Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Disgusting disregard of our heritage. (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33712079)

nodrogd 08-08-2023 20:13

Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
"The Crooked House", famed as being Britain's wonkiest pub has now been demolished without local authority consent following a fire that gutted it a few days ago. The fire follows a few days after the brewery that owned it had sold it to a "mystery" buyer.

Why it was never made a listed structure I don't know!

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2389606.html

ianch99 08-08-2023 20:32

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nodrogd (Post 36158147)
"The Crooked House", famed as being Britain's wonkiest pub has now been demolished without local authority consent following a fire that gutted it a few days ago. The fire follows a few days after the brewery that owned it had sold it to a "mystery" buyer.

Why it was never made a listed structure I don't know!

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2389606.html

Totally agree. I heard the earth moving equipment was booked before the fire happened :shocked:

Remember, it is all about the money ....

nomadking 10-08-2023 08:21

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36158148)
Totally agree. I heard the earth moving equipment was booked before the fire happened :shocked:

Remember, it is all about the money ....

You mean the earth moving equipment that was used to build the mounds of earth to block off the area if caravans turned up?

Chris 10-08-2023 09:21

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36158241)
You mean the earth moving equipment that was used to build the mounds of earth to block off the area if caravans turned up?

If you like, yes :rofl:

jfman 10-08-2023 09:24

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
There’s a spate of old buildings in Glasgow that mysteriously burn down. Including the Art School, twice!

Pierre 10-08-2023 09:27

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Thought to be arson, in a news report that surprised…………no one

Hugh 10-08-2023 09:28

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36158242)
If you like, yes :rofl:

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...9&d=1691656118

If only there had been a gate there… ;)

nomadking 10-08-2023 09:52

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36158245)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...9&d=1691656118

If only there had been a gate there… ;)

Many examples of where the usual suspects have simply removed any gate.
If it was supposed to be the mounds of earth that blocked the fire brigade, why wouldn't the gate also have blocked them? Proves that earth moving equipment was needed before any fire.

TheDaddy 10-08-2023 14:33

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36158246)
Many examples of where the usual suspects have simply removed any gate.
If it was supposed to be the mounds of earth that blocked the fire brigade, why wouldn't the gate also have blocked them? Proves that earth moving equipment was needed before any fire.

Because they have hydraulic cutters that'd make short work of the padlock and a lot of the time they have a key anyway, that's why the gate wouldn't have blocked them

1andrew1 10-08-2023 14:45

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36158241)
You mean the earth moving equipment that was used to build the mounds of earth to block off the area if caravans turned up?

I think you misspelt fire engines.

Hugh 10-08-2023 16:53

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36158241)
You mean the earth moving equipment that was used to build the mounds of earth to block off the area if caravans turned up?

Why would the Caravan Club be going there?

Sirius 10-08-2023 19:21

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36158277)
Why would the Caravan Club be going there?

They go anywhere they like specially if it upsets the locals. As for mysterious fires we have had a few in Warrington where the local council had just refused planning permission for demolition so flats could be built in place of the old buildings

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...ester-32305364

https://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk...-away-with-it/

https://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk...-famous-faces/

nodrogd 11-08-2023 11:30

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
We had a situation a few years ago on a new development in our town. A big complex was built along with a cinema & two night clubs. There was also supposed to be a hotel built on the sight, but the deal fell through & it remained scrub land.

A while later twenty caravans illegally entered the site, whence things started disappearing out of locals gardens & sheds. Then came the weekend, with hoards of youngsters tipping out from the nightclubs at 2 & 3am. The caravan occupants got into a confrontation with them & ended up being pelted with empty beer bottles & anything else that was to hand. Needless to say the local council needed to take no action to evict them. The caravans had mysteriously gone by the following morning.

GrimUpNorth 11-08-2023 12:51

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Some years ago a couple of my team met a developer on site to do some background noise measurements. He told them the owner of the derelict house adjacent to the site they wanted to develop wasn't for selling but it wouldn't be an issue 'in a couple of weeks' and as if by magic it burned down soon after.

I think this sort of thing goes on pretty often, the number of old mills that've burned down in Bradford over the years. I think some owners see it as a victimless crime as fire insurance is often the last thing they stop paying.

Chris 11-08-2023 13:05

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nodrogd (Post 36158345)
We had a situation a few years ago on a new development in our town. A big complex was built along with a cinema & two night clubs. There was also supposed to be a hotel built on the sight, but the deal fell through & it remained scrub land.

A while later twenty caravans illegally entered the site, whence things started disappearing out of locals gardens & sheds. Then came the weekend, with hoards of youngsters tipping out from the nightclubs at 2 & 3am. The caravan occupants got into a confrontation with them & ended up being pelted with empty beer bottles & anything else that was to hand. Needless to say the local council needed to take no action to evict them. The caravans had mysteriously gone by the following morning.

Wally World by any chance? If so, that was meant to be a Ladbroke Group hotel, but their focus changed once they got involved with Hilton. Nobody seemed to think that was a good spot for a luxury hotel for some reason. :D

pip08456 11-08-2023 15:41

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Pity it wasn't listed. There was certainly a reson for it being so.

Quote:

A group of property developers have been ordered to rebuild a Grade II-listed pub that they demolished without permission.

The historic Punch Bowl Inn at Hurst Green, Lancashire, needs to be rebuilt brick by brick within a year, a judge has ruled.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...-to-rebuild-it

They are still trying though.

Quote:

However, in the latest twist, Donelan Trading has now put in a new planning application to Ribble Valley Borough Council in which they propose building holiday lets. They make various claims that it was be "impossible" to rebuild the Punch Bowl to its former design including that it would not meet building regulations and would create a "dangerous" entrance.

The application reveals they would build six holiday lets and one for manager's accommodation.

In a planning statement the applicants state: "The north east corner of the original building was built right up to the edge of the highway and on something of a bend, and the original front door of this part of the premises opened directly onto the road which was clearly dangerous and this doorway was not used. It would be impossible to actually rebuild the building exactly on its original site without closing or restricting Longridge Road as to scaffold the corner would encroach on the highway and to try to build this corner without scaffolding would not meet the health and safety requirements."
https://www.lancs.live/news/lancashi...ished-26915290

nodrogd 11-08-2023 15:58

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36158347)
Wally World by any chance? If so, that was meant to be a Ladbroke Group hotel, but their focus changed once they got involved with Hilton. Nobody seemed to think that was a good spot for a luxury hotel for some reason. :D

Yep! & the rumour was that local police never wanted to deal with the rowdy behaviour every weekend. So, despite there being virtually no traffic on the roads at that time of night they would come from several miles away with sirens blaring & lights flashing. Because the site was on top of a hill anyone up there had a good 3 minutes warning of their approach & had ample opportunity to scarper into the local housing estates.

Chris 11-08-2023 17:26

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
I lived in your neck of the woods for a few years when I was first married. Quickly learned not to go anywhere near the McDonalds drive-thru when coming out of that cinema….

Paul 11-08-2023 18:36

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nodrogd (Post 36158147)
Why it was never made a listed structure I don't know!

Well that wouldnt have stopped it burning down.

Since it ended up a burned out shell, what else would they do besides demolish it ?

OLD BOY 11-08-2023 19:54

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36158360)
Pity it wasn't listed. There was certainly a reson for it being so.

Maybe, but in my opinion, whilst novel, this was a dangerous structure. The place could have collapsed on its customers at any time.

Actually, my opinion is that if you buy the land, you should be able to do with it as you wish, within sensible planning regulations. If the authorities want to list a building on the land and this is incompatible with what the owner wants, the authorities should be given the option of buying it at commercial rates. If they are not prepared to do that, the owner should be allowed, within reason, to do as they want, including demolition.

This country needs to free itself from unnecessary regulation, and where they want to impose unreasonable compliance, they should put their money where their mouths are.

---------- Post added at 19:54 ---------- Previous post was at 19:50 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36158366)
Well that wouldnt have stopped it burning down.

Since it ended up a burned out shell, what else would they do besides demolish it ?

It’s pretty clear that this was planned, but good luck to them! How could the authorities have allowed the place to operate with this degree of subsidence? I’m no expert, but it seems to me that the place was in imminent danger of collapse.

I suppose it was a tourist attraction, but are tourists dispensable just because they live somewhere else?

jfman 11-08-2023 20:04

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Typical OB here. Anything that has any meaning in this country, anything of value in a community, is to be destroyed and commoditised for someone else to gain profits. Even if it’s the result of criminal activity.

OLD BOY 11-08-2023 20:23

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158376)
Typical OB here. Anything that has any meaning in this country, anything of value in a community, is to be destroyed and commoditised for someone else to gain profits. Even if it’s the result of criminal activity.

I didn’t say that. I said that if it is of value and the owner doesn’t want it, the assigned authority should be obliged to buy it if they think it’s of genuine interest. I also pointed out that the structure was unsafe.

For once in your life, answer the points and stop the trolling.

jfman 11-08-2023 20:28

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158378)
I didn’t say that. I said that if it is of value and the owner doesn’t want it, the assigned authority should be obliged to buy it if they think it’s of genuine interest. I also pointed out that the structure was unsafe.

For once in your life, answer the points and stop the trolling.

So we get to bypass the lawful processes by which buildings can be demolished and replaced for profits, ignoring the communities they are in and historic status of the building?

Gotcha.

Here’s an idea if you don’t want to buy a wonky pub don’t buy one, and seek out other land elsewhere.

OLD BOY 11-08-2023 20:36

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158380)
So we get to bypass the lawful processes by which buildings can be demolished and replaced for profits, ignoring the communities they are in and historic status of the building?

Gotcha.

Here’s an idea if you don’t want to buy a wonky pub don’t buy one, and seek out other land elsewhere.

No. I’m saying the law should be changed. I know that this is a concept that challenges you. 😆

jfman 11-08-2023 20:42

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158383)
No. I’m saying the law should be changed. I know that this is a concept that challenges you. 😆

Your own words

Quote:

but good luck to them!
A disgusting enthusiasm.

Chris 11-08-2023 20:42

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158372)
It’s pretty clear that this was planned, but good luck to them! How could the authorities have allowed the place to operate with this degree of subsidence?

An interesting question.

Quote:

I’m no expert,
Ain’t that the truth.

Quote:

but it seems to me that the place was in imminent danger of collapse.

I suppose it was a tourist attraction, but are tourists dispensable just because they live somewhere else?
The mayor of Pisa has just been on the phone, he says they have need of your insight at the city council. If you hurry you can catch the late flight.

OLD BOY 11-08-2023 20:43

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36158388)
An interesting question.



Ain’t that the truth.



The mayor of Pisa has just been on the phone, he says they have need of your insight at the city council. If you hurry you can catch the late flight.

The Tower of Piza looks a lot more stable than that old pub was - even more so now! :D

GrimUpNorth 11-08-2023 20:43

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158372)
Maybe, but in my opinion, whilst novel, this was a dangerous structure. The place could have collapsed on its customers at any time.

Actually, my opinion is that if you buy the land, you should be able to do with it as you wish, within sensible planning regulations. If the authorities want to list a building on the land and this is incompatible with what the owner wants, the authorities should be given the option of buying it at commercial rates. If they are not prepared to do that, the owner should be allowed, within reason, to do as they want, including demolition.

This country needs to free itself from unnecessary regulation, and where they want to impose unreasonable compliance, they should put their money where their mouths are.

---------- Post added at 19:54 ---------- Previous post was at 19:50 ----------



It’s pretty clear that this was planned, but good luck to them! How could the authorities have allowed the place to operate with this degree of subsidence? I’m no expert, but it seems to me that the place was in imminent danger of collapse.

I suppose it was a tourist attraction, but are tourists dispensable just because they live somewhere else?

You're the only person I'm aware of saying the building was unsafe.

jfman 11-08-2023 20:46

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36158392)
You're the only person I'm aware of saying the building was unsafe.

It’s stood for decades, nay, hundreds, of years.

Sounds like red tape, ‘elf and safety gone mad, etc. to say it’s unsafe now. Especially with no qualifications :rofl:

OLD BOY 11-08-2023 20:58

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36158392)
You're the only person I'm aware of saying the building was unsafe.

Oh, right. That’s an interesting point that I hadn’t considered.

Remind me to take no notice of anyone on here who advises me on buying a property!

Interesting that you can’t see the danger presented by this. People I know have been advised to evacuate their subsidised property and it looked a lot safer than that relic!

jfman 11-08-2023 21:00

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158398)
Oh, right. That’s an interesting point that I hadn’t considered.

Remind me to take no notice of anyone on here who advises me on buying a property!

Interesting that you can’t see the danger presented by this. People I know have been advised to evacuate their subsidised property and it looked a lot safer than that relic!

Speculative nonsense as always.

Has any competent authority determines this? What you would buy is irrelevant.

GrimUpNorth 11-08-2023 21:00

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158394)
It’s stood for decades, nay, hundreds, of years.

Sounds like red tape, ‘elf and safety gone mad, etc. to say it’s unsafe now. Especially with no qualifications :rofl:

It's the sort of structure the local council would visit regularly as they wouldn't want to be left holding the bucket of you-know-what if something did happen. It's the kind of thing I'd expect an armchair structural engineer to know, especially one with local authority experience.

OLD BOY 11-08-2023 21:00

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158394)
It’s stood for decades, nay, hundreds, of years.

Sounds like red tape, ‘elf and safety gone mad, etc. to say it’s unsafe now. Especially with no qualifications :rofl:

Yes, and no doubt it would have stood forever! You are so hilarious! I’d stop now while you’re losing this argument! :D

jfman 11-08-2023 21:01

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158401)
Yes, and no doubt it would have stood forever! You are so hilarious! I’d stop now while you’re losing this argument! :D

OB if losing an argument was a worthy cause for not contributing we’d see much less of you.

OLD BOY 11-08-2023 21:07

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36158400)
It's the sort of structure the local council would visit regularly as they wouldn't want to be left holding the bucket of you-know-what if something did happen. It's the kind of thing I'd expect an armchair structural engineer to know, especially one with local authority experience.

Then let the local council pay for it.

My local council paid for a telephone box that is now plastered with masking tape and with seven panes knocked out! The paintwork has all peeled off. By the way, the phone no longer works!

You couldn’t make it up and you people all seem to think it’s OK!

Common sense has gone out of the window.

---------- Post added at 21:07 ---------- Previous post was at 21:04 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158402)
OB if losing an argument was a worthy cause for not contributing we’d see much less of you.

I’ve not lost any argument. Nobody seems to be arguing the points I’ve made.

I did notice that, and it’s a common theme on Cable Forum, unfortunately.

Why exactly do you think this dangerous structure should have been preserved?Clearly, not many people visited it!

jfman 11-08-2023 21:10

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158403)
Then let the local council pay for it.

My local council paid for a telephone box that is now plastered with masking tape and with seven panes knocked out! The paintwork has all peeled off. By the way, the phone no longer works!

You couldn’t make it up and you people all seem to think it’s OK!

Common sense has gone out of the window.

“Common” sense - and dare I say adhering to the law - would have told the purchaser who wanted empty land to go elsewhere rather than break planning rules to remove an existing structure they didn’t want when they purchased it.

More anecdotal evidence of nothing at all.

---------- Post added at 21:10 ---------- Previous post was at 21:07 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158403)
I’ve no lost any argument. Nobody seems to be arguing the points I’ve made.

When your points are entirely fabricated to justify a property developer breaking planning rules - as decided by the Conservative Government, implemented by local authorities - it’s unsurprising that the vast majority, using their “common” sense, decide to ignore you.

OLD BOY 11-08-2023 22:32

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158405)
“Common” sense - and dare I say adhering to the law - would have told the purchaser who wanted empty land to go elsewhere rather than break planning rules to remove an existing structure they didn’t want when they purchased it.

More anecdotal evidence of nothing at all.

---------- Post added at 21:10 ---------- Previous post was at 21:07 ----------



When your points are entirely fabricated to justify a property developer breaking planning rules - as decided by the Conservative Government, implemented by local authorities - it’s unsurprising that the vast majority, using their “common” sense, decide to ignore you.

And still, you haven’t got the ammunition to address my argument. What are you playing at?

I think I know the answer. It’s called deflection.

jfman 11-08-2023 22:36

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158408)
And still, you haven’t got the ammunition to address my argument. What are you playing at?

I think I know the answer. It’s called deflection.

OB it’s not my fault if you are incapable of, or wilfully are not, understanding the inherent flaw in your own argument of condoning potentially criminal activity.

What the planning rules could/should say are irrelevant.

You’ve made it clear the interests of property developers should go above local communities. You want them to be able to ride roughshot over the hard won restrictions that are in the planning system to control land use in this country. Considering you are condoning slavery as the answer to Britain’s lack of competitiveness in global markets in the other thread I would call it a night.

If you are going to hang about then riddle me this, OB. As a Conservative of all things. Why should a landowner of nearby land, with appropriate planning permission for whatever someone wants to build, have their land (and asset) devalued by criminal activity, knowing that anyone can buy any other land without planning permission, illegally demolish whatever happens to be on it, subsequently get planning permission that wouldn’t have been approved without the illegal demolition in the middle?

Dude111 12-08-2023 02:27

Very sad this happend to it :(

Hugh 12-08-2023 09:26

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
I see OB has got the latest talking points from CCHQ.

Everything (in this and other threads yesterday) is either "deflection", "hot air", "you’re not arguing the points I made", or "I’ve answered that already, it’s up to you to find it"…

OLD BOY 12-08-2023 11:40

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158405)
“Common” sense - and dare I say adhering to the law - would have told the purchaser who wanted empty land to go elsewhere rather than break planning rules to remove an existing structure they didn’t want when they purchased it.

More anecdotal evidence of nothing at all.

---------- Post added at 21:10 ---------- Previous post was at 21:07 ----------



When your points are entirely fabricated to justify a property developer breaking planning rules - as decided by the Conservative Government, implemented by local authorities - it’s unsurprising that the vast majority, using their “common” sense, decide to ignore you.

Well, these are not the points I’m arguing. Yes, clearly the law has been broken and that should carry consequences.

My point is that this obsession we have to list buildings has gone too far and the law needs to change. There will be those buildings we wish to preserve, of course, but if nobody wants to buy it and preserve it, it should be bought by the government.

GrimUpNorth 12-08-2023 11:42

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158403)
Then let the local council pay for it.

My local council paid for a telephone box that is now plastered with masking tape and with seven panes knocked out! The paintwork has all peeled off. By the way, the phone no longer works!

You couldn’t make it up and you people all seem to think it’s OK!

Common sense has gone out of the window.

---------- Post added at 21:07 ---------- Previous post was at 21:04 ----------



I’ve not lost any argument. Nobody seems to be arguing the points I’ve made.

I did notice that, and it’s a common theme on Cable Forum, unfortunately.

Why exactly do you think this dangerous structure should have been preserved?Clearly, not many people visited it!

Back in the day local councils have purchased properties etc to protect them for future generations, but unfortunately your team have cut the funding so deeply that councils no longer have the money.

Also, I wonder if your contemptuous view of the planning laws would change if your next door neighbours decided to install a dioxin factory in their back garden, or open a 24 hour a day heavy engineering works?

OLD BOY 12-08-2023 11:48

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36158438)
Back in the day local councils have purchased properties etc to protect them for future generations, but unfortunately your team have cut the funding so deeply that councils no longer have the money.

Also, I wonder if your contemptuous view of the planning laws would change if your next door neighbours decided to install a dioxin factory in their back garden, or open a 24 hour a day heavy engineering works?

I have already made clear that I am not justifying anyone breaking the law.

spiderplant 12-08-2023 11:48

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158437)
Yes, clearly the law has been broken and that should carry consequences.

Which law do you believe has been broken?

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158437)
it should be bought by the government.

You're advocating nationalisation? Get back to your left-leaning snake pit. :)

nodrogd 12-08-2023 12:33

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36158392)
You're the only person I'm aware of saying the building was unsafe.

And no doubt the same comment could be made of leaning tower of Pisa. Both buildings have undergone some "stabilization". The pub had huge internal steel beams, some of which were clearly visible after the fire. I visited the place back in 2010 & was very impressed with how they were maintaining it.

jfman 12-08-2023 13:05

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158437)
Well, these are not the points I’m arguing. Yes, clearly the law has been broken and that should carry consequences.

My point is that this obsession we have to list buildings has gone too far and the law needs to change. There will be those buildings we wish to preserve, of course, but if nobody wants to buy it and preserve it, it should be bought by the government.

Total red herring here, OB. You wished them luck ffs.

If you want to go away and campaign for the destruction of anything meaningful and our national heritage knock yourself out. If the pub/land in the current legal framework had no value it should have been sold on that basis - not to someone to burn it down.

If you follow such a flawed logic one could reasonably say the asylum system is failing so “good luck” to make those who wish to make the crossing on small boats.

GrimUpNorth 12-08-2023 13:10

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nodrogd (Post 36158443)
And no doubt the same comment could be made of leaning tower of Pisa. Both buildings have undergone some "stabilization". The pub had huge internal steel beams, some of which were clearly visible after the fire. I visited the place back in 2010 & was very impressed with how they were maintaining it.

Working closely with someone who is in building control I know councils take safety very seriously.

jfman 15-08-2023 21:17

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...ngham-66514759

I can only assume when OB nods to the entrepreneurial spirit of this couple that’s a euphemism for the accelerant they use.

Chris 16-08-2023 08:16

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158678)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...ngham-66514759

I can only assume when OB nods to the entrepreneurial spirit of this couple that’s a euphemism for the accelerant they use.

They really have had bad luck with things they own burning to ashes in catastrophic fires, haven’t they.

Hugh 24-08-2023 17:21

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Crooked House: Arson arrests in wonky pub fire probe

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...ngham-66608279

OLD BOY 25-08-2023 16:30

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158678)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...ngham-66514759

I can only assume when OB nods to the entrepreneurial spirit of this couple that’s a euphemism for the accelerant they use.

While I disagree with the restrictive planning laws on so many buildings ‘of interest’, because I believe it’s your own business if you want to pull an old building down on your own land, I accept that legal action must be taken to enforce the law as it stands.

Obviously, there will be some buildings that the government might want to preserve, but I think far too many are being added to the list.

jfman 25-08-2023 16:51

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36159225)
While I disagree with the restrictive planning laws on so many buildings ‘of interest’, because I believe it’s your own business if you want to pull an old building down on your own land, I accept that legal action must be taken to enforce the law as it stands.

Obviously, there will be some buildings that the government might want to preserve, but I think far too many are being added to the list.

The law of the land is the law of the land, whether you agree with it or not.

It’s not for the Government to have to purchase perfectly acceptable historic buildings to save them from criminal vultures.

OLD BOY 25-08-2023 16:56

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36159228)
The law of the land is the law of the land, whether you agree with it or not.

I don’t disagree. I said as much.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36159228)

It’s not for the Government to have to purchase perfectly acceptable historic buildings to save them from criminal vultures.

If they want to list them, they should buy them if the owner disagrees.

jfman 25-08-2023 17:23

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36159230)
I don’t disagree. I said as much.

If they want to list them, they should buy them if the owner disagrees.

And if they’re already listed, presumably buyers shouldn’t purchase them to burn them down.

OLD BOY 26-08-2023 13:02

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36159231)
And if they’re already listed, presumably buyers shouldn’t purchase them to burn them down.

I would just gently point out that the pub wasn’t listed.

1andrew1 26-08-2023 13:17

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36159276)
I would just gently point out that the pub wasn’t listed.

Not listed but listing. :D

jfman 26-08-2023 13:42

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36159276)
I would just gently point out that the pub wasn’t listed.

You are the one banging on about the Government having to buy listed buildings.

Paul 26-08-2023 13:55

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158437)
My point is that this obsession we have to list buildings has gone too far and the law needs to change.

The building wasnt listed, so you have no point thats relevant to this topic.

OLD BOY 26-08-2023 14:41

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
The OP mentioned listing in his first post, and it has been raised on several occasions on here by various posters. I was addressing those points.

Yes, it wasn’t listed, but there were moves to do so prior to the fire.

jfman 27-02-2024 13:17

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...shire-68414524

A welcome development - they’ve been ordered to rebuild it.

Hopefully some kind of deterrent for future arsonist property developers.

1andrew1 27-02-2024 13:27

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36171021)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...shire-68414524

A welcome development - they’ve been ordered to rebuild it.

Hopefully some kind of deterrent for future arsonist property developers.

I assume the entity owning it will fall into receivership and it won't be rebuilt. Then someone else will buy the and redevelop it. But hopefully this penalises the current owners.

Sirius 27-02-2024 15:26

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36171022)
I assume the entity owning it will fall into receivership and it won't be rebuilt. Then someone else will buy the and redevelop it. But hopefully this penalises the current owners.

That was the first thing that went through my mind. I would love for that pub to be rebuilt however i feel it will never happen.

Taf 27-02-2024 15:40

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
They could not rebuild it "as it was" as it would fail too many building regulations.

heero_yuy 27-02-2024 16:39

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
I strongly suspect that they will liquidate their company and just walk away.

Itshim 27-02-2024 17:19

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36158694)
They really have had bad luck with things they own burning to ashes in catastrophic fires, haven’t they.

Well known pub in Cardiff , was sold to convert in to flats but the front had to stay . It burnt down and had too be demonstrated. :shocked:

Paul 27-02-2024 19:29

Re: Disgusting disregard of our heritage.
 
I can honestly say I dont really care either way. :sleep:


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum