Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Networking (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=87)
-   -   Wireless Bridge for printer and TV? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33673568)

parkie 02-01-2011 20:35

Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
I have a Virgin Media Hub upstairs and want to connect my TV and Printer which are downstairs to my wireless network. what do I need? My printer has an ethernet port so no need for a dedicated print server. I'm getting confused between an access point and a bridge. Can someone tell me exactly what would work in this situation? What would you recommend

cheers

p

progers 02-01-2011 20:44

Re: Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
I use a cheap router, Edimax BR 6574N from e-buyer as a Universal Bridge to connect my TV, Blu Ray player with ethernet and laptop downstairs wirelessly.

A bit tricky to set up but works well

jrhnewark 06-01-2011 00:36

Re: Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
Sounds like you need two wireless bridges. The printer needs to connect to an ethernet-to-wireless bridge.

Does the TV have an ethernet port?

vanman 06-01-2011 11:23

Re: Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by parkie (Post 35146444)
I have a Virgin Media Hub upstairs and want to connect my TV and Printer which are downstairs to my wireless network. what do I need? My printer has an ethernet port so no need for a dedicated print server. I'm getting confused between an access point and a bridge. Can someone tell me exactly what would work in this situation? What would you recommend

cheers

p

best to go this way http://www.solwise.co.uk/net-powerline-pl-85pe-mk2.htm

jrhnewark 06-01-2011 12:10

Re: Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vanman (Post 35148040)

Expensive and they cause a lot of radio interference. Stick to WiFi if you can.

vanman 06-01-2011 12:33

Re: Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrhnewark (Post 35148063)
Expensive and they cause a lot of radio interference. Stick to WiFi if you can.

OP HAS NO WiFi ON PRINTER
Quote:

My printer has an ethernet port

TheNorm 06-01-2011 12:41

Re: Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vanman (Post 35148040)

Or even their 1gig adapters if you want to be assured of good throughput, or have multiple users:

http://www.solwise.co.uk/net-powerline-gig-index.htm

jrhnewark 06-01-2011 13:35

Re: Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vanman (Post 35148040)

Quote:

Originally Posted by vanman (Post 35148078)
OP HAS NO WiFi ON PRINTER

And I suggested a solution to that.

vanman 06-01-2011 14:34

Re: Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrhnewark (Post 35148113)
And I suggested a solution to that.

ok i am sorry but explain how to make a ethernet-to-wireless bridge.

Stuart 06-01-2011 14:45

Re: Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
The simplest (though not cheapest) option is probably http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?ModuleNo=475112

But, generally if you are using a router (which will be a cheaper option), you need to disable DHCP (essentially disabling the "router' part of the router and just using it as a switch).

vanman 06-01-2011 14:56

Re: Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35148163)
The simplest (though not cheapest) option is probably http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?ModuleNo=475112

But, generally if you are using a router (which will be a cheaper option), you need to disable DHCP (essentially disabling the "router' part of the router and just using it as a switch).

but surely this is cheaper http://www.solwise.co.uk/net-powerline-pl-85pe-mk2.htm
£36.50
each twin pack
and easier to set up
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrhnewark (Post 35148063)
and they cause a lot of radio interference.

its a printer do that matter

jrhnewark 07-01-2011 00:13

Re: Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vanman (Post 35148155)
ok i am sorry but explain how to make a ethernet-to-wireless bridge.

You don't make one, you buy one from Maplin (above) or your favourite online retailer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by vanman (Post 35148169)
its a printer do that matter

The word you're looking for, if I'm not being impolite, is *does*.

I meant interference by using your whole mains system as an antenna for all the rogue Radio Frequency carriers those IP-over-mains things give off - i.e. interference to all your neighbours, not to your printer.

Stuart 07-01-2011 00:47

Re: Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vanman (Post 35148169)

I did say that my option was not the cheapest, but was the simplest, and it is, especially if (as I have seen in a few friend's houses), your mains sockets are not that accessible.

jrhnewark 07-01-2011 00:54

Re: Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35148539)
I did say that my option was not the cheapest, but was the simplest, and it is, especially if (as I have seen in a few friend's houses), your mains sockets are not that accessible.

Actually (aside from the fact I hate 'powerline' kit), I've just bought one of those Netgear bits of kit from Maplin that you linked to above to get my Slingbox onto my wireless network instead of running CAT5.

Works a treat - and both the Netgear device and the Slingbox get their own IP addresses via DHCP. :)

vanman 07-01-2011 01:08

Re: Wireless Bridge for printer and TV?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrhnewark (Post 35148528)
You don't make one, you buy one from Maplin (above) or your favourite online retailer.

The word you're looking for, if I'm not being impolite, is *does*.

I meant interference by using your whole mains system as an antenna for all the rogue Radio Frequency carriers those IP-over-mains things give off - i.e. interference to all your neighbours, not to your printer.

thanks for that i was not aware of that .have you any links of evidence of this ?
or is it just your opinion.
as for *does* .
if i wanted to say *does* i would have wrote *does*
and not do that .


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:11.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum