![]() |
One arm bandits ARE bandits
Not sure if right place for this but still...
Surely most of us thought they were fixed, but its seem the proof is emerging Here Shows there is a valid use for those emulators after all ! |
Thats terrible. I'm glad that I stopped playing those things 20 years ago.
|
Quote:
|
Nice one Bob, as an avid " player " when in pubs I've known for years that this was the case, proof or no. It all depends on the bandit as you say but they do go through " cycles " , after all they have to pay out a percentage although when and what that percentage is, is again as you say down to the program.
This " news " wont deter me from " investing " the odd pound or two...lol, but thanks for the link.. busy d\l ing some bandits now so as to play at home :) :) :) EDIT :- £4.00 stake & £9.60 out...lol, as Russ D says below, some times there are ways and means..lol |
There are always ways to 'play' them though...I used to be quite successful at exploiting the cheats found in most machines :)
|
Even though I know this I still play them;) Mad or what!!:)
|
Why is it terrible? The people that operate fruit machines do so because they want to make a profit, not to give money away.
Having read that article, it seems that it there is a chance you will lose on a fruit machine. You may not have the 70% chance of winning inferred by the labelling on the machine, but you still have a chance of winning. Also that, article is actually wrong in some parts. It says that in any gamble, you have zero chance of winning. This is bull, as almost anyone who has played a fruit machine will tell you. It also seems to infer that any machine with hi and lo buttons decides you are going to lose before you push the button. This is wrong as well. Also, they are basing their findings on an emulator. The emulator may or may not be accurate.. |
Quote:
|
Scastle : you don;t work for the gaming board do you ?
""An interesting response is received from the Gaming Board, the supposedly regulatory body for fruit machines in the UK. In it, they say that the machine behaviour alleged by this site would be "undesirable" if true, but that they suspect the emulation is not accurately reproducing real machine behaviour. (We weren't aware the Gaming Board was home to emulation experts...) We have alerted them to further evidence, and await their reply. " As ususal the relavent industry watchdog sticks its head up it ar*e |
Quote:
its another to have the proof ! |
I am desperate to get one of the emulators working but cant any one got an idiots guide
|
Quote:
good luck :) |
When i down load it and others it only seems to find eastenders and also where do you get other emulaters from as my machine is quiet old
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I fail to see what this article "proves".
Yes, fruit machines are fixed. Of course they are, it says so on the front of them! The average return, over a long term, is 70% This is not, however the return on any particular spin of the reels or gamble, it is the return on if you play, say £100, on average, at the end of it, you will end up with £70. What this means in actuality is that the machine can go for a long time without paying out then pay out a large amount in one go. In fact this is exactly what a friend of mine who plays these machines a lot counts on. He visits the arcades or pubs and watches for people who play the machines without any real idea of what they're doing. When they've finished sticking in their money and losing most of it, he wanders over with a pocket full of pound coins and, generally within a few minutes, he wanders away again with several pockets full of pound coins! Mostly this is because he's taken time to learn the "tricks", eg some have "skill shot" features where, if you hold down the "cancel hold" button, the skill shot slows right down. On others if it gives three Holds in a row and you don't hold anything it puts in a win. So the poor sap who has stuck in all his money and lost it got a 0% return, my friend gets a 140% return, but the *average* return is still 70% Personally I can't be bothered and just keep my money in my pocket for a 100% guaranteed return!! |
"At the moment, it is perfectly legal to operate a fruit machine which pays out just 5% or even 0% of its takings. The 70% minimum at which most machines currently operate is purely voluntary and not enforceable by law. We want a legal minimum to be set and enforced. This would also require setting a specific period over which the percentage had to be attained, since the current indefinite period makes any percentage figure meaningless"
Quote source |
Quote:
There are two kinds of features which fruit machines will flag as "Skill". The more common one is not skill-based at all, it merely creates an impression of being so by, for example, lighting a moving trail sequentially rather than randomly. However, when the player finally presses the button to stop the feature, the machine will not necessarily select the light that was lit at that point. Frequently it will "jump" to a different one entirely. You can see this behaviour for yourself by slowing the machine down using the emulator's "Delay" function. As players came to realise that "Skill" features were misleadingly named, manufacturers instituted the "True Skill" feature. According to the BACTA guidelines, features described as "True Skill" must actually be functions of player skill. (Though bear in mind that these are only guidelines and are not legally enforceable.) However, the machine gets round this by only offering "True Skill" in a limited manner. For example, if a win ladder has 12 positions, the machine may only offer "True Skill" gambles on the first eight positions. After that it will cease to say "True Skill" on its display, and normal (cheating) behaviour will be resumed. " |
Quote:
If so get him to seek help. |
Quote:
So in fact for every £1000 entered into the machine, the machine legally has to pay out £800. However, If the machine is full, you will receive a lot more than 80%. Especially if the machine has just been delivered. |
Quote:
All fruit machines have a 'logic chip' which assumes the way you will play, for example if you have 2 symbols in a row, with the third one in the next row up, it will often offer you a 'nudge'. It will assume you will use this nudge to bring the final symbol down. This is being processed by the 'logic chip'. But if you were to act 'illogically', the process is upset. I don't wish to encourage anyone to gamble so I won't go in to any more detail other than my method relied on constantly confusing the logic chip, which paid great dividends :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Albeit very small, |
A mate of mine plays them for a living, he's banned form every arcade in Nottingham, he reckons you can easily win about £1,500 per week, he must be right because he's got a brand new Impreza and does no other work.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I get the same so we both obiously doing something wrong Could some body email me one they have got working !!!
Or provide a link to one that they know works After reading about it it seems that they all use diferent emulaters and the prob is working out which one goes with which |
got it to work it was my old cr***y machine
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:58. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum