Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33711265)

1andrew1 22-08-2022 09:10

Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Water companies have been increasing their dumping of raw sewage into the sea by over 2,500% since 2016 putting Britons at risk of Britons at risk of e-coli, salmonella and shockingly, hepatitis A.

Is it really acceptable for a developed country to be doing this in the 21st century? Surely we should be encouraging people to enjoy our great sea and beaches without such a risk to their health? And what about the adverse economic impact on tourism?
Quote:

The moment thousands of gallons of RAW sewage flooded into the sea in Sussex forcing beaches to be closed for swimming
  • Beaches in Bexhill and Normans Bay, East Sussex, have been shut to swimmers
  • It comes after untreated sewage was released into the sea by Southern Water
  • The water firm said it happened as the result of a 'significant' electrical issue
  • Southern Water has been accused of 'environmental vandalism' by surfers

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ewage-sea.html

Quote:

UK health body calls for upgrade to sewage system as beaches close
Britons at risk of e-coli, salmonella and even hepatitis A after water companies dump sewage and storm water into sea


The UK’s public health body warned of the risk of illness to swimmers after water companies dumped sewage and waste water into the sea this week.

“It harms the economy, it harms ecosystems, it harms health,” said Jim McManus, president of the UK’s Association of Directors of Public Health, on BBC Radio Four’s Today programme on Friday. “We need a sewage system fit for the 21st century that stops discharging sewage wherever possible.”

McManus warned of stomach, chest, ear, eye infections, e-coli, salmonella and even hepatitis A being contracted through contact with dirty water. “There are health impacts being seen and sometimes you see GPs reporting on those every year,” he said, adding that household chemicals also find their way into waste water.

“We made massive strides in life expectancy because of sewage, because of food safety . . . and here we are talking about the harms from sewage 175 years after my first predecessor tried to stop it,” he added.

The comments will add to pressure on the water monopolies and their regulators in England and Wales this summer, which have been heavily criticised for awarding lucrative pay packages and dividends to chief executives and investors while announcing hosepipe bans for households and presiding over leakage and pollution failures.

Earlier this week, Southern Water was attacked for telling swimmers to “use your judgment” on whether to swim in water affected by a release of sewage.

Katy Taylor, chief customer officer of Southern Water, told the ITV show Good Morning: “We’re not saying to customers: ‘Don’t swim or don’t go in at all’. We’re saying: ‘There has been a release, this is how long that release has been. It rained, so it’s 95 per cent rainwater, you then need to use your judgment on whether you feel it’s safe to go swimming or not’.”
https://www.ft.com/content/0140a61d-...d-1a797f7475bb

Quote:

Huge increase in raw sewage released into UK waterways and sea, data reveals

The figure is an increase of 2,553% over five years, according to Environment Agency (EA) data, released under the Freedom of Information Act.

Between 2016 and 2021 water companies discharged sewage into waterways and the sea for a total of 9,427,355 hours, the equivalent of 1,076 years.

It comes as the EA issued warnings to holidaymakers to avoid dozens of beaches across England and Wales this week.

Beaches in Bexhill and Normans Bay were shut down after Southern Water experienced a 'significant' electrical issue at a pumping station in Galley Hill which led to the untreated wastewater gushing into the sea.

It means all beaches between Brighton and Hastings are now closed to swimmers as they are polluted by the release of raw sewage.

The water was released when the primary power and the back-up system at the station failed on Wednesday.

Nearby Hastings Borough Council also warned people not to swim at Pelham Beach due to the pollution risk.

Swimmers in East Sussex have hit out demanding that water firm bosses are held to account.
https://news.sky.com/story/huge-incr...veals-12677730

Chris 22-08-2022 10:54

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36131970)
Water companies have been increasing their dumping of raw sewage into the sea by over 2,500% since 2016 putting Britons at risk of Britons at risk of e-coli, salmonella and shockingly, hepatitis A.

Is it really acceptable for a developed country to be doing this in the 21st century? Surely we should be encouraging people to enjoy our great sea and beaches without such a risk to their health? And what about the adverse economic impact on tourism?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ewage-sea.html


https://www.ft.com/content/0140a61d-...d-1a797f7475bb


https://news.sky.com/story/huge-incr...veals-12677730

Companies blaming unforeseen electrical/mechanical breakdowns for their problems, while simultaneously spending less than the bare minimum on maintaining those systems and replacing them when life-expired … :afire:

jfman 22-08-2022 10:57

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Welcome to late stage capitalism.

Chris 22-08-2022 11:10

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36131979)
Welcome to late stage capitalism.

My posts are your clickbait ;)

Hugh 22-08-2022 13:32

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...3&d=1661171514

And in totally unrelated news…

https://www.theguardian.com/environm...ronment-agency

Quote:

government funding for the EA’s work on areas including river quality for 2021-22 has remained at just over £40m, which represents a continuing reduction in financial support for the agency, said Howard Boyd. Since 2010, funding for the EA’s work has been cut by nearly two-thirds, from £120m to the latest settlement of £43m plus £5m for new activity.

Pierre 22-08-2022 13:33

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
As someone that started his professional working life in the water industry, I can understand in general terms the issue at hand.

Sewage Treatment Works/Waste Water Treatment Works are designed to handle a certain flow rate.

When we have storms/ flash floods a lot of the excess water finds itself in the waste water system and overwhelms the treatment plant.

What should happen is that the excess flow should exit the plant before it enters the plant over a storm weir into storm tanks. The excess material will then be pumped into the treatment plant for treatment from the storm tanks after the excess flow has receded to manageable levels.

But the storm tanks are a finite volume, and when they are full the excess flow will then by diverted into whatever watercourse the treatments plants outfall is.

There are screens so condoms, tampons, nappies, wet wipes (all the stuff you shouldn't flush down the toilet anyway) should be stopped.

Also when you say "raw sewage" it is heavily diluted by the excess flow, and a large % of the solid matter will settle in the storm tanks.

The only way to alleviate the problem is to build more storm storage tanks or build more treatment plants. Which is a legitimate question of investment.

And/or stop storm water entering the waste water network. Storm water should enter drains and watercourses, not sewers (unless specifically designed to)

TheDaddy 22-08-2022 13:51

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36131996)
As someone that started his professional working life in the water industry, I can understand in general terms the issue at hand.

Sewage Treatment Works/Waste Water Treatment Works are designed to handle a certain flow rate.

When we have storms/ flash floods a lot of the excess water finds itself in the waste water system and overwhelms the treatment plant.


And/or stop storm water entering the waste water network. Storm water should enter drains and watercourses, not sewers (unless specifically designed to)

Interesting, wonder if storms/ flash floods have increased 2500% in 6 years?

1andrew1 22-08-2022 13:59

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36131995)

Yes, Redwood chooses to hide behind the cloak of an under-funded government agency whilst instructing it to permit foreign-owned water companies to dump raw sewage into our beautiful British seaside.

Pierre 22-08-2022 14:00

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36131997)
Interesting, wonder if storms/ flash floods have increased 2500% in 6 years?

% are a terrible statistic though. It depends what the starting number is.

Also my example above, as I pointed out, was in general terms.

The Mail story in the OP refers to an electrical issue at a pumping station.

This also makes sense, as not everywhere is uphill of a treatment works and pumping stations are required to move the flow to the treatment plant.

Every pumping station I worked at also had the same set up as I advised previously regarding storm tanks. I can only assume that the pumping station(s) involved where inactive for a long period of time or had no storage capability.

1andrew1 22-08-2022 14:58

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36132001)
% are a terrible statistic though. It depends what the starting number is.

Also my example above, as I pointed out, was in general terms.

The Mail story in the OP refers to an electrical issue at a pumping station.

This also makes sense, as not everywhere is uphill of a treatment works and pumping stations are required to move the flow to the treatment plant.

Every pumping station I worked at also had the same set up as I advised previously regarding storm tanks. I can only assume that the pumping station(s) involved where inactive for a long period of time or had no storage capability.

I'm guessing to some extent it's about long-term planning and funding the necessary investment. And having a strong well-resourced regulator backed up by government and not used as a scapegoat.

Dave42 22-08-2022 16:00

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
it what the tories want they all voted to allow it except 22 that voted against they want no regulations

nffc 22-08-2022 17:13

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
No wonder norovirus is around if they're poking around on the beaches with all this sewage...

papa smurf 22-08-2022 17:18

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Last week we had torrential rain in cleethorpes ,if that excess water is not dumped into the Humber the streets would be awash with human sewage as the Victorian sewers are overwhelmed and mister poo poo comes back to haunt us.

Hugh 22-08-2022 17:47

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Or, they could have adequate storm tanks and treatment plants to prevent that from happening…

Chris 22-08-2022 17:57

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36132020)
Last week we had torrential rain in cleethorpes ,if that excess water is not dumped into the Humber the streets would be awash with human sewage as the Victorian sewers are overwhelmed and mister poo poo comes back to haunt us.

Yeah … that excuse really doesn’t hold water (geddit). Public sewage systems have been a thing in this country for 175 years. The engineering is well understood, including the design and maintenance of adequate storm water storage. If there isn’t adequate volume in the system to cope then that’s a failure to invest in a well understood and entirely predictable part of the system we’re paying for through our water/sewage bills.

papa smurf 22-08-2022 17:57

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
I never ague with an expert who's talking shyte ;)

pip08456 22-08-2022 19:16

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36132023)
Yeah … that excuse really doesn’t hold water (geddit). Public sewage systems have been a thing in this country for 175 years. The engineering is well understood, including the design and maintenance of adequate storm water storage. If there isn’t adequate volume in the system to cope then that’s a failure to invest in a well understood and entirely predictable part of the system we’re paying for through our water/sewage bills.

Alledgedly that's supposed to be underway.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1661192101

1andrew1 23-08-2022 00:35

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Who's up to her neck in the proverbial? Liz Truss
Quote:

The Tory leadership frontrunner, Liz Truss, was responsible for cutting millions of pounds of funding earmarked for tackling water pollution during her time as environment secretary, the Guardian can reveal.

Truss, who was in charge at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) between 2014 and 2016, oversaw “efficiency” plans set out in the 2015 spending review to reduce Environment Agency funding by £235m.

This included a £24m cut from a government grant for environmental protection, including surveillance of water companies to prevent the dumping of raw sewage, between 2014-15 and 2016-17, according to the National Audit Office.

It represents almost a quarter of the funding cut from this area between 2010, when the grant stood at £120m, and 2020, by which time it had fallen to £40m.

Labour analysis of official figures shows that since 2016 raw sewage discharge in England and Wales has more than doubled, from 14.7 spill events per overflow to 29.3 in 2021. Greenpeace said the figures showed Truss had “sewage on her hands”.

The Environment Agency has called for the government to reverse the cuts but campaigners want the next prime minister to go further and also give the body the power to properly monitor water companies over sewage, rather than allowing them to self-report discharges.

It follows the finding that 24% of sewage overflow pipes at popular seaside resorts in England and Wales have monitors that are faulty or do not have monitors at all, meaning people could be swimming in human waste this summer without realising.

Last year the head of the Environment Agency, James Bevan, called on the government to reinstate the funds, saying that given the length of the country’s river systems, having “only a few hundred people to oversee them is a pretty tall ask”.

He told MPs: “It has had an effect on our capacity to monitor, to enforce the rules and to help improve the environment where we think it needs doing. Honestly, I would like to see that grant restored. I would like to get back to where we were 10 years ago, and I think it would make a massive difference.”
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...da9fb434286c7c

Hugh 23-08-2022 10:01

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-62633559

Quote:

The Downing Street spokesperson said since the industry was privatised in 1989, the equivalent of £5bn had been invested to upgrade water infrastructure.
In the same time period, water companies have paid out £72 billion in shareholder dividends., mostly paid for by debt.

https://www.theguardian.com/environm...lt-leaks-fixed

tweetiepooh 23-08-2022 10:38

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Would help if we stopped building more houses which leave less land to soak up rain. Or people buying houses on flood plains/springs and then wanting help when they are flooded. Flood plains are meant to flood, the hint is in the name.


Also does 2,500% really mean anything in isolation? If initial levels are very low it doesn't take much increase for really high percentages.


None of this abrogates those responsible from properly doing their duty.

TheDaddy 23-08-2022 15:58

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36132064)
Who's up to her neck in the proverbial? Liz Truss

Ideology over ecology, mind you her ideals don't seem to get a look in when there's an opportunity to be grasped

nomadking 23-08-2022 18:40

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
So is it being dumped just because they feel like it, or is it because there isn't enough water available to process it?

Hugh 23-08-2022 19:01

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36132130)
So is it being dumped just because they feel like it, or is it because there isn't enough water available to process it?

Or is it they haven’t built the appropriate infrastructure, storage, and processing plants to deal with it?

nomadking 23-08-2022 20:16

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36132134)
Or is it they haven’t built the appropriate infrastructure, storage, and processing plants to deal with it?

You still need water to process it. People complain enough about bills, so how likely is they would pay more for those things to happen?

GrimUpNorth 23-08-2022 20:23

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36132143)
You still need water to process it. People complain enough about bills, so how likely is they would pay more for those things to happen?

How about the shareholders cough up?

1andrew1 23-08-2022 20:25

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36132144)
How about the shareholders cough up?

Wash your mouth out with seawater!

Mr K 23-08-2022 20:26

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36132143)
You still need water to process it. People complain enough about bills, so how likely is they would pay more for those things to happen?

Maybe the privatised companies could have take it out of the £1.6 billion in dividends they pay out every year.

Water should never have been privatised, it'll be the air we breathe next.

nomadking 23-08-2022 20:53

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36132146)
Maybe the privatised companies could have take it out of the £1.6 billion in dividends they pay out every year.

Water should never have been privatised, it'll be the air we breathe next.

Ofwat controls what profits they can make, and the prices they can charge.
Quote:

Water and sewerage companies implement large-scale investment programmes to maintain their assets and meet their legal environmental and quality obligations. But the companies do not collect from customers all of the money they invest in the year in which they spend it.
So, companies must fund a large proportion of this investment from the competitive financial markets, either through borrowing (debt) or through investment from shareholders (equity).
Just as mortgage providers for homeowners expect a return on the finance (or capital) they lend, water companies must provide a reasonable return to providers of capital. This means that they must make a profit to reward their investors.
...
Do Ofwat control dividends?
We have no formal powers to control dividends. But each company’s licence requires it to declare or pay dividends only in accordance with a dividend policy which has been approved by its Board and which complies with both of the following principles.
  • The dividends declared or paid will not impair the ability of the company to finance the regulated water and sewerage business.
  • Under a system of incentive regulation, dividends reward efficiency and the management of economic risk.

How does it compare to other major European countries?

Mr K 23-08-2022 21:00

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36132148)
Ofwat controls what profits they can make, and the prices they can charge.
How does it compare to other major European countries?

Maybe OFWAT, like OFGEM, isn't fit for purpose either.

nomadking 23-08-2022 21:04

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36132149)
Maybe OFWAT, like OFGEM, isn't fit for purpose either.

Without either of them prices would be HIGHER.:rolleyes:

Mr K 23-08-2022 21:10

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36132151)
Without either of them prices would be HIGHER.:rolleyes:

If they had done their jobs properly it wouldn't. Look at the profits being made by these companies, they're obscene.

GrimUpNorth 23-08-2022 21:48

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36132151)
Without either of them prices would be HIGHER.:rolleyes:

Just think if all the profits stayed in the public purse, the dividends paid by the water companies since privatisation have dwarfed the £7.6 billion the sale of the assets raised. Another massive Conservative own goal :rolleyes::rolleyes:

1andrew1 23-08-2022 21:50

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36132148)
Ofwat controls what profits they can make, and the prices they can charge.
How does it compare to other major European countries?

Outside England and Wales, I believe it's either provided by state-owned companies eg Scotland and Ireland or by local authorities eg France and Germany.

Chris 23-08-2022 21:54

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Indeed … water was never privatised in Scotland so we don’t get a separate water bill. It’s billed with council tax (though itemised separately) and what you pay depends on what band your house is in.

tweetiepooh 24-08-2022 10:21

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Our water bills fell when a meter was installed. Metering water usage is a good thing as bigger users pay more, same as power.


Maybe we need to meter the leaks and then charge them to the company into a more general fund (but I bet if that was done the quango setup to us the pot would waste it).

Chris 24-08-2022 13:19

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36132177)
Our water bills fell when a meter was installed. Metering water usage is a good thing as bigger users pay more, same as power.


Maybe we need to meter the leaks and then charge them to the company into a more general fund (but I bet if that was done the quango setup to us the pot would waste it).

Metering domestic water isn't a good thing because it turns what ought to be a basic human right into a commodity and puts pressure on poor families to use less than they need. As a society we no longer sink wells or draw from streams, and we live for the most part in urban or suburban settings as that permits the efficient functioning of our economy. Piped water is a therefore a basic necessity for the health of the population and ought to be available on an ability to pay basis (as it more-or-less is in Scotland, with water payment aligned with council tax bands).

Water waste is possibly the most pernicious lie in all public discourse. Leakage from poorly maintained infrastructure is the only serious source of water wastage in this country. Turning the tap off after you wet your toothbrush might be the right thing to do on a point of principle but let's not kid ourselves that anything anybody can do within their own home is going to make the same difference as sorting out the THREE BILLION litres of water lost from the distribution pipes EVERY SINGLE DAY in England and Wales. (Scotland manages to lose around 460 million litres a day, so is relatively slightly worse than England on a per capita basis, although per mile of pipe would be a fairer comparison and I have no idea how to find that information).

Maggy 25-08-2022 09:03

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36132188)
Metering domestic water isn't a good thing because it turns what ought to be a basic human right into a commodity and puts pressure on poor families to use less than they need. As a society we no longer sink wells or draw from streams, and we live for the most part in urban or suburban settings as that permits the efficient functioning of our economy. Piped water is a therefore a basic necessity for the health of the population and ought to be available on an ability to pay basis (as it more-or-less is in Scotland, with water payment aligned with council tax bands).

Water waste is possibly the most pernicious lie in all public discourse. Leakage from poorly maintained infrastructure is the only serious source of water wastage in this country. Turning the tap off after you wet your toothbrush might be the right thing to do on a point of principle but let's not kid ourselves that anything anybody can do within their own home is going to make the same difference as sorting out the THREE BILLION litres of water lost from the distribution pipes EVERY SINGLE DAY in England and Wales. (Scotland manages to lose around 460 million litres a day, so is relatively slightly worse than England on a per capita basis, although per mile of pipe would be a fairer comparison and I have no idea how to find that information).

:tu:

tweetiepooh 25-08-2022 10:56

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36132188)
Metering domestic water isn't a good thing because it turns what ought to be a basic human right into a commodity and puts pressure on poor families to use less than they need. As a society we no longer sink wells or draw from streams, and we live for the most part in urban or suburban settings as that permits the efficient functioning of our economy. Piped water is a therefore a basic necessity for the health of the population and ought to be available on an ability to pay basis (as it more-or-less is in Scotland, with water payment aligned with council tax bands).

Water waste is possibly the most pernicious lie in all public discourse. Leakage from poorly maintained infrastructure is the only serious source of water wastage in this country. Turning the tap off after you wet your toothbrush might be the right thing to do on a point of principle but let's not kid ourselves that anything anybody can do within their own home is going to make the same difference as sorting out the THREE BILLION litres of water lost from the distribution pipes EVERY SINGLE DAY in England and Wales. (Scotland manages to lose around 460 million litres a day, so is relatively slightly worse than England on a per capita basis, although per mile of pipe would be a fairer comparison and I have no idea how to find that information).


Totally agree that mains leakage dwarfs savings made individual but that saving should still be made. Also it means that smaller households pay less than larger and that is fair. Why should the bill be made on rateable value and not water usage? A house with garden and lost of people would pay more than an expensive flat with one occupant.

1andrew1 25-08-2022 12:39

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

French MEPs attack UK over sewage discharge

Three French members of the European Parliament allied to president Emmanuel Macron have called on Brussels to take action against the dumping of untreated sewage in the Channel and the North Sea by British water companies.

“We ask the Commission to use all political and legal means in its power to stop this,” Pierre Karleskind, Nathalie Loiseau and Stéphanie Yon-Courtin said in a letter to EU environmental commissioner Virginijus Sinkevičius that they posted on Twitter.

“Since Brexit, the UK has excused itself from these environmental requirements,” they wrote. “It’s unacceptable . . . We are worried about the negative consequences on the marine environment we share with the UK and also about marine biodiversity and the activities of fishermen and shellfish farmers.”

Last week, the UK’s public health body called for the modernisation of the country’s sewage system after dozens of beaches were closed when heavy rainfall prompted water companies to dump waste into the sea.
https://www.ft.com/content/664595f6-...b-01e271e3ad8f

Pierre 25-08-2022 14:19

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
The French don't exactly have a great track record in this area. Glass houses and all that.

Chris 25-08-2022 15:44

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
MEPs. LOL.

papa smurf 26-08-2022 08:16

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Those of you who are bothered by this should avoid a holiday in Venice

"Venice has no sewer system; household waste flows into the canals and is washed out into the ocean twice a day with the tides. "

tweetiepooh 26-08-2022 09:24

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Maybe it's a plan to deter channel crossings!

Maggy 26-08-2022 09:28

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Seriously annoyed that the release of sewage into the sea is still an issue some time after I last swam off my local beach(5 min stroll from my house).
Which was back in the 80s BTW.:rolleyes:

BenMcr 26-08-2022 09:55

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36132449)
Those of you who are bothered by this should avoid a holiday in Venice

"Venice has no sewer system; household waste flows into the canals and is washed out into the ocean twice a day with the tides. "

That's what happens when the main system is from the 16th Century. Pretty sure most of the UK were still using the street for sewers at that point.

Pierre 26-08-2022 11:26

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36132472)
That's what happens when the main system is from the 16th Century. Pretty sure most of the UK were still using the street for sewers at that point.

Indeed that is how the original London sewage system was designed, to discharge into the Thames during the outgoing tide.

Damien 26-08-2022 11:28

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36132481)
Indeed that is how the original London sewage system was designed, to discharge into the Thames during the outgoing tide.

And it's only now they're fixing it. The super sewer is still being built IIRC. Interested to see the impact on the Thames when it's finished.

BenMcr 26-08-2022 14:06

Re: Raw sewage dumped into the sea increases by 2,500% since 2016
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36132482)
And it's only now they're fixing it. The super sewer is still being built IIRC. Interested to see the impact on the Thames when it's finished.

Maybe they can open the Tower beach again :D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJNcFEZgOdg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tower_Beach,_London


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:01.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum