Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Manchester synagogue attack (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33713530)

Pierre 02-10-2025 14:01

Manchester synagogue attack
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cx2703lnww4t

Diversity is our strength

Sephiroth 02-10-2025 14:18

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
The perpetrator of this atrocity was shot dead by the police.

One down; how many more perps to go?

The public will want to know details of the perpetrator as in whether he was an established resident or an asylum seeker. Either case would be alarming.

Damien 02-10-2025 14:26

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Hospitals are in lockdown, but that could be precautionary.

1andrew1 02-10-2025 14:31

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36203854)
The perpetrator of this atrocity was shot dead by the police.

One down; how many more perps to go?

The public will want to know details of the perpetrator as in whether he was an established resident or an asylum seeker. Either case would be alarming.

Only one perpetrator here and as you say, he's now dead.

Sephiroth 02-10-2025 14:41

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Are you trying to evade my actual point (which is obvious)? Think 7/7, for example.

Chris 02-10-2025 15:00

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
There’s some horrific video circulating on Xitter, as is now commonplace after events like this. Truly awful. And sadly predictable, whenever a society allows the normalisation of rhetoric against a people group the way we have allowed the fringes of every pro-Palestine protest to descend into outright antisemitism. No different in principle to the shooting of Charlie Kirk. When you delegitimise someone as inhuman or their politics as inherently vile, you embolden nutters at the other extreme to act.

thenry 02-10-2025 15:12

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
RIP.

Laying in your own exposed pool of blood is no way to depart this free world. If you don't like something move on. Simples.

Hugh 02-10-2025 15:26

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
A horrible thing to happen, especially on this day (Yom Kippur).

Paul 02-10-2025 16:12

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
No idea what that is, so I looked it up.

Quote:

Yom Kippur is the holiest day of the year in Judaism. It occurs annually on the 10th of Tishrei, corresponding to a date in late September or early October. For traditional Jewish people, it is primarily centered on atonement and repentance.
This year it is apparently the "Evening of Wed, 1 Oct 2025 – Thu, 2 Oct 2025".


Given the above, I doubt the timing is a coincidence.

TheDaddy 02-10-2025 16:25

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
A couple of schools I work with will no doubt be in lockdown as a result of this, they have trouble at the best of times and I've never really understood it, tiny, little children are as innocent as they come and don't deserve to be in a place that resembles a prison more than an educational establishment

Sephiroth 02-10-2025 16:33

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36203869)
A couple of schools I work with will no doubt be in lockdown as a result of this, they have trouble at the best of times and I've never really understood it, tiny, little children are as innocent as they come and don't deserve to be in a place that resembles a prison more than an educational establishment

You really don’t understand? Kids get indoctrinated at home - otherwise this sort of thing wouldn’t happen.

Muslim kids go to madrasas and that is where indoctrination starts; Jewish kids go to Sunday school.

I think you know what’s going on.

Damien 02-10-2025 16:43

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Police have confirmed it's a terrorist attack.

Hugh 02-10-2025 17:00

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36203871)
You really don’t understand? Kids get indoctrinated at home - otherwise this sort of thing wouldn’t happen.

Muslim kids go to madrasas and that is where indoctrination starts; Jewish kids go to Sunday school.

I think you know what’s going on.

My Jewish friends call it cheder, or religious school - it’s on a Sunday morning, usually.

TheDaddy 02-10-2025 17:51

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36203876)
My Jewish friends call it cheder, or religious school - it’s on a Sunday morning, usually.

Yeah these aren't Sunday schools, they're monday to friday primary schools that happen to be Jewish, from what I've seen inclusive and promoting of British values too. Really can't be bothered arguing with certain people banging on about indoctrination when I've seen what has to be done on a daily basis just to protect them at school.

Sephiroth 02-10-2025 18:31

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36203877)
Yeah these aren't Sunday schools, they're monday to friday primary schools that happen to be Jewish, from what I've seen inclusive and promoting of British values too. Really can't be bothered arguing with certain people banging on about indoctrination when I've seen what has to be done on a daily basis just to protect them at school.

I don't think you are right. Cheders are Sunday schools. Madrasas are (AFAIK) daily sessions of a couple of hours focused on Islam.

Chris 02-10-2025 19:13

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36203868)
No idea what that is, so I looked it up.



This year it is apparently the "Evening of Wed, 1 Oct 2025 – Thu, 2 Oct 2025".


Given the above, I doubt the timing is a coincidence.

In ancient Israel, it was the one day of the year when the High Priest was allowed to go into the holiest part of the temple, carrying a blood sacrifice which he would present at the Ark of the Covenant.

As the temple and its system of animal sacrifices is long since gone, modern Jews use the festival today to focus on the principles behind it instead.

Pierre 02-10-2025 22:15

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Police have just confirmed the name of the suspect in this morning's attack as 35-year-old Jihad al Shamie, a British citizen of Syrian descent.
Well, the clue is right there in the ff’n name isn’t it?

papa smurf 02-10-2025 22:38

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36203890)
Well, the clue is right there in the ff’n name isn’t it?

I think it means struggle in Arabic

Chris 02-10-2025 23:01

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
It means holy war.

Dude111 03-10-2025 00:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth
One down; how many more perps to go?

Hioefully not many :(

1andrew1 03-10-2025 07:55

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36203892)
I think it means struggle in Arabic

Agreed. Quite a bit of nuance over what it means so everyone is right really.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiha...s%20of%20Islam.

Pierre 03-10-2025 08:38

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36203917)
Agreed. Quite a bit of nuance over what it means so everyone is right really.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiha...s%20of%20Islam.

There’s no nuance, everybody knows what it means. It mean Islamic conquest through war.

Anyone that says different is just obfuscating. It may have meant other things a long time ago.

Much like the swastika was a Hindu symbol of peace, but nobody would walk around with one tattooed on their arm now, because it is totally associated with Nazi’s.

Chris 03-10-2025 08:44

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Back in the day I recall newspapers noting that the DVLA had blacklisted the registration number J1HAD.

Chris 03-10-2025 09:24

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36203924)
'Everybody knows' is not a source, it's just your echo chamber. I doubt anyone's going to give their son a headstart in life by naming him 'Islamic conquest by war'. ;)

Might I politely suggest that you refusing to believe *anyone* would do such a thing arises from views acquired in your own echo chamber. ;)

GrimUpNorth 03-10-2025 09:38

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36203925)
Might I politely suggest that you refusing to believe *anyone* would do such a thing arises from views acquired in your own echo chamber. ;)

I suppose that could be said about many comments, yours included ;)

TheDaddy 03-10-2025 09:48

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36203879)
I don't think you are right. Cheders are Sunday schools.

and these aren't them, never said they were, they're normal schools

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36203925)
Might I politely suggest that you refusing to believe *anyone* would do such a thing arises from views acquired in your own echo chamber. ;)

Can't find the post you quoted :shocked: but I wonder if you remember the hooha years ago when those US white supremacists tried to register their child's name as Aryan Race? Turned out Aryan had an older brother and sister will almost as ridiculous names iirc

Sephiroth 03-10-2025 09:52

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36203920)
There’s no nuance, everybody knows what it means. It mean Islamic conquest through war.

Anyone that says different is just obfuscating. It may have meant other things a long time ago.

Much like the swastika was a Hindu symbol of peace, but nobody would walk around with one tattooed on their arm now, because it is totally associated with Nazi’s.

Agreed. A man called "Jihad" murders some Jews; a whole load of pirrocks at Waterloo Station (or somewhere) give it the "river to the sea treatment" and we're debating the square root of the meaning of the word "jihad".

1andrew1 03-10-2025 09:53

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36203925)
Might I politely suggest that you refusing to believe *anyone* would do such a thing arises from views acquired in your own echo chamber. ;)

Maybe I should have said 'highly unlikely'. The Wikipedia article is not an echo chamber and worth a read.

Chris 03-10-2025 10:04

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36203929)
Maybe I should have said 'highly unlikely'. The Wikipedia article is not an echo chamber and worth a read.

I’d suggest the Wikipedia editor community is very much an echo chamber all of its own, but that would be another topic.

1andrew1 03-10-2025 10:40

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36203930)
I’d suggest the Wikipedia editor community is very much an echo chamber all of its own, but that would be another topic.

Indeed. But the more pertinent question to ask in this context is "Is it better than anyone knows?".

tweetiepooh 03-10-2025 10:52

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Attacking Jews on Yom-Kippur is not new. Al-Jazeera has some interesting articles including details that have impact on the current Israeli/Palestinian situation.
And in case you are interested, in Judaism the day runs from sunset to sunset.

Pierre 03-10-2025 12:04

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Just reported on the news that one of the victims may have shot by the police!!

Hugh 03-10-2025 12:07

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36203947)
Just reported on the news that one of the victims may have shot by the police!!


From the BBC

Quote:

In an update, Greater Manchester Police says that two victims of yesterday's attack have been found to have gunshot wounds.

The statement in full reads:
"The Home Office Pathologist has advised that he has provisionally determined, that one of the deceased victims would appear to have suffered a wound consistent with a gunshot injury," a statement reads.

"It is currently believed that the suspect, Jihad Al Shamie, was not in possession of a firearm and the only shots fired were from GMP's Authorised Firearms Officers as they worked to prevent the offender from entering the synagogue and causing further harm to our Jewish community. It follows therefore, that subject to further forensic examination, this injury may sadly have been sustained as a tragic and unforeseen consequence of the urgently required action taken by my officers to bring this vicious attack to an end.

"We have also been advised by medical professionals that one of the three victims currently receiving treatment in hospital, has also suffered a gunshot wound, which is mercifully not life threatening. It is believed that both victims were close together behind the synagogue door, as worshippers acted bravely to prevent the attacker from gaining entry."

Damien 03-10-2025 12:09

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36203947)
Just reported on the news that one of the victims may have shot by the police!!

Yup. It looks like two people were shot (aside from the killer). One of them died, and one of them has injuries but will survive.

Greater Manchester Police have said the murderer didn't have a gun and the only shots fired were from the police.

thenry 03-10-2025 12:43

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Well done :no:

papa smurf 03-10-2025 12:57

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
police and guns a recipe for disaster

Damien 03-10-2025 13:05

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
We don't know what happened yet.

You send armed police into a frantic and deadly confrontation, then this is a risk. It might they acted rashly or against protocol, or it might be that something happened where they fired in good faith and a bullet went astray.

Sephiroth 03-10-2025 13:13

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36203932)
Attacking Jews on Yom-Kippur is not new. Al-Jazeera has some interesting articles including details that have impact on the current Israeli/Palestinian situation.
And in case you are interested, in Judaism the day runs from sunset to sunset.

I wonder why the ‘Israeli/Palestinian situation’ should be raised here unless it’s to highlight how Arabs tend to hate Jews (and prolly less so the other way round).

papa smurf 03-10-2025 13:21

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36203965)
I wonder why the ‘Israeli/Palestinian situation’ should be raised here unless it’s to highlight how Arabs tend to hate Jews (and prolly less so the other way round).

that's a bit of a generalisation

Hugh 03-10-2025 13:25

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36203962)
We don't know what happened yet.

You send armed police into a frantic and deadly confrontation, then this is a risk. It might they acted rashly or against protocol, or it might be that something happened where they fired in good faith and a bullet went astray.

It looks as if the attacker was in front of the door, trying to push in, whilst the people on the other side of the door were trying to hold it shut.

From the BBC

Quote:

Both victims of the gunshot wounds were believed to have been "close together behind the synagogue door"
If some of the shots missed the attacker, they could have gone through the door and hit those inside (speculation on my part).

Pierre 03-10-2025 14:44

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36203967)
If some of the shots missed the attacker, they could have gone through the door and hit those inside (speculation on my part).

Depending on high powered the police weapons are they could have gone through the attacker and through the door!

Hugh 03-10-2025 15:09

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36203970)
Depending on high powered the police weapons are they could have gone through the attacker and through the door!

I believe Manchester Police Tactical Firearms Unit use the H&K G36C, which has a muzzle velocity of 920m/s, so you’re probably right.

Sephiroth 03-10-2025 15:24

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36203966)
that's a bit of a generalisation

Er - "tend", Papa. So yes - only a "bit" of a generalisation!

Hugh 03-10-2025 15:50

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
More like a lot of a generalisation… ;)

Tend - to be likely to behave in a particular way
Bit - a small piece or amount of something:

1andrew1 03-10-2025 16:05

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36203970)
Depending on high powered the police weapons are they could have gone through the attacker and through the door!

Those killed and injured were holding the door from the inside to stop the terrorist entering so that sounds logical.

Paul 03-10-2025 16:23

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
They must surely have known they had been shot long before being told by a pathologist ?

Hugh 03-10-2025 16:34

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36203984)
They must surely have known they had been shot long before being told by a pathologist ?

Depends where the wound is - if it was on the trunk, there would be a lot of blood, and the entry wound of a bullet isn’t very big; the first responders would be checking for a pulse, and if no pulse, moving on to the next victim.

Carth 03-10-2025 17:04

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36203987)
Depends where the wound is - if it was on the trunk, there would be a lot of blood, and the entry wound of a bullet isn’t very big; the first responders would be checking for a pulse, and if no pulse, moving on to the next victim.

Quite possibly mistaken for a knife wound initially, it was obviously all hectic . . and nobody thought of a bullet wound when all the initial info was of a knife

Sephiroth 03-10-2025 17:10

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
I just watched the Synagogue vigil on TV. One of the speakers was David Lammy (where was the PM?). He was mercilessly heckled because of his past pronouncements on Israel, which are taken to stoke antisemitism.

His words were useless; thought are with you; we are with you; we have your back ... all that platitudinal stuff.

Apart from Starmer, other Labour front-benchers plus Rayner turned up. The Home Secretary was there and looked absolutely unphased. Remember, in her address yesterday, she never mentioned antisemitism.

Not only was yesterday evil stuff, it was an indictment of the government that has failed to deal with antisemitism in a definitive way. Stopping any marches that fuel antisemitism; educating whities on these demos who wear the Palestinian shawl but have absolutely no sense of history or proportion or an understanding of how they stoke antisemitism.

Will the government's focus still be on a definition of the word "Islamophobia"? As far as I am concerned there is no Islamophobia.

1andrew1 03-10-2025 17:31

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36203990)
I just watched the Synagogue vigil on TV. One of the speakers was David Lammy (where was the PM?). He was mercilessly heckled because of his past pronouncements on Israel, which are taken to stoke antisemitism.

His words were useless; thought are with you; we are with you; we have your back ... all that platitudinal stuff.

Apart from Starmer, other Labour front-benchers plus Rayner turned up. The Home Secretary was there and looked absolutely unphased. Remember, in her address yesterday, she never mentioned antisemitism.

Not only was yesterday evil stuff, it was an indictment of the government that has failed to deal with antisemitism in a definitive way. Stopping any marches that fuel antisemitism; educating whities on these demos who wear the Palestinian shawl but have absolutely no sense of history or proportion or an understanding of how they stoke antisemitism.

Will the government's focus still be on a definition of the word "Islamophobia"? As far as I am concerned there is no Islamophobia.

Carrying out acts of Islamophobia and anti-semitism are surely both hate crimes.

The PM's wife is Jewish so he is not as distant from that community as you might want to believe.

Quote:

Since moving into Downing Street, the Starmers have kept up a tradition of having Shabbat dinners on Friday nights, although the Prime Minister has admitted that his job has meant it has been difficult for him to join in. Sir Keir has called the Shabbat a “rock in the week” for the family.

He defended the tradition with unusual passion when he was criticsed by Rishi Sunak before the election for saying that he would still seek to take Friday evenings off in Downing Street.

The family have also attended the Liberal Jewish Synagogue, an imposing building across the street from Lord’s Cricket Ground, and last November Sir Keir made a visit to another London synagogue, in South Hampstead.

Lady Starmer still has members of her extended family living in Tel Aviv, and Sir Keir has spoken about how they were affected by the Oct 7 terror attack by Hamas and the subsequent war in Gaza.
https://archive.ph/1B67N#selection-3651.0-3717.194

papa smurf 03-10-2025 17:34

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
lammy was sent out as a human shield so starmer could make his escape

Damien 03-10-2025 17:47

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
People on the marches need to police the fringes that express anti-semitic statements better, or the actual police need to remove those people.

I don't think opposing Israeli actions in Gaza is anti-semitic, nor is protesting those actions. It's important we separate out those two issues. Jewish people around the world are not responsible for Israeli actions.

Sephiroth 03-10-2025 17:52

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36203991)
Carrying out acts of Islamophobia and anti-semitism are surely both hate crimes.

The PM's wife is Jewish so he is not as distant from that community as you might want to believe.


https://archive.ph/1B67N#selection-3651.0-3717.194

I'm not sure what your point is, Andrew.

I've said that there is no Islamophobia so far as I can see. I take the term "phobia", as most people would, as having the meaning of irrational fear.

Antisemitism is evident.

I'd also point out that antisemitism results at the extreme in death and causes fear amongst the Jewish community.

Anti-Islam demonstrations are rare; there is no violence from people with anti-Islam feelings.

I warn you, and all quasi-apologists for the cultural threat that is taking place, that the politicians are giving this country away to people who, eventually, will make us all face east.



---------- Post added at 16:52 ---------- Previous post was at 16:49 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36203994)
People on the marches need to police the fringes that express anti-semitic statements better, or the actual police need to remove those people.

I don't think opposing Israeli actions in Gaza is anti-semitic, nor is protesting those actions. It's important we separate out those two issues. Jewish people around the world are not responsible for Israeli actions.

Anti-Israel demonstrators stoke antisemitism. We can see that right in front of our eyes. "From the river to the sea", chanted by whities, is surely a manifestation of antisemitism and fully implies the genocide that they claim to be protesting against.

History has shown that Jews are very easy target.

Pierre 03-10-2025 18:04

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Islamophobia is a poor word to use. A fear of Islam, or more correctly Islamists is entirely rational.

Anti-Muslim Hatred is a better term.

Damien 03-10-2025 18:12

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36203995)
Anti-Israel demonstrators stoke antisemitism. We can see that right in front of our eyes. "From the river to the sea", chanted by whities, is surely a manifestation of antisemitism and fully implies the genocide that they claim to be protesting against.

But what's the alternative? Ban the protests entirely? I don't think it's reasonable to ban protests about the actions of a nation-state.

I think there is a problem that anti-semites use this issue to indulge their anti-semitism, but we need to separate these people from those who are just protesting the Israeli state.

Sephiroth 03-10-2025 18:30

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36203998)
But what's the alternative? Ban the protests entirely? I don't think it's reasonable to ban protests about the actions of a nation-state.

I think there is a problem that anti-semites use this issue to indulge their anti-semitism, but we need to separate these people from those who are just protesting the Israeli state.

In an ideal world, so to speak, what you say is right. But in this nasty world, where the Jews are pretty much the same fair game that they have been in the past, Israel/Zionism and Jews are all mixed in the minds who have an antisemitic tendency.

What can be done? The proscription of Palestine Action is a lever that should be fully used (army if necessary); likewise stamping on "from the river to the sea" placard holders. Such arrested people should, by law, attend a course that explores their attitudes and educates them as to consequences and other methods demonstration.

All very difficult. Lammy saying that his thoughts are with the Manchester Jewish community is no more than blah blah that keeps Lammy away from stuff he enjoys doing - like demanding reparations to our past colonies, recognition of Palestine etc.

Pierre 03-10-2025 18:41

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Attacker was on bail for a rape charge.

https://news.sky.com/story/synagogue...ester-13442674

Diversity is our strength.

thenry 03-10-2025 18:43

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Not enough against him to remand him in custody?

Paul 03-10-2025 20:42

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36204010)
Attacker was on bail for a rape charge.

Diversity is our strength.

What does being on bail for rape have to do with "Diversity" or commiting a terrorist attack :confused:

mrmistoffelees 03-10-2025 21:51

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36203990)
I just watched the Synagogue vigil on TV. One of the speakers was David Lammy (where was the PM?). He was mercilessly heckled because of his past pronouncements on Israel, which are taken to stoke antisemitism.

His words were useless; thought are with you; we are with you; we have your back ... all that platitudinal stuff.

Apart from Starmer, other Labour front-benchers plus Rayner turned up. The Home Secretary was there and looked absolutely unphased. Remember, in her address yesterday, she never mentioned antisemitism.

Not only was yesterday evil stuff, it was an indictment of the government that has failed to deal with antisemitism in a definitive way. Stopping any marches that fuel antisemitism; educating whities on these demos who wear the Palestinian shawl but have absolutely no sense of history or proportion or an understanding of how they stoke antisemitism.

Will the government's focus still be on a definition of the word "Islamophobia"? As far as I am concerned there is no Islamophobia.

I’ll begin by stating that yesterday was horrific evil scenes (because it would appear that to some if you don’t explicitly state this you’re supporting the action)

I think your thinking regarding Islamophobia is way off. From what I could find there were 6000 reported incidents of Islamophobia reported in 2024 vs iirc 3800 (ish) reported incidents of antisemitism

To suggest Islamophobia isn’t an issue with Islamophobia is ridiculous but alas completely expected from you.

Chris 03-10-2025 22:00

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36204035)
I’ll begin by stating that yesterday was horrific evil scenes (because it would appear that to some if you don’t explicitly state this you’re supporting the action)

I think your thinking regarding Islamophobia is way off. From what I could find there were 6000 reported incidents of Islamophobia reported in 2024 vs iirc 3800 (ish) reported incidents of antisemitism

To suggest Islamophobia isn’t an issue with Islamophobia is ridiculous but alas completely expected from you.

The Muslim population in the UK is about 10x larger than the Jewish one. On a per capita basis, that makes antisemitism a far larger problem, based on the reported crime figures you’re leaning on.

3,800 cases of antisemitism means on average one in every 100 Jews has suffered in some way, while the figure for Muslims is nearer one in 680.

damien c 03-10-2025 22:08

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
I feel sorry for 2 people I used to work with, one of them is Jewish, he was due to go to that specific synagogue yesterday but was unable to due to his wife having bad morning sickness, he is happy that he didn't go because he could have been injured but is also devastated because of what has happened.

One of my old bosses lives not too far in reality from the synagogue and last night and this morning has had people making stupid comments to him, he is Muslim, him and his family are really nice, friendly and would help anyone if they could.

I feel sorry for all involved who have lost someone, those injured and those who now will feel even more afraid to leave their houses, sadly though nothing will change really, the police will show up a bit more for a week or so and then back to their normal routines until something else happens.


Personal thoughts below.

Personally I think there will be more attacks in the coming months, with the way things are going on with Israel and Hamas, I can only see things getting more and more heated throughout the world and more attacks being carried out, sadly I think in order to actually put a stop to the whole thing, I think the west needs to step in and remove Netanyahu from power, stop providing Israel with weapons and basically take control of the IDF and give Hamas 1 day to disarm and hand over control of Gaza to an International Controlling Authority, made up from people from different countries not lead by Trump and Blair.

Get them setup for "Mutual Survival" and basically tell them straight, start again and you deal with it yourselves, no help from the west at all, personally we shouldn't be helping countries who only seem to only ever fight with each other in an aim to wipe each other out.

mrmistoffelees 03-10-2025 22:13

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36204037)
The Muslim population in the UK is about 10x larger than the Jewish one. On a per capita basis, that makes antisemitism a far larger problem, based on the reported crime figures you’re leaning on.

3,800 cases of antisemitism means on average one in every 100 Jews has suffered in some way, while the figure for Muslims is nearer one in 680.

Fair point I hadn’t considered that

Pierre 03-10-2025 23:20

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36204021)
What does being on bail for rape have to do with "Diversity" or commiting a terrorist attack :confused:

Well………


The fact that he was a Syrian national, an immigrant (don’t know how he came in) given citizenship. Obviously a wrongun. Why was he allowed to stay …….no doubt that may come out.

My point is Starmer and all the others, bang on about how diversity is our strength and diverse cultures enrich our own.

When, in reality, we are are importing a load of violent, murderous, rapist men from cultures that are less than ours, way less.

Don’t get me wrong, we have our own indigenous equals, but they are ours to deal with, we do not need to import anymore.

This upstanding citizen from Syria came here in 2007, or became a citizen in 2007. And he has allegedly raped someone and definitely killed somebody, and by his actions killed and injured several others. If he was not allowed into this country in the first place how different would those lives be now?

That is the issue.

We are letting in thousands of potential Jihadists every day. Don’t kid yourself islamist killings is already, in the scheme of things, a regular occurrence in the U.K.

Sephiroth 03-10-2025 23:52

Re: Manchester synagogue attack
 
Antisemitism is a well understood thing and its formal definition is accepted by all except those who don't like Jews.

Islamophobia hasn't been formally defined and that's because you have to define the irrationality element that is to be deprecated. At the moment, as events have shown over the last 20 years or so, Islamophobia doesn't really exist. There is a genuine fear of Islam at the moment and the demonstrations and immigration numbers do nothing to lessen that fear. Hence no phobia.

With regard to your statistics, they need to be carefully assessed. The BBC has done the reporting, quoting Tell Mama in the cases of Muslims & the Community Security Trust in the cases of Jews. Each of those charities is aligned to the respective community and are not official bodies.

It is also the case that those numbers you quoted were all related to the October 7th massacre and subsequent Israeli reaction. So that's a packed situation and in the UK, it's Muslim people who who commit terrorist acts in the UK not Jews.

Also to bear in mind, there are c. 4 million Muslims in the UK and 300,000 Jews. That would surely affect the balance of reports as Chris has observed.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:00.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum