![]() |
So that's the problem with the nhs
Wales has too many hospitals and too many beds according to the Finance Minister Mark Drakeford.The former Labour first minister told the "For Wales, See Wales" podcast that Wales was "over hospitalised" and that more money should be spent on primary care.
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
That is Dripford-speak for "We don't have enough doctors or nurses".
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
How? Governments practically imported a nations worth of workers
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
The workforce in the UK is 800,000 less than it was pre-pandemic. Early retirement, ageing population profile, etc.
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
They were words stupid words to use (he has form for that) but what he said has been completely taken out of context.
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
What he meant was Wales relies too much on sending people to hospital when they could be treated by primary care, GPs and alternative methods. He kind of has a point but realistically what the whole country needs are better equipped hospitals. |
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
How would increasing primary care reduce the number of beds and the waiting lists?
Where would all the GPs required come from? Wales has too many hospitals, says Drakeford Longest hospital waiting lists still rising (Wales) Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
It is not a valid excuse for the poor performance of the Welsh NHS compared with the other UK regions. |
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
It would have been worse under the Tories.
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
As for it not being worse in England over the same time, maybe take a look at waiting list levels for NHS England over that 14 year period. The Tories do not have a good record of looking after the NHS. |
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
Anyway, whatever. The English NHS has been performing better than the Scots or the Welsh versions. It will be interesting to see the comparisons after 4.5years. Will we in England sink to the level we see in Wales? Let’s hope not. |
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...3&d=1737896854 https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1737896854 https://www.nhsconfed.org/articles/key-statistics-nhs |
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
IMHO the problem is the Doctors surgery's that are impossible to get through to and book an appointment..
So people go to A&E. I mean everytime I phone I'm either told the queue is full and try later or I'm 30+ in the queue and press "8" to get a call back when you get to the right place in the queue |
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
I can access appointments with various doctors via work schemes. The problem with them is that you dont get NHS prescriptions, only private. I can book appointments with my own doctor online, or ring them up. Next day is generally rare, esp in the winter months, same week is often possible, tho sometimes its a phone appointment initially. I can usually book face to face about 2/3 weeks ahead, which is fine for routine stuff. I have one this week that I booked 2 weeks ago. |
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
A&E purpose ? the clue is in the name…. |
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
---------- Post added at 14:12 ---------- Previous post was at 14:03 ---------- Quote:
for them just everyone else. |
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
https://www.expressnews.com/opinion/...p-20018041.php Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Whoopsie….
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
I’ve never complained about the tax I pay (in fact, when I was contracting, I used an Umbrella Company so I paid my full tax, rather than minimising my tax/NI by paying myself a minimal salary and dividends - my choice, others are entitled to their choice).
Being part of society means (to me) contributing appropriately, if you can - not boasting about how you can avoid doing so… |
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
It was a worrying time enough as it was but at least costs were not something we ever needed to think about. The admin went as far as name, date of birth, GP and address and that was it to get treatment at a world renowned children’s hospital |
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
The missus was called in to see her GP last week, She was asked to urgently write a letter to the Cardiac Unit to request they write a letter to the Diabetes Unit referring her to the Cardiac Unit. Nothing else was said at the appointment. The GP said that if they wrote the letter, it would affect their budget.
After the weekend, we got the first of 3 phone calls from the Practice, asking is the missus had received any mail from either the Cardiac or Diabetes Units. Nothing yet. Admin gone mad? |
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
---------- Post added at 17:22 ---------- Previous post was at 17:15 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
My private scheme via work doesn't cover chronic conditions but may cover acute episodes resulting from a chronic condition.
Related to that is cover of chronic conditions where the patient will not or cannot take care of that condition in themselves. Is there any point where you delay or withdraw further treatment until they do? Is there a difference between those who will not and those who cannot? What about the person who generally does but then on one occasions does not and ends up needing treatment compared to the person who generally does not? Examples : the diabetic who still eats Mars daily, refuses to take any exercise (even when that is provided free or discounted), refuses to monitor their condition all because the NHS will fix things up anyway. The diabetic who is normally careful but at a special occasion forgets, becomes hypoglycaemic and injures themselves. I am not having a go at diabetics but it is a chronic condition that does require the patient to be active in their treatment, other conditions like high blood pressure may also require non-clinical action. Overall why should the NHS pick up the bill for people who willingly don't stay healthy? I do emphasise the "willingly", they know it's wrong but can't be bothered to correct their behaviour so they don't need treatment. I guess one issue is someone who "abuses" their body but ends up needing treatment for something unrelated. You can't refuse treatment for someone with a history of high blood sugar who was hit by a car! |
Re: So that's the problem with the nhs
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:09. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum