![]() |
IE7 to tighten priviledges
Eweek
Quote:
|
Re: IE7 to tighten priviledges
're-architected' ..? :erm: they need to stop inventing words and spend more time on the software.
|
Re: IE7 to tighten priviledges
Pretty sure re-architected is a valid form of american business "slang"
|
Re: IE7 to tighten priviledges
Quote:
|
Re: IE7 to tighten priviledges
Quote:
|
Re: IE7 to tighten priviledges
Quote:
|
Re: IE7 to tighten priviledges
I like eva, external vehicular activity, or more recently, a Mars Sol ? why couldn't they say "a day"
|
Re: IE7 to tighten priviledges
Quote:
|
Re: IE7 to tighten priviledges
Quote:
Are we getting a tad OT ? |
Re: IE7 to tighten priviledges
I can see trouble ahead. It'll be a rehash of the XP SP2 firewall. All was well until you upgraded, then everything stopped working. Our policy at work is to turn it off - damned nuisance and not needed. Thinking about it, potential nightmare really given that the trend is towards using the Web as a front-end rather than writing a GUI. All those applications :disturbd:
|
Re: IE7 to tighten priviledges
Forgive me if this is someone on google but I am not feeling well today, is there a ETA for IE7's release?
Just so I know when to back everything up on my pc. |
Re: IE7 to tighten priviledges
IE should have run with reduced privileges from the start, idiots.
IIS (their web server software) runs in an extremely constricted user-context and has done since the year 1999 so why assume that home users running IE 5,5.5 and 6 are any less vulnerable? Well they did assume, and that's why they have the worst browser security record in history. |
Re: IE7 to tighten priviledges
Good to know MS are learning unfortenatly it took them many years to figure it out.
|
Re: IE7 to tighten priviledges
Quote:
£5 says that the first IE 7 security vulnerability will be found within a week :D |
Re: IE7 to tighten priviledges
They aren't bugs, merely undocumented 'features'
MS have always had a propensity for releasing vulnerable / unstable software, and given their home user / business terminal market position, and the lack of viable competition (Yes, I know about linux, but for a lot of people using legacy apps, and for people wishing to play games it's still not a viable alternative for most) the only way they can get people to upgrade at a premium each new release, is by promising less vulnerability and better stability each time, if their OS actually DID do what it said on the box, where would be the incentive for people to spend money on the next version when it gets released? |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 16:47. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum