Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Post-Brexit Thread (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33703180)

martyh 24-06-2016 11:09

Post-Brexit Thread
 
We could simply withdraw by repealing the 1972 European Communities Act and negotiate with the separate nations ,or we could use Article 50 and let the EU dictate the timetable .Since there is no precedent it is unclear how Article 50 will actually work and with Cameron resigning we may end up with a leader that doesn't favour using Article 50 to leave the EU

Damien 24-06-2016 11:40

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
I think we'll end up with a Norway style deal or won't invoke it

Anypermitedroute 24-06-2016 11:41

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
or rebadge EU as the Commonwealth of Europe, suggests it has reformed and join that instead

papa smurf 24-06-2016 12:11

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
its a two year process [i believe] so i see no point in delaying invoking article 50 why put off until tomorrow what you can do today ,i think a delay gives the opportunity for undemocratic and unethical practices to be invoked ,cameron said[promised] he would do it he should do it or go now.

martyh 24-06-2016 12:31

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35845158)
its a two year process [i believe] so i see no point in delaying invoking article 50 why put off until tomorrow what you can do today ,i think a delay gives the opportunity for undemocratic and unethical practices to be invoked ,cameron said[promised] he would do it he should do it or go now.

It's not a question of putting anything off ,it's whether we should use Article 50 to exit the EU .Only the EU say we have to use it ,it is for their benefit not ours ,we could in theory simply change our own laws and then begin negotiations with other countries

RizzyKing 24-06-2016 12:43

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
I think constructively we should use article 50 it means negotiations are for both sides I don't think now is the time to just withdraw this vote has shocked everyone article 50 gives everyone and everything time to calm down and regain some perspective. I do think article 50 should be implemented within two weeks maximum delaying it serves no purpose and if we can't resolve the various issues within two years more time is unlikely to deliver results.

papa smurf 24-06-2016 13:04

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35845175)
It's not a question of putting anything off ,it's whether we should use Article 50 to exit the EU .Only the EU say we have to use it ,it is for their benefit not ours ,we could in theory simply change our own laws and then begin negotiations with other countries

why antagonise the EU there is a mechanism in place to facilitate our exit we should use it ,we should part on good terms .

jamiefrost 24-06-2016 13:10

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35845175)
It's not a question of putting anything off ,it's whether we should use Article 50 to exit the EU .Only the EU say we have to use it ,it is for their benefit not ours ,we could in theory simply change our own laws and then begin negotiations with other countries

If we just leave would we not have trade with all other countries as per the WTO rules and then we would have to negotiate with each individual country while trading under those rules.

J

martyh 24-06-2016 13:14

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35845189)
why antagonise the EU there is a mechanism in place to facilitate our exit we should use it ,we should part on good terms .

The mechanism is skewed in their favour and is not designed for use as a bargaining tool .The whole idea of having the referendum is to take back control so it's rather ironic that to take back control we give up all the control to the other 27 nations ,and if we didn't want to antagonise the EU we shouldn't have held a referendum that effectively says their rules and regulations are complete bollocks and we don't want them

---------- Post added at 13:14 ---------- Previous post was at 13:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamiefrost (Post 35845196)
If we just leave would we not have trade with all other countries as per the WTO rules and then we would have to negotiate with each individual country while trading under those rules.

J

I believe that is the case .We would have to trade like most of the world does

papa smurf 24-06-2016 13:30

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35845197)
The mechanism is skewed in their favour and is not designed for use as a bargaining tool .The whole idea of having the referendum is to take back control so it's rather ironic that to take back control we give up all the control to the other 27 nations ,and if we didn't want to antagonise the EU we shouldn't have held a referendum that effectively says their rules and regulations are complete bollocks and we don't want them

---------- Post added at 13:14 ---------- Previous post was at 13:12 ----------



I believe that is the case .We would have to trade like most of the world does

sorry my mistake- i thought you started a debate Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?

techguyone 24-06-2016 13:38

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
We should - but not until the Govt leadership is concluded.

Why?

we'll lose 3 or so months to no effect as we're now effectively leaderless. It won't hurt to wait a bit, not everything in life needs to be a knee jerk snap reaction.

Chris 24-06-2016 13:44

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35845175)
It's not a question of putting anything off ,it's whether we should use Article 50 to exit the EU .Only the EU say we have to use it ,it is for their benefit not ours ,we could in theory simply change our own laws and then begin negotiations with other countries

To be fair, it's not the orders of the EU, it's Article 50 of a treaty we are signatories to.

We will use the exit mechanism, because that's what it's there for. It's just a matter of when, and I think waiting until we have a new PM is sensible.

There is no rush. We need to get this right.

Osem 24-06-2016 13:54

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by techguyone (Post 35845210)
We should - but not until the Govt leadership is concluded.

Why?

we'll lose 3 or so months to no effect as we're now effectively leaderless. It won't hurt to wait a bit, not everything in life needs to be a knee jerk snap reaction.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35845212)
To be fair, it's not the orders of the EU, it's Article 50 of a treaty we are signatories to.

We will use the exit mechanism, because that's what it's there for. It's just a matter of when, and I think waiting until we have a new PM is sensible.

There is no rush. We need to get this right.

That's exactly what's required. We may live in an age when folks get upset when their phone takes more than a nanosecond to send a message around the globe but this is a time for reflection, to let the dust settle, lets the emotions calm down and then proceed in an orderly fashion.

That's what I expect from leaders in the UK and the EU and if they have any sense that's what will happen.

martyh 24-06-2016 14:32

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35845207)
sorry my mistake- i thought you started a debate Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?

Yes i did ,that doesn't mean i have to agree with you .The problem with Article 50 is that once it is started it cannot be stopped regardless of whether we approve of negotiations or not .As Chris just said first we need a new PM and than their first decision is how to exit the EU that best serves the UK not the remaining 27 nations.If that means using Article 50 then so be it, but there are other alternatives

Stuart 24-06-2016 14:41

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35845158)
its a two year process [i believe] so i see no point in delaying invoking article 50 why put off until tomorrow what you can do today ,i think a delay gives the opportunity for undemocratic and unethical practices to be invoked ,cameron said[promised] he would do it he should do it or go now.

Depends what they are planning. I've seen some people suggesting that this attempt to leave the EU is an attempt to get better terms for rejoining the EU. This is a possibility if they don't invoke Article 50. If they invoke Article 50, if my understanding is correct, there will be no option to rejoin the EU.

Do I think the government will rejoin the EU under any circumstances? I don't know. Most of Parliament appear to want us to have stayed in the EU, so maybe they will. The MPs that wanted to leave won't, I don't think they will, although several of them have shown they are perfectly willing to change allegiances (Bo-Jo being the major one).

martyh 24-06-2016 14:46

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35845228)
Depends what they are planning. I've seen some people suggesting that this attempt to leave the EU is an attempt to get better terms for rejoining the EU. This is a possibility if they don't invoke Article 50. If they invoke Article 50, if my understanding is correct, there will be no option to rejoin the EU.

Do I think the government will rejoin the EU under any circumstances? I don't know. Most of Parliament appear to want us to have stayed in the EU, so maybe they will. The MPs that wanted to leave won't, I don't think they will, although several of them have shown they are perfectly willing to change allegiances (Bo-Jo being the major one).

It may be that us leaving starts a domino effect and that in turn forces the EU into re winding to something more akin to the old EEC which we would probably want to be part of and as you say invoking Article 50 would preclude that

papa smurf 24-06-2016 14:55

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35845228)
Depends what they are planning. I've seen some people suggesting that this attempt to leave the EU is an attempt to get better terms for rejoining the EU. This is a possibility if they don't invoke Article 50. If they invoke Article 50, if my understanding is correct, there will be no option to rejoin the EU.

Do I think the government will rejoin the EU under any circumstances? I don't know. Most of Parliament appear to want us to have stayed in the EU, so maybe they will. The MPs that wanted to leave won't, I don't think they will, although several of them have shown they are perfectly willing to change allegiances (Bo-Jo being the major one).

i cant imagine wanting to rejoin its broken every one knows its broken i think other country's will follow our lead to the point where the whole thing collapses

Pierre 24-06-2016 20:09

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845144)
I think we'll end up with a Norway style deal or won't invoke it

Why would we want a Norway deal?

Damien 24-06-2016 20:14

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35845330)
Why would we want a Norway deal?

Access to the single market.

RBMark 24-06-2016 20:17

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845334)
Access to the single market.

If the EU wants access to our market, then they will let us have access to theirs. Do you really think Merkel wants to tell VW they just lost their second biggest market for cars worth €billions a year?

Or BMW they can't sell in the UK? Or Adidas? Etc etc? It's a 2 way street! Leaders of German industry have made it very clear they want the UK to keep its free trade agreements. An as Germany is a democracy then all will be fine

I mean if we can't buy VW's or BMW's then sales of none EU made cars will rise. We will still buy cars, just not german cars! That's a lot of trade for Germany to say goodbye to.

Damien 24-06-2016 20:29

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RBMark (Post 35845338)
If the EU wants access to our market, then they will let us have access to theirs. Do you really think Merkel wants to tell VW they just lost their second biggest market for cars worth €billions a year?

Or BMW they can't sell in the UK? Or Adidas? Etc etc? It's a 2 way street! Leaders of German industry have made it very clear they want the UK to keep its free trade agreements. An as Germany is a democracy then all will be fine

I mean if we can't buy VW's or BMW's then sales of none EU made cars will rise. We will still buy cars, just not german cars! That's a lot of trade for Germany to say goodbye to.

Yes we get access to each others markets but with freedom of movement. By the way the EU is much bigger than us in terms of GDP and addressable market so the advantage is theirs.

Pierre 24-06-2016 20:32

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845334)
Access to the single market.

Norway have accept free movement of people, agree to the Schengen Zone, and pay a comparable amount per head of population into the EU coffers.

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/35...-post2354.html

Norway is not the model we want or we might as well of stayed in the EU.

martyh 24-06-2016 20:40

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845341)
Yes we get access to each others markets but with freedom of movement. By the way the EU is much bigger than us in terms of GDP and addressable market so the advantage is theirs.

What's with this entrenched idea that we must have freedom of movement to access the single market .Australia ,japan and the US all benefit from the single market and do not have to have to allow all EU citizens into their countries.

Damien 24-06-2016 20:48

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35845343)
Norway have accept free movement of people, agree to the Schengen Zone, and pay a comparable amount per head of population into the EU coffers.

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/35...-post2354.html

Norway is not the model we want or we might as well of stayed in the EU.

Yes. There will be downsides.

---------- Post added at 20:48 ---------- Previous post was at 20:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35845347)
What's with this entrenched idea that we must have freedom of movement to access the single market .Australia ,japan and the US all benefit from the single market and do not have to have to allow all EU citizens into their countries.

They don't have a single market. :confused:

Pierre 24-06-2016 21:02

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35845347)
What's with this entrenched idea that we must have freedom of movement to access the single market .Australia ,japan and the US all benefit from the single market and do not have to have to allow all EU citizens into their countries.

A single market is not the same as a free trade agreement.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36083664

RBMark 24-06-2016 21:02

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845341)
Yes we get access to each others markets but with freedom of movement. By the way the EU is much bigger than us in terms of GDP and addressable market so the advantage is theirs.

Yes but Germany get hurt if we stop buying German goods, Germany won't like that. So you understand, as whole the EU thinks it's all powerful but as each member state realises what it's going to lose if it doesn't trade with the U.K. Then then EC will be under pressure from members who are about to lose BILLIONS in UK trade.

An we are a rich country, you won't replace customers as wealthy as us very easily! Have some pride and belief in your amazing country!!! I believe the ball really is in our court.

Damien 24-06-2016 21:08

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RBMark (Post 35845357)
An we are a rich country, you won't replace customers as wealthy as us very easily! Have some pride and belief in your amazing country!!! I believe the ball really is in our court.

This is what terrifies me. No one has any plan at all.

Pierre 24-06-2016 21:08

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RBMark (Post 35845357)
Yes but Germany get hurt if we stop buying German goods, Germany won't like that. So you understand, as whole the EU thinks it's all powerful but as each member state realises what it's going to lose if it doesn't trade with the U.K. Then then EC will be under pressure from members who are about to lose BILLIONS in UK trade.

An we are a rich country, you won't replace customers as wealthy as us very easily! Have some pride and belief in your amazing country!!! I believe the ball really is in our court.

Nobody is going to stop trading with nobody.

Damien 24-06-2016 21:10

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35845359)
Nobody is going to stop trading with nobody.

It's the nature of trade that is the issue. I.E Tariffs on services? We have a problem.

martyh 24-06-2016 21:16

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845353)

They don't have a single market. :confused:

They have access to it as do many other countries in the same way as we would want it and none of them have to have freedom of movement .We do not have to be a member of the single market to benefit from it

RBMark 24-06-2016 21:17

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845361)
It's the nature of trade that is the issue. I.E Tariffs on services? We have a problem.

We can add tariffs on their services, I'm not sure you understand just how massive the UK economy is. Somehow someone has eroded any faith or belief you have in your country. Let me tell you on behalf of 17plus million leave voters- you're going to be ok, we won't let you down, we won't leave you behind, we love you and we love Britain. It's going to be awkward and uncomfortable for a little while. Stick together work hard and we will be ok!

Pierre 24-06-2016 21:32

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35845363)
They have access to it as do many other countries

No they don't. They have a Trade Agreement not access to the single market.

There's a difference, look it up.

Osem 24-06-2016 21:36

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
I'm certain Aldi and Lidl will want to close all their UK stores immediately. All that UK growth and profit they're enjoying in this market won't be missed at all...

RBMark 24-06-2016 21:40

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35845371)
I'm certain Aldi and Lidl will want to close all their UK stores immediately. All that UK growth and profit they're enjoying in this market won't be missed at all...


:D:D:D:D Don't worry, if they do Tesco/ASDA/Sainsburys/Morrisons/Home Bargains etc will be happy to sell us their goods instead. As a market to sell to the UK is unmatched and irreplaceable.

Damien 24-06-2016 22:34

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
If Scotland gets another referendum I think they'll win it. They're getting a lot of support from previous No voters and one of the most Unionist papers in Scotland the last time around, The Daily Record, is backing another one this time.

RBMark 24-06-2016 22:37

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845377)
If Scotland gets another referendum I think they'll win it. They're getting a lot of support from previous No voters and one of the most Unionist papers in Scotland the last time around, The Daily Record, is backing another one this time.

I hope you do get your referendum, and millions and millions of Brexit Leave voters will congratulate whatever you decide. None of this nasty sour grapes you and your failed remainers have been dishing out!

adzii_nufc 24-06-2016 22:40

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
At least UKIP are essentially a dead party with Farage leading the way. Top bloke he is, getting caught telling fibs and being made to look like a tool. Who am I kidding, its hardly the first time he's told lies. Just hoping that one was the final nail. Absolute donkey of a bloke. Scares me anyone could actually think voting for a ****** like that would bring change.

'I never said that' - Nigel Farage "Since the beginning of time"
'Someone tried to assassinate me' 'But I was caught lying again..'

They should tag this next to his name every time he's on TV.

martyh 24-06-2016 22:46

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35845370)
No they don't. They have a Trade Agreement not access to the single market.

There's a difference, look it up.

Yes they do

Quote:

Every developed country has access to the single market. The EU has a relatively low external tariff with the exception of certain goods such as agriculture. The inconvenient truth is that non-members of the EU have often exploited the single market far more successfully than we have.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...ss-to-the-sin/

We do not need to be a member of the single market to have access ,look it up

Arthurgray50@blu 24-06-2016 22:47

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Can someone please explain this.

I was told today, that the country that is most worried is Poland, and the polish people that are here already.

Now that we have voted to get out of Europe. Surely that IF Polish residents are here. It wont effect them ?

Ignitionnet 24-06-2016 22:50

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RBMark (Post 35845372)
:D:D:D:D Don't worry, if they do Tesco/ASDA/Sainsburys/Morrisons/Home Bargains etc will be happy to sell us their goods instead. As a market to sell to the UK is unmatched and irreplaceable.

When you have some time do check the labels on various goods from those outlets.

See where things like ketchup and lemon juice in Asda, or Smash are made and processed. Maybe have a look at how much of the beef is Irish. We are connected to the EU in far more ways than the obvious. A ton of our goods go through the EU at some point in the supply chain.

As far as unmatched and irreplaceable are going you are joking, right? I would speculate the USA and China are somewhat larger markets, neither has a free trade deal with the EU or access to the common market.

The German car manufacturers will lobby Brussels hard, no question. They will also hit a lot of resistance. Bending the rules to accommodate us creates an existential issue for the EU. We don't match up as far as Germany's exporters go to the rest of the EU combined. We aren't irreplaceable, we aren't unmatched and we aren't greater than the rest of the EU combined.

If we go into negotiations with that frankly incredibly arrogant attitude we will leave with nothing. The EU would definitely love to have us trade freely with them, but not at any price.

---------- Post added at 22:50 ---------- Previous post was at 22:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845377)
If Scotland gets another referendum I think they'll win it. They're getting a lot of support from previous No voters and one of the most Unionist papers in Scotland the last time around, The Daily Record, is backing another one this time.

It won't be held until the SNP are quite sure they can win it, and there's not much that we can offer them to convince them to stay. Brexit has shown that dour economic arguments don't seem to carry much weight, and of course we aren't offering the status quo.

From their point of view both options carry risk. We at least previously had stability to offer them, and don't now.

adzii_nufc 24-06-2016 22:53

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Imagine if England won Euro 2016 now. You'd have to wonder what else is coming this year.

Is there any substance behind a company like Nissan closing its doors and putting ten thousand out of work when the UK does leave the EU and if any deals are just simply not good enough. Unsure of non EU exports.

Nissan constantly exports via Tyne dock around Europe I expect

Ignitionnet 24-06-2016 22:58

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RBMark (Post 35845364)
We can add tariffs on their services, I'm not sure you understand just how massive the UK economy is.

I don't think you understand how massively positive our balance of payments on services is with the EU.

You know, that same argument that keeps being used to claim the EU will be falling over themselves to have a free trade agreement over goods.

A large part of our services exported to the EU are financial ones. Even without tariffs there are barriers.

Passporting is a very, very big deal. We have extremely privileged access to the Eurozone's financial services markets.

---------- Post added at 22:58 ---------- Previous post was at 22:57 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by adzii_nufc (Post 35845386)
Is there any substance behind a company like Nissan closing its doors and putting ten thousand out of work when the UK does leave the EU and if any deals are just simply not good enough.

Yes. Why would you maintain manufacturing in a country that's pretty expensive to manufacture in anyway, along with having the products it produces be more expensive due to import tariffs when you can simply move the production to Eastern Europe, pay less to manufacture and pay no import tariffs?

adzii_nufc 24-06-2016 23:08

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35845388)
I don't think you understand how massively positive our balance of payments on services is with the EU.

You know, that same argument that keeps being used to claim the EU will be falling over themselves to have a free trade agreement over goods.

A large part of our services exported to the EU are financial ones. Even without tariffs there are barriers.

Passporting is a very, very big deal. We have extremely privileged access to the Eurozone's financial services markets.

---------- Post added at 22:58 ---------- Previous post was at 22:57 ----------



Yes. Why would you maintain manufacturing in a country that's pretty expensive to manufacture in anyway, along with having the products it produces be more expensive due to import tariffs when you can simply move the production to Eastern Europe, pay less to manufacture and pay no import tariffs?

When put like that it sounds like absolute madness that Sunderland got a landslide Leave vote. From this perspective I don't really understand a great lot but it appears they've potentially voted themselves out of jobs in a game of chance or hope etc. All I see is the word uncertainty being thrown all over. If it comes off and we do better they can celebrate but if it goes tits up then 'ah tough luck'

I honestly don't think people in said areas got enough information on the potential risks. I mean without some googling I would've been left with no information at all. I got that Cameron leaflet and that's about it. That only further adds to the argument that Remain made an arse of things.

Got posts flying around about some kid that voted leave because lulz.. Didn't expect it to happen. Absolute bell end.

I see a lot of 'we're going to negotiate this and that' but no guarantee that any of it will be any better if not worse than we already had.

RizzyKing 24-06-2016 23:08

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
It's not even been a day since the vote and remainers are calling for change and this and that while still slinging doom and gloom, are they really that dense to not understand that it was exactly that superior scaremongering attitude that cost them the vote. Nearly everyone I have spoken too including a few that voted remain have all criticised the remain campaign and even after polls showed it wasn't working they stuck with it and increased the scare mongering.

The UK is not unique or irreplaceable to the EU but pretending we're on the same level as Norway is ridiculous. We have long standing trade with many countries and company's within those countries and they weren't trading with us because we were a member of the EU they were trading because we could offer what they needed at the right price that hasn't changed and that's why business all over the EU is telling the politicians they want free trade to continue between the UK and the EU.

What happens next is going to take time and needs calm constructive people to negotiate it not knee jerk reactionaries. Remain need to accept the result and get behind the UK in making sure we get the best deal we can. As for the ludicrous assertion that it was "selfish over 50's" that swung this I am not over 50 nor is my wife and after looking into it I decided to vote leave not for me but for my kids and their future. Being selfish I'd have voted remain as for my personal circumstances remain was the safe bet but looking at the future and the likely economic troubles the EU will face I wasn't prepared to sign my kids up for that.

The UK is a great country with a great people and it not only has a future outside the EU but it has a good future being more involved in the whole world and a more secure future that will be a benefit. It's time for some people to stop talking this country down and continuing a failed campaign and accept the path that's been chosen.

Damien 24-06-2016 23:11

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RBMark (Post 35845379)
I hope you do get your referendum, and millions and millions of Brexit Leave voters will congratulate whatever you decide. None of this nasty sour grapes you and your failed remainers have been dishing out!

I am not Scottish nor do I live in Scotland. It isn't 'my' referendum. Also I have hardly been nasty.

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35845381)
Yes they do



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...ss-to-the-sin/

We do not need to be a member of the single market to have access ,look it up

They have access to it in terms of being able to trade with it but not being in it. Being inside is different. It means everyone can operate within a common system, regulatory framework, employment market and so on.

Ignitionnet 24-06-2016 23:13

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
I am behind the UK getting the best deal we can - it's EFTA-EEA membership. Access to the single market, free movement, but not the biggest bugbear for me and some others, political union.

As I think I wrote before that's probably as far as we should've gone all along. Our joining the EU fully was a mistake, acknowledged by both UK and EU.

Gavin78 24-06-2016 23:27

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Germany fears France, Austria, Finland, the Netherlands and Hungary may follow the UK and leave the EU, a government paper says.

The finance ministry strategy paper expresses concern that the UK's historic vote may trigger a Brexit domino effect across Europe, according to the German newspaper Die Welt.

It recommends that the EU enters into negotiations aimed at making the UK an "associated partner country" for the remaining 27 nations.

As it stands, the UK's exit may cause Germany's contribution to the EU's budget to rise by 3bn euros (£2.44bn) a year, the paper adds.


And there was me thinking if we left there was no deals at all from the EU leave was leave lol

Mick 25-06-2016 00:47

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Saw this posted in an Anti-EU FB group... Sums up my mood for the day entirely...

Quote:

A Prime Minister resigned. The £ plummeted. The FTSE 100 lost significant ground. But then the £ rallied past February levels, and the FTSE closed on a weekly high: 2.4% up on last Friday, its best performance in 4 months. President Obama decided we wouldn't be at the 'back of the queue' after all and that our 'special relationship' was still strong. The French President confirmed the Le Touquet agreement would stay in place. The President of the European Commission stated Brexit negations would be 'orderly' and stressed the UK would continue to be a 'close partner' of the EU. A big bank denied reports it would shift 2,000 staff overseas. The CBI, vehemently anti-Brexit during the referendum campaign, stated British business was resilient and would adapt. Several countries outside the EU stated they wished to begin bi-lateral trade talks with the UK immediately. If this was the predicted apocalypse, well, it was a very British one. It was all over by teatime. Not a bad first day of freedom.
By Warren Mitchell

RizzyKing 25-06-2016 02:25

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Yep there is far more optimism out there then some would like to admit too many people just cannot accept remain lost and won't be happy with anything less then then the reality of the doom and gloom predicted.

Anypermitedroute 25-06-2016 06:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35845382)
Can someone please explain this.

I was told today, that the country that is most worried is Poland, and the polish people that are here already.

Now that we have voted to get out of Europe. Surely that IF Polish residents are here. It wont effect them ?

Well, people from both sides have been suggesting they, along with all other EU nationals (Ireland included) by the Vienna convention

However, again this may not be accurate https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jun/22/will-europeans-be-free-to-stay-in-the-uk-after-brexit

From a personal point of view, my girlfriend is Austrian, has worked everyday here for 6 years, never used NHS and paid in and adapted to British life, hell she even has a season ticket for cricket with me.

And suddenly she feels rather unwelcome and to be honest I can't give her a good answer as to guarantee she is safe to remain here.

If suddenly she is made to go I would of course follow her to Austria but the flip side is as soon to be non-eu my once freedom of movement and right to work (and even travel to see her family) may not be allowed in Austria and why should they if we do the same to them

Thanks UK, thanks a bunch

Russ 25-06-2016 07:50

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35845402)
Saw this posted in an Anti-EU FB group... Sums up my mood for the day entirely...

:tu: Very good article that.

Another good point I read yesterday mentioned the fact that Remain voters were saying Leave supporters won it with a campaign of fear of what life would be like if we stay in the EU and as such the result was unfair. OK that's a pretty odd notion of 'unfair' as all political elections/referendums are fuelled by lies and BS however look at all the subsequent predictions of doom and gloom the Remainers have come out with over the past 24 hours....but of course, that's "different".

---------- Post added at 07:50 ---------- Previous post was at 07:42 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anypermitedroute (Post 35845408)
Well, people from both sides have been suggesting they, along with all other EU nationals (Ireland included) by the Vienna convention

However, again this may not be accurate https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...k-after-brexit

From a personal point of view, my girlfriend is Austrian, has worked everyday here for 6 years, never used NHS and paid in and adapted to British life, hell she even has a season ticket for cricket with me.

And suddenly she feels rather unwelcome and to be honest I can't give her a good answer as to guarantee she is safe to remain here.

If suddenly she is made to go I would of course follow her to Austria but the flip side is as soon to be non-eu my once freedom of movement and right to work (and even travel to see her family) may not be allowed in Austria and why should they if we do the same to them

Thanks UK, thanks a bunch

I was viewing this angle with interest and was worried the result may fuel some racist and xenophobic attitudes and so far I'm glad to see that doesn't appear to be the case. On Radio 5 yesterday there were reports that due to so many EU nationals living, working and settled in the UK (and of course vice versa) it would be a logistic and administrative nightmare to simply withdraw their rights to be wherever they are so it appears some provisions and compromises will be offered.

Obviously for yourself that's hardly the certainty you need but I can't see a blanket "get out and go home" rule being applied.

RBMark 25-06-2016 07:54

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
There won't be a blanket get out and go home rule applied, because we the people of Britian won't allow it. This is still the amazingly tolerant vibrant country it always was.

We will just be able to have control over our own laws now,

Russ 25-06-2016 08:11

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RBMark (Post 35845413)
There won't be a blanket get out and go home rule applied, because we the people of Britian won't allow it. This is still the amazingly tolerant vibrant country it always was.

Absolutely, and may that never ever change.

I put the following on Facebook earlier in response to so many people posting things saying we don't have the right to be called Great anymore..

I don't see why this can't be an opportunity to show how Great we can be. Being all negative and defeatist is what removing the Great would be and yes the doom and gloom of Friday would be just that but if we're going to do this why not show the world how resilient we can be? Let's use this to fire up a patriotic British resurgence. I'm all for that as long as it's done *properly* and by that I mean celebrating GB and NOT hating or being hostile to anything foreign. Let's be proud of our country but the kind of pride that's colour blind and respects all other nations. Although I do respect the country I'm not a fan of Americanisms but the love they (generally) have for all things American is the sort of national pride we ought to have for Great Britain.

Again I only support an inclusive British pride, no racism or xenophobia should ever be cultivated or tolerated. Britain First, NF, BNP, EDL etc can all go to hell. We don't want the sort of GB they promote.

Let's have a truly great Great Britain rising from this!

Pierre 25-06-2016 08:11

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35845381)
Yes they do



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...ss-to-the-sin/

We do not need to be a member of the single market to have access ,look it up

Paying tariffs to trade with the EU, is not being in the single market

Anypermitedroute 25-06-2016 08:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35845411)
:tu: Very good article that.

Another good point I read yesterday mentioned the fact that Remain voters were saying Leave supporters won it with a campaign of fear of what life would be like if we stay in the EU and as such the result was unfair. OK that's a pretty odd notion of 'unfair' as all political elections/referendums are fuelled by lies and BS however look at all the subsequent predictions of doom and gloom the Remainers have come out with over the past 24 hours....but of course, that's "different".

---------- Post added at 07:50 ---------- Previous post was at 07:42 ----------



From when you and I last met you'll know I have a related issue (albeit my situation not regarding the EU) so I was viewing this angle with interest and was worried the result may fuel some racist and xenophobic attitudes and so far I'm glad to see that doesn't appear to be the case. On Radio 5 yesterday there were reports that due to so many EU nationals living, working and settled in the UK (and of course vice versa) it would be a logistic and administrative nightmare to simply withdraw their rights to be wherever they are so it appears some provisions and compromises will be offered.

Obviously for yourself that's hardly the certainty you need but I can't see a blanket "get out and go home" rule being applied.

That's the problem, both side have been saying they won't but no one is certain and as you can appreciate with recent events I can't rely on "goodwill" because frankly no one know for certain

Whilst I have to respect the democratic process I am bloody furious

So far I had people I vaguely know use the classic "if you don't like it why don't you just leave with them"
Well my my 5 year goal was go and live I Austria, and with their vote yesterday they just gone and made that harder

Russ 25-06-2016 08:34

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Anypermitedroute (Post 35845416)
That's the problem, both side have been saying they won't but no one is certain and as you can appreciate with recent events I can't rely on "goodwill" because frankly no one know for certain

Whilst I have to respect the democratic process I am bloody furious

So far I had people I vaguely know use the classic "if you don't like it why don't you just leave with them"
Well my my 5 year goal was go and live I Austria, and with their vote yesterday they just gone and made that harder

No absolutely, you and many others in your situation have every right to be angry at this, even more so as I very much doubt a concrete plan will be announced any time soon.

Damien 25-06-2016 08:35

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 35845414)
Absolutely, and may that never ever change.

I put the following on Facebook earlier in response to so many people posting things saying we don't have the right to be called Great anymore..

I don't see why this can't be an opportunity to show how Great we can be. Being all negative and defeatist is what removing the Great would be and yes the doom and gloom of Friday would be just that but if we're going to do this why not show the world how resilient we can be? Let's use this to fire up a patriotic British resurgence. I'm all for that as long as it's done *properly* and by that I mean celebrating GB and NOT hating or being hostile to anything foreign. Let's be proud of our country but the kind of pride that's colour blind and respects all other nations. Although I do respect the country I'm not a fan of Americanisms but the love they (generally) have for all things American is the sort of national pride we ought to have for Great Britain.

Again I only support an inclusive British pride, no racism or xenophobia should ever be cultivated or tolerated. Britain First, NF, BNP, EDL etc can all go to hell. We don't want the sort of GB they promote.

Let's have a truly great Great Britain rising from this!

But Leave have won. We're now discussing what we should actually do. Which is why the discussion is about what that would involve. Yes it's a 'great' country but we can't keep discussing that isn't of the practicalities of what we do.

This morning there is more talk of a Norway deal this morning.

Big Brian 25-06-2016 08:36

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35845158)
its a two year process [i believe] so i see no point in delaying invoking article 50 why put off until tomorrow what you can do today ,i think a delay gives the opportunity for undemocratic and unethical practices to be invoked ,cameron said[promised] he would do it he should do it or go now.

Next week I believe there is a summit to discuss the timetable for the divorce from the EU. Article 50 should not be invoked until we find out about that first.

Damien 25-06-2016 08:40

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Anypermitedroute (Post 35845416)
So far I had people I vaguely know use the classic "if you don't like it why don't you just leave with them"
Well my my 5 year goal was go and live I Austria, and with their vote yesterday they just gone and made that harder

Any reason for Austria? I was in Vienna a few months ago, seems a nice city to live in.

You could go before we actually leave? The one thing I am pretty sure of is that EU citizens already here and British people in the EU would be able to stay. :)

---------- Post added at 08:40 ---------- Previous post was at 08:38 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Brian (Post 35845419)
Next week I believe there is a summit to discuss the timetable for the divorce from the EU. Article 50 should not be invoked until we find out about that first.

Article 50 should be stalled at least until we have a new PM.

martyh 25-06-2016 08:48

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845394)
They have access to it in terms of being able to trade with it but not being in it. Being inside is different. It means everyone can operate within a common system, regulatory framework, employment market and so on.

Exactly ,we do not want to be in it ,we just voted to get out of all that crap .It is enough to be able to trade on mutually agreed terms with countries instead of being told how/when and where we can trade .
The biggest issue we are going to have to face is that you youngsters(;)) don't know anything other than being in the EU ,you have always had the EU telling you what to do and you don't know any different.It may come as a shock but what will most likely happen is that if it proves too expensive to buy stuff in from EU countries because they took the hump with us for leaving then companies will simply start making the stuff ourselves just like we used to .We could become a manufacturing nation once again instead of being a nation of bankers and salesmen

---------- Post added at 08:48 ---------- Previous post was at 08:46 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35845415)
Paying tariffs to trade with the EU, is not being in the single market

Nobody said we wanted to be in the single market ,you said to have access to it we would have to maintain free movement which simply is not true .

Damien 25-06-2016 09:02

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35845422)
Exactly ,we do not want to be in it ,we just voted to get out of all that crap .It is enough to be able to trade on mutually agreed terms with countries instead of being told how/when and where we can trade .

Did we though? If we could stay in the common market without any of the rest of the EU stuff would that be ok?

A single market is very useful, especially for the service industry. Rather than the EU being a foreign market we trade with. Being able to treat Berlin as an addressable market the same way you would treat Liverpool is very good.

If we could get that without any of the other stuff perfect no?

martyh 25-06-2016 09:09

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845418)

This morning there is more talk of a Norway deal this morning.

We don't need that ,for politicians to even suggest that shows a lack of confidence in themselves so while we're in the mood for chucking things out lets get rid of all the politicians not prepared to show some balls and make this work

---------- Post added at 09:09 ---------- Previous post was at 09:04 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845424)
Did we though? If we could stay in the common market without any of the rest of the EU stuff would that be ok?

A single market is very useful, especially for the service industry. Rather than the EU being a foreign market we trade with. Being able to treat Berlin as an addressable market the same way you would treat Liverpool is very good.

If we could get that without any of the other stuff perfect no?

Of course having free trade with the EU is better but we shouldn't get bogged down trying to get that at any cost ,we could survive quite easily without free trade .we used to be a self sufficient country actually supplying the rest of the world with skills and goods long before the EU swallowed us up

Damien 25-06-2016 09:16

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35845425)
We don't need that ,for politicians to even suggest that shows a lack of confidence in themselves so while we're in the mood for chucking things out lets get rid of all the politicians not prepared to show some balls and make this work

Well this is the problem isn't it? We voted Leave but not on what version of Leave we go for. There was a poll that showed the EEA was the most popular option of everyone because some on the Leave side supported it and the vast majority of Remain support it since it's the least change option. However a lot of Leave supporters would, rightly, be outraged because Immigration was the biggest theme of the Leave campaign.

This is why people are expecting an election so a governing party can get a mandate of what to do on Leave. I think though that Boris/Gove would be more inclined for the EEA option.

If we even had a chance of getting it that is. At the moment it seems the best deal we could get economically but the EU may well reject it.

Quote:

Of course having free trade with the EU is better but we shouldn't get bogged down trying to get that at any cost ,we could survive quite easily without free trade .we used to be a self sufficient country actually supplying the rest of the world with skills and goods long before the EU swallowed us up
We also had an Empire.

Going forward we need a pragmatic focus on what is best for the UK now. What does our economy need in a deal, what could we get and what would it cost us.

Remainers have to expect the result and work for the best option and Leavers might have to temper their expectations of what is achievable and accept inevitable downsides they may not have expected.

Anypermitedroute 25-06-2016 09:18

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845420)
Any reason for Austria? I was in Vienna a few months ago, seems a nice city to live in.

You could go before we actually leave? The one thing I am pretty sure of is that EU citizens already here and British people in the EU would be able to stay. :)

---------- Post added at 08:40 ---------- Previous post was at 08:38 ----------



Article 50 should be stalled at least until we have a new PM.

My girlfriend is Austrian and it is one the most beautiful places I seen. We goto south Austrian near the border, very rural. First Brit they have ever met but I made a real effort to understand the culture and learn about all items and they accepted me with welcome arms

The problem is Austria is fighting its own right wing issues regarding immigration and I'm hearing the same stories as before 10 years here ("of course I don't count but..." Line)

Yes I could go now but I think we will be even more buffered as simply we don't know what the deal will be. Yes I deep in my heart it will sort itself out but no one can say that with any degree of certainty whether EU as a whole or individual deals. All I knew under EU I have that freedom. I know I come from a generation that watch the fall of the wall, able to travel freely and people can sit around a dinner table from 6 nations, I'm not saying it won't continue to happen but it's just got harder and when people speak of returning to the good old days I read the history books and if I'm being honest it need to stay there as it's not the future I want for me or my children.

Utopian/aspirational/day dream, perhaps but you need to start somewhere and make it work and I just can't see how packing up and leaving will make that work but good luck to us.

And as for Norway model, I'm pretty sure the majority of Norwegian think it's poor deal. Whilst we are demonstarting a leanient view here on CF (which I am grateful) and elsewhere let's be honest with ourselves; the majority didn't want Eu because of immigration, People from abroad here taking what they perceive is their jobs because they consider that unfair (but likewise would at see a problem with a Brit working abroad)

I look forward to the jobless Britain taking the seasonal jobs of fruit picking and social care looking after my grandma, working as barista and cleaning toilets. Well done guys you got it back:)

martyh 25-06-2016 09:45

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845428)
Well this is the problem isn't it? We voted Leave but not on what version of Leave we go for. There was a poll that showed the EEA was the most popular option of everyone because some on the Leave side supported it and the vast majority of Remain support it since it's the least change option. However a lot of Leave supporters would, rightly, be outraged because Immigration was the biggest theme of the Leave campaign.

Any deal that involves free movement of any sort would be totally unacceptable

Quote:

This is why people are expecting an election so a governing party can get a mandate of what to do on Leave. I think though that Boris/Gove would be more inclined for the EEA option.
I would be very surprised if there wasn't a general election ,the problem is though is that all the major parties are pro Europe ,what about a new party or even a coalition with cross party ministers made up of Brexiters ?

Quote:

If we even had a chance of getting it that is. At the moment it seems the best deal we could get economically but the EU may well reject it.
Another reason why we need strong politicians ,not the weak willed spongers we have had to put up with ,they have become lazy and reliant on Europe telling them what to do

Quote:

Remainers have to expect the result and work for the best option and Leavers might have to temper their expectations of what is achievable and accept inevitable downsides they may not have expected.
I agree to an extent but i see this as an opportunity to give British Politics a shake up .Our politicians have become used to simply marking time and letting Europe make the real decisions ,now they need to take some chances and have the underlying idea that it is possible for the UK to function outside of Europe

---------- Post added at 09:45 ---------- Previous post was at 09:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anypermitedroute (Post 35845429)

I look forward to the jobless Britain taking the seasonal jobs of fruit picking and social care looking after my grandma, working as barista and cleaning toilets. Well done guys you got it back:)

You may well be surprised .

techguyone 25-06-2016 10:01

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
I don't understand why Anypermitedroute's girlfriend wouldn't be 'safe' ffs, is she going to be attacked or something? Given Austrias track record, you'd be less 'safe' in Austria.

I'm just glad we got the ref when we did, what with Gen Snowflake and the population makeup in the big Cities, another 5- 10 years would have killed that off forever.

This is our best chance to do something new and good, but it'll never work whilst half the country refuses to accept it and only offers doom and gloom.

I think a massive section of the public need to grow the fark up... petitions... calls for another ref... cries of how it's unfair... selfish old people etc etc.

It's happened, it's real, get over it.

Work together or it WILL fail.

Or is that what they want?

martyh 25-06-2016 10:09

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by techguyone (Post 35845439)
I don't understand why Anypermitedroute's girlfriend wouldn't be 'safe' ffs, is she going to be attacked or something? Given Austrias track record, you'd be less 'safe' in Austria.

I'm just glad we got the ref when we did, what with Gen Snowflake and the population makeup in the big Cities, another 5- 10 years would have killed that off forever.

This is our best chance to do something new and good, but it'll never work whilst half the country refuses to accept it and only offers doom and gloom.

I think a massive section of the public need to grow the fark up... petitions... calls for another ref... cries of how it's unfair... selfish old people etc etc.

It's happened, it's real, get over it.

Work together or it WILL fail.

Or is that what they want?

Yep ,those same people complaining about leaving the EU are most likely the same people complaining about Britain not being great any more ,well now's our chance and they will never get a better one in their lifetimes.Heard some student twonk on the news this morning complaining because going through customs is going to be "such a polarva" :rolleyes:

Damien 25-06-2016 10:19

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35845442)
Yep ,those same people complaining about leaving the EU are most likely the same people complaining about Britain not being great any more ,well now's our chance and they will never get a better one in their lifetimes.Heard some student twonk on the news this morning complaining because going through customs is going to be "such a polarva" :rolleyes:

Are the people who voted to stay in the EU the same people complaining about Britain not being great anymore? I would have thought such sentiments were more likely to come from people voting to Leave. They're far more likely to have been unhappy with the status-quo and to have been older. The archetypical Remain support would be a degree-level educated young person in a major city.

Personally I am not someone who thinks that. I think it's just a slogan. All of this stuff about believing in Britain, that Britain can be great again, doesn't go anywhere to making it happen. What will help is cold, hard, pragmatism and deal-making with the EU and beyond to secure the best outcome possible.

The vote was close. It's a divided country and in the case of Scotland a divide that may become tangible. We have a divide between cities and rural areas, young and old and between classes. This isn't going away. It wouldn't have gone away if Remain had won either. A fear some people had on either side was a close result and this is why.

martyh 25-06-2016 10:24

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845445)
Are the people who voted to stay in the EU the same people complaining about Britain not being great anymore? I would have thought such sentiments were more likely to come from people voting to Leave. They're far more likely to have been unhappy with the status-quo and to have been older. The archetypical Remain support would be a degree-level educated young person in a major city.

Personally I am not someone who thinks that. I think it's just a slogan. All of this stuff about believing in Britain, that Britain can be great again, doesn't go anywhere to making it happen. What will help is cold, hard, pragmatism and deal-making with the EU and beyond to secure the best outcome possible.

The vote was close. It's a divided country and in the case of Scotland a divide that may become tangible. We have a divide between cities and rural areas, young and old and between classes. This isn't going away. It wouldn't have gone away if Remain had won either. A fear some people had on either side was a close result and this is why.


Way to have an upbeat attitude Damien :rolleyes:

denphone 25-06-2016 10:25

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by techguyone (Post 35845439)
I don't understand why Anypermitedroute's girlfriend wouldn't be 'safe' ffs, is she going to be attacked or something? Given Austrias track record, you'd be less 'safe' in Austria.

I'm just glad we got the ref when we did, what with Gen Snowflake and the population makeup in the big Cities, another 5- 10 years would have killed that off forever.

This is our best chance to do something new and good, but it'll never work whilst half the country refuses to accept it and only offers doom and gloom.

I think a massive section of the public need to grow the fark up... petitions... calls for another ref... cries of how it's unfair... selfish old people etc etc.

It's happened, it's real, get over it.

Work together or it WILL fail.

Or is that what they want?

l have not moaned about it even though l voted remain so l think you are rather over generalising when you say half the country refuses to accept it as most people l know who voted remain have accepted the will of the people and have said the sooner we try to make this country work again the better.

papa smurf 25-06-2016 10:28

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
there's a lot of talk in some papers about how the "boomers" have ruined the lives of 18-24 year olds who apparently voted to stay in large numbers ,does any one have an accurate turn out figure for this age group ie those who actually went to the polling booth . i found some stuff on the net yesterday that suggested a turn out of 34% and of that figure 70%voted remain not sure of its accuracy though.

Damien 25-06-2016 10:28

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35845447)
Way to have an upbeat attitude Damien :rolleyes:

Oh come on. What's wrong with what I said? :confused:

I think it's a fair assessment of the situation. I didn't say we were heading for disaster but that it's a divided country, it is by the way, and we need to achieve the best deal possible.

RBMark 25-06-2016 10:30

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845452)
Oh come on. What's wrong with what I said? :confused:

I think it's a fair assessment of the situation. I didn't say we were heading for disaster but that it's a divided country, it is by the way, and we need to achieve the best deal possible.

Well you e gone from complete doom, to mild doom, another few days and your hysterics will be almost forgotten eh...

Damien 25-06-2016 10:38

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RBMark (Post 35845454)
Well you e gone from complete doom, to mild doom, another few days and your hysterics will be almost forgotten eh...

My position is the same. I think Leaving is a mistake and I think it will hurt us economically. Democracy means you accept the result, which I do, but it doesn't mean you have to agree with it. When a party wins a General Election all the voters who didn't choose them have to accept their mandate to govern but they don't have to become supporters of the party.

I am pretty miffed at the sudden insistence those of us that lost become enthusiasts for the cause. I wouldn't expect any of you to become Europhiles had Remain won.

I do hope for a very good deal from Europe and that my reservations are wrong. I am not calling for a second referendum, I didn't sign that stupid petition.

I really don't know what all of you expect to be honest.

Kursk 25-06-2016 10:45

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Some people are so used to being namby-pambied they are petrified of change.

The UK, as is often the case, is leading the way in instigating that change. There will be continued co-operation with Europe but it will be on different terms; terms that do not absorb our democratic right to determine our own future.

The vote has been taken. Everyone needs to get behind the choice of the majority and stop bellyaching and worrying. It is isolationist to look upon the referendum result as a mistake. We have opened the door to the World with Europe still included.

ianch99 25-06-2016 10:48

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
EU Brexit referendum: France's Calais seeks border deal changes

Seems fair I suppose ..

Quote:

The mayor of Calais wants changes to a deal which allows Britain to carry out immigration checks on the French side of the English Channel, after a UK vote to leave the EU.
Natacha Bouchart said Paris must act after Thursday's referendum in which the UK voted to leave the EU.
"The British must take the consequences of their choice," she said on Friday.
Under the 2003 Touquet deal, Britain can carry out check in Calais to stop migrants trying to get to Britain.

Damien 25-06-2016 10:52

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
The French government is in charge of that. They haven't indicated it is in danger yet.

ianch99 25-06-2016 10:58

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
This is interesting: maybe Leave are not going to do what they promised on immigration after all?

I am not sure how influential this chap is but if he is, worrying for those that voted leave:

Evan Davis Clashes With Daniel Hannan MEP On Newsnight After EU Referendum Brexit Vote

Quote:

Evan Davis has accused a leading Brexit campaigner of peddling an immigration policy “completely at odds with what the public think they’ve just voted for” after Brexit.

The Newsnight presenter confronted MEP Daniel Hannan, when he was reduced to putting his head in his hands out of visible frustration over the “change of tone on freedom of movement”.

A tense exchange between the two saw Davis accuse Hannan of promising to take back control of immigration, but after a Brexit win on Friday, admit the country would still allow free movement of labour from Europe.

Hannan had said the UK should stay within the “common market” - the EU trading group - but Davis reminded him that meant Britain would still have to allow in unlimited numbers of European workers.

“I’m sorry we’ve just been through three months of agony on the issue of immigration,” Davis lamented. “The public have been led to believe that what they have voted for is an end to free movement.”

Damien 25-06-2016 11:01

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
The problem is that different Leavers had different ideas of what Leave is. Hannan, like Gove and Johnson, aren't too fussed about immigration but rather the social chapter stuff from the EU imposing themselves on UK law. It's why Hannan has always quite admired something 'close' to what Norway do. I.E Pay for entry to the single market.

Gavin78 25-06-2016 11:03

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
I just read on sky news website that the 6 founding members are having a meeting to discuss UK leaving the EU minus the UK as they have EU related stuff to talk about as well and the UK can't be part of that anymore lol like we give a crap.

merkel went on to say that we wont let the UK destroy the EU. all I can say is take a chill pill we wanted to do it on our own we had or haven't shown any interest in destroying the EU. if the EU is that weak that it needs the UK to hold it together then it shows how weak the EU really was and we were puppets on a string.

It shows how the other member states must have actually being laughing at us from across the water and now we have left it's turned into negativity towards us and they don't see the funny side now we have taken their toys away

ntluser 25-06-2016 11:12

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Given the news reported today that several countries are now pushing for an EU referendum, it seems likely that the EU may be diminished or may even break up.

Given too the massive unhappiness in the EU countries this presents the new PM with an opportunity to create a new purely economic trading bloc with countries that leave.

It could be a genuine free trade area with no VAT, no Tariffs, no EU courts and no political union with immigration levels left at the discretion of national governments.

We do need and welcome immigrants but the government would have to manage their countrywide distribution better as heavy concentrations of immigrants in one area tend to breed resentment.

We also need to do a lot more to get the unemployed 5% of the population into a job because present schemes are not working. Part of that task will also be weeding out those who have no intention of getting a job and dealing with them.

Anypermitedroute 25-06-2016 11:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by techguyone (Post 35845439)
I don't understand why Anypermitedroute's girlfriend wouldn't be 'safe' ffs, is she going to be attacked or something? Given Austrias track record, you'd be less 'safe' in Austria.

I'm just glad we got the ref when we did, what with Gen Snowflake and the population makeup in the big Cities, another 5- 10 years would have killed that off forever.

This is our best chance to do something new and good, but it'll never work whilst half the country refuses to accept it and only offers doom and gloom.

I think a massive section of the public need to grow the fark up... petitions... calls for another ref... cries of how it's unfair... selfish old people etc etc.

It's happened, it's real, get over it.

Work together or it WILL fail.

Or is that what they want?

I said unwelcome and safe in the context of whether safe to remain or be asked to leave.

No one knows this until discussion have taken place, we can have a view but there is now no guarantees of anything other than pulling out of EU

Big Brian 25-06-2016 11:21

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35845189)
why antagonise the EU there is a mechanism in place to facilitate our exit we should use it ,we should part on good terms .

I think parting on good terms is a must to allow us to get good trade deals. Is there a way we can get deals with EU country or does it have to be a bloc deal? I know Germany want trade as usual and there is no way they will put up tariffs.

---------- Post added at 11:21 ---------- Previous post was at 11:17 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845461)
The problem is that different Leavers had different ideas of what Leave is. Hannan, like Gove and Johnson, aren't too fussed about immigration but rather the social chapter stuff from the EU imposing themselves on UK law. It's why Hannan has always quite admired something 'close' to what Norway do. I.E Pay for entry to the single market.

How much would it cost? This is the big question. We don't want to be back to paying to the EU as that kinda defeats the purpose of leaving somewhat.

I think we are in a different position to Norway and Switzerland as we have already been in the Single Market. I can't see why leaving the Political EU should bar us from leaving the Single Market. After all it was the Single Market we joined in the first place. No I think it would have to be some kind of different deal to them.

Ignitionnet 25-06-2016 11:25

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845428)
This is why people are expecting an election so a governing party can get a mandate of what to do on Leave. I think though that Boris/Gove would be more inclined for the EEA option.

If we even had a chance of getting it that is. At the moment it seems the best deal we could get economically but the EU may well reject it.

I definitely think Boris/Gove are more inclined towards the EEA option. It would tick most of the boxes for Daniel Hannan. It would probably outrage many on the UKIP side.

As long as they can point to freedom of movement as a 'necessary evil' they're alright.

Economically I think the EU wouldn't necessarily be too opposed. The UK was always a bad fit, that politically incorrect uncle you hope stays in the corner at the family party getting drunk and not talking to anyone.

martyh 25-06-2016 11:28

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35845452)
Oh come on. What's wrong with what I said? :confused:

I think it's a fair assessment of the situation. I didn't say we were heading for disaster but that it's a divided country, it is by the way, and we need to achieve the best deal possible.

There's nothing really wrong with what you said but at least let the people have their day before the boring doom and gloom stuff starts ,a positive mental attitude never hurts ;)

Ignitionnet 25-06-2016 11:28

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by techguyone (Post 35845439)
I don't understand why Anypermitedroute's girlfriend wouldn't be 'safe' ffs, is she going to be attacked or something? Given Austrias track record, you'd be less 'safe' in Austria.

It's happened, it's real, get over it.

Work together or it WILL fail.

Yesterday 2 European immigrants that I know were asked when they were going home.

Yes, let's work together towards a sensible solution that works for all involved.

Damien 25-06-2016 11:29

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Brian (Post 35845465)
How much would it cost? This is the big question. We don't want to be back to paying to the EU as that kinda defeats the purpose of leaving somewhat.

£350,000,001 a day! Not really. I don't know. Probably similar to what we pay now without the rebate. The real cost though would be freedom of movement.

Quote:

I think we are in a different position to Norway and Switzerland as we have already been in the Single Market. I can't see why leaving the Political EU should bar us from leaving the Single Market. After all it was the Single Market we joined in the first place. No I think it would have to be some kind of different deal to them.
I think that's pretty much what the EEA sorta is. I think Hannan wants a version of that.

RBMark 25-06-2016 11:29

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35845467)
I definitely think Boris/Gove are more inclined towards the EEA option. It would tick most of the boxes for Daniel Hannan. It would probably outrage many on the UKIP side.

As long as they can point to freedom of movement as a 'necessary evil' they're alright.

Economically I think the EU wouldn't necessarily be too opposed. The UK was always a bad fit, that politically incorrect uncle you hope stays in the corner at the family party getting drunk and not talking to anyone.

Or the UK that amazingly diverse country that attracts millions from around the world who will literally crawl through Spain/France etc to get here. This is a great diverse beautiful country, your hate filled anti UK comments should be kept for Facebook where you'll have plenty who agree with you!

I've read some of your comments in the past about reasons why you can't afford to live/buy a home in London! People in glass houses!!!!!!

Big Brian 25-06-2016 11:30

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35845460)
This is interesting: maybe Leave are not going to do what they promised on immigration after all?

I am not sure how influential this chap is but if he is, worrying for those that voted leave:

Evan Davis Clashes With Daniel Hannan MEP On Newsnight After EU Referendum Brexit Vote

Let's sort this out once and for all. Leave never promised to stop immigration, they promised to limit it and cut it down. You can't stop it completely, you need immigration. You have to set a target of say 50k a year and not go above it. You don't have to take 50k, you may only need 20k so you stop well. In Australia, theirs is geared to get more immigration. This is why we say "an Australian Style.' and not an Australian system. It isn't rocket science really.

Incidentally, I hear talk of people asking reporters when they have to leave. They don't have to leave, this is where the confusion is. On the news a Poll asked that question live to a reporter. She asked this because she didn't have a British Passport. Do any of us have a British Passport? Wouldn't know haven't renewed mine since the 80's. I'd say if you have a job you'll be safe.
.

ntluser 25-06-2016 11:32

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
It would be good to leave on good terms if the EU will allow us to.

It might help if the new PM were to announce:-

a) we were still hoping to trade with the EU in some way without tariffs on either side

b) we were not planning to expel existing working, law abiding foreign nationals

c) we were allowing immigration into the UK within limits specified by the UK government

This would demonstrate good will and relieve some of the anxiety felt by foreign nationals here.

Gavin78 25-06-2016 11:35

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...ommons-website

Petition urging second EU referendum reaches 1m signatures


I'm just wondering how highly likely this would happen? Can't take it seriously considering the petition wants London independent of the UK and part of the EU lol

Big Brian 25-06-2016 11:35

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ntluser (Post 35845473)
It would be good to leave on good terms if the EU will allow us to.

It might help if the new PM were to announce:-

a) we were still hoping to trade with the EU in some way without tariffs on either side

b) we were not planning to expel existing working, law abiding foreign nationals

c) we were allowing immigration into the UK within limits specified by the UK government

This would demonstrate good will and relieve some of the anxiety felt by foreign nationals here.

I could live with that.

papa smurf 25-06-2016 11:36

Re: Should the UK invoke Article 50?
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Brian (Post 35845465)
I think parting on good terms is a must to allow us to get good trade deals. Is there a way we can get deals with EU country or does it have to be a bloc deal? I know Germany want trade as usual and there is no way they will put up tariffs.[COLOR="Silver"]

---------- Post added at 11:21 ---------- Previous post was at 11:17 ----------

this is Grimsby car port [we used to be a fishing port] i drive past this every day we have cars in and we have car going out the little dots in the picture are cars that have just come off the eucc KESS and other boats like it it is an enormous amount of trade .

Damien 25-06-2016 11:36

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gavin78 (Post 35845474)
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...ommons-website

Petition urging second EU referendum reaches 1m signatures


I'm just wondering how highly likely this would happen? Can't take it seriously considering the petition wants London independent of the UK and part of the EU lol

It won't happen.

Big Brian 25-06-2016 11:39

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Someone needs to reassure the EU Nationals here. That was only one example on the news, how many more are asking it in private?

---------- Post added at 11:39 ---------- Previous post was at 11:37 ----------

[QUOTE=papa smurf;35845476]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Brian (Post 35845465)
I think parting on good terms is a must to allow us to get good trade deals. Is there a way we can get deals with EU country or does it have to be a bloc deal? I know Germany want trade as usual and there is no way they will put up tariffs.[COLOR="Silver"]

---------- Post added at 11:21 ---------- Previous post was at 11:17 ----------

this is Grimsby car port [we used to be a fishing port] i drive past this every day we have cars in and we have car going out the little dots in the picture are cars that have just come off the eucc KESS and other boats like it it is an enormous amount of trade .

Indeed it is and there is no reason why it can't continue IMHO. It's up to those negotiators to thrash it out.

Damien 25-06-2016 11:41

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Brian (Post 35845472)
Incidentally, I hear talk of people asking reporters when they have to leave. They don't have to leave, this is where the confusion is. On the news a Poll asked that question live to a reporter. She asked this because she didn't have a British Passport.
.

I think there is some convention that allows EU citizens to stay if they've been here 5/10 years it's just not very clear or well advertised. Other than that though we don't actually know, for sure, what their status is. It's just very unlikely they'll be made to leave because it would be far too costly, disruptive and unworkable to make them leave.

Some voters though seem to think that the immigration that has already happened would be reversed if we left.

Both campaigns are to blame for this perception though. Remain wanted to terrify people that there would be deportations and Leave didn't want to alienate voters who are voting because of immigration, especially in there area, they both made lip-service to the notion they would stay. Especially the Tory Leavers (Gove, Hannan and Johnson) but not especially loudly.

They'll be fine.

RBMark 25-06-2016 11:42

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
The EU states Britain must URGENTLY trigger article 50! Let it begin

http://news.sky.com/story/1717427/uk...rgently-france

martyh 25-06-2016 11:42

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Brian (Post 35845478)
Someone needs to reassure the EU Nationals here. That was only one example on the news, how many more are asking it in private?[COLOR="Silver"]
.

To be honest if they really think they will all be kicked out then they have been fed some serious mis-information or are just plain thick

Chris 25-06-2016 11:45

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RBMark (Post 35845481)
The EU states Britain must URGENTLY trigger article 50! Let it begin

http://news.sky.com/story/1717427/uk...rgently-france

The EU States are waking up and discovering when they drafted Article 50 they made no provision for the remaining states to force the start of negotiations. Only the British government can invoke Art50 and it is annoying the rest of them like hell.

martyh 25-06-2016 11:47

Re: Post-Brexit Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35845483)
The EU States are waking up and discovering when they drafted Article 50 they made no provision for the remaining states to force the start of negotiations. Only the British government can invoke Art50 and it is annoying the rest of them like hell.


Good innit :D


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:45.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.