Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710898)

Mick 17-03-2022 18:48

P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
And with immediate effect. (Potentially breaching UK employment law)

Quote:

It was later confirmed that all 800 crew, including officers, had been laid off with immediate effect via a video message while agency workers were in position to take over the running of ships.

Why have all services effectively been cancelled?

All P&O Ferries services have been suspended "for the next few days", according to P&O, with disruption perhaps lasting to the "end of next week".

That was a change from the company's initial position that had signalled services would face minimal delays.

The shift in its stance reflects the backlash that P&O is now facing.

Workers who have had their contracts terminated are now involved in a series of angry protests, some on board P&O ships, including at Dover which is the busiest route for P&O.
https://news.sky.com/story/p-o-ferri...kings-12568494

Damien 17-03-2022 18:57

Re: P&O Cruises disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Hopefully people boycott them. Pathetic action.

1andrew1 17-03-2022 19:07

Re: P&O Cruises disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Desperate stuff from P&O.

It's a good job market at the moment so I'm sure they could have restructured the company in a less aggressive way which does not disrupts everyone's lives - both staff and customers. This has damaged their reputation badly.

OLD BOY 17-03-2022 20:42

Re: P&O Cruises disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36116833)
And with immediate effect. (Potentially breaching UK employment law)



https://news.sky.com/story/p-o-ferri...kings-12568494

There’s no ‘potentially’ about it Mick. For a start, they are meant to consult with their employees (through the trade unions) before making anyone redundant. Given the number of redundancies involved, at least 3 months’ notice of the intention to declare redundancies should be provided. During that time, companies are meant to carry out meaningful consultation and consider alternatives.

All employees are also entitled to statutory notice pay or more if contracts are more generous.

As for replacing permanent staff with agency staff, well good luck with that one. That certainly doesn’t indicate that dismissal is by reason of redundancy as the jobs are still there.

If the company do not withdraw this threat of redundancies, they will stand liable to pay out a huge amount of compensation to these employees. They have already done tremendous damage, because even if the proposals were withdrawn, employees would be able to leave the company and sue for constructive dismissal on the grounds of loss of trust and confidence based on the company’s actions.

What they should have done was consult the unions about proposed changes in terms and conditions, citing the financial position of the company and the preference to avoid redundancies. This should lead again to meaningful discussions on how to ensure that jobs could be retained in the harsher economic climate.

If negotiations on changes to contracts do not result in agreement, the company should then give everyone notice of termination under their existing contracts and an offer of re-employment on new terms and conditions of employment with no break in service. As an inducement to accept, the company could give those accepting the new contracts within a specified time limit six months’ protection on their existing terms and conditions before the new contracts kick in.

Does P&O not have an HR Department?!! This ineptitude will cost them a fortune.

Mr K 17-03-2022 20:51

Re: P&O Cruises disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36116840)
There’s no ‘potentially’ about it Mick. For a start, they are meant to consult with their employees (through the trade unions) before making anyone redundant. Given the number of redundancies involved, at least 3 months’ notice of the intention to declare redundancies should be provided. During that time, companies are meant to carry out meaningful consultation and consider alternatives.

All employees are also entitled to statutory notice pay or more if contracts are more generous.

As for replacing permanent staff with agency staff, well good luck with that one. That certainly doesn’t indicate that dismissal is by reason of redundancy as the jobs are still there.

If the company do not withdraw this threat of redundancies, they will stand liable to pay out a huge amount of compensation to these employees. They have already done tremendous damage, because even if the proposals were withdrawn, employees would be able to leave the company and sue for constructive dismissal on the grounds of loss of trust and confidence based on the company’s actions.

What they should have done was consult the unions about proposed changes in terms and conditions, citing the financial position of the company and the preference to avoid redundancies. This should lead again to meaningful discussions on how to ensure that jobs could be retained in the harsher economic climate.

If negotiations on changes to contracts do not result in agreement, the company should then give everyone notice of termination under their existing contracts and an offer of re-employment on new terms and conditions of employment with no break in service. As an inducement to accept, the company could give those accepting the new contracts within a specified time limit six months’ protection on their existing terms and conditions before the new contracts kick in.

Does P&O not have an HR Department?!! This ineptitude will cost them a fortune.

Red OB. I like it :)

GrimUpNorth 17-03-2022 20:55

Re: P&O Cruises disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36116842)
Red OB. I like it :)

Yeah, except he's proposing the old management trick of fire and rehire (probably on substantially reduced money and conditions).

We're under the threat of a Section 188 notice despite the council saying next financial year they intend to increase the FTE job count by some 200 :confused: It's wrong to treat your staff like that.

1andrew1 17-03-2022 21:42

Re: P&O Cruises disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Just a point of clarity. The company that has made the staff redundant is P&O Ferries, part of DP World. P&O Cruises is a separate company and a brand of the Carnival cruise company.

Mick 17-03-2022 22:08

Re: P&O Cruises disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36116847)
Just a point of clarity. The company that has made the staff redundant is P&O Ferries, part of DP World. P&O Cruises is a separate company and a brand of the Carnival cruise company.

Title amended. :tu:

OLD BOY 18-03-2022 00:08

Re: P&O Cruises disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36116843)
Yeah, except he's proposing the old management trick of fire and rehire (probably on substantially reduced money and conditions).

We're under the threat of a Section 188 notice despite the council saying next financial year they intend to increase the FTE job count by some 200 :confused: It's wrong to treat your staff like that.

I’m not proposing that at all, Grim. I’m just telling you how it should be done if that’s what an employer wants to do. The way P&O is going about it is amateurish and unbecoming of such a large company.

RichardCoulter 18-03-2022 08:36

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Apparently, they are able to get away with doing this because, following Brexit, the Government repealed the EU Port Regulations.

The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers campaigned for a yes vote to leave the EU. There have been claims that this union has links to Putin.

OLD BOY 18-03-2022 08:48

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36116863)
Apparently, they are able to get away with doing this because, following Brexit, the Government repealed the EU Port Services regulations..

Their union campaigned for a yes vote to leave the EU.

I don't think the EU Port Services Regulations had anything to do with what P&O Ferries have done here. The Regulations are not primarily concerned with employment matters, although Article 9 does provide that ports must require the designated provider of port services to grant staff working conditions in accordance with applicable obligations in social and labour law and to comply with social standards as set out in Union law, national law or collective agreements.

What P&O Ferries has done is breach the UK's employment law, and so however you look at this, it was unlawful before Brexit and it remains unlawful now.

Pierre 18-03-2022 10:13

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36116833)
And with immediate effect. (Potentially breaching UK employment law)



https://news.sky.com/story/p-o-ferri...kings-12568494

But they're not contracted in the UK, they're on Jersey contracts apparently.

---------- Post added at 09:12 ---------- Previous post was at 09:11 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36116840)
There’s no ‘potentially’ about it Mick. For a start, they are meant to consult with their employees (through the trade unions) before making anyone redundant. Given the number of redundancies involved, at least 3 months’ notice of the intention to declare redundancies should be provided. During that time, companies are meant to carry out meaningful consultation and consider alternatives.

All employees are also entitled to statutory notice pay or more if contracts are more generous.

As for replacing permanent staff with agency staff, well good luck with that one. That certainly doesn’t indicate that dismissal is by reason of redundancy as the jobs are still there.

If the company do not withdraw this threat of redundancies, they will stand liable to pay out a huge amount of compensation to these employees. They have already done tremendous damage, because even if the proposals were withdrawn, employees would be able to leave the company and sue for constructive dismissal on the grounds of loss of trust and confidence based on the company’s actions.

What they should have done was consult the unions about proposed changes in terms and conditions, citing the financial position of the company and the preference to avoid redundancies. This should lead again to meaningful discussions on how to ensure that jobs could be retained in the harsher economic climate.

If negotiations on changes to contracts do not result in agreement, the company should then give everyone notice of termination under their existing contracts and an offer of re-employment on new terms and conditions of employment with no break in service. As an inducement to accept, the company could give those accepting the new contracts within a specified time limit six months’ protection on their existing terms and conditions before the new contracts kick in.

Does P&O not have an HR Department?!! This ineptitude will cost them a fortune.

They're not employed under UK law.

---------- Post added at 09:13 ---------- Previous post was at 09:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36116863)
Apparently, they are able to get away with doing this because, following Brexit, the Government repealed the EU Port Regulations.

The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers campaigned for a yes vote to leave the EU. There have been claims that this union has links to Putin.

It's nothing to do with BREXIT (the employment bit, there's an argument the dip in cross channel freight may be an issue)

BenMcr 18-03-2022 10:17

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36116867)
But they're not contracted in the UK, they're on Jersey contracts apparently.

---------- Post added at 09:12 ---------- Previous post was at 09:11 ----------


They're not employed under UK law.

---------- Post added at 09:13 ---------- Previous post was at 09:12 ----------



It's nothing to do with BREXIT (the employment bit, there's an argument the dip in cross channel freight may be an issue)

Jersey law still has consultation requirements

https://www.jacs.org.je/media/1105/r...-sept-2020.pdf

Quote:

Collective Consultation: While employers were already required to consult employees individually about redundancies to avoid claims of unfair dismissal and associated penalties, employers are now required to consult with elected representatives when a larger number of employees are to be made redundant in a specified period. When an employer proposes to dismiss as redundant 12 or more employees (whether unionised or non-unionised) at one establishment within a capture period of 30 days then the employer is required to consult with elected representatives on behalf of employees.
Quote:

Notifying the Minister: An is required to notify the Social Security Minister when proposing 12 or more redundancies at one establishment in a 30 day capture period. The Minister must be advised before any notice is given to employees and/or at least 30 days before the first dismissal takes place, whichever is the earlier date.

Pierre 18-03-2022 10:41

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36116870)
Jersey law still has consultation requirements

https://www.jacs.org.je/media/1105/r...-sept-2020.pdf

Well hopefully Jersey (or whatever jurisdiction, they are under) throw the book at them.

Mick 18-03-2022 11:15

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36116863)
Apparently, they are able to get away with doing this because, following Brexit, the Government repealed the EU Port Regulations.

The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers campaigned for a yes vote to leave the EU. There have been claims that this union has links to Putin.

Eeh by jolly, don’t repeat this mantra, it will give Re-joiners something else to froth at the mouth, where it doesn’t apply.

Where companies often slip up, because they invest very little in a Human Resources Dept. Whether under UK, or Jersey jurisdictions, in redundancy, the role(s) being made redundant, have to cease to exist, the same responsibilities cannot be passed on to other workers.

As BenMcr above points out, there has to be a consultancy period, each employee has to be offered alternative opportunities, if they exist within the company, redundancy is or has to be last resort.

Under UK law and I expect it to be same under Jersey law, there has to be notice periods, if employees are not expected to be at work in their notice period, then they are legally entitled to payment in lieu of notice. Usually 90 days under UK law.

Just seen this though under Jersey law:

Quote:

Protective awards : Employers who fail to consult properly may face a claim for additional compensation, called a "protective award". The claim for such an award, which could be up to an additional 9 weeks' pay to each affected employee, must be made to the Tribunal by the representative(s), or by individual employees if no representatives were appointed.
9 weeks additional compensation pay for failure to adequately notify or warn of redundancy x 800 on top of Statutory redundancy payment requirements, P&O Ferries may have dropped a very large bollock here and it now serves them right, not only the public backlash but the sting in the tail, financial stings they’re about to face.

ianch99 18-03-2022 11:21

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
From what I see in the news, only the UK workers have been sacked, not the French or Dutch ones.

This is capitalism at its ugliest. To quote from the letter sent to the UK employees from the CEO of P&O:

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/u...g-800-23425666

Quote:

Today we have entered into a new partnership with International Ferry Management (IFM) who are an international crewing company, and they will be responsible for providing new crews for all those ships affected by this change. Our new teams of seafaring colleagues have already joined our ships.

Our new crew are now going through a process of intense familiarisation and training programme on our ships, run by IFM. Only when that process has happened, will we gradually return to a normal service safely and securely - upholding our P&O standards and brand.

This new crew model will reduce our crewing costs by 50% and enable us to better compete and be more responsive to our customers’ needs. It is a model that is proven to work across the industry, while still allowing us to retain service and safety levels which are central to our operations.
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2022...king-800-staff

Quote:

Is this “fire and rehire”?

Fire and rehire is a hugely controversial method used by some companies, usually – but not always – when in dire financial straits. It involves sacking staff and then telling them they can apply for their old jobs on less favourable terms. Companies that have deployed the tactic include Weetabix, Tesco, British Airways, Heathrow and British Gas. Trade unions and the public support a ban on the practice but ministers last year blocked a bill that aimed to do just that.

The government would be “dismayed” if P&O were doing this, a No 10 spokesperson said. But what P&O is trying to do looks slightly different. Rather than rehiring staff to their old jobs, it is replacing them with agency workers and saying that sacked staff could, if they wanted, join those agencies.

“That is effectively seeking to avoid having to renegotiate terms with staff and their representatives,” said Tata.

The TUC said it was not yet clear if P&O was planning to rehire staff on inferior terms but warned it was a growing trend, with 9% of workers affected by such a scheme in the first year of the pandemic.
Just a reminder:

(for Tory supporters of a nervous disposition, look away now)

Fire-and-rehire: Government blocks law to curb the practice

Quote:

The government has blocked a new law to curb businesses' ability to lay staff off and take them back on different - often worse - pay and terms.

nomadking 18-03-2022 11:40

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Of course the desired(by Labour and the unions) outcome is that the firms go completely bust. What alternatives are there for businesses?:rolleyes:

Mick 18-03-2022 11:43

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36116878)
From what I see in the news, only the UK workers have been sacked, not the French or Dutch ones.

This is capitalism at its ugliest. To quote from the letter sent to the UK employees from the CEO of P&O:

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/u...g-800-23425666



https://www.theguardian.com/law/2022...king-800-staff



Just a reminder:

(for Tory supporters of a nervous disposition, look away now)

Fire-and-rehire: Government blocks law to curb the practice

Erm, just before you get a little bit excited and throw another wobble about the UK government, if P&O Ferries is based in Jersey, then Jersey jurisdiction applies. Jersey is a self governing country with its own independent laws. The only responsibilities the UK government has on Jersey, is to defend it and represent it, internationally.

Chris 18-03-2022 11:47

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36116880)
Of course the desired(by Labour and the unions) outcome is that the firms go completely bust. What alternatives are there for businesses?:rolleyes:

The 1970s were just on the phone. They said your spaghetti hoops are going cold and can you pick up 20 woodbines on your way home.



Meanwhile, back in the 21st century, I believe all the union actually wants here (in agreement with MPs from all parties) is for P&O to obey employment law. Redundancies on this scale should have been notified and consulted on well in advance. It is unlikely they can get around such an egregious breach of employment law no matter how generous the severance package is, and I bet it’s not nearly as generous as they’re making out anyway.

Hom3r 18-03-2022 11:53

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
A very similar thing happened to me, we say through a boring 2-hour state of the company meeting (which had us nervous as the top people turned up and this never happens).


On PowerPoint page 168 of 169, it had a simple bullet point, to close our office by end of year, they literally just skipped through it like it didn't matter on to the last page.


Someone said "Woah, go back a page, WTH is that about closing this office".


Needless to say, they had made their minds up and 100 of us lost our jobs.

---------- Post added at 10:53 ---------- Previous post was at 10:51 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36116882)
Erm, just before you get a little bit excited and throw another wobble about the UK government, if P&O Ferries is based in Jersey, then Jersey jurisdiction applies. Jersey is a self governing country with its own independent laws. The only responsibilities the UK government has on Jersey, is to defend it and represent it, internationally.


True, but we must be able to stop them entering UK ports under normal circimstances?

Chris 18-03-2022 11:56

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36116882)
Erm, just before you get a little bit excited and throw another wobble about the UK government, if P&O Ferries is based in Jersey, then Jersey jurisdiction applies. Jersey is a self governing country with its own independent laws. The only responsibilities the UK government has on Jersey, is to defend it and represent it, internationally.

It’s unlikely that UK based employees will have contracts directly with the Jersey-registered company. There will be a UK-registered subsidiary in there somewhere. Otherwise it would be easy for any big business to evade UK employment law, by operating out of a territory with lax controls on what an employer can do to its staff.

Mick 18-03-2022 12:15

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36116887)
It’s unlikely that UK based employees will have contracts directly with the Jersey-registered company. There will be a UK-registered subsidiary in there somewhere. Otherwise it would be easy for any big business to evade UK employment law, by operating out of a territory with lax controls on what an employer can do to its staff.

Agreed, but this fire and rehire law mantra being passed about. Employment law protections still exist despite it, there are Statutory minimums in place that no company can legally go below of.

---------- Post added at 11:15 ---------- Previous post was at 11:08 ----------

Just seen this though from ITV News’s Joel Hill:

Quote:

The unions argue that P&O’s UK crew were easy to fire because their contracts were issued in Jersey as part of P&O’s “offshore employment model”.

I’m told P&O has c50 Dutch + French crew, employed on contracts in the Netherlands and France who weren’t dismissed yesterday.

Chris 18-03-2022 12:18

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
That’s a horrific loophole if true and the law should be changed to prevent it.

Mick 18-03-2022 12:21

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36116893)
That’s a horrific loophole if true and the law should be changed to prevent it.

Jersey law, UK law or both?

Chris 18-03-2022 12:23

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36116894)
Jersey law, UK law or both?

Well what Jersey does is Jersey’s business. But we ought to be able to frame UK employment law so as to prevent employers dodging it in this way. Otherwise it makes a mockery of the whole process.

Mick 18-03-2022 12:27

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36116895)
Well what Jersey does is Jersey’s business. But we ought to be able to frame UK employment law so as to prevent employers dodging it in this way. Otherwise it makes a mockery of the whole process.

ITV News’s Joel Hill added bit more:

Quote:

Employing crew in places like Jersey, Guernsey and Singapore is apparently common across the ferry industry.

By doing this, P&O (and others) avoid paying Employers National Insurance contributions. There are also fewer protections for employees.

P&O’s UK crew did pay NI and Were therefore eligible for furlough support. The RMT says P&O received £150m from Job Retention Scheme.

It’s very possible that DP World also put extra money into the business to keep it going during COVID.

I have sought clarity of all of the above from P&O but no comment yet.

OLD BOY 18-03-2022 12:44

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36116870)
Jersey law still has consultation requirements

https://www.jacs.org.je/media/1105/r...-sept-2020.pdf

Yes, the statutory requirements aren’t a million miles away from the UK’s. They’ve broken the law, no two ways about it.

nomadking 18-03-2022 13:33

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36116883)
The 1970s were just on the phone. They said your spaghetti hoops are going cold and can you pick up 20 woodbines on your way home.



Meanwhile, back in the 21st century, I believe all the union actually wants here (in agreement with MPs from all parties) is for P&O to obey employment law. Redundancies on this scale should have been notified and consulted on well in advance. It is unlikely they can get around such an egregious breach of employment law no matter how generous the severance package is, and I bet it’s not nearly as generous as they’re making out anyway.

I remember the Winter of Discontent, constant strikes, car workers with makeshift beds in the factory. Whatever did happen to British Leyland and so many other companies?:rolleyes: Little point "protecting jobs", if the company as a whole goes bust as a result.
Of course the Unions want particular(they get to choose which ones) laws to followed, especially when they paid for the laws to be implemented in the first place.
Nobody seems to ever come up with valid alternatives, that would work.
Eg if a company started negotiations, would customers have faith in using them? The consequences of that and other issues would mean the business went bust anyway.
They have been announcing closure of routes, reduction in journeys, and loss of jobs for more than a year.

1andrew1 18-03-2022 13:35

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
There's another theory circulating on the redundancies. It's paywalled in The Telegraph though.

DP World's principal investor, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum (Dubai's ruler) has reportedly developed a grudge against the UK after the UK High Court ordered him last year to pay his estranged wife £550 million for her family’s security and maintenance. She fled to London in 2019 saying she feared for her life and was the youngest of his six wives.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...tle-po-ferries

Hugh 18-03-2022 14:42

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36116902)
I remember the Winter of Discontent, constant strikes, car workers with makeshift beds in the factory. Whatever did happen to British Leyland and so many other companies?:rolleyes: Little point "protecting jobs", if the company as a whole goes bust as a result.
Of course the Unions want particular(they get to choose which ones) laws to followed, especially when they paid for the laws to be implemented in the first place.
Nobody seems to ever come up with valid alternatives, that would work.
Eg if a company started negotiations, would customers have faith in using them? The consequences of that and other issues would mean the business went bust anyway.
They have been announcing closure of routes, reduction in journeys, and loss of jobs for more than a year.

Well, when O2/BT Cellnet split off from BT in 2002, they followed the guidelines (90 day consultation, notifying "at risk" employees, looking for alternative posts in the company for those at "at risk) - pretty sure O2 didn’t go bust (or all the other companies that followed the process).

I have been made redundant four times, have had the awful task of making others redundant four times, and the guidelines were followed every time, and all of those companies (except one) are still in business.

(The one that isn’t was a Financial Services company, and it failed in 2008…)

nomadking 18-03-2022 14:59

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36116909)
Well, when O2/BT Cellnet split off from BT in 2002, they followed the guidelines (90 day consultation, notifying "at risk" employees, looking for alternative posts in the company for those at "at risk) - pretty sure O2 didn’t go bust (or all the other companies that followed the process).

I have been made redundant four times, have had the awful task of making others redundant four times, and the guidelines were followed every time, and all of those companies (except one) are still in business.

(The one that isn’t was a Financial Services company, and it failed in 2008…)

Was O2 or any of those other companies at immediate risk of otherwise going bust? Their rivals had already cut jobs at that point.


A business isn't going to do things this way, unless there are sound business reasons for doing so. Eg trying to avoid disruption because of inevitable strikes.

BenMcr 18-03-2022 15:02

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Is hiding stuff the default for this government?

https://www.theguardian.com/business...ing-says-union

Quote:

Government knew of P&O Ferries sackings the day before, No 10 admits

Labour and unions demand immediate action including suspending licences of parent company DP World
Quote:

Sources at the DfT said it was made aware of the impending mass sackings and suspension of ferry services on Wednesday night.

Boris Johnson’s official spokesperson had said on Thursday: “We weren’t given any notice to this.”

Julian 18-03-2022 15:14

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36116911)
Is hiding stuff the default for this government?

https://www.theguardian.com/business...ing-says-union

Tut tut, deliberately ignoring a relevant paragraph to suit your agenda :rolleyes:

Quote:

He confirmed on Friday that senior officials at the DfT had first been informed about the firm’s plan on Wednesday evening but had kept the information within a small group, because of concerns about commercial sensitivity.

Mick 18-03-2022 15:41

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
If it’s being claimed by RMT Union that these employees were in Jersey jurisdiction for employment law and was sacked because of it, wtf it got to do with UK government?

BenMcr 18-03-2022 16:06

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36116913)
Tut tut, deliberately ignoring a relevant paragraph to suit your agenda :rolleyes:

I did read that bit, it was this bit I was talking about
Quote:

Boris Johnson’s official spokesperson had said on Thursday: “We weren’t given any notice to this.”
They could have quite easily said yesterday what you quoted.

---------- Post added at 15:06 ---------- Previous post was at 15:04 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36116916)
If it’s being claimed by RMT Union that these employees were in Jersey jurisdiction for employment law and was sacked because of it, wtf it got to do with UK government?

Because they live in the UK and have paid UK tax? Was obviously something to do with the UK government if P&O Ferries staff qualified for furlough payments from them and not from the Jersey government.

Chris 18-03-2022 16:08

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
They will also now have to claim UK dole. As they’re all UK domiciled there may have been an obligation to tell the DfT, which it now appears they did, though whether they did it in a way that satisfies their obligations, I don’t know.

Mick 18-03-2022 17:02

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Well P&O still didn’t apply the legally required notice, or undertake any kind of consultation whether it be Jersey or UK law.

Hugh 18-03-2022 18:02

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36116910)
Was O2 or any of those other companies at immediate risk of otherwise going bust? Their rivals had already cut jobs at that point.


A business isn't going to do things this way, unless there are sound business reasons for doing so. Eg trying to avoid disruption because of inevitable strikes.

Going bust?

It’s parent company increased revenues and profits, according to its latest results…

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dp...e-271646899806
Quote:

The Dubai-based logistics company said pretax profit was $1.35 billion compared with $1.08 billion in 2020.

Revenue rose to $10.78 billion from $8.53 billion the year before.

pip08456 18-03-2022 18:02

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36116882)
Erm, just before you get a little bit excited and throw another wobble about the UK government, if P&O Ferries is based in Jersey, then Jersey jurisdiction applies. Jersey is a self governing country with its own independent laws. The only responsibilities the UK government has on Jersey, is to defend it and represent it, internationally.

It's also owned by Dubai-based logistics giant DP World. The bought it in 2019.

nomadking 18-03-2022 18:22

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36116927)
Going bust?

It’s parent company increased revenues and profits, according to its latest results…

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dp...e-271646899806

Parent company, and from PRE-COVID times.
The parent company handed over £100m to P&O to cover its losses.

1andrew1 18-03-2022 18:38

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36116932)
Parent company, and from PRE-COVID times.
The parent company handed over £100m to P&O to cover its losses.

Pretty sure that Covid was around in 2021 which is when its results in question are for.

The losses for P&O were £86m for y/e Dec 2020 and £40m for y/e Dec 2019 with a small profit of £9m for y/e Dec 2018. No other audited figures have been officially reported.
https://find-and-update.company-info...filing-history

But if a subsidiary company is loss-making, then its parent company could see it fall into administration.

If I was DP World and looking for a way out, my inclination would be to sell P&O to DFDS or another competitor. Its current course of action has just reduced the value of the business considerably and I speak as someone previously involved in selling businesses. If you don't have staff loyalty (or any staff) and customer loyalty then the only assets you have for sale are the ships. The business where you add value between the three areas is gone.

Chris 18-03-2022 18:41

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36116933)
Pretty sure that Covid was around in 2021 which is when its results in question are for.

The losses for P&O were £86m for y/e Dec 2020 and £40m for y/e Dec 2019 with a small profit of £9m for y/e Dec 2018. No other audited figures have been officially reported.
https://find-and-update.company-info...filing-history

And blaming UK workers for that when the company carries something like 10% of the traffic in and out of our ports is absurd. It has been chronically mismanaged.

nomadking 18-03-2022 18:42

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36116933)
Pretty sure that Covid was around in 2021 which is when its results in question are for.

The losses for P&O were £86m for y/e Dec 2020 and £40m for y/e Dec 2019 with a small profit of £9m for y/e Dec 2018. No other audited figures have been officially reported.
https://find-and-update.company-info...filing-history

Quote:

The company said this was supported by acquisitions and new concessions.
P&O made a £100m loss. Still the revenue and profits of the PARENT company, and NOT P&O.

1andrew1 18-03-2022 18:52

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36116936)
P&O made a £100m loss. Still the revenue and profits of the PARENT company, and NOT P&O.

So you acknowledge that Covid was around in 2021 and Hugh wasn't just dreaming it?

P&O may well have made a loss of £100m in 2021, but I've not seen any audited figures confirming this.

nomadking 18-03-2022 19:26

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36116939)
So you acknowledge that Covid was around in 2021 and Hugh wasn't just dreaming it?

P&O may well have made a loss of £100m in 2021, but I've not seen any audited figures confirming this.

Link
Quote:

It paid a £270m dividend to shareholders in 2020.
So based upon business pre-covid.
Link

Quote:

P&O said its survival was dependent on "making swift and significant changes now".


"We have made a £100m loss year on year, which has been covered by our parent DP World. This is not sustainable. Without these changes there is no future for P&O Ferries."



Hugh 18-03-2022 19:53

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
You appear to be ignoring the fact the parent company made increased profits from the previous year, which would have covered the loss three times over…

You seem to make a habit of trying to defend the indefensible in a number of threads…

OLD BOY 18-03-2022 20:15

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36116942)
You appear to be ignoring the fact the parent company made increased profits from the previous year, which would have covered the loss three times over…

You seem to make a habit of trying to defend the indefensible in a number of threads…

But the issue is that P&O Ferries is making a loss. No parent company is going to put up with one of its businesses making a loss. Either something must be done about the losses or the company that is unviable has to go.

That said, P&O Ferries have acted despicably in this case. But let us be in no doubt, being employed in a loss making company is not the best place to be.

Paul 18-03-2022 20:21

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36116943)
But the issue is that P&O Ferries is making a loss.

No it isnt, and Im getting tired of this thread being dragged off topic.

The issue is that they sacked 800 workers without [apparently] following proper procedures, whatever their reason for doing so.

ianch99 18-03-2022 23:56

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36116944)
No it isnt, and Im getting tired of this thread being dragged off topic.

The issue is that they sacked 800 workers without [apparently] following proper procedures, whatever their reason for doing so.

Paul's right - the issue is not the corporate bottom line, it is the people involved, citizens of this country who deserve better.

nomadking 19-03-2022 09:01

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
So people would be happy if the company where they worked, was put out of business, just because their competitors had "sugar daddies" that could constantly subsidise those competitors and charge lower prices? No doubt they would be screaming out for a law to prevent that from happening.:rolleyes:
P&O has had job losses before, so they would likely to have had dealing with the unions before. They would've known whether it would be pointless to have further negotiations.

Hugh 19-03-2022 10:42

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
So you would be happy if they lined up all the workers, shot them, then dumped their bodies in the harbours?

(See, I can do extreme unrealistic scenarios as well…)

nomadking 19-03-2022 11:13

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36116977)
So you would be happy if they lined up all the workers, shot them, then dumped their bodies in the harbours?

(See, I can do extreme unrealistic scenarios as well…)

How is companies being unfairly propped up by "sugar daddies" unrealistic?
It happens. A good example is Football. They introduced rules(laws) to combat the unfairness.
People are implying that a parent company should repeatedly prop up a company.

They have 2 main options, increase prices and risk people taking their business elsewhere, or decrease costs.

Maggy 19-03-2022 11:20

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36116944)
No it isnt, and Im getting tired of this thread being dragged off topic.

The issue is that they sacked 800 workers without [apparently] following proper procedures, whatever their reason for doing so.

:tu:

---------- Post added at 10:20 ---------- Previous post was at 10:18 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36116980)
How is companies being unfairly propped up by "sugar daddies" unrealistic?
It happens. A good example is Football. They introduced rules(laws) to combat the unfairness.
People are implying that a parent company should repeatedly prop up a company.

They have 2 main options, increase prices and risk people taking their business elsewhere, or decrease costs.

And possibly face the fact that possible customers might just think that using the company might be a mistake and look around for a company that treats it's workers and customers fairly.

OLD BOY 19-03-2022 11:46

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36116944)
No it isnt, and Im getting tired of this thread being dragged off topic.

The issue is that they sacked 800 workers without [apparently] following proper procedures, whatever their reason for doing so.

Of course it isn't off-topic! It's the reason why P&O Ferries are taking this action, but as we all know, they are doing it the wrong way.

There are some on this forum who seem to think that as long as the parent company is profitable, the losses made by a business don't need to be addressed. That is naive in the extreme.

The question is, whose brilliant idea was it to disregard the law in this way and who thought that they could get away with it? I don't think anyone on here is defending the company on the actions they have taken. This will cost them dearly in the courts, and it didn't have to come to that.

---------- Post added at 10:46 ---------- Previous post was at 10:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36116982)
:


And possibly face the fact that possible customers might just think that using the company might be a mistake and look around for a company that treats it's workers and customers fairly.

I agree. Who would want to work for them now? This is a massive own goal.

Carth 19-03-2022 12:12

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36116982)
And possibly face the fact that possible customers might just think that using the company might be a mistake and look around for a company that treats it's workers and customers fairly.

I think you'll find that 98.37%* of people wanting a quick ferry trip won't actually give two hoots




*figure may not be accurate, no Government or independent polls were consulted, neither were facebook, twitter, tiktok or snapchat used to obtain a figure that is simply my opinion of how things are . . and always will be.

Hugh 19-03-2022 12:25

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36116980)
How is companies being unfairly propped up by "sugar daddies" unrealistic?
It happens. A good example is Football. They introduced rules(laws) to combat the unfairness.
People are implying that a parent company should repeatedly prop up a company.

They have 2 main options, increase prices and risk people taking their business elsewhere, or decrease costs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36116944)
No it isnt, and Im getting tired of this thread being dragged off topic.

The issue is that they sacked 800 workers without [apparently] following proper procedures, whatever their reason for doing so.


nomadking 19-03-2022 12:53

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
As is all too often, too many people want to dodge underlying reasons for something, and don't suggest valid, workable alternatives.

Hugh 19-03-2022 13:36

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
The valid workable alternatives existed - P&O Ferries decided not to use them in the U.K.

Strange how all the Irish and French workers in the same company are still employed…

Carth 19-03-2022 13:44

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36116994)
The valid workable alternatives existed - P&O Ferries decided not to use them in the U.K.

Strange how all the Irish and French workers in the same company are still employed…


Are you suggesting it could be a Brexit thing? ;)

nomadking 19-03-2022 14:02

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36116994)
The valid workable alternatives existed - P&O Ferries decided not to use them in the U.K.

Strange how all the Irish and French workers in the same company are still employed…

And many of them were shoreside workers? IE resident in Ireland or France.
So what are these valid, workable alternatives?

Chris 19-03-2022 14:30

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36116997)
And many of them were shoreside workers? IE resident in Ireland or France.
So what are these valid, workable alternatives?

The irony is, P&O has shut down discussion of alternative ways of saving money by illegally circumventing the usual process of notifying large scale redundancies well in advance and then running a consultation. While the applicable laws are those of Jersey, we have come to understand that in this area they are comparable to the UK. Notification and consultation should have happened. This isn’t the 1970s and the trade union could have been expected to engage constructively with the issues at hand. Workable alternatives could then have emerged through detailed examination of the company’s predicament over the next several months.

(Edit)

Further to the above, there’s some suggestion that UK law applies here because the workers work ‘from’ the UK. That appears to over-ride foreign contracts or ownership of the business.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-60792039

Mick 21-03-2022 11:36

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
BREAKING: From ITV News Joel Hill:

Quote:

The @RMTunion says P&O plans to restart its ferry service in Dover using agency crew from India + will pay them the equivalent of $2.38 (£1.80) an hour.

RMT doesn’t offer proof but this is plausible and - while some may find this shocking - it would be legal. I’ll explain…

P&O trades internationally and its ships aren’t registered in UK so it is not subject to UK employment law and requirement to pay the UK minimum wage.

P&O does have to comply with rates of pay set out by International Transport Federation/International Labour Organisation

The ITF/ILO minimum recommended rate for an Ordinary Seaman (OS) - usually the lowest rank on a ship - is $15.9/day - or $1.99/hour for an 8 hour shift.

P&O reportedly wants to cut its wage bill in half.

Offering agency crew from India £1.80/hour (well below UK min wage of £8.91/hour) would be legal and, I’m told, competitive.

Other ferry operators also use non-UK crews - from countries like Poland and the Philippines.

Carth 21-03-2022 12:11

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
So it boils down to:

The company isn't British
The ships aren't British
The crew aren't (now) British


I guess it's similar to large companies closing call centers in Manchester and Glasgow then opening call centers in Mumbai and Delhi :shrug:

Not very nice, but what can you do in this age of globalization

Pierre 21-03-2022 12:12

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36117158)
BREAKING: From ITV News Joel Hill:

This is possible because the UK has no Cabotage rules, it is possible to prevent this from happening if they change this.

I doubt something similar could happen in the US or other countries that have Cabotage rules

1andrew1 21-03-2022 12:24

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36117159)
So it boils down to:

The company isn't British
The ships aren't British
The crew aren't (now) British

I guess it's similar to large companies closing call centers in Manchester and Glasgow then opening call centers in Mumbai and Delhi :shrug:

Not very nice, but what can you do in this age of globalization

It didn't happen to P&O's Irish, Dutch and French crews so presumably it can be prevented if the Government enacted similar legislation to those countries.

Halcyon 21-03-2022 12:56

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36117159)
So it boils down to:

The company isn't British
The ships aren't British
The crew aren't (now) British


I guess it's similar to large companies closing call centers in Manchester and Glasgow then opening call centers in Mumbai and Delhi :shrug:

Not very nice, but what can you do in this age of globalization




Soon there will be nothing left that is British.

nffc 21-03-2022 13:22

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36117160)
This is possible because the UK has no Cabotage rules, it is possible to prevent this from happening if they change this.

I doubt something similar could happen in the US or other countries that have Cabotage rules

Sounds to me like - in that respect - they may be taking somewhat advantage of the government allowing an exception for foreign truckers to transport in the UK to cover the shortfall in domestic workers being available.


Considering the alternative would have meant we didn't have anything to transport goods, that is obviously something they had to do.


But at the same time, doing this would allow other companies to use foreign workers to do similar transports.


It's an utter disgrace for P&O to do this and then rehire the British jobs using presumably foreign agency workers, based out of the UK, but it does appear if they aren't replacing directly, say they were using Indian workers instead of UK ones, then it seems to be possible these can be classed as genuine redundancies. Guess as their operation is global, unless there's some kind of licence consideration with sailing or docking on UK waters, then their staff could come from anywhere in the world.


I guess the situation is different if they are rehiring from a UK agency as that's closer to the roles they originally had but it is definite cost cutting exercise due to pandemic travel restrictions...

Sephiroth 22-03-2022 13:34

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36117161)
It didn't happen to P&O's Irish, Dutch and French crews so presumably it can be prevented if the Government enacted similar legislation to those countries.

Are you sure, Andrew? Didn't P&O Ferries fire ALL their ferry staff?

https://news.sky.com/story/p-o-ferri...kings-12568494

Quote:

t was later confirmed that all 800 crew, including officers, had been laid off with immediate effect via a video message while agency workers were in position to take over the running of ships.

Hugh 22-03-2022 14:28

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36117260)
Are you sure, Andrew? Didn't P&O Ferries fire ALL their ferry staff?

https://news.sky.com/story/p-o-ferri...kings-12568494




https://www.thelocal.fr/20220318/why...rench-workers/

Quote:

Cross-Channel ferry company P&O made a shocking announcement on Thursday - 800 of its UK staff have been dismissed with immediate effect. But the company's French employees are apparently not affected.

Sephiroth 22-03-2022 15:28

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
In which case, if these British workers were hired under Jersey Law, would not any enacted British laws have no effect?

1andrew1 22-03-2022 19:29

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
In 2005, Irish Ferries replaced its workers with Eastern European agency labour that was considerably cheaper. This template has now been used by competitor P&O.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...0/transport.uk

1andrew1 22-03-2022 23:33

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Another twist in the tale.
Quote:

Change in law signed off by Chris Grayling meant P&O didn't need to tell govt, maritime lawyer says

While senior government officials have claimed that the sacking of 800 workers by P&O Ferries was illegal, a specialist in maritime law argues that is incorrect.

But Kevin Barnett, head of employment at marine law specialists Lester Aldridge LLP, told Sky News that Mr Grayling's amendment removed the need to notify the government.

"The amendment states the notification must be made to the competent authority of the state where the ship is registered, instead of the secretary of state," he said.

He said Mr Kwarteng's insistence that he should have been notified of the sackings in advance is "incorrect."

A letter to Mr Kwarteng from P&O's chief executive Peter Hebblethwaite written after the sackings says: "The very clear statutory obligation in the particular circumstances that applied was for each company to notify the competent authority of the state where the vessel is registered.

"All relevant vessels are registered outside the UK. Notification was made to the relevant authorities on March 17."...

The change signed off by Mr Grayling states: "[If] the employees concerned are members of the crew of a seagoing vessel which is registered at a port outside Great Britain .. the employer shall give the notification required .. to the competent authority of the state where the vessel is registered (instead of to the Secretary of State)."

The amendment is the only change to the 1992 act relating specifically to foreign-registered ships.

According to an explanatory memorandum published by the Department for Transport, the amendment, part of a package called the Seafarers Directive, was supposed to improve seafarers' employment rights.

"The purpose [is to] address an anomaly where land-based workers may enjoy greater employment rights than those at sea," it said.

The memorandum claimed the amendment had been supported by the unions who have led protests against P&O's actions...
The memorandum states no formal consultation was carried out before the change was made, and no impact assessment was carried out.
https://news.sky.com/story/p-o-ferri...-says-12572920

Paul 23-03-2022 00:22

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-60840467

Quote:

P&O Ferries has denied suggestions that it broke the law when it sacked 800 workers without warning last week.

Ministers had questioned whether the move was legal under British law - but in a letter, the firm said those affected were employed outside the UK.

It also said staff would benefit from a £36.5m redundancy pot - with around 40 getting more than £100,000 each.
Even if the "pot" were divided equally between all 800, thats over £45,000 each.

nashville 23-03-2022 13:38

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
This must be against the law , sacking people without notice

Hugh 24-03-2022 13:30

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
BBC News - P&O Ferries: Not consulting on job cuts broke law, boss admits

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-60862933

Pierre 24-03-2022 13:52

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36117395)
BBC News - P&O Ferries: Not consulting on job cuts broke law, boss admits

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-60862933

Cue, 800 cases of unfair dismissal. Could be expensive.

---------- Post added at 12:52 ---------- Previous post was at 12:47 ----------

Considering they paid out a 270 million dividend in 2020 whilst claiming 10 million furlough, I'd happily see them go to the wall. They'll leave a gap in the Ferry market that will be filled by others.

Sephiroth 24-03-2022 14:42

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36117398)
Cue, 800 cases of unfair dismissal. Could be expensive.

---------- Post added at 12:52 ---------- Previous post was at 12:47 ----------

Considering they paid out a 270 million dividend in 2020 whilst claiming 10 million furlough, I'd happily see them go to the wall. They'll leave a gap in the Ferry market that will be filled by others.

Isn't that the parent company, DP World, paying dividends on its global profits? And isn't it a business principle that loss-making subsidiaries have to be turned round or closed?

It's typical of the rag press to come up with meaningless comparisons like that.

The real point is that the Guvmin should not allow P&O ferries to dock if their staff and paid at least the UK minimum wage. That will necessarily shake things up, fares will no doubt rise - and then we'll start whinging again about those fares!

Hom3r 24-03-2022 16:52

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Lets see how the smug gits feels when he's inside for breaking employment law

Paul 24-03-2022 20:43

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36117395)
BBC News - P&O Ferries: Not consulting on job cuts broke law, boss admits

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-60862933

They did it deliberately as well ....

Quote:

He said there was "absolutely no doubt" that under UK employment law the firm was required to consult unions before making the mass cuts.

However, he said no union would have accepted the plan and it was easier to compensate workers "in full" instead.

Pierre 24-03-2022 21:48

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36117409)
Lets see how the smug gits feels when he's inside for breaking employment law

I don’t know the ins and outs of the law, but it would certainly send a message to other CEOs if he did serve a custodial period if he was found guilty.

Sephiroth 24-03-2022 21:58

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36117428)
I don’t know the ins and outs of the law, but it would certainly send a message to other CEOs if he did serve a custodial period if he was found guilty.

Custodial? Guilty of what? Unless there was corporate manslaughter attached to his misdeed, or he'd become a director whilst disqualified as such, the most he could get is disqualification and possibly a fine if there was a question of HMRC not getting its share of something.

Pierre 24-03-2022 23:33

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36117429)
Custodial?


That’s what I said, yes.


Quote:

Guilty of what?
breaking U.K. employment law on a scale, possibly never seen before. Potentially jeopardising the security of 800 families, especially during these trying times.


Quote:

Unless there was corporate manslaughter attached to his misdeed, or he'd become a director whilst disqualified as such, the most he could get is disqualification and possibly a fine if there was a question of HMRC not getting its share of something.
I caveated my post by saying, I don’t know what potential penalties are available to the judiciary in the act. Given the scale of the issue and the seemingly calculated decision to break the law. I hope he gets the harshest possible penalty, whatever that is.

GrimUpNorth 25-03-2022 01:45

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36117435)
That’s what I said, yes.


breaking U.K. employment law on a scale, possibly never seen before. Potentially jeopardising the security of 800 families, especially during these trying times.




I caveated my post by saying, I don’t know what potential penalties are available to the judiciary in the act. Given the scale of the issue and the seemingly calculated decision to break the law. I hope he gets the harshest possible penalty, whatever that is.

I couldn't agree more, but sadly I doubt he'll be making any new friends on E-wing. What he will get no doubt will be a big fat bonus for doing his master's dirty work and taking the fall for him.

OLD BOY 25-03-2022 08:47

Re: P&O Ferries disgracefully make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36117409)
Lets see how the smug gits feels when he's inside for breaking employment law

It doesn't work like that. He will not serve any jail time for breaking employment law.

1andrew1 25-03-2022 10:56

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
I'm sure P&O has done its homework. All the courts would say is pay the ex-workers an enhanced redundancy and this is what P&O has done.

I suspect Johnson's talk of taking the company to court was just to get him off the hook in PMQs in the expectation that people would forget about it.

Julian 25-03-2022 11:05

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36117442)
I'm sure P&O has done its homework. All the courts would say is pay the ex-workers an enhanced redundancy and this is what P&O has done.

I suspect Johnson's talk of taking the company to court was just to get him off the hook in PMQs in the expectation that people would forget about it.

How was he on the hook? out of interest.

1andrew1 25-03-2022 11:17

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36117444)
How was he on the hook? out of interest.

It happened under his watch.

Some may think that's unfair but that's the responsibility that comes with the job. The same would be true if it happened under another Prime Minister.

Chris 25-03-2022 11:44

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36117446)
It happened under his watch.

Some may think that's unfair but that's the responsibility that comes with the job. The same would be true if it happened under another Prime Minister.

That’s a bit desperate, even for you.

‘On his watch’ generally is used in discussion of failures the one on watch (or their subordinates) should have seen and taken action on.

It is very hard to see how the government could or should have done anything here, especially as P&O has now admitted it knowingly broke the law in the whole area of *not* telling people what it was planning.

1andrew1 25-03-2022 12:19

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36117449)
That’s a bit desperate, even for you.

‘On his watch’ generally is used in discussion of failures the one on watch (or their subordinates) should have seen and taken action on.

It is very hard to see how the government could or should have done anything here, especially as P&O has now admitted it knowingly broke the law in the whole area of *not* telling people what it was planning.

Johnson was under pressure on the issue and bought time by saying the government would take action against the company.

The underlying issue here is that UK law is weaker here than some of its European peers which have prevented mass sackings and P&O has exploited this weakness. I'm not sure the finger can be pointed at anyone but the Government with regard to the UK's weaker legislation.

Julian 25-03-2022 12:32

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36117455)
Johnson was under pressure on the issue and bought time by saying the government would take action against the company.

The underlying issue here is that UK law is weaker here than some of its European peers which have prevented mass sackings and P&O has exploited this weakness. I'm not sure the finger can be pointed at anyone but the Government with regard to the UK's weaker legislation.

In what way is our law weaker?

Chris 25-03-2022 12:42

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36117455)
Johnson was under pressure on the issue and bought time by saying the government would take action against the company.

The underlying issue here is that UK law is weaker here than some of its European peers which have prevented mass sackings and P&O has exploited this weakness. I'm not sure the finger can be pointed at anyone but the Government with regard to the UK's weaker legislation.

I’m sorry but P&O has well and truly shot that fox.

They broke the law. They knew they were breaking the law. And they’re openly bribing their (ex) employees to try to avoid the consequences. Trying to turn this into a Brexit/EU/Bumbling Boris story is just silly.

1andrew1 25-03-2022 13:13

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36117460)
I’m sorry but P&O has well and truly shot that fox.

They broke the law. They knew they were breaking the law. And they’re openly bribing their (ex) employees to try to avoid the consequences. Trying to turn this into a Brexit/EU/Bumbling Boris story is just silly.

Why are you resorting to strawmen, Chris? I've not mentioned Brexit or the EU on this thread as they're not relevant. :confused:

This is about the difference in countries' national laws and P&O exploiting the weaker UK laws in an unscrupulous manner.

Chris 25-03-2022 13:29

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36117461)
Why are you resorting to strawmen, Chris? I've not mentioned Brexit or the EU on this thread as they're not relevant. :confused:

This is about the difference in countries' national laws and P&O exploiting the weaker UK laws in an unscrupulous manner.

I gave you a menu of your three favourite obsessions. You and I both know which one you’ve plumped for in this thread, because it’s the one you didn’t just object to. ;)

Julian 25-03-2022 13:33

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36117461)
Why are you resorting to strawmen, Chris? I've not mentioned Brexit or the EU on this thread as they're not relevant. :confused:

This is about the difference in countries' national laws and P&O exploiting the weaker UK laws in an unscrupulous manner.

Can you provide evidence that our laws are weaker please?

OLD BOY 25-03-2022 14:00

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36117461)
Why are you resorting to strawmen, Chris? I've not mentioned Brexit or the EU on this thread as they're not relevant. :confused:

This is about the difference in countries' national laws and P&O exploiting the weaker UK laws in an unscrupulous manner.

No, it’s not, Andrew. We could have had tougher rules in place and they would have broken them too. They are willing to pay heavy fines because it will be worth it in the long run.

It’s a bit like saying that because so many cars are exceeding the 30mph speed limit, we need a 20mph speed limit.

Carth 25-03-2022 14:33

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Lots of firms break environmental rules . . because it's cheaper to pay the fines than fix the issue.

1andrew1 25-03-2022 16:52

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36117464)
No, it’s not, Andrew. We could have had tougher rules in place and they would have broken them too. They are willing to pay heavy fines because it will be worth it in the long run.

It’s a bit like saying that because so many cars are exceeding the 30mph speed limit, we need a 20mph speed limit.

What heavy fines are you referring to? They're paying enhanced redundancy to their ex-workforce but I'm not aware of any fines they've incurred.

---------- Post added at 15:52 ---------- Previous post was at 15:45 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36117463)
Can you provide evidence that our laws are weaker please?

Please see this article
https://www.thelocal.fr/20220318/why...rench-workers/

Julian 25-03-2022 18:18

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36117476)
What heavy fines are you referring to? They're paying enhanced redundancy to their ex-workforce but I'm not aware of any fines they've incurred.

---------- Post added at 15:52 ---------- Previous post was at 15:45 ----------


Please see this article
https://www.thelocal.fr/20220318/why...rench-workers/

Thanks but needs a subscription

1andrew1 25-03-2022 18:58

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36117485)
Thanks but needs a subscription

That's strange, I could access it ok.

Mad Max 25-03-2022 19:22

Re: P&O Ferries make 800 British Workers Redundant
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36117490)
That's strange, I could access it ok.

Yup, same here.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:14.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum