Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33711923)

1andrew1 23-05-2023 18:12

BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Boris Johnson referred to police over new lockdown rulebreaking claims

Papers from Covid era show friends visited Chequers during lockdown

Boris Johnson has been referred to police by the Cabinet Office over new claims he broke lockdown rules after his ministerial diary revealed visits by friends to Chequers during the pandemic.

The Cabinet Office has passed concerns to the Metropolitan Police and Thames Valley police after several visits to the prime minister’s grace and favour residence were highlighted during preparations for a public inquiry into the pandemic.

The privileges committee, which is investigating claims that Johnson misled parliament over lockdown-breaking parties, has been informed. Johnson was made aware of the concerns last week and has since written to the Cabinet Office denying rulebreaking.

The development will intensify pressure on Johnson, who is already fighting for his political future. The privileges committee is due to report back next month and if it recommends suspending the prime minister for more than 10 days he could face a by-election.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/b...ends-0h0msqnld

RichardCoulter 23-05-2023 18:31

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Good heavens, it's never ending with this idiot.

Hugh 23-05-2023 18:32

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
https://media.tenor.com/aK9Q5vEfofsA...sol-novela.gif

Damien 23-05-2023 18:50

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
It won't be PartyGate 2 as he isn't relevant any longer and no one is surprised. His few remaining disciples will go to their grave defending his right to impose restrictions on the public that he didn't follow but that's it.

Pretty stupid though. He gave this evidence himself to the lawyers.

jfman 23-05-2023 18:59

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Rolf Harris has a better chance of a comeback now.

Dave42 23-05-2023 19:38

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
even the defenders of him must see the light now surely

ianch99 23-05-2023 19:41

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
More oxygen for the reasons to remove the Party of sleaze & corruption.

1andrew1 23-05-2023 20:41

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36152535)
even the defenders of him must see the light now surely

Let's see what Old Boy has to say on the matter.

---------- Post added at 20:41 ---------- Previous post was at 20:36 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36152530)
It won't be PartyGate 2 as he isn't relevant any longer and no one is surprised. His few remaining disciples will go to their grave defending his right to impose restrictions on the public that he didn't follow but that's it.

Pretty stupid though. He gave this evidence himself to the lawyers.

It's more sleaze around the Party, a perception which Sunak hoped to move away from. And it might mean a by election...though I'm aware this has been said before and has not happened.

Braverman and Partygate II. The popcorn makers are going to be busy over the next few weeks! :D

GrimUpNorth 23-05-2023 22:47

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
And he would of got away with it if it wasn't for those pesky civil servants in the Cabinet Office and their blatant left wing agenda.

Chrysalis 24-05-2023 00:27

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Meanwhile my city mayor ignored covid rules and just got elected again.

Ms NTL 24-05-2023 04:18

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 36152558)
Meanwhile my city mayor ignored covid rules and just got elected again.

Which one?

Russ 24-05-2023 07:01

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
There seems to be plenty of of people with the attitude of “it was years ago, let it go”.

No, let’s not let it go. He won’t ever get prosecuted for spaffing billions to his mates, he won’t get prosecuted for lying to the Queen, selling us his “oven ready deal” based on complete horseshit so let’s get him for whatever we can get on him.

I’ve never been a Tory fan but I have never detested them more than I did during his reign of terror.

1andrew1 24-05-2023 08:44

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36152562)
There seems to be plenty of of people with the attitude of “it was years ago, let it go”.

No, let’s not let it go. He won’t ever get prosecuted for spaffing billions to his mates, he won’t get prosecuted for lying to the Queen, selling us his “oven ready deal” based on complete horseshit so let’s get him for whatever we can get on him.

I’ve never been a Tory fan but I have never detested them more than I did during his reign of terror.

Hopefully, Johnson did not break the rules again. But as he's a sitting MP, it's still relevant. Expect questions in the Commons today about this and the Braverman story. And the more frequent use of the sleaze adjective in connection with the Conservative Party, potentially increasing the Party's losses at the next election.

Damien 24-05-2023 09:00

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
https://twitter.com/Steven_Swinford/...67658396794880

Quote:

BREAKING

Boris Johnson allies up the ante and warn they will obstruct Rishi Sunak’s government unless he intervened to stop what they see as a ‘witch hunt’

They say it’s the ‘final straw’ for Johnson and warn that MPs and members supportive of former PM will begin organising
I don't think Johnson has enough allies to make this work and even amongst the few he has I doubt they will go to the bat for him on this issue now. I suspect this 'allies' consist of him and Nadine Dorris.

Still it shows how for Boris Johnson it's always about, and was always about, Johnson's ego.

Maggy 24-05-2023 09:06

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36152553)
And he would of got away with it if it wasn't for those pesky civil servants in the Cabinet Office and their blatant left wing agenda.

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

ianch99 24-05-2023 09:07

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
There is an interesting theory running around that says that had Johnson paid for his own legal defence, he could not have reported to the Police due to client confidentiality rules. As the state paid for the legal defence, these rights were not in place. Does this make sense?

1andrew1 24-05-2023 09:19

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36152568)
There is an interesting theory running around that says that had Johnson paid for his own legal defence, he could not have reported to the Police due to client confidentiality rules. As the state paid for the legal defence, these rights were not in place. Does this make sense?

Surely, they'd still be with holding evidence if they did not pass the information to the Police, whoever paid the bill?

If I was an unscrupulous lawyer looking for future work from Johnson, I might be tempted to say that the handwriting on page ZZ was a bit unclear, hint, hint, and he might wish to rewrite it again.

jonbxx 24-05-2023 09:22

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36152568)
There is an interesting theory running around that says that had Johnson paid for his own legal defence, he could not have reported to the Police due to client confidentiality rules. As the state paid for the legal defence, these rights were not in place. Does this make sense?

That’s right. The legal team for Boris Johnson was hired by the Cabinet Office which is a Civil Service function. Once the legal team found evidence of these new events, they passed this on to their client as the defence and accused has a right to know all evidence against them. The Civil Service code says that they must report all instances of suspected law breaking which is what they did.

If Boris Johnson hired his own legal team, we would know about the case against him but could keep schtum about it.

Damien 24-05-2023 09:39

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Yeah, he didn't have confidentiality as the Cabinet Office were the clients apparently so they had the right to see all submissions. Some Tory MPs are upset about the fact the Cabinet Office reported him but there is no suggestion the lawyers have broken client confidentiality.

Personally, I am not sure the police will investigate this. They've said before they don't retrospectively investigate lockdown breaches but Johnson and Starmer were investigated due to the public interest of them being senior politicians accused of breaking those rules. However, Johnson isn't PM anymore and the police probably don't want to have to keep going back to investigate other politicians should more come out.

GrimUpNorth 24-05-2023 09:40

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36152562)
There seems to be plenty of of people with the attitude of “it was years ago, let it go”.

No, let’s not let it go. He won’t ever get prosecuted for spaffing billions to his mates, he won’t get prosecuted for lying to the Queen, selling us his “oven ready deal” based on complete horseshit so let’s get him for whatever we can get on him.

I’ve never been a Tory fan but I have never detested them more than I did during his reign of terror.

Couldn't agree more or say it better.

Damien 24-05-2023 09:43

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36152573)
Surely, they'd still be with holding evidence if they did not pass the information to the Police, whoever paid the bill?

If I was an unscrupulous lawyer looking for future work from Johnson, I might be tempted to say that the handwriting on page ZZ was a bit unclear, hint, hint, and he might wish to rewrite it again.

I don't think lawyers are allowed to break confidentiality unless someone is at harm and/or it's evidence that has to be disclosed to the other side in a legal dispute.

So if you told your lawyer "Yeah mate, I robbed that store. LOL!" they aren't allowed to tell anyone. If you said you planned to murder someone they can tell the police. If you documents that were evidence as part of a case then all parties in the case can see the evidence. I think.

Pierre 24-05-2023 09:47

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36152562)
during his reign of terror.

Not exactly Stalin is he?

Damien 24-05-2023 10:05

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36152579)
Not exactly Stalin is he?

Maybe the Armando Iannucci version

Chrysalis 24-05-2023 10:12

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36152559)
Which one?

Soulsby in Leicester.

Mad Max 24-05-2023 12:54

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
It's a witch hunt.

Hugh 24-05-2023 13:06

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36152595)
It's a witch hunt.

Perhaps if he had been less of a witch, there would be less hunting going on?

Or are we saying that if Government lawyers find evidence of a potentially criminal activity, they should ignore it?

denphone 24-05-2023 13:34

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36152595)
It's a witch hunt.

Tell that to those who all followed the lockdown rules and those who could not even say their proper goodbyes to their loved ones.

Rules are for "all of us" to abide by.

1andrew1 24-05-2023 13:46

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

COVID inquiry issues legal notice to Cabinet Office for not handing over unredacted Johnson messages

The COVID inquiry has issued a legal notice to the Cabinet Office for not handing over the full contents of Boris Johnson's messages.

The Cabinet Office tried to object to handing over the communications but was overruled by Baroness Hallett, the chair of the inquiry.

Downing Street insisted the government was supplying "all relevant material" to the inquiry.

The Cabinet Office has already provided more than 55,000 documents, 24 personal witness statements and eight corporate statements to the inquiry.

But the Government believes it has no duty to disclose "unambiguously irrelevant" material, Downing Street said.

Boris Johnson says he is instructing new lawyers to represent him in the inquiry.
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-inq...sages-12888338

Mad Max 24-05-2023 14:40

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36152601)
Tell that to those who all followed the lockdown rules and those who could not even say their proper goodbyes to their loved ones.

Rules are for "all of us" to abide by.

I know the govt made the rules but I'll bet thousands didn't follow them, time to move on old chap.:)

daveeb 24-05-2023 16:22

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36152608)
I know the govt made the rules but I'll bet thousands didn't follow them, time to move on old chap.:)

That's not the point old chap. Hundreds of people were prosecuted throughout lockdown for far less and the rule makers need to set the bar high, not duck and dive under it.

Dave42 24-05-2023 16:41

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

BREAKING: Boris Johnson’s allies are threatening to trigger THREE by-elections to damage Rishi Sunak over the police referral

Nadine Dorries will almost certainly be one of those…
https://twitter.com/PolitlcsUK/statu...67207723425793

Damien 24-05-2023 16:45

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
I am sure Sunak is deeply worried about losing three MPs who want him gone

Dave42 24-05-2023 16:50

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36152595)
It's a witch hunt.

were you not one of the ones that supporting the right wing media witch hunt of Starmer when he had a curry lunch break done nothing wrong

but Johnson breaking rules all fine as rules dont apply to tories right ?

---------- Post added at 16:50 ---------- Previous post was at 16:49 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36152628)
I am sure Sunak is deeply worried about losing three MPs who want him gone

exactly let them go and lose the tories the 3 seats ;)

denphone 24-05-2023 17:20

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36152608)
I know the govt made the rules but I'll bet thousands didn't follow them, time to move on old chap.:)

A great bit of whataboutery MM.

Mad Max 24-05-2023 19:29

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36152634)
A great bit of whataboutery MM.

:D:D

---------- Post added at 19:29 ---------- Previous post was at 19:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36152629)
were you not one of the ones that supporting the right wing media witch hunt of Starmer when he had a curry lunch break done nothing wrong

but Johnson breaking rules all fine as rules dont apply to tories right ?

---------- Post added at 16:50 ---------- Previous post was at 16:49 ----------



exactly let them go and lose the tories the 3 seats ;)

No idea what you're on about, or was that the one where he had a beer?

Mick 25-05-2023 16:49

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36152595)
It's a witch hunt.

I’m no fan of Johnson, but a witch hunt is exactly what it is.

Snivel servants need to be sacked, who leak stuff to the pathetic liberal media, like the ultra gutter & lefty rag, guardian.

Damien 25-05-2023 17:23

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36152696)
I’m no fan of Johnson, but a witch hunt is exactly what it is.

Snivel servants need to be sacked, who leak stuff to the pathetic liberal media, like the ultra gutter & lefty rag, guardian.

The story came from The Times but I think the cabinet office was obligated to refer to the police if they find evidence of a crime?

OLD BOY 29-05-2023 17:59

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36152699)
The story came from The Times but I think the cabinet office was obligated to refer to the police if they find evidence of a crime?

Boris should have eaten all the cake instead of leaving it behind as evidence. :rolleyes:

jfman 29-05-2023 18:06

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36152932)
Boris should have eaten all the cake instead of leaving it behind as evidence. :rolleyes:

I think it’s the inviting folk who aren’t colleagues round to Chequers that’s the problem this time, OB.

Dave42 29-05-2023 18:42

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36152932)
Boris should have eaten all the cake instead of leaving it behind as evidence. :rolleyes:

has nothing to do with the cake as you well know OB it the gatherings that broke the rules

OLD BOY 29-05-2023 19:06

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36152938)
has nothing to do with the cake as you well know OB it the gatherings that broke the rules

Are you sure about that, Dave? There are a lot of people who think that eating cake or drinking alcohol are proof of a party.

Clearly, that is not the case, but it appears to have swayed the Met. If there hadn’t been cake, Boris would not have been fined. Ridiculous, I know, but true.

It’s also true that Kier attended a function with curry and alcohol at a party member’s house. Police reaction? Move on, nothing to see here….

The ONLY difference apart from the fact that Kier was at a social event and Boris was at a work event was that Boris had cake.

Think about it. If it wasn’t so glaringly obvious and tragic, it would make a hilarious comedy. How to make something out of nothing, and do it so inconsistently, citing cake as the final arbiter when cake isn’t even mentioned in the rules. Yet a social event is OK, when it really isn’t!

Hugh 29-05-2023 19:33

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
No one, except you (repeatedly) is "citing cake"…

OLD BOY 29-05-2023 19:45

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36152944)
No one, except you (repeatedly) is "citing cake"…

Thank you, Hugh. Glad I nailed that one first. :D

It’s the logical conclusion. If there hadn’t been cake, Boris would not have been fined. Why else was he fined?

Dave42 29-05-2023 19:48

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36152947)
Thank you, Hugh. Glad I nailed that one first. :D

It’s the logical conclusion. If there hadn’t been cake, Boris would not have been fined. Why else was he fined?

he was fined because of the gathering OB man why do you think he in trouble again he admitted to more gatherings in his diary nothing to do with the cake

jfman 29-05-2023 19:48

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36152947)
Thank you, Hugh. Glad I nailed that one first. :D

It’s the logical conclusion. If there hadn’t been cake, Boris would not have been fined. Why else was he fined?

OB you are even more tiresome than the failed leader, proven liar and soon to be former MP you defend so much.

OLD BOY 29-05-2023 19:56

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36152948)
he was fined because of the gathering OB man why do you think he in trouble again he admitted to more gatherings in his diary nothing to do with the cake

They were gathering for a scheduled meeting, remember?

Hugh 29-05-2023 20:59

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36152951)
They were gathering for a scheduled meeting, remember?

Johnson disagrees with you…

Quote:

Discussing his lockdown-breaking birthday party, Mr Johnson said "in all frankness at that time it did not occur to me that this might have been a breach of the rules".

After the fine, however, he "now humbly accepts" he did breach COVID-19 laws.
https://news.sky.com/story/boris-joh...%20June%202020.

1andrew1 29-05-2023 21:08

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36152951)
They were gathering for a scheduled meeting, remember?

May I commend the Sue Gray Report to you Old Boy?
https://assets.publishing.service.go...GATHERINGS.pdf

GrimUpNorth 29-05-2023 22:35

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36152951)
They were gathering for a scheduled meeting, remember?

So the Johnson's interior decorator was formally invited and involved in meetings about running the country?

Hang on, with hindsight, she might have been an imprtant cog in the UK decision making machine all along and without her vital input the country might be even further up the creek than we are now.

I think we've all been a bit harsh on BJ as he was only doing the best for the country with the very best people available.

OLD BOY 29-05-2023 23:20

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36152963)
So the Johnson's interior decorator was formally invited and involved in meetings about running the country?

Hang on, with hindsight, she might have been an imprtant cog in the UK decision making machine all along and without her vital input the country might be even further up the creek than we are now.

I think we've all been a bit harsh on BJ as he was only doing the best for the country with the very best people available.

But it was the cake what clinched it. ;)

1andrew1 29-05-2023 23:48

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36152968)
But it was the cake what clinched it. ;)

He probably should have been fined for the other parties too.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...y-get-one-fine

1andrew1 30-05-2023 06:57

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
BoJo and the Government are now launching a legal challenge to prevent the Cabinet Office from releasing his WhatsApp messages and diaries to the Covid Enquiry.
https://news.sky.com/story/legal-bat...sages-12892827

OLD BOY 30-05-2023 09:16

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36152970)
He probably should have been fined for the other parties too.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...y-get-one-fine

The police were satisfied that a leaving presentation was a legitimate work activity.

1andrew1 30-05-2023 10:22

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36152978)
The police were satisfied that a leaving presentation was a legitimate work activity.

Agreed. The others weren't all leaving-dos so I think you've got a legitimate question in asking why he wasn't fined for the rest.

On another note
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36152978)
It’s also true that Kier attended a function with curry and alcohol at a party member’s house. Police reaction? Move on, nothing to see here….

Repeating a falsehood does not make it correct. This was post-work food and drinks at a meeting venue. The police reaction was not "nothing to see here" but "we've launched an investigation".

Hugh 30-05-2023 12:03

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/4...97dcd51b4fb028

Quote:

The Cabinet Office is resolute in its view that documents and correspondence covering more than two years do not need to be released in full, claiming that parts of discussions are “unambiguously irrelevant” to the inquiry.
https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk/wp...ry-Notice-.pdf

Quote:

The Cabinet Office was sent a copy of the Chair's Ruling on its section 21(4) application on the day that the Ruling was given, Monday 22 May 2023.

The Ruling set 4pm on Tuesday 30 May 2023 as the new deadline for compliance with the section 21 Notice.

2. Shortly after close of business on Friday 26 May, the Inquiry received correspondence from the Government Legal Department on behalf of the Cabinet Office, raising two matters for the first time.

3. First, an extension was requested for compliance with the Ruling until Monday 5 June

2023. Second, the Inquiry was informed that the Cabinet Office does not have in its possession either Mr Johnson's WhatsApp messages or Mr Johnson's notebooks, as sought in the original section 21 Notice.

4. The Chair rejected the request for an extension of time to 5 June 2023, but granted a short extension to 4pm on Thursday 1 June 2023. The section 21 Notice has been varied accordingly.

Apparently, after stating that documents and correspondence are "unambiguously irrelevant", they also state they don’t have the documents and correspondence they refer to - how do they know they are "unambiguously irrelevant", then?

Also, Baroness Hallett requires a signed statement verified by oath to back up the claim that the Cabinet Office does not have copies of Boris Johnson’s WhatsApps or diaries - and a detailed chronology setting out if it had copies and any correspondence with Johnson about it.

About to get very interesting….

OLD BOY 30-05-2023 12:13

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36152983)
Agreed. The others weren't all leaving-dos so I think you've got a legitimate question in asking why he wasn't fined for the rest.

On another note

Repeating a falsehood does not make it correct. This was post-work food and drinks at a meeting venue. The police reaction was not "nothing to see here" but "we've launched an investigation".

I know what it was, but it was still a social event that went on the the wee small hours, and some were worse for wear when they departed. There was no falsehood in my post.

I don’t see how any of you can view that as not being worse than Boris receiving a cake just as he was assembling for a pre-planned meeting.

But there you go…

GrimUpNorth 30-05-2023 12:36

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36152996)
I know what it was, but it was still a social event that went on the the wee small hours, and some were worse for wear when they departed. There was no falsehood in my post.

I don’t see how any of you can view that as not being worse than Boris receiving a cake just as he was assembling for a pre-planned meeting.

But there you go…

I suppose you could just sum it up as your guy broke the law and the other guy didn't, but there you go....

1andrew1 30-05-2023 12:41

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36152996)
I know what it was, but it was still a social event that went on the the wee small hours, and some were worse for wear when they departed. There was no falsehood in my post.

I don’t see how any of you can view that as not being worse than Boris receiving a cake just as he was assembling for a pre-planned meeting.

But there you go…

It was a falsehood to state the police did nothing about Starmer's meal and drinks. You knew that they investigated and cleared him as being inline with Covid guidance at the time.

It was false to state it was a party at a friend's house. It was held at the Miners Hall where they had worked during the day.

Stating it to be a social event is a loose definition as all events involving people are social! The question is whether it was a work or non-work event. It was found by the police to be a work one.

I doubt your quip about it going onto the wee small hours is anything more than wishful thinking.

It's not what we think about BoJo's birthday party, it's what the police think. they found it was not a work event.

BoJo has moved on. I encourage you to join him.

---------- Post added at 12:41 ---------- Previous post was at 12:37 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36152994)

Apparently, after stating that documents and correspondence are "unambiguously irrelevant", they also state they don’t have the documents and correspondence they refer to - how do they know they are "unambiguously irrelevant", then?

Also, Baroness Hallett requires a signed statement verified by oath to back up the claim that the Cabinet Office does not have copies of Boris Johnson’s WhatsApps or diaries - and a detailed chronology setting out if it had copies and any correspondence with Johnson about it.

About to get very interesting….

Interesting. On what basis did they decide that the WhatsApp messages and diaries were unambiguously irrelevent? Did they just take Johnson's word for that?

GrimUpNorth 30-05-2023 12:43

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36152994)
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/4...97dcd51b4fb028



https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk/wp...ry-Notice-.pdf




Apparently, after stating that documents and correspondence are "unambiguously irrelevant", they also state they don’t have the documents and correspondence they refer to - how do they know they are "unambiguously irrelevant", then?

Also, Baroness Hallett requires a signed statement verified by oath to back up the claim that the Cabinet Office does not have copies of Boris Johnson’s WhatsApps or diaries - and a detailed chronology setting out if it had copies and any correspondence with Johnson about it.

About to get very interesting….

So what they're saying is WhatsApps, texts, emails etc that were not directly related to Covid are irrelevant so should remain private, while they feel it's OK to expect a rape victim to allow the police etc to trawl through their entire digital life to check if they were asking to be raped? Shocking, absolutely shocking and anyone who supports this lot should be ashamed.

Damien 30-05-2023 13:30

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Maybe don't conduct Government business on private WhatsApp accounts?

Sephiroth 30-05-2023 21:33

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36152961)
May I commend the Sue Gray Report to you Old Boy?
https://assets.publishing.service.go...GATHERINGS.pdf

Commend? You serious, Andrew? She's tainted goods.(As is Boris).

1andrew1 30-05-2023 21:46

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36153046)
Commend? You serious, Andrew? She's tainted goods.(As is Boris).

It's the report OB was urging us to wait for but it appears he may have missed its release.

Sephiroth 30-05-2023 21:53

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36153047)
It's the report OB was urging us to wait for but it appears he may have missed its release.

Yeah - but we didn't know then that Gray was tainted goods.

Hugh 30-05-2023 22:16

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36153046)
Commend? You serious, Andrew? She's tainted goods.(As is Boris).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36153050)
Yeah - but we didn't know then that Gray was tainted goods.

Keep repeating the slur, someone might believe you…

https://www.instituteforgovernment.o...-investigation

Quote:

The investigation was completed in January 2022 but, following the decision of the Metropolitan Police to investigate the breaches of Covid laws, Gray’s full report was put on hold and a short ‘update’ was published on 31 January 2022.

On 19 May 2022, the Met Police announced it had completed its inquiries and had issued 126 fixed penalty notices to 83 people. Of the 12 gatherings investigated, fines were issued for eight of them. Gray’s full report was published on 25 May.
The Labour chief of staff vacancy was advertised November 2022, as Starmer had a re-organisation the previous month, and had let the previous CoS (Sam White) go.

1andrew1 30-05-2023 22:17

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36153050)
Yeah - but we didn't know then that Gray was tainted goods.

She hadn't spoken to Starmer when her report was writtten.

She's a strong character, she;s no flunky in search of an easy number and ran a pub near the Northern Irish town of Newry in the troubled 1980s.

Sephiroth 30-05-2023 22:39

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36153052)
She hadn't spoken to Starmer when her report was writtten.

She's a strong character, she;s no flunky in search of an easy number and ran a pub near the Northern Irish town of Newry in the troubled 1980s.

We (includes you and Hugh) have no idea as to who spoke to Gray nor when. As in 'their people spoke to her people...'. They're all economical with the truth.

In any case, the "seen to be proper" rules, you know, the "perceived impropriety" bit, applies.

1andrew1 30-05-2023 22:50

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36153053)
We (includes you and Hugh) have no idea as to who spoke to Gray nor when. As in 'their people spoke to her people...'. They're all economical with the truth.

In any case, the "seen to be proper" rules, you know, the "perceived impropriety" bit, applies.

Is that not a "guilty unless innocence can be proved" approach?

Sephiroth 30-05-2023 23:13

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36153054)
Is that not a "guilty unless innocence can be proved" approach?

I'm surprised at you, Andrew. We're dealing with the CS code here and impartiality.

When it transpired that Gray was to become a high-up in the Labour Party, it immediately begged all the questions about her impartiality. And remember, Starmer repeatedly refused to say when Gray had been first contacted. Here impartiality was not "seen to be so".



Maggy 31-05-2023 08:56

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36153053)
We (includes you and Hugh) have no idea as to who spoke to Gray nor when. As in 'their people spoke to her people...'. They're all economical with the truth.

In any case, the "seen to be proper" rules, you know, the "perceived impropriety" bit, applies.

With no respect you don't know anything about it.It's all supposition and innuendo with you.

1andrew1 31-05-2023 09:54

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36153057)
I'm surprised at you, Andrew. We're dealing with the CS code here and impartiality.

When it transpired that Gray was to become a high-up in the Labour Party, it immediately begged all the questions about her impartiality. And remember, Starmer repeatedly refused to say when Gray had been first contacted. Here impartiality was not "seen to be so".

I don't have an issue with civil servants moving to political parties. I think the timing that Hugh outlined provides us with confidence that her report was not an attempt to curry favour for a job. Besides, her capabilities are well known and respected by government and opposition alike so would get a good role on her own merits.

Sephiroth 31-05-2023 11:37

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36153063)
With no respect you don't know anything about it.It's all supposition and innuendo with you.

What on earth are you on about?

---------- Post added at 11:37 ---------- Previous post was at 11:35 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36153064)
I don't have an issue with civil servants moving to political parties. I think the timing that Hugh outlined provides us with confidence that her report was not an attempt to curry favour for a job. Besides, her capabilities are well known and respected by government and opposition alike so would get a good role on her own merits.

I've made no suggestion that Gray might have tried to curry favour for a job with Starmer. It was more about her likely feelings about Boris and on the principle of "perception", when you look back on it, that's where she falls foul, imo.

GrimUpNorth 31-05-2023 12:58

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36153066)
What on earth are you on about?

---------- Post added at 11:37 ---------- Previous post was at 11:35 ----------



I've made no suggestion that Gray might have tried to curry favour for a job with Starmer. It was more about her likely feelings about Boris and on the principle of "perception", when you look back on it, that's where she falls foul, imo.

I'm sure there're plenty of (Senior) Civil Servants who vote Conservative but put those feelings to one side and got on with the job they were charged with during the last Labour administration. Or are you saying it's only those Civil Servants with left leaning political views that can't be trusted to follow the code?

Sephiroth 31-05-2023 15:03

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36153068)
I'm sure there're plenty of (Senior) Civil Servants who vote Conservative but put those feelings to one side and got on with the job they were charged with during the last Labour administration. Or are you saying it's only those Civil Servants with left leaning political views that can't be trusted to follow the code?


That's an unreasonable question to put to me. We are dealing with a specific case with no other reference point to a transgressing Labour politician.

The Gray questions only arose after it was revealed that she had been chosen as a #1 to Starmer. Furthermore:

https://news.sky.com/story/partygate...ivil%20servant.

Quote:

Partygate inquiry chair Harriet Harman was in personal contact with Sue Gray in early stages of parliamentary probe. Sky News understands the veteran Labour MP - who was leading the investigation into claims Boris Johnson misled MPs - had been in direct contact with the former senior civil servant.
It is totally valid under the "seen to be so" principle to ask these questions. Plus, I think Boris is a lying toad and should leave parliament.


1andrew1 31-05-2023 15:40

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36153072)

That's an unreasonable question to put to me. We are dealing with a specific case with no other reference point to a transgressing Labour politician.

The Gray questions only arose after it was revealed that she had been chosen as a #1 to Starmer. Furthermore:

https://news.sky.com/story/partygate...ivil%20servant.

I think this quote from that Sky News article provides some useful context.
Quote:

There is no suggestion Ms Harman was aware of Labour's plans to recruit Ms Gray at the time of her conversations, or that the contact continued after Ms Gray was first approached by aides to Sir Keir.

A privileges committee spokesperson said: "It was the duty of the chair to make contact with anyone, including Sue Gray, who might be able to indicate potential witnesses. The only evidence the committee will rely on it is that which is separately and independently verified by the relevant witness. The privileges committee is not relying on evidence gathered by Sue Gray.

Sephiroth 31-05-2023 16:01

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 

"There is no suggestion ...", "we have no plans..." are all forms of weasel wording that allows for the opposite when it emerges. It has well emerged as it's all in the open and being alleged.

Remember "seen/perceived to be so".

Hugh 31-05-2023 16:13

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
As you say "perception is all".

Remember when the Chief Global Strategist for Charles Stanley advised investors to remove their money from the United Kingdom.

Quote:

“Time to look further afield as the UK economy hits the brakes”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/frances...h=650cbb7c4c1e

Sephiroth 31-05-2023 16:22

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36153075)
As you say "perception is all".

Remember when the Chief Global Strategist for Charles Stanley advised investors to remove their money from the United Kingdom.



https://www.forbes.com/sites/frances...h=650cbb7c4c1e

Where's the perception of impropriety in the case of financial advice that you've cited?

And was it duff advice, btw?

Dave42 31-05-2023 16:58

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Politics latest: Johnson hands unredacted WhatsApps to Cabinet Office - urging them to hand details over to inquiry
In a surprise move, the former prime minister gives all of the documents the COVID inquiry wants to the department - now the ball is in the government's court.

https://news.sky.com/story/politics-...andal-12593360

Hugh 31-05-2023 17:07

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36153076)
Where's the perception of impropriety in the case of financial advice that you've cited?

And was it duff advice, btw?


I see Mr Movingthegoalposts has arrived, changing the conversation from "perception" to "perception of impropriety"...

He was a lawmaker giving one message to voters (vote for this and you'll be better off) and the opposite message to clients (things will go badly, get your money out of the UK).

Also, at the time he was advising investors to move their money out of the UK, he was pushing in parliament for a Hard Brexit that would see even more investment desert the country.

Sephiroth 31-05-2023 17:13

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36153079)
I see Mr Movingthegoalposts has arrived, changing the conversation from "perception" to "perception of impropriety"...

He was a lawmaker giving one message to voters (vote for this and you'll be better off) and the opposite message to clients (things will go badly, get your money out of the UK).

Also, at the time he was advising investors to move their money out of the UK, he was pushing in parliament for a Hard Brexit that would see even more investment desert the country.

So no impropriety.

As to 'moving the goalposts', 'perception' was always a 'perception of impropriety'. What else would I have meant?

Hugh 31-05-2023 17:59

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36153080)
So no impropriety.

As to 'moving the goalposts', 'perception' was always a 'perception of impropriety'. What else would I have meant?

That's just your perception...

If you don't perceive saying one thing to the electorate and another to clients as improper, that's shows your perception of impropriety is improper, in my perception...

Hugh 31-05-2023 18:33

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36153078)
Politics latest: Johnson hands unredacted WhatsApps to Cabinet Office - urging them to hand details over to inquiry

In a surprise move, the former prime minister gives all of the documents the COVID inquiry wants to the department - now the ball is in the government's court.

https://news.sky.com/story/politics-...andal-12593360

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...6&d=1685552448

---------- Post added at 18:33 ---------- Previous post was at 18:01 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36153078)
Politics latest: Johnson hands unredacted WhatsApps to Cabinet Office - urging them to hand details over to inquiry
In a surprise move, the former prime minister gives all of the documents the COVID inquiry wants to the department - now the ball is in the government's court.

https://news.sky.com/story/politics-...andal-12593360

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65770586

Quote:

Mr Johnson's spokesman said the Cabinet Office had had "access to this material for several months" and he would disclose it directly to the inquiry if asked.

"While Mr Johnson understands the government's position, and does not seek to contradict it, he is perfectly happy for the inquiry to have access to this material in whatever form it requires," he added.

Mr Johnson is among those who will give evidence to the inquiry, which is due to start hearings in two weeks.

The material includes 24 notebooks with contemporaneous notes, as well as his diaries and WhatsApp messages between Mr Johnson and cabinet ministers, advisors and senior civil servants.

On Tuesday, the inquiry revealed it had been told the Cabinet Office did not currently have the WhatsApp messages or notebooks in its possession.
Who to believe - the Cabinet Office or Johnson?

It's like having to choose between explosive diarrhea and and projectile vomiting...

OLD BOY 31-05-2023 18:58

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36153001)
I suppose you could just sum it up as your guy broke the law and the other guy didn't, but there you go....

I’m tempted to ask you for the logic in your statement, but frankly I have better things to do than keep setting out the obvious.

And just (again) for the record, I don’t think either of them should have been fined as both had excuses which in my opinion were reasonable. But Starmer’s case was still closer to the danger line than Boris was.

Mr K 31-05-2023 19:06

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36153095)
I’m tempted to ask you for the logic in your statement, but frankly I have better things to do than keep setting out the obvious.

And just (again) for the record, I don’t think either of them should have been fined as both had excuses which in my opinion were reasonable. But Starmer’s case was still closer to the danger line than Boris was.

Not according to the CPS.

Dave42 31-05-2023 19:12

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36153095)
I’m tempted to ask you for the logic in your statement, but frankly I have better things to do than keep setting out the obvious.

And just (again) for the record, I don’t think either of them should have been fined as both had excuses which in my opinion were reasonable. But Starmer’s case was still closer to the danger line than Boris was.

that is your tory bias OB CPS disagree with you

Hugh 31-05-2023 19:54

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36153097)
that is your tory bias OB CPS disagree with you

Johnson disagrees with him as well, so he appears to be supporting Johnson by calling him a liar...

1andrew1 01-06-2023 22:51

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
No wonder Johnson couldn't wait to hand over his WhatsApps - they only went back to May 2021!
Quote:

Rishi Sunak’s government on Thursday launched legal action to block the release of Boris Johnson’s unredacted WhatsApp messages to the official Covid-19 public inquiry.

But in a new twist, it emerged that Johnson had only given the government messages relating to the period after May 2021 when he acquired a new phone; by that time the worst of the Covid crisis had passed.

The two developments prompted Labour to claim that both Sunak and Johnson were trying to frustrate the inquiry, set up to draw lessons from the way the government handled the pandemic.
https://www.ft.com/content/32b70216-...d-f389a48e71fe

Hugh 02-06-2023 00:50

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36153169)
No wonder Johnson couldn't wait to hand over his WhatsApps - they only went back to May 2021!

https://www.ft.com/content/32b70216-...d-f389a48e71fe

https://www.imobie.com/iphone-tips/r...lost-phone.htm

Quote:

Can I Recover my Old WhatsApp Messages from a Lost Phone?

YES, you can. Usually, an Android phone will back up WhatsApp messages with Google Drive. And, iPhone can store chat history on iCloud. Therefore, only if your old WhatsApp messages are backed up to the cloud, you can get them back when lost the phone.
I’m pretty sure he knew how to do this, having been given one-on-one "Technology Lessons" costing £126k…

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...y-lessons.html

Quote:

The American businesswoman who received thousands in public money after becoming close friends with Boris Johnson has insisted to friends that he only visited her flat for private ‘technology’ lessons.

Mr K 02-06-2023 07:17

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
I'm definitely going to book some of those lessons, they sound good :)

Not much use any evidence from liar as they'll all be lies.

1andrew1 02-06-2023 08:17

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36153171)
https://www.imobie.com/iphone-tips/r...lost-phone.htm

I’m pretty sure he knew how to do this, having been given one-on-one "Technology Lessons" costing £126k…

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...y-lessons.html

Lol. Hands up anyone who believes those messages are still on the Cloud.

Maggy 02-06-2023 09:42

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Hmm! Boris Johnson being trustworthy? I very much doubt it.

1andrew1 02-06-2023 10:20

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Reminds me of Blackadder "did not shoot this delicious plump breasted pigeon" "did not delete those 2020 WhatsApp messages"

Hugh 02-06-2023 10:52

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65787617

Quote:

Boris Johnson has said he is giving his unredacted WhatsApp messages directly to the Covid inquiry.

It comes a day after the government said it would seek a judicial review of the inquiry's demand that it hand over messages from the former prime minister and other officials.

Mr Johnson said he understood why it was taking legal action but added that this was not his decision.

He said he was "perfectly content" for the inquiry to see his messages.

In a letter to the head of the Covid inquiry Baroness Hallett, Mr Johnson said he would be sending her "all unredacted WhatsApps I provided to the Cabinet Office".

These messages date back only to April 2021 - more than a year into the pandemic - because Mr Johnson's phone was involved in a security breach and has not been turned on since.

Mr Johnson said he would like to send the inquiry messages pre-dating April 2021, but that he had been told he could no longer "access safely" his old phone,

He said he would like to "test" the advice received from the security services and has asked the Cabinet Office for assistance in turning his old phone on securely.

mrmistoffelees 02-06-2023 11:17

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
'These messages date back only to April 2021 - more than a year into the pandemic - because Mr Johnson's phone was involved in a security breach and has not been turned on since.

Mr Johnson said he would like to send the inquiry messages pre-dating April 2021, but that he had been told he could no longer "access safely" his old phone'


Bwah ha ha ha, there are readily available commercial tools never mind those used by security/intelligence services to safely recover data from a device involved in a security breach.

'Hide the the stuff that incriminates me, publish the stuff that incriminates everyone else'

1andrew1 02-06-2023 13:43

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
When something sounds too good to be true
Quote:

In a letter to the head of the Covid inquiry Baroness Hallett, Mr Johnson said he would be sending her "all unredacted WhatsApps I provided to the Cabinet Office".
You know there's always a catch.
Quote:

These messages date back only to April 2021 - more than a year into the pandemic - because Mr Johnson's phone was involved in a security breach and has not been turned on since.

Hugh 03-06-2023 19:23

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Boris Johnson could lose legal funding for Covid inquiry

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/1...540ecb9ddb1313

Quote:

The Cabinet Office has warned Boris Johnson it will pull public funding for his legal advice for the Covid inquiry if he “undermines the government’s position” or releases evidence without permission.

Government lawyers wrote to Johnson last week saying money would “cease to be available” if he broke any of their conditions.

These include the requirement to co-operate with any “reasonable” demand and to send them his witness statements and any requested documents for pre-approval and redaction before they are submitted to the inquiry.

The advice puts the former prime minister on a collision course with officials, with experts suggesting that he may have already breached some of its provisions.
Oh, dear, how sad, never mind…

Mind you, I suppose he could ask one of his mates to pay for it - you know, people who have loaned him money/given him freebies before; his cousin Sam Blyth (who was such"close family" he had to be introduced to him by Richard Sharp), Lord Lebedev of Hampton and Serbia, Lord and Lady Bamford of JCB, Lord Goldsmith, Lord Cruddas, David Ross, Lord Brownlow, Christopher Harborne, Investors in Private Capital Ltd, Keith Rupert Murdoch, UK Office of the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, etc., etc…

OLD BOY 03-06-2023 20:00

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36153190)
'These messages date back only to April 2021 - more than a year into the pandemic - because Mr Johnson's phone was involved in a security breach and has not been turned on since.

Mr Johnson said he would like to send the inquiry messages pre-dating April 2021, but that he had been told he could no longer "access safely" his old phone'


Bwah ha ha ha, there are readily available commercial tools never mind those used by security/intelligence services to safely recover data from a device involved in a security breach.

'Hide the the stuff that incriminates me, publish the stuff that incriminates everyone else'

You missed the bit in your quote that explained:

‘He said he would like to "test" the advice received from the security services and has asked the Cabinet Office for assistance in turning his old phone on securely.’


I’m sure that was just an oversight. :walk:

---------- Post added at 19:58 ---------- Previous post was at 19:57 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36153197)
When something sounds too good to be true

You know there's always a catch.

You missed it too. How very strange.:o:

---------- Post added at 20:00 ---------- Previous post was at 19:58 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36153223)
Boris Johnson could lose legal funding for Covid inquiry

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/1...540ecb9ddb1313



Oh, dear, how sad, never mind…

Mind you, I suppose he could ask one of his mates to pay for it - you know, people who have loaned him money/given him freebies before; his cousin Sam Blyth (who was such"close family" he had to be introduced to him by Richard Sharp), Lord Lebedev of Hampton and Serbia, Lord and Lady Bamford of JCB, Lord Goldsmith, Lord Cruddas, David Ross, Lord Brownlow, Christopher Harborne, Investors in Private Capital Ltd, Keith Rupert Murdoch, UK Office of the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, etc., etc…

Well, in case you missed it, Boris is actually trying to co-operate with the inquiry. You wouldn’t think it from the tone of your post.

Hugh 03-06-2023 21:23

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36153223)
Boris Johnson could lose legal funding for Covid inquiry

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/1...540ecb9ddb1313



Oh, dear, how sad, never mind…

Mind you, I suppose he could ask one of his mates to pay for it - you know, people who have loaned him money/given him freebies before; his cousin Sam Blyth (who was such"close family" he had to be introduced to him by Richard Sharp), Lord Lebedev of Hampton and Serbia, Lord and Lady Bamford of JCB, Lord Goldsmith, Lord Cruddas, David Ross, Lord Brownlow, Christopher Harborne, Investors in Private Capital Ltd, Keith Rupert Murdoch, UK Office of the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, etc., etc…

Missed one out…

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...9&d=1685823801

Hugh 03-06-2023 21:24

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36153226)
You missed the bit in your quote that explained:

‘He said he would like to "test" the advice received from the security services and has asked the Cabinet Office for assistance in turning his old phone on securely.’


I’m sure that was just an oversight. :walk:

---------- Post added at 19:58 ---------- Previous post was at 19:57 ----------


You missed it too. How very strange.:o:

---------- Post added at 20:00 ---------- Previous post was at 19:58 ----------


Well, in case you missed it, Boris is actually trying to co-operate with the inquiry. You wouldn’t think it from the tone of your post.


Bless…

You must be one of the very few people in the World who doesn’t realise Johnson only engages in actions that benefit him, or can weaken others.

OLD BOY 04-06-2023 23:39

Re: BoJo referred to police by the Cabinet Office. Partygate II?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36153232)
Bless…

You must be one of the very few people in the World who doesn’t realise Johnson only engages in actions that benefit him, or can weaken others.

Yes, you would say that, wouldn’t you, Hugh?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:24.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum