![]() |
Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
Right, as promised, here is the continuation of the Vote 2005 thread. It has a new poll so we can track changing opinion during the election campaign. The scores achieved by each poll option during weeks 1 and 2 are bracketed within the options available this week.
Please feel free to continue discussing any issues raised during week 2 by copying and pasting. The week 2 thread is closed but you can still read it here: http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/sh...566#post452566 |
Re: Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
Intrestingly the results are quite similer to all the polls in that labour has been increasing, and tory staying the same.
I belive that the torys continuing talk about immigration isnt winning any new votes, everyone knows about it now so they have made up there mind of this issue |
Re: Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
The polls indeed show the Tories are not getting the breakthrough they will need. Interestingly the Tory score in the various polls tracked by the BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/vote2...ml/default.stm .... is pretty much consistent with our own polling here. Labour, however, is doing far worse in our polls. To an extent this depends of course on how the question is framed and what options are available, we have 'Not voting' and 'undecided' in our poll. Our own results so far are most like those from YouGov, which I guess makes sense because YouGov is an internet-based poll. A few days ago we were discussing the merits of internet polling due to its potentially skewed sample, but on Today this morning someone was saying that a large-scale internet poll is actually more likely to be accurate than the traditional polls conducted by the likes of MORI and ICM. Certainly when you examine the stats on that BBC site you find the YouGov sample size is twice that of any of the others, while margin of error is just 2% compared to 3% for all the others. If that's the case, the race is a little closer than Labour would like to think. |
Re: Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
Quote:
__________________ Quote:
|
Re: Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
Quote:
http://www.yougov.com/yougov_website...asp?wID=0&uID= Presumably they weight the results of each poll they conduct to ensure it reflects the composition of the electorate. They are claiming to have called recent elections correctly to within 1% of the actual result. |
Re: Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
Quote:
I would rep you but you have already been too helpful so it will not let me ;) |
Re: Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
Quote:
|
Re: Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
It looks as if Mr. Howard has blown this one, last night's ITV programme has embarrassed him.
Also fascinating that Rupert Murdoch is now being critical of Tory policy on immigration. The Guardian It is extremely nasty as the Tories do, to infer there is uncontrolled immigration when the evidence is that the immigration service is in fact controlling immigration. |
Re: Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
Quote:
|
Re: Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
Quote:
|
Re: Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
Quote:
|
Re: Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
Quote:
In other words labour supporters think they will win, while torys think they may win if they work at it __________________ I think when sky news do a 'poll of polls' where the average ALL the polls out may be the best one. |
Re: Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
Quote:
I'm not stating this as fact though, it's just my opinion, taking into account the fact that Labour still have a massive majority. |
Re: Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
Based on the YouGov poll labour would have a majority of 104. It would require a futher 3% swing from the yougov poll to get a hung parlament.
|
Re: Vote 2005 week 3, with another new poll
Quote:
http://news3.thdo.bbc.co.uk/nol/shar...CULATE+RESULTS I input the YouGov poll results, then adjusted results in marginal constituencies a little to simulate tactical voting against Labour (with Labour pretty much guaranteed to lose seats this time there seemed little point in adjusting any tactical voting in Labour's favour). I was quite surprised to find Labour's majority reduced to just 44! Go and put your own figures in it, it's fun. :) |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:59. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum