![]() |
BBC Multicast
The BBC have started peering with isp's for their multicast service. I believe the following list is current showing already peered and soon to be peered isp's and NTL arent listed. Is NTL planning to provide this service, if unknown can Micke or another contact please ask thanks.
List of current providers: JANET C&W Claranet NetServices Bogons.net PIPEX In progress : Eclipse.net Intervivo.net Easynet |
Re: BBC Multicast
I would assume NTL and BT Would provide the service, without them the BBC would not be reaching many households, i'd be surprised if all of the ISP's listed above with exception of PIPEX had combined subscriber numbers to compare with BT let alone NTL
|
Re: BBC Multicast
I think the reason the BBC is going for the "little" ISP's is to test if their systems are up to the amount of people going to use their servers.. if you would have NTL and BT with the list instantly the servers surely would overload due to massive demand. now they only have something in total like 1million users, with BT and NTL in there it would be close to 5 million or more even.
I would say give it 6 months max from when its released to the public on the listed ISPs for when it'll be NTL and BT users |
Re: BBC Multicast
You're misunderstanding the whole point of multicasting - to lower the bandwidth and server requirements from unicasting!
|
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
|
Re: BBC Multicast
I've emailed NTL about this with no reply. About time they do..
|
Re: BBC Multicast
iv been banging on about Multicasting for a very long time, and it seems the likes of NTL will not Re-activate multicasting on their routers as a matter of course, BECAUSE they cant find a viable charging model and no other reason.
as iv said for years, it would open up a vast (old)new market, and save everyones bandwidth, and that includes the end users becoming far more effective for streaming their content to many people with nothing more than a single multicast UDP channel (, use VLC for instance, test MC for yourself in your own lan setup, it works a treat). at least anyone within the NTL network if nothing else, thats assuming they dont want to peer with the EU multicasting network or some other Org (because of cost etc). you can use multicasting today by tunneling into the multicasted ISP's network, such as the 'SURFnet Detective' app people use and run as part of the vast EU network, alas NTL dont seem to care about the inovation, just the cash...... |
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
|
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
|
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
|
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: BBC Multicast
I just checked the current list. Easynet are NOT on it.
Also note that despite C&W being on the list, bulldog are excluded http://www.bbc.co.uk/multicast/ |
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
However i dont think NTL will offer it anyway. They cannot even provide DNS correctly so how they could offer anything as technical as this is beyond them in my opinion |
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
True. However, NTL provide a lot of the backbone for janet. so their networks can obviously handle it. Admittedly, that's not ntl home. |
Re: BBC Multicast
that list I posted was correct at the time, this thread originated a while ago so things can change.
|
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
|
Re: BBC Multicast
JANET is pretty big, probably comparable to bt/ntl in terms of end users if not paying customers (since they customers are academic institutions). I tried it a while ago using a uni computer though and I couldn't get it to work, probably due to firewall restrictions.
|
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
|
Re: BBC Multicast
with regards JANET and indeed the other places, its conceavable that you could setup the java mTunnel
http://www.cdt.luth.se/~peppar/progs/mTunnel/ as a server or 100+ on them, and use it in client mode at the NTL end user side to get these H.264 multicasts, any takers to set it up here and advertise the urls?. ---------- Post added at 18:27 ---------- Previous post was at 17:59 ---------- if you want go a little better and include userspace dns and web server to make it easyer for a test of this,take a look at these rebol scripts http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap...sync-example.r and a whole load of simple fully working sample servers to plug the tunnel into for instance http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap...erver&form=yes http://www.rebol.net/builds/ |
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
|
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
More CS-BS to borrow Neil's term. |
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
|
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
It's also true to say that fireall's can cause havoc with the BBC trial... :D |
Re: BBC Multicast
if ntl supply janet bandwidth why is downloading of janet servers to ntl so slow?
|
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
|
Re: BBC Multicast
Hrmm I think I've already said this and think it's been mentioned loads of times, ntl supply JANET with fibre capacity not IP bandwidth for the most part.
I think there are a very few JANET sites that use ntl as a backhaul to the rest of JANET on perhaps 2Mbit up to at most 155Mbit circuits however apart from those isolated examples ntl supply JANET with fibre wavelengths only over which JANET run their 10Gbit goodness. JANET and ntl peer, ntl do not supply JANET with external bandwidth, it's just a normal private peering. |
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
Depends. It could be many things. One thing is that due to budget constraints, Universities sometimes don't upgrade their servers when they really need to. For instance, in our case, most of our student facing servers (ftp, user areas, email and web servers) are fairly up to date. However, some of the servers for our internal stuff are way out of date. For instance, the database server used to enable web access to student details is a P90! Also, Unis don't necessarily have fast enough links (again, due to budget). Where I work, we are lucky. The Campus was only opened in 1999, so our networking hardware is (relatively) new. The main Computing department (who manage the network for the whole University) is also based here, so the link tends to get upgraded frequently, and is well maintained. |
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
|
Re: BBC Multicast
Quote:
---------- Post added at 11:55 ---------- Previous post was at 11:54 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 11:57 ---------- Previous post was at 11:55 ---------- Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:11. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum