long your Transparent Cache takes to fetch a page from the Internet. Please note that this test is subject to many different parameters and sometimes may not be 100% accurate. This test can be used to show delays when trying to view Internet sites. The timing takes place from the moment the request for the file is sent to the moment the proxy server responds. Average time taken to retrieve a page: 0ms - At least one of the pages requested failed to download. This may indicate problems with your Webcache. Run the test again to confirm this. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Test Statistics: Information on the test Time and Date: 12/08/2004 00:19:51 Test duration: 374 seconds IP address: <removed> Username: [Not disclosed] Test Version: 2.81 Broadband Speed Test - www.vantage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
[Incog - I've removed your IP from the results, & also done a bit of tidying to the text formatting (as it messed the page up) & removed a couple of unneccessary bits...actually, the ping & tracert bits aren't really needed either...]
Quote:
Looks better than with the other test (well, for consistency...no wildly varying numbers...although it is only a couple of results) :) But it's still not quite 300k. The 3rd one only has an error because the test tried to use the BT webcache. The cache can be changed in the speed test settings to whatever you want (e.g. an ntl cache). |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
What time during the night do NTL normally do their upgrade work?
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Cable Modem Information
Maximum Downstream Data Rate : 1024000Maximum Upstream Data Rate : 256000 http://www.ntlworld.com/data-feeds/e...de/checker.php Congratulations your service has been upgraded. BB3 1JF was upgraded in August. It's not, someone as not got it right. Regards Mark |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Give NTL tech a ring, I'm in the same boat, it'll be interesting to see what they say.
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Fair point Darthyoda, but surely if the checker has changed to say you've been upgraded they've got reasoning to do so? They wouldnt just change it for the sake of it surely?
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
This is what I've been trying to say since the beginning - OK, if the checker says you're due to be done then you'd have no cause to call. Surely if it says you've actually BEEN done and you haven't then you ought to tell them, purely because it'll alert them to the fact that people have "slipped through the net" as it were.
I'm going to call NTL tech support again and tell them, hopefully this time I won't get some disinterested Geordie bird who doesn't have a clue what she's on about... |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
I have rung NTL Tech Support again this morning, who's response was:
"Your due to be done in August, the checker is probably ahead of itself by a few days." Thats no joke. Can you believe what sort of things they'll fob you off with!! Shocking!! |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
I spoke to an online advisor called Jason the other day who said much the same thing - although he knew the speed upgrades were being done, he didn't know what department was responsible for them and so didn't know who to talk to about problems with them.
Typical ntl, a communications company that can't communicate... |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
I told them that I was upgraded last week and it has since dropped back down, they said there were tech difficulties in the area. Surely though the postcode checker should say it's not been done, its gotta be linked to database?
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Worth rebooting your CM to see if you've been upgraded but not rebooted. Particularly if you're in a Bromley area and still aren't on the new speed, except for 1Mb STB customers. Everyone else on Bromley should be done, apparently.
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Yeah cheers BBKing. Running at full 750k now! So tempted by 1.5mb......
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
think mine has just been done, i was on the net, and the modem.. u/s sync and rdy lights went out for about 20-30 min, when they came back on had to reboot, and it seems i`m faster on the web now.. 45sec for a 2.2mb file.
i was on 150kbs |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Just rebooted and....
Maximum Downstream Data Rate : 1536000 /me very happy now :D |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
1 Attachment(s)
It seems that ntlhell's speed test has problems with detecting how fast my connection is...
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Can anyone who is on the 1.5MB service tell me if it's worth getting instead of the 750K service I am on at present. Is their a major difference in surfing and dowloaded files. I am tempted to go for the 1.5MB service just to get one of them new samsung boxes :) Still got an old PACE box that's starting to show it's age.
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
So what is actually going on with the upstream, because I love my BitTorrent and ??I would love for the extra upstream on-top of the downstream, because then I can get more mmppphhh!!!! :-)
Also, my friend just down the road from me who uses 150 has already been upgraded to 300, but me with my 1Mb is not yet running at 1.5Mb. Whats going on there? Richard Green ;) |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
The postcode checker now informs me that 'congratulations my speed has been increased' but it hasn't - I'm still on 1mb, I've tried rebooting but no change.
Samsung STB. :( Ian |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
I would assume it's the latter. Although, this being NTL, I could be wrong... :D |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
OK thanks, the postcode checker is a bit misleading then, its probably going to generate a lot of uneccesary calls to support.
Thanks for the info. Ian |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Apologies if this has been raised before (don't want to check by wading through 70 odd pages of posts!) but does anyone wknow why us 600k customers are only getting a 25% increase in speed when everyone else is getting either a 50% increase (1MB customers) or even 100% (300k users) ?
I'm just being greedy but I would have thought I deserve upping to 900k at least !!! |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Two possible answers
1 - because thats what Telewest did 2 - thinking of Telewests intentions, the 750k lifts it a clear 50ish% above your DSL BB speed, so while you are only getting a 25% uplift you will be downloading 50% faster than the competition. At 900k they may well need to look at upgrading the upstream speed to cope with the ACK packets and it would probably result in a lot more downgrades from the 1.5 M package. |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
thanks. OH and im in bedford, no upgrade yet :( |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Well i just got broadband 300 kb service and getting 35 to 40 kb a sec on downloads so im happy :D
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/kb/9/how...my-cable-modem |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
:p:
Just wondering but 90% of the time i get 1534 for the test, if theres an offset it usually is 1556, but ive done multiple over the day and its all like that....might my area be undersubscribed to ntl...if there could be such a phrase? Sorry if this seems a bit pointless...just wondering. |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
No 1.5 MB speed for me till November :(
http://www.ntlworld.com/data-feeds/e...sites/upgrade/ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:35. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.