Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33713447)

thenry 17-07-2025 14:37

Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

16 and 17-year-olds will be able to vote in next general election

https://news.sky.com/story/politics-...#liveblog-body
Good.

Paul 17-07-2025 14:51

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Good ? You must know a different set of 16/17 year olds to me. :erm:

I note they will be able to vote for someone else, but not stand for election themselves, makes perfect sense. :rolleyes:

They also wont be able to do some of the things they are voting for policies on.

thenry 17-07-2025 14:53

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
What's the worse that could happen, after all they will only vote according to which way the wind is blowing that particular day :D

Paul 17-07-2025 14:56

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36199416)
What's the worse that could happen

Reform, Libdems .... or even Greens (Shudder) get elected.

thenry 17-07-2025 15:05

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Oh a whole load of liberating will be going on for sure.

downquark1 17-07-2025 15:14

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Why do we keep getting these radical changes without debate?

denphone 17-07-2025 15:16

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
If they pay tax then they should be able to vote like other countries.

thenry 17-07-2025 15:18

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36199420)
If they pay tax then they should be able to vote like other countries.

That's a good point. I paid bloody tax from 16. Where was my vote!

mrmistoffelees 17-07-2025 15:22

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36199417)
Reform, Libdems .... or even Greens (Shudder) get elected.

There’s a cynical part of me that wonder if that’s exactly why the age has been lowered in an attempt to keep reform out at the next election. (More than likely it’s to bring us into line with Scotland and wales I think?)

Be interesting to see voting intentions for 16 & 17 year olds

TheDaddy 17-07-2025 16:19

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36199422)

Be interesting to see voting intentions for 16 & 17 year olds

For the majority the intention will be to not do it ;)

1701-e 17-07-2025 16:45

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Not reform or Tory judging by a you gov poll. 11% for, 83% against the age reduction for both of those parties surveyed

Mr K 17-07-2025 17:37

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Fair enough. They'll be voting for a Govt for the next 5 years, taking them to 21, the most important years of their life. Why should the old non productive has beens decide their future.

nomadking 17-07-2025 17:39

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Children can be liable for tax before 16. Most countries around the world still have a voting age of 18.

Paul 17-07-2025 18:05

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
What ID will they have to use, they wont have a driving licence at 16 (or many at 17 either), and I suspect the majority wont have passports.

papa smurf 17-07-2025 18:19

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36199427)
Fair enough. They'll be voting for a Govt for the next 5 years, taking them to 21, the most important years of their life. Why should the old non productive has beens decide their future.

now now don't talk yourself down you're not completely useless

---------- Post added at 18:19 ---------- Previous post was at 18:18 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36199429)
What ID will they have to use, they wont have a driving licence at 16 (or many at 17 either), and I suspect the majority wont have passports.

Bank card is what i read this morning

Bank cards allowed as voter ID

As part of the strategy, voter ID will also be extended to include UK-issued bank cards.

Mr Holmes raised concerns using bank cards for ID will "undermine the security of the ballot box".

https://news.sky.com/story/16-and-17...ction-13397859

Mr K 17-07-2025 18:46

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36199430)
Mr Holmes raised concerns using bank cards for ID will "undermine the security of the ballot box".

Nah. Mr Holmes is worried it will allow youngsters to vote for someone else.

It was I'm their manifesto, so Labour have a mandate. Granted, it is unusual for parties to actually do what they promised.

papa smurf 17-07-2025 18:51

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36199433)
Nah. Mr Holmes is worried it will allow youngsters to vote for someone else.

It was I'm their manifesto, so Labour have a mandate. Granted, it is unusual for parties to actually do what they promised.

i thought they could use Pokemon cards but no one listens to me

Paul 17-07-2025 18:57

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
You can get bank cards at less than 16, all my kids had one.

Seems like they finally realised that ID was a bad idea, and are watering it down to the point its ... well pointless.

papa smurf 17-07-2025 19:03

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36199438)
You can get bank cards at less than 16, all my kids had one.

Seems like they finally realised that ID was a bad idea, and are watering it down to the point its ... well pointless.

you could send one of the kids to vote on your behalf using a card as id , just make sure they don't pass a toy shop on the way

thenry 17-07-2025 19:15

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Proxy vote

https://www.gov.uk/how-to-vote/votin...r-someone-else

My dads brother voted for my dad while he was out the country working. I wasn't aware of proxy votes so refrained only to get a bollocking :(

Damien 17-07-2025 19:43

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36199438)
You can get bank cards at less than 16, all my kids had one.

Seems like they finally realised that ID was a bad idea, and are watering it down to the point its ... well pointless.

Yup. Actually this change and that people will now be automatically registered to vote are the bigger changes from this bill IMO.

As for 16/17 year olds voting, I am fine with it. I think you need a good reason not to enfranchise people and 16 is probably as early as we can give the vote.

nomadking 17-07-2025 21:02

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Only 10 countries in the world have voting at 16. Not exactly widespread.

Mr K 17-07-2025 21:59

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36199444)
Only 10 countries in the world have voting at 16. Not exactly widespread.

We're trend setters. Well done the UK.

The young are the future. Trying to pick rhe crap hand they've been dealt. God help them.

nomadking 17-07-2025 22:09

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36199446)
We're trend setters. Well done the UK.

The young are the future. Trying to pick rhe crap hand they've been dealt. God help them.

Up there with the likes of Cuba and Nicaragua?

Sephiroth 17-07-2025 22:30

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36199442)
Yup. Actually this change and that people will now be automatically registered to vote are the bigger changes from this bill IMO.

As for 16/17 year olds voting, I am fine with it. I think you need a good reason not to enfranchise people and 16 is probably as early as we can give the vote.

16 year olds cannot frame their vote in terms of current affairs, taxes, economy, defence, driving and so on.

Labour's proposal is naked gerrymandering because they know that kids don't change up to being less socialist / more conservative until they've tasted proper life.

Maggy 17-07-2025 22:40

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
I remember the kerfuffle about the lowering of voting age to 18. Now we all accept it without a second thought.Speaking as a teacher I think 16 is the lowest age that can be applied to voting. Younger than that it will become problematic.

Chris 17-07-2025 22:41

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Kids aren’t socialist, they’re contrarian and reactionary. Labour better hope this doesn’t bite them on the bum - when the kidz come to cast a ballot, Labour will be the establishment.

Mr K 17-07-2025 23:26

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36199453)
Kids aren’t socialist, they’re contrarian and reactionary. Labour better hope this doesn’t bite them on the bum - when the kidz come to cast a ballot, Labour will be the establishment.

At least the next generation will own it, rather than given it, without a choice.

Paul 18-07-2025 02:03

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36199457)
At least the next generation will own it, rather than given it, without a choice.

Ok, quick reality check - its only 2 years between 16 & 18, and general elections tend to be every 4 or 5 years, so the majority will see no difference.

Even council elections are every 2/3 or 4 years (depending on how they choose to run them).

They will also have to be registered to vote (how many do you think will bother, they'll still be at school).

nomadking 18-07-2025 07:07

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36199459)
Ok, quick reality check - its only 2 years between 16 & 18, and general elections tend to be every 4 or 5 years, so the majority will see no difference.

Even council elections are every 2/3 or 4 years (depending on how they choose to run them).

They will also have to be registered to vote (how many do you think will bother, they'll still be at school).

But the young socialists WILL bother. Starmer joined the Labour party at 16.

Damien 18-07-2025 07:17

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36199450)
16 year olds cannot frame their vote in terms of current affairs, taxes, economy, defence, driving and so on.

Labour's proposal is naked gerrymandering because they know that kids don't change up to being less socialist / more conservative until they've tasted proper life.

It won't change much, the demographic is too small, and less likely to be engaged. I also think they won't vote for Labour in the volumes people expect.

---------- Post added at 07:17 ---------- Previous post was at 07:16 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36199462)
But the young socialists WILL bother. Starmer joined the Labour party at 16.

Then good for them. If it causes people to become politically aware earlier, it's a good thing.

Anonymouse 18-07-2025 08:11

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36199464)
I also think they won't vote for Labour in the volumes people expect.

If they vote Labour at all...which I doubt.

And I still want the introduction of 'None Of The Above'!

Mr K 18-07-2025 17:58

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymouse (Post 36199467)
If they vote Labour at all...which I doubt.

And I still want the introduction of 'None Of The Above'!

Only needed if voting is compulsory, which it is in Australia, and its an option on the ballot paper there.

'None of the above' here - either don't vote or stand for election yourself.

Sephiroth 18-07-2025 18:36

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36199492)
Only needed if voting is compulsory, which it is in Australia, and its an option on the ballot paper there.

'None of the above' here - either don't vote or stand for election yourself.

I favour compulsory voting.

Jaymoss 18-07-2025 18:41

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36199494)
I favour compulsory voting.

I would still not vote and face the consequences.

pip08456 18-07-2025 19:36

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36199494)
I favour compulsory voting.

Riddle me this Seph, we have compulsoy voying introduced. How is it policed? Do people just have to turn up at the polling station, have their name ticked off on the electoral role as having attended?
Do they have to vote or can they destroy their ballot by whatever means?
How can someone check if a secret ballot has resulted in a vote?

Mr K 18-07-2025 19:45

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36199497)
Riddle me this Seph, we have compulsoy voying introduced. How is it policed? Do people just have to turn up at the polling station, have their name ticked off on the electoral role as having attended?
Do they have to vote or can they destroy their ballot by whatever means?
How can someone check if a secret ballot has resulted in a vote?

Look at Australia. You get a fine. Doesn't matter if submit a blank vote or spoil the ballot, as long you return it.

I favour compulsory voting too. But it'll never happen in this country. We're too apathetic and object to anything that involves getting out of bed.

Sephiroth 18-07-2025 20:47

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36199498)
Look at Australia. You get a fine. Doesn't matter if submit a blank vote or spoil the ballot, as long you return it.

I favour compulsory voting too. But it'll never happen in this country. We're too apathetic and object to anything that involves getting out of bed.

You're prolly right. Anyway, the government does the opposite of what people want.

Btw, I also support an ID card - always have done.

Paul 19-07-2025 01:32

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaymoss (Post 36199495)
I would still not vote and face the consequences.

Why ?

Anonymouse 19-07-2025 08:28

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Shouldn't be compulsory. The right to vote should include the right not to vote IMO.

Is NOTA an option for the Aussies? Strewth! Good for you, cobbers!

Sephiroth 19-07-2025 11:12

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymouse (Post 36199516)
Shouldn't be compulsory. The right to vote should include the right not to vote IMO.

Is NOTA an option for the Aussies? Strewth! Good for you, cobbers!

Spoil the ballot, Squire.

papa smurf 19-07-2025 11:19

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36199521)
Spoil the ballot, Squire.

wot vote labour :shocked:

thenry 19-07-2025 11:20

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
The right to vote right to not vote seems a bit woke with regards to compulsory voting.

Sephiroth 19-07-2025 11:41

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thenry (Post 36199523)
The right to vote right to not vote seems a bit woke with regards to compulsory voting.

Please explain what you mean.

thenry 19-07-2025 11:47

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36199524)
Please explain what you mean.

Silly people getting offended by a vote.

Hom3r 20-07-2025 14:14

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
So expect the Green party to get in and petrol and diesel engines to be banned, then probably tax aviation out of the UK.


Yet another big mistake by labour

.

idi banashapan 20-07-2025 15:07

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
I’m not against young people engaging in politics, but giving 16 and 17 year olds the vote in general elections raises some valid concerns. At that age, the brain is still developing, particularly the areas tied to long-term decision-making, impulse control, and critical thinking. While many teens are bright and well-meaning, the ability to fully grasp complex national issues and weigh their consequences is still maturing. This isn’t about intelligence, it;s about neurological readiness.

There’s also the inconsistency of rights. At 16, you can’t drink, smoke, or be fully held accountable in the legal system, but you’d be allowed to help decide the country’s future? That contradiction muddles what it means to be a responsible adult citizen. Add to that the fact that many teens are highly susceptible to external influence, from social media, school environments, and even parents, and it becomes harder to argue that the average 16 year old is making a truly independent, informed choice. We could end up with a government based around narrow opinions fed via TikTok, which is a scary thought. These feeds are not officially composed messages on political agenda, these are often the uninformed, unverified opinons of other 16 and 17 year olds.

If society wants to lower the voting age, it should come with stronger civic education and clearer alignment of legal responsibilities. Until then, keeping the voting age at 18 seems like the more balanced and coherent approach. Let;s not confuse early enthusiasm with long-term political maturity.

Mr K 20-07-2025 15:19

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36199579)
So expect the Green party to get in and petrol and diesel engines to be banned, then probably tax aviation out of the UK.


Yet another big mistake by liebour

Letting the planet die might be a bigger mistake. Guess the young might care about that a bit more than the selfish older generations.

Russ 20-07-2025 16:15

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by idi banashapan (Post 36199581)
I’m not against young people engaging in politics, but giving 16 and 17 year olds the vote in general elections raises some valid concerns. At that age, the brain is still developing, particularly the areas tied to long-term decision-making, impulse control, and critical thinking. While many teens are bright and well-meaning, the ability to fully grasp complex national issues and weigh their consequences is still maturing. This isn’t about intelligence, it;s about neurological readiness.

Perhaps much the same might be said about those who voted in all kinds of national things.

Clearly, intelligence does not necessarily begin at 18. We allow adults with legitimate mental issues/impairment the vote. Some 16 year olds are mature and rational-thinking. Some 43-year-olds are seriously immature and lack cognitive skills.

As has been said, if you pay taxes, then you ought to have a say in where you think those taxes go.

Paul 20-07-2025 16:24

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36199583)
As has been said, if you pay taxes, then you ought to have a say in where you think those taxes go.

If taxes were the only thing their vote counted towards, I'd entirely agree. However, its not.

While I dont agree with it, lets also just remember to get it in perspective.
Only about 3.5% of the possible voters are 16/17, and they will not all vote.

Sephiroth 20-07-2025 16:34

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36199583)
Perhaps much the same might be said about those who voted in all kinds of national things.

Clearly, intelligence does not necessarily begin at 18. We allow adults with legitimate mental issues/impairment the vote. Some 16 year olds are mature and rational-thinking. Some 43-year-olds are seriously immature and lack cognitive skills.

As has been said, if you pay taxes, then you ought to have a say in where you think those taxes go.

That is one of the most ridiculous things said in this topic.

First, 84% of 16-27 year olds are in education. https://explore-education-statistics...mployment/2024 which totally knocks the assertion on the head.

Second, by corollary, (and equally ridiculous), if the assertion is to hold, then the 16% in the full time labour market, could have the vote and the 84% not.

Third, and taking in the rest of what you've said, how rational can a 16/17 year old be in relation to national issues when they have no experience framework to which the relate and balance their thinking.

18 is already a young age - but they have a two year advantage on their younger cohort. It is well known that the human brain isn't fully mature before the age of 24 or 25. Why on earth give the vote to an immature teenager?

Russ 20-07-2025 16:37

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36199586)
That is one of the most ridiculous things said in this topic.

First, 84% of 16-27 year olds are in education. https://explore-education-statistics...mployment/2024 which totally knocks the assertion on the head.

Second, by corollary, (and equally ridiculous), if the assertion is to hold, then the 16% in the full time labour market, could have the vote and the 84% not.

Third, and taking in the rest of what you've said, how rational can a 16/17 year old be in relation to national issues when they have no experience framework to which the relate and balance their thinking.

18 is already a young age - but they have a two year advantage on their younger cohort. It is well known that the human brain isn't fully mature before the age of 24 or 25. Why on earth give the vote to an immature teenager?

If you pay tax on your earnings you ought to be able to have a say on how you think it should be spent.

It’s as easy as that.

idi banashapan 20-07-2025 16:42

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36199583)
Perhaps much the same might be said about those who voted in all kinds of national things.

Clearly, intelligence does not necessarily begin at 18. We allow adults with legitimate mental issues/impairment the vote. Some 16 year olds are mature and rational-thinking. Some 43-year-olds are seriously immature and lack cognitive skills.

As has been said, if you pay taxes, then you ought to have a say in where you think those taxes go.


You raise a fair point and I completely agree that age doesn't automatically determine intelligence or capability. There are absolutely mature 16 year olds out there, just as there are adults who make consistently poor decisons. My argument isn't about excluding anyone based on intelligence, but about where we draw the baseline for civic (for want of a better word) readiness in a system that needs to be consistent, scalable, and protected from negative influence.

We already accept that certain adult rights (like buying alcohol or serving on a jury) have age restrictions because they require a degree of judgment, emotional regulation / intelligence, and responsibility that typically develops over time. The ability to vote in general elections, with all its long term national impact, seems to fall into that same category, does it not?

As for paying taxes, I get the logic. 'No taxation without representation' is a powerful principle. But I'd argue that a 16year old working part-time and paying a small amount in tax isn;t quite the same as managing a household, paying national insurance, or running a business. If we were to lower the voting age based on tax contribution alone, we'd also need to define what level of contribution grants that right, which opens up a different kind of inequality.

I’m definitely open to the idea of change if it’s paired with comprehensive civic education and a clearer alignment of legal responsibilities across the board. But until then, I still think 18 strikes the best current balance between inclusion and long-term national consequence. If we could get away with it, I'd almost suggest increasing that age. We know the brain and it's cognitive functions are not fully formed until the mid 20s, whcih gives that train of thought a fair arguement, I think.

---------- Post added at 16:42 ---------- Previous post was at 16:40 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36199587)
If you pay tax on your earnings you ought to be able to have a say on how you think it should be spent.

It’s as easy as that.

I just don't agree it is that simple. There are so many complexities involved that it cannot be that black and white.

Russ 20-07-2025 16:45

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by idi banashapan (Post 36199588)
I just don't agree it is that simple. There are so many complexities involved that it cannot be that black and white.

We’re constantly being told that Britain needs change. This is change.

idi banashapan 20-07-2025 16:46

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36199590)
We’re constantly being told that Britain needs change. This is change.

Absolutely. But does any kind of change consitute good change, or the right change? Just because we can does not mean we should.

Sephiroth 20-07-2025 16:51

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36199587)
If you pay tax on your earnings you ought to be able to have a say on how you think it should be spent.

It’s as easy as that.

If only 16% of 16/17 year olds are paying tax, then why would you award the vote to the other 84% (based on your argument)O?

There is no logic to giving a child the vote other than political gerrymandering by Labour (in this case) relying on the probability that children tend not to care for Conservatives until they have their own house and car etc.

Do you not acknowledge the lack of wisdom and judgement of a child, including 16/17 year olds?

Btw, as regards 18 year olds, not only do they have a 2 year drop on the children, but they have the advantage of 6th form education or two years in work since the age of 16.

On all levels, votes for 16 year olds is wrong.

Russ 20-07-2025 16:52

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by idi banashapan (Post 36199591)
Absolutely. But does any kind of change consitute good change, or the right change? Just because we can does not mean we should.

Any kind of change has been suggested plenty of times of late. It should follow that just about everyone should be in favour of this.

I don’t see why people are getting their tits in a twist over this. As has previously been said, it won’t add that many to the electorate numbers.

Sephiroth 20-07-2025 16:53

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36199590)
We’re constantly being told that Britain needs change. This is change.

That's not the needed change. We need economic growth, not political gerrymandering.

idi banashapan 20-07-2025 16:58

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36199594)
Any kind of change has been suggested plenty of times of late. It should follow that just about everyone should be in favour of this.

I don’t see why people are getting their tits in a twist over this. As has previously been said, it won’t add that many to the electorate numbers.

In your opinion, what are the benefits and strengths of allowing 16 years olds to vote on the direction of the nation in a general election?

Mr K 20-07-2025 17:03

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36199595)
That's not the needed change. We need economic growth, not political gerrymandering.

Ah change, but only your change?

The Tories tried a bit of gerrymandering before the last election altering boundaries to favour themselves. Didn't work and this change may not work in Labours favour.
Getting more people to vote is surely good.

As for young minds still developing/being immature, you could say over 60's minds are declining - should they be refused a vote? Some pensioners pay little or no tax, should they also be barred from voting?

Russ 20-07-2025 17:08

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by idi banashapan (Post 36199596)
In your opinion, what are the benefits and strengths of allowing 16 years olds to vote on the direction of the nation in a general election?

The only 16 year old I can speak about with any authority is my 22 year old daughter when she was that age.

She and her group of friends were very politically aware. Having recently graduated from uni she’s not paid any income tax but she told me she wished she could vote at that age to help build her plan for the future (ie now) when she’s completed education and where life takes her and how the world is shaped ahead of her.

Being able to have a say in how you want your future to roll out is just one very good reason for this new change.

idi banashapan 20-07-2025 17:18

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36199597)
As for young minds still developing/being immature, you could say over 60's minds are declining - should they be refused a vote? Some pensioners pay little or no tax, should they also be barred from voting?

This is a great point. Why do you suppose this was not brought into the equation when the government decided to reduce the voting age to 16?

---------- Post added at 17:18 ---------- Previous post was at 17:10 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36199599)
The only 16 year old I can speak about with any authority is my 22 year old daughter when she was that age.

She and her group of friends were very politically aware. Having recently graduated from uni she’s not paid any income tax but she told me she wished she could vote at that age to help build her plan for the future (ie now) when she’s completed education and where life takes her and how the world is shaped ahead of her.

Being able to have a say in how you want your future to roll out is just one very good reason for this new change.

It sounds like your daughter is thoughtful and engaged, and that’s genuinely encouraging to hear. I don’t doubt there are 16 year olds out there who take a deep interest in politics and care about their future. That's a good thing.

That said, I think the challenge here isn’t about individual exceptions, but about setting a fair and consistent baseline for the whole population. Just as your daughter might have been ahead of the curve at 16, many others may still be developing the critical thinking skills, emotional regulation, and independence needed to make major civic decisions. Two years may not seem like much on paper, and you have made a good case that in terms of voting volume, the addition might seem negligable.

But developmentally, especially in adolescence, those two years can be significant. It;s not about undermining anyone’s intelligence or good intentions, but recognising that cognitive maturity plays a key role in how we interpret complex matters. In this case, policital, envirnmental and financial futures for everyone will be determined by these votes.

Ultimately, it’s about designing a system that works for the majority, not the outliers, and making sure that when we entrust someone with shaping national outcomes, they’re doing so from a position of relative autonomy, understanding, and resilience against outside influence. I’d argue that 18 still best represents that balance… for now.

Russ 20-07-2025 17:26

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
At 16 we don’t allow people to take control of a potential killing machine.

The following year they are then allowed to take control of the potential killing machine.

Some are ready for that responsibility, some are not.

Giving them the vote is just bring more of life in to line with things like these.

Sephiroth 20-07-2025 18:18

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36199597)
Ah change, but only your change?

The Tories tried a bit of gerrymandering before the last election altering boundaries to favour themselves. Didn't work and this change may not work in Labours favour.
Getting more people to vote is surely good.

As for young minds still developing/being immature, you could say over 60's minds are declining - should they be refused a vote? Some pensioners pay little or no tax, should they also be barred from voting?

You're confecting an argument here. Why over 60? Where's the evidence that this should be a cut-off point for voting?

As to "paying little or no tax" - please ask Russ.

Pierre 20-07-2025 21:44

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36199602)
At 16 we don’t allow people to take control of a potential killing machine.

At 16 you can become a killing machine, trained to do so.


As it happens I am totally fine in giving 16yr olds the the vote.

I laugh at those that think 16yr olds will be predisposed to vote Labour. If they vote at all, there is no evidence they will vote that way, and as we favour immigrants over them, they’ll probably vote for their own interests.

Maggy 21-07-2025 08:38

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
As a retired secondary school teacher I am in favour of giving 16 year olds the vote because in my experience they are no worse at picking whom to vote for than a 70/80/90/100 year old. Any younger I think they should be able to continue to have a childhood of sorts.

Sephiroth 21-07-2025 08:49

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36199632)
As a retired secondary school teacher I am in favour of giving 16 year olds the vote because in my experience they are no worse at picking whom to vote for than a 70/80/90/100 year old. Any younger I think they should be able to continue to have a childhood of sorts.

What was wrong with my argument that the two years between 16 and 18 are significant? 18 year olds have either the advantage of 2 years of education or 2 years of work. The 16 year old has no such advantage.

As to the older voters, that surely should not be a consideration in the debate as to whether or not the vote should be given to a 16 year old. Older people, btw, are wiser and have depth of perspective. You too.

Russ 21-07-2025 18:20

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36199620)
At 16 you can become a killing machine, trained to do so.

If they're responsible, mature and capable enough of then even more reason to lob them the vote.

Sephiroth 21-07-2025 18:58

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36199665)
If they're responsible, mature and capable enough of then even more reason to lob them the vote.

16 year olds cannot be responsible. They're children.

16 year olds are, by definition, not mature.

16 year olds are not capable of making judgements based on experience other than their time as children.


Russ 21-07-2025 19:03

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
They’re capable of making decisions about their futures.

thenry 21-07-2025 19:08

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Are 16 years old considered adults if they get arrested by the police?

Paul 21-07-2025 19:11

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Their future ?
Take the 16 year old I know (a distant relation via in-laws).
I asked them what work they plan to look for when they leave school.
Answer: "None, I'll just live off benefits".

1andrew1 22-07-2025 00:47

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36199671)
Their future ?
Take the 16 year old I know (a distant relation via in-laws).
I asked them what work they plan to look for when they leave school.
Answer: "None, I'll just live off benefits".

Phew! I had worried they might say influencer! :D

Maggy 22-07-2025 10:34

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36199667)
16 year olds cannot be responsible. They're children.

16 year olds are, by definition, not mature.

16 year olds are not capable of making judgements based on experience other than their time as children.


As a qualified educator of the 11-18 age group I disagree with your generalisation.

Sephiroth 22-07-2025 11:08

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36199691)
As a qualified educator of the 11-18 age group I disagree with your generalisation.

What?

16 year olds are not children?

16 year olds are mature?

16 year olds are capable of making judgements based on their experience other than as children?

Seriously?

1andrew1 22-07-2025 14:19

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36199694)
What?

16 year olds are not children?

16 year olds are mature?

16 year olds are capable of making judgements based on their experience other than as children?

Seriously?

If Reform had their way, teenagers would be running the country!

Quote:

Teenager to run Reform-led county council with multimillion-pound budget
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other...6cddc5e7&ei=28

Hugh 22-07-2025 14:56

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36199700)
If Reform had their way, teenagers would be running the country!


https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/other...6cddc5e7&ei=28

From the Times…

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1753192596

Maggy 22-07-2025 18:41

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36199694)
What?

16 year olds are not children?

16 year olds are mature?

16 year olds are capable of making judgements based on their experience other than as children?

Seriously?

They have to make decisions about their future examinations and careers and what direction they have to take to achieve their aims. Why do you think that I'm not capable as a retired secondary teacher in making this judgement? Many 16 year olds are more than capable of making decisions about their future. Indeed not every 16 year old have parents to aid in their decisions. You obviously need to get out and actually meet some 16 year olds.:rolleyes:

Sephiroth 22-07-2025 18:55

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36199715)
They have to make decisions about their future examinations and careers and what direction they have to take to achieve their aims. Why do you think that I'm not capable as a retired secondary teacher in making this judgement? Many 16 year olds are more than capable of making decisions about their future. Indeed not every 16 year old have parents to aid in their decisions. You obviously need to get out and actually meet some 16 year olds.:rolleyes:

You can roll your eyes as much as you like, as well as avoid answering the points I have made to your direct remarks.

I have 6x children and 10x grandchildren. You know nothing about me and the number of 16 year olds I have met and, indeed, helped into adulthood.

It's the children's judgement I'm questioning and I'm sadly forced into questioning your judgement.

Why can't you just concede that Labour's intention is entirely down to counting the children's votye at the next GE?

idi banashapan 22-07-2025 20:16

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36199691)
As a qualified educator of the 11-18 age group I disagree with your generalisation.

Respectfully, appealing to one’s position as a “qualified educator” does not, in itself, negate a generalisation, nor does it automatically provide a counterpoint grounded in fact. Authority is not a substitute fo argument. While educators may have valuable insight, experience alone does not invalidate the broader psychological and neurological consensus around adolescent cognitive developmnt

Developmental psychology, neuroscience, and behavioural studies consistently show that the prefrontal cortex (the part of the brain responsible for executive function, impulse control, and long-term planning) is still developing well into the mid 20s. This is why 16 year olds, despite being capable of moments of maturity, often struggle with complex risk assessment, susceptibility to peer influence, and longer-term consequence evaluation. A reason why car insurance for young adults even into mid 20s can cost a considerable amount more, even if a 23 year old has been driving longer than a 33 year old. This isn’t a moral judgement, it’s a biological reality, one supported by findings from organisations like the American Psychological Association and echoed in UK government guidelines on youth sentencing and safeguarding, as has already been touched on in this thread.

This doesn’t mean young people lack value, voice, or intelligence. But being “capable of expressing opinions” is not the same as being developmentally ready to make far reaching societal decisions. If we extend the logic of using personal experience to rebut scientific generalisations, then every teacher, parent, or youth worker who has seen the opposite must also be equally valid, and that renders the argument circular. A nuanced conversation about capability should be based on data, psychology, and long-term civic impact, not solely on anecdotal exceptions.

Sephiroth 22-07-2025 20:24

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by idi banashapan (Post 36199723)
Respectfully, appealing to one’s position as a “qualified educator” does not, in itself, negate a generalisation, nor does it automatically provide a counterpoint grounded in fact. Authority is not a substitute fo argument. While educators may have valuable insight, experience alone does not invalidate the broader psychological and neurological consensus around adolescent cognitive developmnt

Developmental psychology, neuroscience, and behavioural studies consistently show that the prefrontal cortex (the part of the brain responsible for executive function, impulse control, and long-term planning) is still developing well into the mid 20s. This is why 16 year olds, despite being capable of moments of maturity, often struggle with complex risk assessment, susceptibility to peer influence, and longer-term consequence evaluation. A reason why car insurance for young adults even into mid 20s can cost a considerable amount more, even if a 23 year old has been driving longer than a 33 year old. This isn’t a moral judgement, it’s a biological reality, one supported by findings from organisations like the American Psychological Association and echoed in UK government guidelines on youth sentencing and safeguarding.p, as has already been touched on in this thread.

This doesn’t mean young people lack value, voice, or intelligence. But being “capable of expressing opinions” is not the same as being developmentally ready to make far reaching societal decisions. If we extend the logic of using personal experience to rebut scientific generalisations, then every teacher, parent, or youth worker who has seen the opposite must also be equally valid, and that renders the argument circular. A nuanced conversation about capability should be based on data, psychology, and long-term civic impact, not solely on anecdotal exceptions.

Very well expressed. Surely an experienced educator would have to agree with what you wrote in your first paragraph. That would then be a winnable argument that 16 year olds are too young to merit the vote.

TheDaddy 22-07-2025 20:32

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by idi banashapan (Post 36199723)

This is why 16 year olds, despite being capable of moments of maturity, often struggle with complex risk assessment, susceptibility to peer influence, and longer-term consequence evaluation.

It's voting not rocket science, how complex is deciding to vote for the party that bebefits your interests best, how much maturity is required for that?

thenry 22-07-2025 20:34

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Is this guy up for voting standards ?


idi banashapan 22-07-2025 20:51

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36199725)
It's voting not rocket science, how complex is deciding to vote for the party that bebefits your interests best, how much maturity is required for that?

The idea that voting is simply a matter of picking the party that benefits you most overlooks the very essence of responsible voting. Mature voting isn;t just self-interest, it involves understanding complex trade offs, evaluating long term national outcomes, understanding the differences between policy and populism, and resisting emotional or peer-driven influence, which considering the social media hold on young people, isn’t something 16 year olds are good at. These require critical thinking, impulse control, and cognitive maturity, which are still forming in adolescents. If voting truly were that simple, we wouldn’t see widespread manipulation of adult voters through emotional appeals, misinformation, and tribalism.

mrmistoffelees 23-07-2025 06:57

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by idi banashapan (Post 36199727)
The idea that voting is simply a matter of picking the party that benefits you most overlooks the very essence of responsible voting. Mature voting isn;t just self-interest, it involves understanding complex trade offs, evaluating long term national outcomes, understanding the differences between policy and populism, and resisting emotional or peer-driven influence, which considering the social media hold on young people, isn’t something 16 year olds are good at. These require critical thinking, impulse control, and cognitive maturity, which are still forming in adolescents. If voting truly were that simple, we wouldn’t see widespread manipulation of adult voters through emotional appeals, misinformation, and tribalism.

seeing as how a significant % of the adult population failed to take that into consideration nearly nine years ago…..

Rephrasing that, most of the adult population vote for what will they will believe will immediately benefit them and their loved ones/family. On that basis 0 reason to not give 16/17 year olds the ability to vote

GrimUpNorth 23-07-2025 07:08

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
If you look at the state of the world, the 'grown-ups' have done a pretty crappy job at electing the governments we've got, so why not give 16 and 17 year olds a go?

Also, the day before my 18th birthday I felt no different to how I did the next day on my 18th birthday, so I find it quite insulting to be told I wasn't mature enough to vote. My poor mother-in-law has dementia and is still able to vote, she hasn't got a clue what day it is unlike most 16 and 17 year olds.

idi banashapan 23-07-2025 07:30

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Hmmm… What’s interesting is that both of your points actually strengthen the argument that a minimum threshold of maturity and cognitive development should matter in voting. By highlighting how many adults vote emotionally, short-term, or without informed judgment, you’re agreeing, perhaps unknowingly, that this is a problem, not a justification to expand the age range to even less cognitively mature voters. Saying “adults don’t always get it right” doesn’t mean we should add more impulsive decision makers to the process. it suggests we should raise the standard, not lower it.

And while emotional milestones like birthdays may feel arbitrary, legal systems use age thresholds precisely because brain development doesn’t change overnight but it does change significantly across adolescence. Comparing someone with late-stage dementia to a teenager doesn’t prove capability, it simply underscores why maturity and mental competence should be essential for voting, regardless of age.

Paul 23-07-2025 14:21

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36199734)
Also, the day before my 18th birthday I felt no different to how I did the next day on my 18th birthday

Thats a non argument, you could apply it to any cut-off age, for anything.

Carth 23-07-2025 15:17

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
*waves*

It's just my personal opinion, but I'm convinced 80% of 16 to 18 years olds are quite happily grazing on the fodder in the rich fields of TikTok, Facebook, Messenger etc etc.
I also believe 80% of adults graze there too, with an extra feeding trough of ingredients supplied by a myriad of experts and celebrities with nice bright smiles and convincing tales of Utopian pastures to come.
Alas they suddenly (far too late) realize that what they've been digesting for years isn't the food required for an understanding of what has been quietly taking place outside of the field.

Of course there are the occasional 'black sheep' that don't swallow everything fed to them, but usually they are the first to be slaughtered and held up as an example of what may happen if you don't follow the herd without question.

Voting? what's it ever achieved for the masses?

Sephiroth 23-07-2025 15:32

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36199745)
*waves*

It's just my personal opinion, but I'm convinced 80% of 16 to 18 years olds are quite happily grazing on the fodder in the rich fields of TikTok, Facebook, Messenger etc etc.

I also believe 80% of adults graze there too, with an extra feeding trough of ingredients supplied by a myriad of experts and celebrities with nice bright smiles and convincing tales of Utopian pastures to come.

Alas they suddenly (far too late) realize that what they've been digesting for years isn't the food required for an understanding of what has been quietly taking place outside of the field.

Of course there are the occasional 'black sheep' that don't swallow everything fed to them, but usually they are the first to be slaughtered and held up as an example of what may happen if you don't follow the herd without question.

Voting? what's it ever achieved for the masses?


Carth makes a seriously good point, especially his concluding sentence.

But we mustn't facilitate extending the vote to a child cohort that will keep the current shower in government. The two main parties come into the categories of "worse" and "even worse".

vincerooney 03-08-2025 01:51

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36199429)
What ID will they have to use, they wont have a driving licence at 16 (or many at 17 either), and I suspect the majority wont have passports.

why would you think the majority of people wouldn't have passports at that age??

Itshim 03-08-2025 11:48

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
They can't marry, buy cigarettes, can't fight in the armed forces, buy a alcoholic drink. Or for that matter see a 18 rated film . What a strange plan

Hom3r 03-08-2025 12:29

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
The voting age should be raised to 21, I mean below that age they no nothing about the real world.


We would end up with the green party in and all petrol & diesel vehicles banned, and air travel taxed out of existence.

Carth 03-08-2025 13:54

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Then when they get older they'll moan that they can't afford a car, or house, there's no jobs, they're fed up of buying cheap shit from China, TV is shit, Music is shit, internet is always broken, food it too expensive, and why are they only allowed 7 liters of water a day.

Nothing much changes :D

Paul 03-08-2025 14:34

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by vincerooney (Post 36200311)
why would you think the majority of people wouldn't have passports at that age??

Because they dont need one ?

As I implied, its just a guess, not based on any actual information.

Pierre 03-08-2025 16:20

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36200342)
The voting age should be raised to 21, I mean below that age they no nothing about the real world.
.

26 minimum, and if you’ve been in nothing but full time education, you should be banned until you start work.

I’d go so far as to say, if you have a degree but no job …banned.

If you have a humanities degree, banned for life.

Carth 03-08-2025 22:40

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36200362)
26 minimum, and if you’ve been in nothing but full time education, you should be banned until you start work.

I’d go so far as to say, if you have a degree but no job …banned.

If you have a humanities degree, banned for life.

You see, now that's the sort of stuff that would attract me to vote for a party :D

nffc 03-08-2025 22:43

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36200339)
They can't marry, buy cigarettes, can't fight in the armed forces, buy a alcoholic drink. Or for that matter see a 18 rated film . What a strange plan

Or look at porn sites without scanning a selfie because of the OSA


But Kier is happy to pass that whilst letting them vote (yes, I know it was passed under the previous parliament, but he has had plenty of chance to withdraw it if he wanted to).

Carth 03-08-2025 22:52

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Rumour has it that he didn't withdraw it because of the idea Labour could get more votes going their way from youngsters ;)

The fool should know they'll all vote Green and *mess his plans up



*similar to Cameron and Brexit

1andrew1 04-08-2025 07:53

Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
 
Not sure why people are worried about 16-year-olds making bad electoral choices. It's not like we've exactly covered ourselves in any glory! :D


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:40.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum