![]() |
Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
Despite the police knowing who killed him, they ignore the evidence and let him away with it. I wonder why. Yet again, another death caused by the Met goes unpunished.
|
Re: Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
Quote:
|
Re: Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
This report is over 30 years old.It's from a time when there were lot's of dubious practices going on in our public systems.I doubt if justice will be found after all this time.
What we need is to make sure that the present much more transparent systems/services continue to be transparent. I do object to the word murderer though because I doubt that the death of Mr Peach was deliberate or premeditated under the circumstances. |
Re: Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
Sorry Maggie, but doubting Justice would be done after 30 years isnt a good reason not to bring charges against the 6 officers involved. There has been a cover up. plain and simple. I guess now we know if you can hide and obstruct for long enough you get away with a crime when it comes to light.
Of course if charges had been brought 30 years ago it would probably have been "justifiable homicide" a la Liddle Towers. |
Re: Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
Quote:
It doesn't hurt to keep pressuring though. Like I said we must make sure today's systems don't let us down in the same manner and that what we have gained isn't lost to the various terrorism laws since added to the statutes. |
Re: Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
Quote:
|
Re: Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
Quote:
Quote:
answer me this. What happens if 6 members of the public are present when someone loses their life and one of them is directly to blame? you want to be treated the same as the GP well all 6 would be in front of the judge and most likely after this report doing time... |
Re: Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
Quote:
The police know exactly who the murder is. They are just supporting the cover up. If these officers have refused to admit they know who the killer is, why did they keep their jobs? It wouldn't be that the Met would not admit they were not interested in investigating it, would it? Back in the seventies if the Met couldn't work out, out of six people, who was the perpetrator, they would just pin it on the easiest target. Why didn't they do that then? |
Re: Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
Quote:
A friend of mine is a prison warder . She knows an inmate who is serving 15 years for being involved in a robbery where the other perp killed the victim with a shotgun. The other guy was involved in the robbery but had no idea( he says) the other guy had the gun till he got it out of the car and shot the victim So to treat these 6 officers the same would mean they fall under this catagory .. |
Re: Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
There is a major difference, imho, between 'reasonably be concluded' and 'beyond reasonable doubt', but they seem to being used synonymously.
|
Re: Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
Quote:
---------- Post added at 12:12 ---------- Previous post was at 12:10 ---------- Quote:
pretty damning dont you think? afteral they have witnesses |
Re: Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
Quote:
|
Re: Blair Peach murderer esapes justice
Quote:
it would have probably come out in the wash a number of years later and then no charges for anyone involved |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:44. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum