Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   So much for the views held here (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33713465)

Itshim 01-08-2025 18:46

So much for the views held here
 
From Guido fawkes


In a busy month for TV news, the latest BARB viewing figures reveal that GB News has outpaced BBC News and Sky News on average for the whole of July. GB’s total average viewership across the month stood at 1.37%, compared to the BBC’s 1.33% and Sky’s way down on 1.14%. Summer of content for the People’s Channel…

Yesterday, GB News raked in an average of 92,400 live views, while BBC News had 58,100 and Sky News only 54,900. A reminder that Comcast has not yet renewed their contract with Sky. Britain’s news channel leaving the mainstream media in the dust…

Jaymoss 01-08-2025 18:59

Re: So much for the views held here
 
I may be way off but I do not consider this a working class forum more middle class and often out of touch with what lower levels of society want I do not mean that offensive it is what it is . I think the general population have had enough and that is why Reform did so well recently

Mr K 01-08-2025 20:11

Re: So much for the views held here
 
CF is mostly old male cable TV/broadband nerds (me included). A representative sample of the the population, it isn't. But that doesn't matter there's a place for everyone ;)
As for Reform (and their GB news pals), once elected as we've seen in local Govt they're a busted flush. All very well protesting but that's all they can do. If you use a protest vote prepare for the consequences.

Jaymoss 01-08-2025 20:12

Re: So much for the views held here
 
well we are pretty screwed voting labour or conservatives . No better options anywhere

Hugh 01-08-2025 20:28

Re: So much for the views held here
 
1 Attachment(s)
A lot has changed since last month, then...

From the BARB website

https://www.barb.co.uk/monthly-viewing/

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...3&d=1754075981

Also, from the Press Gazette (where the figures don't match Guido's)

https://pressgazette.co.uk/publisher...sky-july-2025/

Quote:

GB News marks milestone on mission to be biggest TV news channel in UK by 2028

Average daily viewership for GB News was 81,000, with BBC News Channel on 79,000.

GB News has claimed a major milestone for its TV ratings as it beat BBC News Channel and Sky News for average viewership in several key slots in July.

However Press Gazette understands the total weekly reach for the BBC News Channel through July remained more than twice the size of GB News while Sky News was almost double.

This means GB News appears to be engaging fewer people in total each month but the high average viewership means their audience stay watching for longer.

The BARB figures for July have not yet been consolidated and are therefore broadcast only, excluding on-demand platforms – meaning the BBC’s figures are likely to increase once iPlayer data is added in...

...In the breakfast slot, GB News presenters including Eamonn Holmes, Stephen Dixon, Ellie Costello and Anne Diamond had average viewing of 98,910 between 6am and 9.30am on Mondays to Sundays in July.

GB News said Sky News was on 71,560 in that time slot while BBC News Channel was at 41,250 – but it should be noted that the vast majority of viewing is at Breakfast on BBC One.
Oh, I see - GB News is beating the BBC News Channel in the morning, when most people watch the BBC News on BBC1...

papa smurf 01-08-2025 20:30

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Gb news must be doing something right to get all those views, question is what are they doing that the others aren't

Russ 01-08-2025 22:13

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36200237)
Gb news must be doing something right to get all those views, question is what are they doing that the others aren't

They're spouting the views that their fans want to hear.

In the words of Jim Cornette, "For the people who like that kind of thing, that's the kind of thing they like".

Carth 01-08-2025 23:24

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36200249)
They're spouting the views that their fans want to hear.

In the words of Jim Cornette, "For the people who like that kind of thing, that's the kind of thing they like".

Doesn't that kind of work for everything?

example:
Years ago you watched on TV what your dad wanted to watch.
Now everyone has a Phone, or laptop, and probably a TV in each bedroom, so you can watch watch, listen to, and read whatever you're into . . within reason :)

Russ 01-08-2025 23:39

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Is there another channel so overtly right wing?

Sephiroth 02-08-2025 09:31

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36200234)
CF is mostly old male cable TV/broadband nerds (me included). A representative sample of the the population, it isn't. But that doesn't matter there's a place for everyone ;)
As for Reform (and their GB news pals), once elected as we've seen in local Govt they're a busted flush. All very well protesting but that's all they can do. If you use a protest vote prepare for the consequences.

”Busted flush” as regards Reform UK needs yet to be seen. But Labour is definitely a busted flush and the Conservatives, my party, ar simply busted.


---------- Post added at 09:31 ---------- Previous post was at 09:26 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36200251)
Is there another channel so overtly right wing?

Here we go. “Right wing” - what’s wrong with GB News understanding the feelings of the average Brit?

What is wrong is for Government to ignore those feelings and for the likes of the BBC to do likewise.

Indeed what is “right wing”? Gas the Muslims? Gas the Jews? Gas the Catholics? Gas the Tories? You can’t put a valid finger on “Right Wing” in the general UK context. Yet everyone knows what the “left wing” is - and it is the opposite of what the average Brit believes.

mrmistoffelees 02-08-2025 09:55

Re: So much for the views held here
 
‘Understanding the values of the average Brit’ you say. Do you have the numbers/evidence to support that or are you just testiculating*

*the art of waving one’s arms about whilst talking complete balls

Jaymoss 02-08-2025 10:05

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36200264)
‘Understanding the values of the average Brit’ you say. Do you have the numbers/evidence to support that or are you just testiculating*

*the art of waving one’s arms about whilst talking complete balls

The recent local elections not enough for you ?

mrmistoffelees 02-08-2025 10:08

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaymoss (Post 36200265)
The recent local elections not enough for you ?

Could you explain how that statistically defines ‘average’ ? Are you making the assumption that watchers are reform
Voters ? Or?

Jaymoss 02-08-2025 10:24

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36200266)
Could you explain how that statistically defines ‘average’ ? Are you making the assumption that watchers are reform
Voters ? Or?

I do not feel the need or urge to quantify anything to you

Taf 02-08-2025 11:07

Re: So much for the views held here
 
I rapidly drifted away from BBC News when almost every topic became about women.

Rich women, poor women, fat women, thin women, artistic women, sporty women. No matter what the major event was, they morphed it into something about women.

Women may be around 50% of the population, but does all reporting have to be about them?

Sky News just seems biased and full of adverts, but so is GBNews in most respects. But at least GBNews has the guts to invite people from opposing political views to join in their debates.

Sephiroth 02-08-2025 11:41

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36200264)
‘Understanding the values of the average Brit’ you say. Do you have the numbers/evidence to support that or are you just testiculating*

*the art of waving one’s arms about whilst talking complete balls

I didn't say what the average Brit thinks - no need for evidence. I did say the bleedin' obvious - which is that the average Brit believes the opposite of left wing views. Don't you agree?

---------- Post added at 11:41 ---------- Previous post was at 11:39 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36200266)
Could you explain how that statistically defines ‘average’ ? Are you making the assumption that watchers are reform
Voters ? Or?

Why not stay with the bleedin' obvious instead of unnecessarily going into the weeds?

Chris 02-08-2025 11:43

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36200236)
A lot has changed since last month, then...

From the BARB website

https://www.barb.co.uk/monthly-viewing/

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...3&d=1754075981

Also, from the Press Gazette (where the figures don't match Guido's)

https://pressgazette.co.uk/publisher...sky-july-2025/



Oh, I see - GB News is beating the BBC News Channel in the morning, when most people watch the BBC News on BBC1...

Guido appears to have cherry-picked one day when GBN beat BBC/Sky. The Barb figures are monthly totals while the UKPG is talking about weeklies, either of which would flatten out any one-off spikes caused by a particular event/programme/one off guest/etc.

Pierre 02-08-2025 14:41

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36200251)
Is there another channel so overtly right wing?

Al jazeerah

Russ 02-08-2025 15:00

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36200262)
Here we go. “Right wing” - what’s wrong with GB News understanding the feelings of the average Brit?

Wind that neck back in. Who said there’s anything wrong with “right wing”?

Damien 02-08-2025 15:00

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Leaving aside that they cherry-picked the stats, it's probably not that surprising if they were to be the most popular. BBC and Sky News are pretty dry and essentially repeat the same segments outside of the morning and evening slots. Out of the relatively small demographic of people who watch rolling news, I think GB News is more likely to have a partisan and engaged audience who are getting more commentary and interesting shows. It's closer to the American style of news channel, with less focus on standard reporting and more emphasis on personalities and entertainment.

It's not how I think news should be done, but you can't argue that they're not doing something different.

I must admit I was wrong on them. I thought there would be room for one right-wing news channel, but I thought it would be TalkTV or whatever it was called, the Murdoch one.

Sephiroth 02-08-2025 15:14

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36200280)
Wind that neck back in. Who said there’s anything wrong with “right wing”?

I didn't and I didn't accuse you of saying that. The question you dodged was:

Quote:

what’s wrong with GB News understanding the feelings of the average Brit

Russ 02-08-2025 15:15

Re: So much for the views held here
 
And the question you’re dodging is

Quote:

Is there another channel so overtly right wing?

Sephiroth 02-08-2025 15:23

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36200283)
And the question you’re dodging is

You dodged my request for a clarification of "right wing".

Quote:

Indeed what is “right wing”? Gas the Muslims? Gas the Jews? Gas the Catholics? Gas the Tories? You can’t put a valid finger on “Right Wing” in the general UK context. Yet everyone knows what the “left wing” is - and it is the opposite of what the average Brit believes.

Russ 02-08-2025 15:32

Re: So much for the views held here
 
You know exactly what right wing means. As such you’ve still not answered my question and it’s safe to say you’ll keep doing that.

papa smurf 02-08-2025 15:52

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36200285)
You know exactly what right wing means. As such you’ve still not answered my question and it’s safe to say you’ll keep doing that.

Having a contrary opinion to that of Kier Starmer and his labour loonies

Sephiroth 02-08-2025 16:00

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36200285)
You know exactly what right wing means. As such you’ve still not answered my question and it’s safe to say you’ll keep doing that.

As if you didn't know, it was YOUR definition I was seeking. Surely you can provide that.

Russ 02-08-2025 16:19

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36200287)
As if you didn't know, it was YOUR definition I was seeking.

No, I didn't know. I can't read minds. I asked a question and you avoided it by starting off with "here we go", then went on about an unsubstantiated point about the "average Brit".

GB News takes a right-wing stance on issues, and any politicians presenting are right-wing.

Armed with this new knowledge, you can now answer the question.

Or not.

Sephiroth 02-08-2025 16:29

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36200289)
No, I didn't know. I can't read minds. I asked a question and you avoided it by starting off with "here we go", then went on about an unsubstantiated point about the "average Brit".

GB News takes a right-wing stance on issues, and any politicians presenting are right-wing.

Armed with this new knowledge, you can now answer the question.

Or not.

Before I answer your question, I need to know what you mean by "right wing". That term lies at the centre of what you are saying/asking.

So, what do you mean by "right wing"?

Carth 02-08-2025 16:31

Re: So much for the views held here
 
I've no idea if I'm a Right Winger or a Left Winger, what are the characteristics I should look for in order to be assigned a label?

Russ 02-08-2025 16:32

Re: So much for the views held here
 
You described yourself as “right wing” in the past. You figure it out.

thenry 02-08-2025 16:36

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36200291)
I've no idea if I'm a Right Winger or a Left Winger, what are the characteristics I should look for in order to be assigned a label?

I'd say angry right wing and wishful thinking left wing :LOL:

Carth 02-08-2025 16:47

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36200293)
I'd say angry right wing and wishful thinking left wing :LOL:

I'm a grumpy old man that shakes his fist at clouds, I think 'angry' is a given :D

Damien 02-08-2025 17:59

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36200291)
I've no idea if I'm a Right Winger or a Left Winger, what are the characteristics I should look for in order to be assigned a label?

Left Wing = Support a bigger state, more government intervention and maybe more socially progressive.

Right Wing = Support a smaller state, less government intervention and maybe less socially progressive.

Although it's not that simple. I.E Old Labour tended to be less socially progressive but supported a bigger state. Some people on the populist right also think that way now. You also get people who want a much smaller state and are socially progressive in that the government shouldn't get involved in the personal lives of anyone.

Carth 02-08-2025 18:22

Re: So much for the views held here
 
right . . .

so what does 'support a smaller/bigger state mean exactly?

Are we about to dump Scotland and Wales, or take over the whole of Ireland?

Please also explain 'Socially Progressive' too, because for years I've just seen society go backwards.


I'm wondering if the Raving Looneys are the party for me, are they Left, Right, or out of this World? :D

Chris 02-08-2025 18:45

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36200297)
right . . .

so what does 'support a smaller/bigger state mean exactly?

Are we about to dump Scotland and Wales, or take over the whole of Ireland?

It means the extent to which the State regulates/owns infrastructure and services, not the number of square miles under government control.

Quote:

Please also explain 'Socially Progressive' too, because for years I've just seen society go backwards.

I'm wondering if the Raving Looneys are the party for me, are they Left, Right, or out of this World? :D
Socially progressive is supposed to mean advocating for social justice, equality and civil rights. Whether it actually achieves any of that is debatable.

Sephiroth 02-08-2025 20:19

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36200296)
Left Wing = Support a bigger state, more government intervention and maybe more socially progressive.

Right Wing = Support a smaller state, less government intervention and maybe less socially progressive.


Although it's not that simple. I.E Old Labour tended to be less socially progressive but supported a bigger state. Some people on the populist right also think that way now. You also get people who want a much smaller state and are socially progressive in that the government shouldn't get involved in the personal lives of anyone.


LEFT = Support a bigger state, more government intervention and maybe more socially progressive. (As per Damien's Left Wing).

LEFT WING = LEFT + nationalise what you can; maximal governmental intervention; include migration within socially progressive policies; totally screw the rich (whoever that is defined as being). Oh - gas the Tories

RIGHT = Support a smaller state, less government intervention and maybe less socially progressive. (As per Damien's Right Wing).

RIGHT WING = ???? It's certainly not going to be RIGHT+. According to Starmer, it's anyone who supports demonstrations against the Connolly woman who tweeted something deemed to be racist in the heat of her distraught moment after the Southport murders. Even @Russ has a difficulty defining "right wing".


Russ 02-08-2025 20:22

Re: So much for the views held here
 
lol you wish

Sephiroth 02-08-2025 21:54

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36200304)
lol you wish

What's your definition of "right wing"?

Paul 02-08-2025 22:14

Re: So much for the views held here
 
The wing on the right.

1andrew1 02-08-2025 22:51

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36200270)
But at least GBNews has the guts to invite people from opposing political views to join in their debates.

Lol :D

Is 'Any Questions' on GB News?

How many Labour or Liberal Democrat presenters are there on GB News?

Hugh 03-08-2025 08:07

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36200305)
What's your definition of "right wing"?

As Chris posted in October ‘22, the second-last time you raised this subject

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36136129)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
We seem to understand what "lefties" means, but "right wing" needs more definition. In my lifetime, it meant fascism.
The Political Compass remains one of the best resources for teasing out these definitions. This is their exapliner, well worth 5 minutes of your time:



Long story short, if you try to describe economic and social politics in terms of “left” and “right” simultaneously you will come unstuck. You need to define someone’s position as economically left or right and socially authoritarian or libertarian. And one position by no means pre-ordains the other.

Their website is here: https://www.politicalcompass.org/

And your result was

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1665073627

Sephiroth 03-08-2025 08:43

Re: So much for the views held here
 
I'm trying to get Russ to define "right wing", which is a term he used in relation to GB News. He framed a question around that so, before I can answer him properly, I need to know what he means by "right wing". Russ has avoided obliging me with his definition.

I'm not surprised - it's not easy. Past "right wing" has been founded on the Mussolini/Hitler model. But that was then. I've noted what Hugh has researched:

Quote:

Long story short, if you try to describe economic and social politics in terms of “left” and “right” simultaneously you will come unstuck. You need to define someone’s position as economically left or right and socially authoritarian or libertarian. And one position by no means pre-ordains the other.
No wonder Russ cannot justify his "overtly right wing" description of GB News (and by association - Reform UK).


Maggy 03-08-2025 09:02

Re: So much for the views held here
 
I didn’t join CF for politics. I came to have fun and to improve cable tv output. Now I’m not sure if any of that applies.

Hugh 03-08-2025 09:24

Re: So much for the views held here
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36200315)
I'm trying to get Russ to define "right wing", which is a term he used in relation to GB News. He framed a question around that so, before I can answer him properly, I need to know what he means by "right wing". Russ has avoided obliging me with his definition.

I'm not surprised - it's not easy. Past "right wing" has been founded on the Mussolini/Hitler model. But that was then. I've noted what Hugh has researched:



No wonder Russ cannot justify his "overtly right wing" description of GB News (and by association - Reform UK).


It really doesn’t.

The Encyclopaedia Brittanica dictionary says

Quote:

Britannica Dictionary definition of RIGHT WING

[singular]

: the part of a political group that consists of people who support conservative or traditional ideas and policies : the part of a political group that belongs to or supports the Right
Quote:

right–wing

Britannica Dictionary definition of RIGHT–WING

: of, relating to, or belonging to the political Right : having or supporting ideas and policies that are associated with conservative groups
Also from Brittanica

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1754209113

What’s your definition of right wing? (please don’t default to your previous standard answer of "its well understood"…

Jaymoss 03-08-2025 09:26

Re: So much for the views held here
 
That has to be out of date now though unless it is the American system where Liberal means something totally different to here. How are the far left Radical ? I thought they were meant to be passive

papa smurf 03-08-2025 09:39

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36200316)
I didn’t join CF for politics. I came to have fun and to improve cable tv output. Now I’m not sure if any of that applies.



Have you improved cable tv output?

Sephiroth 03-08-2025 09:42

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Hugh asks a fair question. "Far right" and "right wing" to my mind are merged concepts. The pedantic might say that anything right of "centre" (whatever the "centre" is) is on the right wing of politics.

But generally, we all understand that, in present context, right wing politics = far right politics - namely the people that Starmer says support Lucy Connolly and the injustice of her imprisonment. Waters nicely muddied.


---------- Post added at 09:42 ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36200318)
It really doesn’t.

The Encyclopaedia Brittanica dictionary says





Also from Brittanica

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1754209113

What’s your definition of right wing? (please don’t default to your previous standard answer of "its well understood"…

I endorse the political spectrum diagram provided that we can contextualise "centre".

Hugh 03-08-2025 10:26

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

But generally, we all understand that, in present context, right wing politics = far right politics
No, "we" don’t…

Just repeating it doesn’t make it true…

A recent YouGov survey showed

https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articl...right-spectrum

Quote:

Where do Britons place the parties on the spectrum?

When it comes to how voters see the main UK parties, the order is probably not that surprising to those familiar with the terms. The Greens are seen as the most left-wing of the five main parties, with an average score of -55, followed by Labour on -36 and the Lib Dems as the most ‘centrist’ party on -23.

The Conservatives are perceived as somewhat right-wing, scoring +51, while Reform UK are seen as being the furthest out from the centre, with Britons giving them an average score of +69.
Quote:

How do Britons’ views of the parties compare to those of experts?

A test of the public understanding of ‘left’ and ‘right’ is to compare their views with experts. Since 1999, the Chapel Hill Center for European Studies has conducted periodic surveys of political scientists about the positioning of European political parties, with the most recent results published earlier this year.

When comparing the two sets of data, the British public and the experts are broadly agreed on the placements of the Conservatives, Lib Dems and Greens. But when it comes to Labour, political scientists view the party as closer to the centre than the public do (-36 vs -24), while seeing Reform UK as further to the right (+69 vs +85).

Jaymoss 03-08-2025 10:28

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36200322)
Hugh asks a fair question. "Far right" and "right wing" to my mind are merged concepts. The pedantic might say that anything right of "centre" (whatever the "centre" is) is on the right wing of politics.

But generally, we all understand that, in present context, right wing politics = far right politics - namely the people that Starmer says support Lucy Connolly and the injustice of her imprisonment. Waters nicely muddied.


---------- Post added at 09:42 ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 ----------



I endorse the political spectrum diagram provided that we can contextualise "centre".

I do not see where those who now tend to air on the DILLIGAF spectrum and I do not mean the late great Jefferson Tarn but those who just do not care any more and have given up expecting anyone to actually do anything good in power

thenry 03-08-2025 11:00

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36200316)
I didn’t join CF for politics. I came to have fun and to improve cable tv output. Now I’m not sure if any of that applies.

Show us your boobs then Ms funfunfun :spin:

And cable has indeed improved. There are no cloned modems on the network. :D

Carth 03-08-2025 11:26

Re: So much for the views held here
 
After further reading of this thread, I've come to the conclusion I'm neither Left, Middle or Right concerning my political stance.

I, like probably a few million others, just don't bother voting, because one set of self serving inept politicians is just as pathetic as the other.

It's definitely time for real changes, and if there aren't any on the horizon, the race to the bottom will still be in the hands of those too 'scared' to stop blindly running. :PP:

SnoopZ 03-08-2025 11:35

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36200330)
Show us your boobs then Ms funfunfun :spin:

And cable has indeed improved. There are no cloned modems on the network. :D

Brave man after her last reply when you said something like that to Maggy... :dig:

Carth 03-08-2025 11:38

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Maggy, like a few of us older folk, probably has distant relatives that were members of the Spanish Inquisition :D

thenry 03-08-2025 11:40

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SnoopZ (Post 36200333)
Brave man after her last reply when you said something like that to Maggy... :dig:

You got my 6£ yet?

Itshim 03-08-2025 11:42

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36200316)
I didn’t join CF for politics. I came to have fun and to improve cable tv output. Now I’m not sure if any of that applies.

To state the obvious, don't read the thread

SnoopZ 03-08-2025 11:44

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36200336)
You got my 6£ yet?

I've spoken to my financial advisor and my lawyer and they have reviewed your case and their judgement is you screwed yourself over in trying to sell a piece of junk phone in the first place so in fact you owe me £16. :D

Sephiroth 03-08-2025 13:27

Re: So much for the views held here
 
I’ll put this “right wing / far right” thing another way, notwithstanding the political scientists and their absolute lack of understanding of what people think.

What is it, specifically (as in policies or pronouncements), about Reform UK that puts them on the “right wing” and at which number on the 65-89 scale?

As a follow-up question, where does GB News sit on that scale and why? Russia certainly that GB News is “overtly right wing” but won’t define “right wing” from his perspective.

Paul 03-08-2025 14:27

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36200337)
To state the obvious, don't read the thread

To state the obvious, that part of the job of being a Moderator.

Sephiroth 03-08-2025 17:06

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36200349)
To state the obvious, that part of the job of being a Moderator.

But Maggy said she joined to have fun, not to be a Moderator.

Hugh 03-08-2025 17:51

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36200345)
I’ll put this “right wing / far right” thing another way, notwithstanding the political scientists and their absolute lack of understanding of what people think.

What is it, specifically (as in policies or pronouncements), about Reform UK that puts them on the “right wing” and at which number on the 65-89 scale?

As a follow-up question, where does GB News sit on that scale and why? Russia certainly that GB News is “overtly right wing” but won’t define “right wing” from his perspective.

But it’s not what "political scientists and their absolute lack of understanding of what people think" - the link above referenced what people think; just because it’s not what you think, doesn’t make their views invalid…

Quote:

Where do Britons place the parties on the spectrum?

When it comes to how voters see the main UK parties, the order is probably not that surprising to those familiar with the terms. The Greens are seen as the most left-wing of the five main parties, with an average score of -55, followed by Labour on -36 and the Lib Dems as the most ‘centrist’ party on -23.

The Conservatives are perceived as somewhat right-wing, scoring +51, while Reform UK are seen as being the furthest out from the centre, with Britons giving them an average score of +69.

Taf 03-08-2025 18:48

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36200307)
Lol :D

Is 'Any Questions' on GB News?

How many Labour or Liberal Democrat presenters are there on GB News?

I don't count, but there are Labour politicians, and very Left-leaning people taking part in their discussions or debates, usually every day. It's all usually well-balanced, unlike Question Time.

Sephiroth 03-08-2025 20:32

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36200365)
But it’s not what "political scientists and their absolute lack of understanding of what people think" - the link above referenced what people think; just because it’s not what you think, doesn’t make their views invalid…


You also said:

Quote:

When comparing the two sets of data, the British public and the experts are broadly agreed on the placements of the Conservatives, Lib Dems and Greens. But when it comes to Labour, political scientists view the party as closer to the centre than the public do (-36 vs -24), while seeing Reform UK as further to the right (+69 vs +85).

Paul 03-08-2025 21:04

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36200363)
But Maggy said she joined to have fun, not to be a Moderator.

Not relevant, she is a Moderator.

Another Moderator (and Administrator) function is to tell people to move on when they start to veer off topic.

Consider this one of those times.

Carth 03-08-2025 22:43

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36200365)
. . . the link above referenced what people think; just because it’s not what you think, doesn’t make their views invalid…


I've never been 'officially' asked what I think.

Was it like those survey things that only seem to ask the 'right' sort of people in the 'right' areas?

Hugh 04-08-2025 09:11

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36200370)

You also said:



True - but the other quote provided evidence of "what people think", which you seem to be ignoring, as it doesn’t support your less than subtle efforts to shuffle the Overton Window to the right, making you/Farage/BadEnoch seem "not right wing" by stating that

Quote:

"Far right" and "right wing" to my mind are merged concepts
Quote:

right wing politics = far right politics
Quote:

Past "right wing" has been founded on the Mussolini/Hitler model

papa smurf 04-08-2025 09:29

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36200385)
I've never been 'officially' asked what I think.

Was it like those survey things that only seem to ask the 'right' sort of people in the 'right' areas?

i've never been asked what i think about anything, and no amount of waffling BS can know what I'm thinking without asking, and then i might not tell the truth just to fudge the stats

Sephiroth 04-08-2025 09:59

Re: So much for the views held here
 
@Hugh

Of course I’m not right wing. I believe in free speech, democracy and no uncontrolled immigration. I also deplore the left wing (a well understood term) who want to take my freedoms away.

So far, nobody other than me has defined “right wing” in the context of this thread, least of all Russ who alleges that GB News is “overtly right wing”?

Don’t you agree that better precision makes for better debate?



1andrew1 04-08-2025 10:05

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36200366)
It's all usually well-balanced, unlike Question Time.

Agreed. That programme gained its nickname of Farage Time for a good reason! ;)

No Labour, Green or Liberal Democrat presenters on GB News, so the discussion questions are all set by biased, shouty right-wing presenters.

Taf 04-08-2025 10:14

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36200406)
.... biased, shouty right-wing presenters.

In almost all the debates on GBNews, it's the Left Wingers who have been "shouty". And most likely to try to talk over anyone else in the debate.

Sephiroth 04-08-2025 10:27

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36200406)
Agreed. That programme gained its nickname of Farage Time for a good reason! ;)

No Labour, Green or Liberal Democrat presenters on GB News, so the discussion questions are all set by biased, shouty right-wing presenters.

How do you define "right wing"? I would put the GB News presenters as right of centre - which s what most Conservatives are/should be.

---------- Post added at 10:27 ---------- Previous post was at 10:26 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36200409)
In almost all the debates on GBNews, it's the Left Wingers who have been "shouty". And most likely to try to talk over anyone else in the debate.

Well said. And I needn't trouble you for a definition of "left wingers"!

Carth 04-08-2025 11:43

Re: So much for the views held here
 
I can't help thinking there's a few posters in this thread that seem to know an awful lot about the content of a program they don't (won't) watch because it's . . . not to their taste?

papa smurf 04-08-2025 12:18

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36200416)
I can't help thinking there's a few posters in this thread that seem to know an awful lot about the content of a program they don't (won't) watch because it's . . . not to their taste?

That's why the viewing figures are up

1andrew1 04-08-2025 13:28

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36200410)
How do you define "right wing"? I would put the GB News presenters as right of centre - which s what most Conservatives are/should be.

A right-winger can be someone right-wing on social values eg hang those rapists, deport every asylum speaker or they could be right-wing on economics eg if it moves, privatise it.

Traditionally, per my link below, voters are more aligned with Labour on economic values and the Conservatives on social values. This is the sweet spot that Reform seems to be aiming for.
https://flipchartfairytales.wordpress.com/page/2/

---------- Post added at 13:28 ---------- Previous post was at 13:24 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36200419)
That's why the viewing figures are up

GB News hasn't been the same since they got rid of Dan Wooton and the comedy priest but obviously I'm in a minority here.

Sephiroth 04-08-2025 16:12

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36200432)
A right-winger can be someone right-wing on social values eg hang those rapists, deport every asylum speaker or they could be right-wing on economics eg if it moves, privatise it.

Traditionally, per my link below, voters are more aligned with Labour on economic values and the Conservatives on social values. This is the sweet spot that Reform seems to be aiming for.
https://flipchartfairytales.wordpress.com/page/2/
<SNIP>

At last, an attempt at the definition of "right wing". Pretty well thought through, imo. Now - does Russ accept your definition?

Maggy 04-08-2025 16:30

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36200363)
But Maggy said she joined to have fun, not to be a Moderator.

Actually I said no such thing. You put words into my mouth.

Itshim 04-08-2025 16:35

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36200349)
To state the obvious, that part of the job of being a Moderator.

You really make your minions read everything. If the subject doesn't appeal let someone else. I keep forgetting this 1984 .so sorry

Sephiroth 04-08-2025 16:37

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36200449)
Actually I said no such thing. You put words into my mouth.

Well, you did (taking my comma into account):

Quote:

I didn’t join CF for politics. I came to have fun and to improve cable tv output. Now I’m not sure if any of that applies.
On the wider point of this thread, the views held here are as broad as they are long. They can be grouped and in the Current Affairs section, which was created by the owners, political stuff is bound to arise and with it the polarised positions people can take. Some of us have fun with that.


Itshim 04-08-2025 16:45

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36200409)
In almost all the debates on GBNews, it's the Left Wingers who have been "shouty". And most likely to try to talk over anyone else in the debate.

What have noticed (my smart tv has taken to starting up on gb news) it reports on demonstrations etc that never get covered on bbc/itv or sky given the stink around bbc programmes . I am starting to wonder why.

1andrew1 04-08-2025 17:26

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36200453)
What have noticed (my smart tv has taken to starting up on gb news) it reports on demonstrations etc that never get covered on bbc/itv or sky given the stink around bbc programmes . I am starting to wonder why.

There's demonstrations taking place all the time, the majority of which are not newsworthy. However, GB News is not a news channel by its own description so perhaps this is why it features them?

Paul 04-08-2025 17:28

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36200450)
You really make your minions read everything.

Part of the job. ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36200450)
keep forgetting this 1984 .so sorry

Its 2025 :dozey:

Of course, we all know that was actually just another of your silly jibes. :rolleyes:
I let this one go, but keep it up and you will end up removed from your own topic.

Sephiroth 04-08-2025 17:33

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36200453)
What have noticed (my smart tv has taken to starting up on gb news) it reports on demonstrations etc that never get covered on bbc/itv or sky given the stink around bbc programmes . I am starting to wonder why.

It's why I believe Labour will try to stamp on GB News through OFCOM.

GB News is a breath of fresh air. It tells it as it is but (deliberately) adds a right-of-centre flavour. It gives left-of-centre luminaries a free voice and I think the balance is correct. You can contrast this with the other news broadcasters who are subtly polarised toward the left or toward the enemies of Israel sort of thing; they are trying to seem more balanced, but you can't easily change the journo's spots, some of which have been there for donkeys' years.

1andrew1 04-08-2025 17:36

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36200465)
It's why I believe Labour will try to stamp on GB News through OFCOM

This is not Trump's America, the regulator and party are separate.

Sephiroth 04-08-2025 17:41

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36200466)
This is not Trump's America, the regulator and party are separate.

You wish. How do some Sirs and Lords get there? Not to mention Freemasons, Eton, Oxford and other old boy networks.

Mr K 04-08-2025 17:44

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36200465)
It's why I believe Labour will try to stamp on GB News through OFCOM.

I wouldnt worry, OFCOM couldn't stamp on anything. A stiffly worded letter possibly...

OFWAT has been given its marching orders, OFCOM should be next. The regulators in this country are pathetic.

jem 04-08-2025 19:53

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36200469)
I wouldnt worry, OFCOM couldn't stamp on anything. A stiffly worded letter possibly...

OFWAT has been given its marching orders, OFCOM should be next. The regulators in this country are pathetic.

Yes yes fine OFWAT has been given it’s marching orders, but what’s the chances of it being replaced with another organisation with a slightly different name, possibly the same people serving on it, a massive ‘rebranding’ budget, paid for by you and I, and nothing different happens?

Paul 04-08-2025 22:54

Re: So much for the views held here
 
Its not so much being replaced as its functions being offloaded to others.

Quote:

Ofwat will be abolished and its functions will be merged with water functions across the Environment Agency, Natural England and the Drinking Water Inspectorate to form a new single, powerful regulator.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:11.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum