![]() |
Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Good ? You must know a different set of 16/17 year olds to me. :erm:
I note they will be able to vote for someone else, but not stand for election themselves, makes perfect sense. :rolleyes: They also wont be able to do some of the things they are voting for policies on. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
What's the worse that could happen, after all they will only vote according to which way the wind is blowing that particular day :D
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Oh a whole load of liberating will be going on for sure.
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Why do we keep getting these radical changes without debate?
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
If they pay tax then they should be able to vote like other countries.
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
Be interesting to see voting intentions for 16 & 17 year olds |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Not reform or Tory judging by a you gov poll. 11% for, 83% against the age reduction for both of those parties surveyed
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Fair enough. They'll be voting for a Govt for the next 5 years, taking them to 21, the most important years of their life. Why should the old non productive has beens decide their future.
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Children can be liable for tax before 16. Most countries around the world still have a voting age of 18.
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
What ID will they have to use, they wont have a driving licence at 16 (or many at 17 either), and I suspect the majority wont have passports.
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
---------- Post added at 18:19 ---------- Previous post was at 18:18 ---------- Quote:
Bank cards allowed as voter ID As part of the strategy, voter ID will also be extended to include UK-issued bank cards. Mr Holmes raised concerns using bank cards for ID will "undermine the security of the ballot box". https://news.sky.com/story/16-and-17...ction-13397859 |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
It was I'm their manifesto, so Labour have a mandate. Granted, it is unusual for parties to actually do what they promised. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
You can get bank cards at less than 16, all my kids had one.
Seems like they finally realised that ID was a bad idea, and are watering it down to the point its ... well pointless. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Proxy vote
https://www.gov.uk/how-to-vote/votin...r-someone-else My dads brother voted for my dad while he was out the country working. I wasn't aware of proxy votes so refrained only to get a bollocking :( |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
As for 16/17 year olds voting, I am fine with it. I think you need a good reason not to enfranchise people and 16 is probably as early as we can give the vote. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Only 10 countries in the world have voting at 16. Not exactly widespread.
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
The young are the future. Trying to pick rhe crap hand they've been dealt. God help them. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
Labour's proposal is naked gerrymandering because they know that kids don't change up to being less socialist / more conservative until they've tasted proper life. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
I remember the kerfuffle about the lowering of voting age to 18. Now we all accept it without a second thought.Speaking as a teacher I think 16 is the lowest age that can be applied to voting. Younger than that it will become problematic.
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Kids aren’t socialist, they’re contrarian and reactionary. Labour better hope this doesn’t bite them on the bum - when the kidz come to cast a ballot, Labour will be the establishment.
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
Even council elections are every 2/3 or 4 years (depending on how they choose to run them). They will also have to be registered to vote (how many do you think will bother, they'll still be at school). |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
---------- Post added at 07:17 ---------- Previous post was at 07:16 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
And I still want the introduction of 'None Of The Above'! |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
'None of the above' here - either don't vote or stand for election yourself. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
Do they have to vote or can they destroy their ballot by whatever means? How can someone check if a secret ballot has resulted in a vote? |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
I favour compulsory voting too. But it'll never happen in this country. We're too apathetic and object to anything that involves getting out of bed. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
Btw, I also support an ID card - always have done. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Shouldn't be compulsory. The right to vote should include the right not to vote IMO.
Is NOTA an option for the Aussies? Strewth! Good for you, cobbers! |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
The right to vote right to not vote seems a bit woke with regards to compulsory voting.
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
So expect the Green party to get in and petrol and diesel engines to be banned, then probably tax aviation out of the UK.
Yet another big mistake by labour . |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
I’m not against young people engaging in politics, but giving 16 and 17 year olds the vote in general elections raises some valid concerns. At that age, the brain is still developing, particularly the areas tied to long-term decision-making, impulse control, and critical thinking. While many teens are bright and well-meaning, the ability to fully grasp complex national issues and weigh their consequences is still maturing. This isn’t about intelligence, it;s about neurological readiness.
There’s also the inconsistency of rights. At 16, you can’t drink, smoke, or be fully held accountable in the legal system, but you’d be allowed to help decide the country’s future? That contradiction muddles what it means to be a responsible adult citizen. Add to that the fact that many teens are highly susceptible to external influence, from social media, school environments, and even parents, and it becomes harder to argue that the average 16 year old is making a truly independent, informed choice. We could end up with a government based around narrow opinions fed via TikTok, which is a scary thought. These feeds are not officially composed messages on political agenda, these are often the uninformed, unverified opinons of other 16 and 17 year olds. If society wants to lower the voting age, it should come with stronger civic education and clearer alignment of legal responsibilities. Until then, keeping the voting age at 18 seems like the more balanced and coherent approach. Let;s not confuse early enthusiasm with long-term political maturity. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
Clearly, intelligence does not necessarily begin at 18. We allow adults with legitimate mental issues/impairment the vote. Some 16 year olds are mature and rational-thinking. Some 43-year-olds are seriously immature and lack cognitive skills. As has been said, if you pay taxes, then you ought to have a say in where you think those taxes go. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
While I dont agree with it, lets also just remember to get it in perspective. Only about 3.5% of the possible voters are 16/17, and they will not all vote. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
First, 84% of 16-27 year olds are in education. https://explore-education-statistics...mployment/2024 which totally knocks the assertion on the head. Second, by corollary, (and equally ridiculous), if the assertion is to hold, then the 16% in the full time labour market, could have the vote and the 84% not. Third, and taking in the rest of what you've said, how rational can a 16/17 year old be in relation to national issues when they have no experience framework to which the relate and balance their thinking. 18 is already a young age - but they have a two year advantage on their younger cohort. It is well known that the human brain isn't fully mature before the age of 24 or 25. Why on earth give the vote to an immature teenager? |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
It’s as easy as that. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
You raise a fair point and I completely agree that age doesn't automatically determine intelligence or capability. There are absolutely mature 16 year olds out there, just as there are adults who make consistently poor decisons. My argument isn't about excluding anyone based on intelligence, but about where we draw the baseline for civic (for want of a better word) readiness in a system that needs to be consistent, scalable, and protected from negative influence. We already accept that certain adult rights (like buying alcohol or serving on a jury) have age restrictions because they require a degree of judgment, emotional regulation / intelligence, and responsibility that typically develops over time. The ability to vote in general elections, with all its long term national impact, seems to fall into that same category, does it not? As for paying taxes, I get the logic. 'No taxation without representation' is a powerful principle. But I'd argue that a 16year old working part-time and paying a small amount in tax isn;t quite the same as managing a household, paying national insurance, or running a business. If we were to lower the voting age based on tax contribution alone, we'd also need to define what level of contribution grants that right, which opens up a different kind of inequality. I’m definitely open to the idea of change if it’s paired with comprehensive civic education and a clearer alignment of legal responsibilities across the board. But until then, I still think 18 strikes the best current balance between inclusion and long-term national consequence. If we could get away with it, I'd almost suggest increasing that age. We know the brain and it's cognitive functions are not fully formed until the mid 20s, whcih gives that train of thought a fair arguement, I think. ---------- Post added at 16:42 ---------- Previous post was at 16:40 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
There is no logic to giving a child the vote other than political gerrymandering by Labour (in this case) relying on the probability that children tend not to care for Conservatives until they have their own house and car etc. Do you not acknowledge the lack of wisdom and judgement of a child, including 16/17 year olds? Btw, as regards 18 year olds, not only do they have a 2 year drop on the children, but they have the advantage of 6th form education or two years in work since the age of 16. On all levels, votes for 16 year olds is wrong. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
I don’t see why people are getting their tits in a twist over this. As has previously been said, it won’t add that many to the electorate numbers. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
The Tories tried a bit of gerrymandering before the last election altering boundaries to favour themselves. Didn't work and this change may not work in Labours favour. Getting more people to vote is surely good. As for young minds still developing/being immature, you could say over 60's minds are declining - should they be refused a vote? Some pensioners pay little or no tax, should they also be barred from voting? |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
She and her group of friends were very politically aware. Having recently graduated from uni she’s not paid any income tax but she told me she wished she could vote at that age to help build her plan for the future (ie now) when she’s completed education and where life takes her and how the world is shaped ahead of her. Being able to have a say in how you want your future to roll out is just one very good reason for this new change. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
---------- Post added at 17:18 ---------- Previous post was at 17:10 ---------- Quote:
That said, I think the challenge here isn’t about individual exceptions, but about setting a fair and consistent baseline for the whole population. Just as your daughter might have been ahead of the curve at 16, many others may still be developing the critical thinking skills, emotional regulation, and independence needed to make major civic decisions. Two years may not seem like much on paper, and you have made a good case that in terms of voting volume, the addition might seem negligable. But developmentally, especially in adolescence, those two years can be significant. It;s not about undermining anyone’s intelligence or good intentions, but recognising that cognitive maturity plays a key role in how we interpret complex matters. In this case, policital, envirnmental and financial futures for everyone will be determined by these votes. Ultimately, it’s about designing a system that works for the majority, not the outliers, and making sure that when we entrust someone with shaping national outcomes, they’re doing so from a position of relative autonomy, understanding, and resilience against outside influence. I’d argue that 18 still best represents that balance… for now. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
At 16 we don’t allow people to take control of a potential killing machine.
The following year they are then allowed to take control of the potential killing machine. Some are ready for that responsibility, some are not. Giving them the vote is just bring more of life in to line with things like these. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
As to "paying little or no tax" - please ask Russ. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
As it happens I am totally fine in giving 16yr olds the the vote. I laugh at those that think 16yr olds will be predisposed to vote Labour. If they vote at all, there is no evidence they will vote that way, and as we favour immigrants over them, they’ll probably vote for their own interests. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
As a retired secondary school teacher I am in favour of giving 16 year olds the vote because in my experience they are no worse at picking whom to vote for than a 70/80/90/100 year old. Any younger I think they should be able to continue to have a childhood of sorts.
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
As to the older voters, that surely should not be a consideration in the debate as to whether or not the vote should be given to a 16 year old. Older people, btw, are wiser and have depth of perspective. You too. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
16 year olds are, by definition, not mature. 16 year olds are not capable of making judgements based on experience other than their time as children. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
They’re capable of making decisions about their futures.
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Are 16 years old considered adults if they get arrested by the police?
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Their future ?
Take the 16 year old I know (a distant relation via in-laws). I asked them what work they plan to look for when they leave school. Answer: "None, I'll just live off benefits". |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
16 year olds are not children? 16 year olds are mature? 16 year olds are capable of making judgements based on their experience other than as children? Seriously? |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1753192596 |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
I have 6x children and 10x grandchildren. You know nothing about me and the number of 16 year olds I have met and, indeed, helped into adulthood. It's the children's judgement I'm questioning and I'm sadly forced into questioning your judgement. Why can't you just concede that Labour's intention is entirely down to counting the children's votye at the next GE? |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
Developmental psychology, neuroscience, and behavioural studies consistently show that the prefrontal cortex (the part of the brain responsible for executive function, impulse control, and long-term planning) is still developing well into the mid 20s. This is why 16 year olds, despite being capable of moments of maturity, often struggle with complex risk assessment, susceptibility to peer influence, and longer-term consequence evaluation. A reason why car insurance for young adults even into mid 20s can cost a considerable amount more, even if a 23 year old has been driving longer than a 33 year old. This isn’t a moral judgement, it’s a biological reality, one supported by findings from organisations like the American Psychological Association and echoed in UK government guidelines on youth sentencing and safeguarding, as has already been touched on in this thread. This doesn’t mean young people lack value, voice, or intelligence. But being “capable of expressing opinions” is not the same as being developmentally ready to make far reaching societal decisions. If we extend the logic of using personal experience to rebut scientific generalisations, then every teacher, parent, or youth worker who has seen the opposite must also be equally valid, and that renders the argument circular. A nuanced conversation about capability should be based on data, psychology, and long-term civic impact, not solely on anecdotal exceptions. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Is this guy up for voting standards ?
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
Rephrasing that, most of the adult population vote for what will they will believe will immediately benefit them and their loved ones/family. On that basis 0 reason to not give 16/17 year olds the ability to vote |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
If you look at the state of the world, the 'grown-ups' have done a pretty crappy job at electing the governments we've got, so why not give 16 and 17 year olds a go?
Also, the day before my 18th birthday I felt no different to how I did the next day on my 18th birthday, so I find it quite insulting to be told I wasn't mature enough to vote. My poor mother-in-law has dementia and is still able to vote, she hasn't got a clue what day it is unlike most 16 and 17 year olds. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Hmmm… What’s interesting is that both of your points actually strengthen the argument that a minimum threshold of maturity and cognitive development should matter in voting. By highlighting how many adults vote emotionally, short-term, or without informed judgment, you’re agreeing, perhaps unknowingly, that this is a problem, not a justification to expand the age range to even less cognitively mature voters. Saying “adults don’t always get it right” doesn’t mean we should add more impulsive decision makers to the process. it suggests we should raise the standard, not lower it.
And while emotional milestones like birthdays may feel arbitrary, legal systems use age thresholds precisely because brain development doesn’t change overnight but it does change significantly across adolescence. Comparing someone with late-stage dementia to a teenager doesn’t prove capability, it simply underscores why maturity and mental competence should be essential for voting, regardless of age. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
*waves*
It's just my personal opinion, but I'm convinced 80% of 16 to 18 years olds are quite happily grazing on the fodder in the rich fields of TikTok, Facebook, Messenger etc etc. I also believe 80% of adults graze there too, with an extra feeding trough of ingredients supplied by a myriad of experts and celebrities with nice bright smiles and convincing tales of Utopian pastures to come. Alas they suddenly (far too late) realize that what they've been digesting for years isn't the food required for an understanding of what has been quietly taking place outside of the field. Of course there are the occasional 'black sheep' that don't swallow everything fed to them, but usually they are the first to be slaughtered and held up as an example of what may happen if you don't follow the herd without question. Voting? what's it ever achieved for the masses? |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
Carth makes a seriously good point, especially his concluding sentence. But we mustn't facilitate extending the vote to a child cohort that will keep the current shower in government. The two main parties come into the categories of "worse" and "even worse". |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
They can't marry, buy cigarettes, can't fight in the armed forces, buy a alcoholic drink. Or for that matter see a 18 rated film . What a strange plan
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
The voting age should be raised to 21, I mean below that age they no nothing about the real world.
We would end up with the green party in and all petrol & diesel vehicles banned, and air travel taxed out of existence. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Then when they get older they'll moan that they can't afford a car, or house, there's no jobs, they're fed up of buying cheap shit from China, TV is shit, Music is shit, internet is always broken, food it too expensive, and why are they only allowed 7 liters of water a day.
Nothing much changes :D |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
As I implied, its just a guess, not based on any actual information. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
I’d go so far as to say, if you have a degree but no job …banned. If you have a humanities degree, banned for life. |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
|
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Quote:
But Kier is happy to pass that whilst letting them vote (yes, I know it was passed under the previous parliament, but he has had plenty of chance to withdraw it if he wanted to). |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Rumour has it that he didn't withdraw it because of the idea Labour could get more votes going their way from youngsters ;)
The fool should know they'll all vote Green and *mess his plans up *similar to Cameron and Brexit |
Re: Voting Age Lowered To 16 In The UK
Not sure why people are worried about 16-year-olds making bad electoral choices. It's not like we've exactly covered ourselves in any glory! :D
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:40. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum