Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2015/07/10.png https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2015/07/11.png https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2015/07/21.jpg https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2015/07/22.jpg https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2015/07/23.jpg |
Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
Quote:
It looks like something out of 'Elite Danergous'! |
Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
Quote:
|
Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
I would give the full specs but I don't have the time to collect disclaimers for messed up keyboards / screens.
|
Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
Quote:
What is the dis-advantage of having your router doing the QoS over packetCable QoS? what is the advantage for the user and/or the cable company? |
Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
Quote:
---------- Post added at 14:18 ---------- Previous post was at 14:17 ---------- Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 14:19 ---------- Previous post was at 14:18 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 14:24 ---------- Previous post was at 14:19 ---------- Quote:
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2015/07/17.jpg https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2015/07/18.jpg https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2015/07/19.jpg and https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2015/07/20.jpg Sadly at nearly £5000 per pair, the AirFiber 24HD is the only one I've not had a chance to play around with :( This is more my kind of antenna porn: https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2015/07/15.jpg |
Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
Quote:
I think you misunderstand the function of PacketCable if you think simple QoS configured on a router is a substitute. The primary driver is being able to dynamically add and remove service flows so that these can run without affecting the 'best effort' broadband service flow. A standard voice call requires 64kbps of symmetrical bandwidth; PacketCable's signalling ensures this gets nailed up as unsolicited grant, so it takes precedence over everything else running on the DOCSIS downstream and upstream channels. Can't really do that with the QoS on the home router, and wasteful to have that service flow sitting there all the time, so it has to be added via dynamic signalling. That's one example. Another is video streams: with PacketCable a video service flow can be added on demand which uses PBE / Priority Best Effort on the cable network, thus taking precedence over the broadband Best Effort service flows for access to bandwidth and ensuring that video is smooth even on highly utilised service groups. PacketCable is there to solve specific problems, which it does. Lastly I'd imagine you'd be looking for the newer PacketCable 2.0 standard if looking for the latest and greatest. Most recent standards published 2014 where 1.5 was originally published in 2009 with extensions in 2012. PacketCable is just software though, so support can be added progressively. eMTA functionality not so much. |
Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2015/07/16.jpg |
Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
Quote:
QoS on a router isn't. |
Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
Does it matter if you only use exisitng in modem only ?
|
Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
Thanks Ignitionnet & qasdfdsaq. I have a better understanding of it now. Appreciated.
|
Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
|
Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
G.fast is still a way away. I wouldn't hold your breath; BT may start small scale roll out in financial year 2016-2017 and say that the full roll out, covering most UK homes, will complete by 2026-2027.
The majority of VM's network will be 500Mb capable by 2016. |
Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
Quote:
|
Re: Broadband Hardware Trial 2015
Quote:
Work to upgrade to the required DOCSIS 3.1 and high-split HFC is a work in progress. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.