![]() |
Monitoring usage
Probably been asked before, but I've searched many threads and can't find the answer.
Given that there is a theoretical cap (and I say theoretical as that's what some of the guys over at nthellworld.com insisted) is there a freeware application that allows a user to view the amount of traffic uploaded/downloaded over a given period? Thanks in advance. |
Re: Monitoring usage
DUmeter is a good one but not freeware
Having a quick search on the squinternet I found: http://www.junell.com/docs/sw/bwmeter/bwmeter.zip Would be nice if NTL provided something that we could use to ensure that we don't go over our allocate 1gb....As many threads will tell you though - Noone as yet seems to have been affected by the CAP. Question - Can NTL manage to monitor all the connections? |
Re: Monitoring usage
Thanks Tricky.
Been looking for ages! |
Re: Monitoring usage
I wouldn't worry about breaking the limit aranj. Nobody has ever heard of ntl enforcing this policy. Looks like AntiCap got there way in the end ;)
|
Re: Monitoring usage
Try Down2Home it will do every thing that you need
and it's Freeware, it can be downloaded from http://jitserv.coolfreepage.com/ HTH |
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
|
Re: Monitoring usage
If you have a home network tho - none of these apps are gonna work :/
|
Re: Monitoring usage
Due meter is no good if their is an internal network unlees they all go through one computer.
MRTG is the best but will not work with NTL coz they block the IP number it uses to log the uploads and downloads. I have been on about this for months on .com with no luck. I have even said NTL should supply this function for members to mnitor their useage if they wished. I do nkow that Blueyonder allow this to work and one person who uses MRTG to monitor his bandwidth has it online here looks really good shame NTL block this function perhaps if others got together we could start contacting NTL as a group and not individual people. |
Re: Monitoring usage
What about www.bmextreme.com ?
|
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
NTL could do this and allow you access to the graphs online where you would log in and only have read access. I have downloaded bmextreme and have it running along du meter. Du meter is no good as it also adds the internel network traffic to the routers incoming and outgoing traffic. It is really hard to know if you are inside or outside the guidlines of the AUP. Many don't care if they are or not I do care and wish to try and stay within the AUP. I am willling to try and talk to NTL if more customers wish to have this feature added so they can monitor their usage. I don't need customer details just the forum names on here and a PM I can show saying that customers do want a way to monitor the usage. |
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
|
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
|
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
|
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
|
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
|
Re: Monitoring usage
why worry? as has been stated ntl don't seem to enforce the cap. I've manged 3.3gb in one day and not a word!!. But, I can assure you that there is a team who monitor it. I think the only time you'll hear anything is if a particular UBR has a problem and your the heavy user on it. As for the cap, the US cable Co's all have one, so it was only a matter of time before it came here.
|
Re: Monitoring usage
MRTG Monitoring is possible but it wouldnt be permanent. At times there have been times when the modem has opened itself up and started listening but then after about an hour it would close the bridge and reject it for around 5 hours then open again. Not really useful but when it is open - it works fine :)
|
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
|
Re: Monitoring usage
it must be an regional thing PRTG has been working fine for me for over 6 months now.
kitty have you considered changing to a router that has proper snmp support so you can poll that instead of the cable modem? |
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
I have a linksys BEFSR41 version 2 I know this will not block MRTG as I have a friend who uses MRTG on the telewest BB and his is online for all to see. I have used PRTG but it has to have the SACM rebooted to get it to work and if anything happens like the pc rebooting or an illegal operation it stops and will not start again without another reboot of the SACM. BBKing did suggest this was not the best way to go about it so I have stopped rebooting the SACM. This leaves me back where I started DU- Meter logging just me if I put it on the kids they turn it off my son blames it for slowing his game down,perhaps he don't want me to know what amount he is downloading. |
Re: Monitoring usage
Kitty, if PRTG works that way then MRTG will but here it seems to open every 5 hours which is pretty pointless for me.
I mean the cable modem is on the same subnet of 255.255.255.0 so there shouldnt be a problem and as demonstrated on robin walkers site - once the default gateway is the cable modem its straight open. I think its the UBR tbh... But id just love to figure out how to bind 192.168.100.2 on netmask 255.255.255.0 with a default gateway of 192.168.100.1 without having to disabled my main internet connection... :/ |
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
|
Re: Monitoring usage
BBKing is around here? If so can you please give Windows XP instructions for binding a second ip/gateway and netmask to the same adapter?
Linux its easily possible... |
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
|
Re: Monitoring usage
You can use a static IP on ntl for a bit but it will eventually time you out. Using a second IP would then be possible for a bit.
Could the problem be stated clearly for me please, I'm a bit dense at the moment (at home looking after baby and rebuilding server which exploded in the night). It's unlikely ntl will allow you to directly hit the CM ntl-side IP (which isn't 192.168.x.x). There are also different types of SACMs in ex-CWC areas (such as Kitty and the chap from Yarmouth) so that may make a difference. |
Re: Monitoring usage
du meter will work internal lan or not, only diff is if you do have an internal lan then you need to configure du meter to only use the cable modem device, having configurable ports isnt much good lan doesnt use any specified ports.
|
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
|
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Monitoring usage
Well 192.168.100.1 is the modems address, it provides the diagnostic web stats. Only if we bypass ntls ubr and connect straight to the modem can we access it.
We just want to use SNMP to monitor the modem and find out our usage using MRTG, PRTG, Lanspy bandwidth monitor pro, etc... So we can monitor our usage and probably lower it or find out what its used on |
Re: Monitoring usage
i know ntl don't enforce the cap but i try to keep to the spirit of it.
if i couldn't monitor my usage i could easily go over it all the time. |
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
If you have a Stand-Alone Cable Modem, then you can use 192.168.100.1 to access the traffic counters via SNMP. This is how DocsDiag works. If you can use DocsDiag, then MRTG and all the rest will work too. If you have a router or a firewall between the cable modem and your PC, then there might be problems because of the router/firewall not handling the SNMP replies correctly: this is not NTL's problem. If you have digital TV set top box being used as a cable modem, then the SNMP features are not available to you. This is unlikely ever to change. |
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
I have a belkin router and three pcs connected so am after something to monitor the traffic through the router. |
Re: Monitoring usage
Tbh Id prefer to make some cool graphs to show my connections working fine - When i see the spikes then i think either - Im not using my connection or somethings happening.
I employ MRTG and RRDTOOL generated tools on my web hosting server and it provides useful information and information to assist in diagnosing problems. |
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
The practical problem is that very few domestic routers have sales literature that reveals whether they support SNMP, so that you can choose one before purchase. |
Re: Monitoring usage
RDHW - In theory it should work - http://192.168.100.1 is unreachable - Pinging 192.168.100.1 is unreachable = The only way getting to it is if the default gateway is 192.168.100.1
Any other way and it wont work... As i prefer to use my internet while monitoring - It wouldnt be too good if i monitored without actually having internet access. No router or firewall in place of the modem (Yes i really must install a firewall soon) Ambit 200 cable modem via ETHERNET Any ideas? |
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
There is one interesting misfeature of at least some (maybe all) of the Ambits: if you send a request to 192.168.100.1 during normal online working, the reply packets are labelled as coming from the ISP-side private IP address, and the replies are routed via the CMTS head-end (UBR) and back again (tromboned), rather than directly from the SACM to the PC. This reply might be blocked by security settings in the CMTS in the ex-C&W region. This mis-match of response IP address might cause routers and firewalls to drop the replies. |
Re: Monitoring usage
Windows XP - Ambit 200 - EX C&W
Ive had periods of time where it seems "Open" and i can get in for an hour or so to monitor the modem but after that it will close again... |
Re: Monitoring usage
I have the Ambit 200 with a linksys router. I have tried both with the router and without.. still the same. I am using windows 2000 I do know that the router will not block it as a friend has the exact router on his cable modem and his MRTG graphs are on his website for all to see, I am also EX C&W area.
to quote a post I did earlier. Quote:
|
Re: Monitoring usage
If they enable SNMP, ship a version of mrtg combined with a small webserver that only opens itself up to 127.0.01 and then shove a link on their desktop to the webserver and port to show the usage then wouldnt that be ok?
Unless they were doing it server side which be easier for us :) but harder for NTL. But some have SNMP/Modem access while we cant with Ambit 200s in EX C&W... :/ Is there no way at all to get around this problem without NTL intervening? |
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
Please try the following experiment and report back. This assumes that your PC is directly connected to your cable modem (without a router in the way): 1. Open a command prompt window. 2. Discover your IP address by typing the command: ipconfig 3. Let your IP address that you found be aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd 4. Type exactly the command: route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd where you replace aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd with the IP address that you discovered in step 2. Now can your PC communicate with your cable modem on 192.168.100.1? For instance, try ping, and try accessing the web interface in the cable modem. |
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
I will take the router off tonight when the kids have gone to bed and test this out. Will report back here. |
Re: Monitoring usage
C:\Documents and Settings\Henry J. Fallon>route add 192.168.100.1 mask 255.255.255.0 81.**.***.***
The route addition failed: The specified mask parameter is invalid. (Destination & Mask) != Destination. C:\Documents and Settings\Henry J. Fallon>route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 81.**.***.*** The above one completes successfully but doesnt help, the very top one wont work... |
Re: Monitoring usage
Um - it's all very well asterisking out your IP address but leaving your actual name in the directory structure rather defeats the object :)
Also if you just asterisk out the last digit of your IP at least I can see which UBR you're connected to. |
Re: Monitoring usage
It didn't work here I removed the router and followed the instructions. my IP is 81.97.2.*** I still cannot ping the SACM I also have Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 81.97.2.***
:shrug: would have thought NTL would like customers to monitor their usage and attempt to stay inside the AUP even though its not being applied it will one day or they would have removed it from the AUP. |
Re: Monitoring usage
BBKing, Why didnt you ask i couldve left the ips in :P But my name, i dont mind but i prefer not to disclose my ip unless asked for it.
BTW My modem is responding to monitoring as of 12:22 today... from a fresh power on of my system |
Re: Monitoring usage
13:10 - Modem stopped responding
10.21.16.1 <-- I think thats the UBR im on |
Re: Monitoring usage
What monitoring program are you using and how did you set it up for it to work?
|
Re: Monitoring usage
PRTG - Device: 192.168.100.1 - SNMP String: Public
Monitoring Report - Continous Polling: Events From All Network Devices - Today 24/12/2003 06:50 PM Ambit 200 Cable Modem has stopped responding (Request Timed Out) 24/12/2003 06:25 PM Ambit 200 Cable Modem is responding again. Response time is 1 milliseconds 24/12/2003 02:55 PM Ambit 200 Cable Modem has stopped responding (Request Timed Out) 24/12/2003 02:27 PM Ambit 200 Cable Modem is responding again. Response time is 3 milliseconds 24/12/2003 02:19 PM Removed Ambit 200 Cable Modem-Software Loopback |
Re: Monitoring usage
25/12/2003 02:24 AM Ambit 200 Cable Modem is responding again. Response time is 1 milliseconds
24/12/2003 10:49 PM Ambit 200 Cable Modem has stopped responding (Request Timed Out) 24/12/2003 10:24 PM Ambit 200 Cable Modem is responding again. Response time is 1 milliseconds Weird stuff, it works and it doesnt Btw Merry christmas all :) |
Re: Monitoring usage
So does anyone know how to set up MRTG with an ntl cablemodem?
Got any example config files? :confused: |
Re: Monitoring usage
if your using windows you can download an easy to use bundle here.
|
Re: Monitoring usage
|
Re: Monitoring usage
Why does it have to be teenagers sharing the Lan through a router? lol.. don't other people of different ages know how to use a PC? :)
|
Re: Monitoring usage
Having read this thread I still cannot get PRTG to work - I am using the following (all ethernet connected) under Windows XP Pro.
1x NTL Cable Modem Ambit 100 1x Linksys WRT54G Router Any ideas? - PRTG When trying to connect says "could not connect to device" using "Public" string |
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
I've downloaded much more than 1GB a day sometimes. Haven't heard a thing from NTL. |
Re: Monitoring usage
Quote:
Installed the WiFiBox Firmware (beats Linksys hands down!) |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:54. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum