![]() |
Digital Cameras
Hello,
Does anyone know if it is necessary to use a UV filter in front of a digital camera in the same way as you do in a film camera? |
Not required but the same as film cameras it will stop some glare but more importantly it will protect your lens.
|
Thanks Tricky!
The reason I mention it is that I just took a load of scenic shots which seem to be a bit washed out. Oh well. Is there a website anywhere that discusses digital photography. Most information I see is mostly about after you capture the shot. I'm still a bit of a novice in the digital world and I find my camera to be a bit difficult at times. |
If your digicam has a filter thread (not many do!) then attach one by all means (just to protect the front element) Beware, some have filter threads but the lens moves beyond the filter (zooming in and out) and will foul on any attachment!
If you want a good website then try www.robgalbraith.com It is aimed at the pro end, but contains a lot of info on CF memory cards, and the forum has hints and tips on processing in photoshop and printing. It is worth a look! Q. What camera do you have? |
I have a NIKON Coolpix 995. I really like it. It is very versatile, but I am used to film cameras of course. I'm not really sure how to get the best out of it.
For instance, with film, when you change ISO, you also affect contrast, but I'm not sure how to treat the ISO setting on my NIKON. I mean I know when I need a 'fast' setting and when I need a 'slow' setting, but with film, there is more to it than that. When I look at books about digital photography, they seem to feature a lot of Gee whizz stuff about what you can do in the PC, and no much about the process of obtaining the best image in the first place. Anyway I will take a look at the site recommenfded above Thanks |
Here's another good source of info on digital cameras:
http://www.steves-digicams.com/ I can't see anything on UV filters though. |
Quote:
I have some great shots from the 885, but I never liked the amount of "noise" that I got when using the flash or very low light conditions. Outdoor shots have been pretty good! Happy Snapping! |
Quote:
|
How would the "experts" amongst you rate this camera on price/performance.?
http://www.novatech.co.uk/novatech/S...tml?nov-ccsp41 :dunce: |
I notice that trhey can't spell 'Aspherical' on the front of this camera....hope that is not a measure of the rest of the quality.
I would not buy it without seeing it first. Seems to have limited ISO range Runs off AA batteries. They will not last very long. Though they are readily available. Really nowadays I think cameras should run off LiIon batts. Be Careful |
I like AA cells. You can get a set of four 2100mAh NiMHs for about £6 - much cheaper than any replacement LIon battery. And you can use disposables if necessary. It uses Compact Flash cards too which are cheap and versatile.
BUT, it seems to be manufactured in Taiwan by J-Link. There seems to be limited support. I think I would stick to an established camera maker. Have you looked at the Canon A70 - it's only a little more expensive? |
I have to agree with Altis - AAs are far more versatile; rechargeables are cheap and if you get caught out you can just pop a set of disposable batteries in instead.
|
Thanks for that guys, I have a trusty Pentax ME Super 35mm SLR, over 20 years old now and still perfect. How do Pentax digital cameras rate with you.?
|
Mrs A's got one of those too.
Have a wander round this site. There's loads of info - but you sometimes have to hunt for it. Look out for the pull-down menu buttons. They have some good tables of the main features. http://www.steves-digicams.com/ I always try to bear in mind the total cost of ownership. How much are spare batteries? What expansion cards are available? I took a long look at the expansion card market and plumped for Compact Flash. See this post. Now, I wouldn't buy anything that didn't take AA batteries and have a Compact Flash socket. That's why I recommended the Canon. ;) Edit Oh, and don't be conned into getting more megapixels than you need. Follow the 'www' link below to see my efforts with a lowly 2.1 megapixel camera. Even the biggest pictures on those pages are only 1/4 of that resolution. Some of my photos are spoilt more by camera shake and poor focussing than by lack of resoulution. Mind you, I hardly ever make prints from them - so, I guess, it depends what you have in mind. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:35. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum