Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   A-level and GCSE results fiasco. (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709292)

Maggy 17-08-2020 11:56

A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-53804323

Quote:

Pressure is mounting on ministers to let teacher-assessed grades stand in England to avoid a second wave of exams chaos hitting GCSE results this week.

About 40% of A-Level results were downgraded after the exams regulator Ofqual used an algorithm based on schools' previous results.
I think that this government really has to step up or be seen as the government that threw the pandemic exam group under the bus.I also foresee a whole age group most likely to put their future votes to another political party unless Boris and co address the situation in a timely manner.

denphone 17-08-2020 11:59

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36046829)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-53804323



I think that this government really has to step up or be seen as the government that threw the pandemic exam group under the bus.I also foresee a whole age group most likely to put their future votes to another political party unless Boris and co address the situation in a timely manner.

From what l hear in this last half hour another screeching big U turn is becoming increasingly likely as Tory MP's pile the pressure on a increasingly embattled Education Secretary.

tweetiepooh 17-08-2020 13:01

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Who gets to make the choice? If teachers are biased towards their pupils and the "board" looks to correct that bias is that wrong?
If the government sought to interfere with the "board" in other situations would we hear complaints that they are seeking to bolster support and ignore the "experts" that are put in place?
The situation is unique (one hopes) but my understanding is that the "board" tried to normalise the teacher supplied grades taking into account past performance of the school, this should have then left a few outliers - students performing better than the school's performance would indicate and they should be easier to be dealt with.
Trouble is whatever model is used would advantage some and disadvantage others. The model used does seem to have lowered grades unexpectedly and for some by a large margin. Do we run a new model? Would that solve the problem? Girls tend to do better when marked over the teaching year and boys better in exams.
---
The other thought is that if the uni's know how the model has adjusted grades they could adjust the offers.

1andrew1 17-08-2020 13:07

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Interesting point here showing how the algorithms favoured the smaller and mostly private schools:

Up to 5 students doing an A-level: You get the teacher's predictions.
5-15 students: Teacher's predictions carry some weight
15 + students: Teacher's predictions carry no weight

https://twitter.com/hugorifkind/stat...724032/photo/1

And here where outstanding candidadtes at poorly-performing schools could not be identified
https://twitter.com/JohnRentoul/stat...583360/photo/1

Carth 17-08-2020 14:37

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Screw em, send em picking veg & flowers instead. University education means bugger all . . . just look at the politicians that have one, and then use the word 'clever' while looking . . go on, I dare ya :D :D

papa smurf 17-08-2020 15:07

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36046840)
Screw em, send em picking veg & flowers instead. University education means bugger all . . . just look at the politicians that have one, and then use the word 'clever' while looking . . go on, I dare ya :D :D

There's nothing wrong with being stupid,it aint not never held me back :erm:

denphone 17-08-2020 15:08

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
This is what Gavin Williamson said on Saturday in the Times (Behind Paywall)

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/g...sult-gwrhx8ztx

Hugh 17-08-2020 16:11

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Bit pointless, as most of the Uni places have been allocated (unless the Government relax the number limits, and allow over-recruitment for those who would have got a place with the Teacher Assessed results).

---------- Post added at 16:11 ---------- Previous post was at 16:10 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36046840)
Screw em, send em picking veg & flowers instead. University education means bugger all . . . just look at the politicians that have one, and then use the word 'clever' while looking . . go on, I dare ya :D :D

Well, bit difficult having doctors or engineers without a degree, but whatever floats your boat...

1andrew1 17-08-2020 16:41

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Good news - the Government has relented.

Quote:

Exams U-turn: Teacher grades to be used in England, Wales and Northern Ireland as algorithm scrapped

A-level and GCSE students in England, Wales and Northern Ireland will be handed exam grades as predicted by their teachers instead of a controversial algorithm.
The move marks a stark U-turn by both Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Education Secretary Gavin Williamson, and comes after growing fury from pupils and Tory MPs about the handling of the results crisis....
Scotland was the first nation to scrap the moderated grades and let students have what they were predicted by teachers.
https://news.sky.com/story/exams-u-t...rades-12051173

Itshim 17-08-2020 17:08

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
very sorry for children involved with this, but last year my granddaughter did her a levels predicted grades were 3a*s got 2a,s and a b not sure teachers are that good at calling this. got a place anyway . As she only needed 1a and 2b,s

denphone 17-08-2020 17:18

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36046856)
Bit pointless, as most of the Uni places have been allocated (unless the Government relax the number limits, and allow over-recruitment for those who would have got a place with the Teacher Assessed results).

The University admissions cap is to be lifted the government has just confirmed.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...isis-live-news

Hugh 17-08-2020 17:49

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36046865)
The University admissions cap is to be lifted the government has just confirmed.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...isis-live-news

Yup, because the offers are legal contracts, so the Unis have to fulfill their agreements (including the previous offers) - be crowded at Uni for the next 3 to 4 years...

heero_yuy 17-08-2020 18:19

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
I wonder how many students with inflated grades will drop out after finding the uni courses too demanding? :scratch:

Pierre 17-08-2020 18:37

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
The Gov were on a hiding to nothing either way.

It was always just best to just let this year go, let the teachers give out the candy bars and focus on getting everything sorted for the next academic year.

None of what happened was anybody's fault. The kids didn't ask not to take exams and the Gov had no choice but to suspend exams.

Any method to "equalise" results would have resulted in shouts of unfairness, so they should have steered well clear of it.

Political naivety really.

Mr K 17-08-2020 20:33

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36046872)
The Gov were on a hiding to nothing either way.

It was always just best to just let this year go, let the teachers give out the candy bars and focus on getting everything sorted for the next academic year.

None of what happened was anybody's fault. The kids didn't ask not to take exams and the Gov had no choice but to suspend exams.

Any method to "equalise" results would have resulted in shouts of unfairness, so they should have steered well clear of it.

Political naivety really.

U turning is getting a habit for Boris and incompetent rabble. His only ministerial criteria was ' are you up for Brexit ? We'll work out which is your arse and elbow later..' (after Bozza works it out)

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a9568956.html

Hom3r 17-08-2020 21:05

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
This affects both my nephew and niece

Maggy 17-08-2020 22:22

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 36046868)
I wonder how many students with inflated grades will drop out after finding the uni courses too demanding? :scratch:

Are you saying teachers give inflated grades?

Pierre 18-08-2020 08:48

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36046888)
Are you saying teachers give inflated grades?

It’s a fact. Which is the whole reason behind the fiasco, teachers should look on the mirror rather than blame Gov.

The grades submitted by teachers were 40% higher than previous years averages. One teacher even submitted all their class for A & A* for two subjects.

The grades for Just A & A* would have been 12.5% Higher than 2019

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g...r-england-2020

So yes, that’s exactly what is being said.

OLD BOY 18-08-2020 09:53

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36046883)
U turning is getting a habit for Boris and incompetent rabble. His only ministerial criteria was ' are you up for Brexit ? We'll work out which is your arse and elbow later..' (after Bozza works it out)

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a9568956.html

It was the Ofqual algorythm that was faulty. They need to take the blame for that, and appeared to have done so. The government was right to recognise this problem and rectify it quickly.

Hugh 18-08-2020 10:36

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36046910)
It was the Ofqual algorythm that was faulty. They need to take the blame for that, and appeared to have done so. The government was right to recognise this problem and rectify it quickly.

And if you don't believe it was monitored and approved by the Department of Education (and the Ministers in charge), I've got a bridge you might be interested in buying... ;)

Mr K 18-08-2020 11:38

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36046910)
It was the Ofqual algorythm that was faulty. They need to take the blame for that, and appeared to have done so. The government was right to recognise this problem and rectify it quickly.

Ah, the blame everyone else and take no responsibility again. There's a pattern from this Govt.

As for quickly rectifying, that's a bit of a joke. Weeks ago when they were aware of the issue and before results were published might have been better. Not wait for public outcry and their own MPs to tell them to change it 'or else'.

Maggy 18-08-2020 11:55

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36046902)
It’s a fact. Which is the whole reason behind the fiasco, teachers should look on the mirror rather than blame Gov.

The grades submitted by teachers were 40% higher than previous years averages. One teacher even submitted all their class for A & A* for two subjects.

The grades for Just A & A* would have been 12.5% Higher than 2019

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g...r-england-2020

So yes, that’s exactly what is being said.

Well I'm a retired teacher and I can tell you that the grading that teachers give are rigorously checked and rechecked by a whole department.It's never one teacher alone.But then why not slur a whole profession while you are about it.. :mad:

denphone 18-08-2020 12:00

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36046921)
Ah, the blame everyone else and take no responsibility again. There's a pattern from this Govt.

As for quickly rectifying, that's a bit of a joke. Weeks ago when they were aware of the issue and before results were published might have been better. Not wait for public outcry and their own MPs to tell them to change it 'or else'.

Exactly you name it and this government absolves itself of any blame and passes the blame on to someone else.

Pierre 18-08-2020 12:40

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36046924)
Well I'm a retired teacher and I can tell you that the grading that teachers give are rigorously checked and rechecked by a whole department.It's never one teacher alone.But then why not slur a whole profession while you are about it.. :mad:

It's a fact Maggy.

From the link I provided, and you probably didn't bother reading.

Quote:

We asked schools and colleges to submit centre assessment grades (CAGs) ..........In general, the CAGs submitted were optimistic. This is understandable and in line with the evidence from previous research. Our recent interviews with teachers who’ve been through the process this summer confirms that – they told us that they tended to think about how each student would perform on a good day, while knowing that every year some students have bad days. This was particularly the case for borderline students.
Teachers are humans and they have feelings for their students, and they would always give them the BoD. That is totally understandable.

But it also inflated the results.

Unless you think class of 2019 if 40% better than previous years?

I still the Gov, played it badly. They tried to do the right thing the wrong way.

It can work both ways. Class of '19 may be considered as having an advantage over other years, or their grades may be considered with suspicion for years to come.

Taf 18-08-2020 12:55

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
I believe this entire fiasco is to support Universities who are desperate for cash now that many foreign students have decided not to come here.

Very little to do with actual education of all ages.

Sephiroth 18-08-2020 15:06

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
You couldn't make it up. You should have heard Williamson on LBC!

https://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presente...e-ofqual-boss/

Paul 18-08-2020 15:34

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36046926)
Exactly you name it and this government absolves itself of any blame and passes the blame on to someone else.

Perhaps because they are no more to blame than you. :sleep:

I could equeally say, you name it, and you blame "the government". :rolleyes:

OLD BOY 18-08-2020 16:20

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36046915)
And if you don't believe it was monitored and approved by the Department of Education (and the Ministers in charge), I've got a bridge you might be interested in buying... ;)

Oh, yeah, you seriously believe that Gavin Williamson was given a demo of the algorythm? Even the Ofqual lot couldn't have tested that out. Had they done so, even those bozos would have seen that downgrading As to Ds would not be acceptable.

GW would have been reassured that the algorithym would produce a fair reflection of the actual grades deserved based on past teacher assessments compared with actual results. There was no reason for him to disbelieve his advisors in the Civil Service - after all, they are meant to be professionals in their respective fields.

Does anyone wonder why BJ wants to reform the Civil Service?

---------- Post added at 16:20 ---------- Previous post was at 16:14 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36046926)
Exactly you name it and this government absolves itself of any blame and passes the blame on to someone else.

You have to face facts, Den. Ofqual 'experts' designed the algorythm, not GW. Ofqual has already accepted the blame, however much some would prefer to deflect this to the government.

I have been saying for some time on various subjects - Brexit, coronavirus, healthy eating experts advising government, privatisation contracts you name it. The Civil Service has a lot to answer for and has caused no end of problems for the government. The Civil Service appears not fit for purpose to me, if I may quote a phrase used by a former Labour minister who was similarly frustrated.

Mr K 18-08-2020 16:51

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36046965)
Oh, yeah, you seriously believe that Gavin Williamson was given a demo of the algorythm? Even the Ofqual lot couldn't have tested that out. Had they done so, even those bozos would have seen that downgrading As to Ds would not be acceptable.

GW would have been reassured that the algorithym would produce a fair reflection of the actual grades deserved based on past teacher assessments compared with actual results. There was no reason for him to disbelieve his advisors in the Civil Service - after all, they are meant to be professionals in their respective fields.

Does anyone wonder why BJ wants to reform the Civil Service?

---------- Post added at 16:20 ---------- Previous post was at 16:14 ----------



You have to face facts, Den. Ofqual 'experts' designed the algorythm, not GW. Ofqual has already accepted the blame, however much some would prefer to deflect this to the government.

I have been saying for some time on various subjects - Brexit, coronavirus, healthy eating experts advising government, privatisation contracts you name it. The Civil Service has a lot to answer for and has caused no end of problems for the government. The Civil Service appears not fit for purpose to me, if I may quote a phrase used by a former Labour minister who was similarly frustrated.

Ofqual, Civil Service ?? Make your mind up ! The beauty of public servants for politicians is that they can't answer back. Just like PHE are to blame for Coronavirus, any scapegoat will do, to detract from Government incompetence.

However, who is in charge, formulates policy and creates these organisations ? The buck stops with the Govt, they are responsible for the for the layers of bureaucracy who are just carrying out Gov. policy.

Sephiroth 18-08-2020 17:05

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
I've been digging into the way the algorithm was tested.

https://unherd.com/2020/08/how-ofqua...lgorithm-test/

Quote:

The normal way to test a predictive algorithm is to see how good it is at predicting the past. That is, you run the program for the previous year and see how well its predictions match what happened in real life. OfQual did that for 2019, but because teachers in previous years were not asked to rank students, OfQual could not use 2019’s teacher-generated rank orders for a test run.

Instead, it used the rank order that emerged from the 2019 exam results. Which is like showing you can predict the results of a horse race by including data about the order in which the horses crossed the finish line in that same race.
“If a test uses aspects of the same data that it is trying to predict, then it results in a false sense of security,” says Nason.

Even by including some of the data they were trying to predict, OfQual found their accuracy in predicting exact grades ranged from two thirds for History to one in four for Italian. For most non-language subjects, over nine in 10 students would be within one grade of the true result, but 3% of Maths students (for example) missing a fair result by two grades or more adds up to a lot of teenagers. Over 10% of Further Maths students, ironically the only ones who can understand the tortuous workings of the algorithm that betrayed them, would be over a grade away from a fair result.
Remember, the politicians called the algorithm "robust" when they either had no idea of its robustness or they were lying - most likely the former in which case someone must resign on grounds of incompetence.



1andrew1 18-08-2020 17:13

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36046965)
You have to face facts, Den. Ofqual 'experts' designed the algorythm, not GW. Ofqual has already accepted the blame, however much some would prefer to deflect this to the government.

It's not about who designed the algorithm, it's how the situation was handled once the implications of the algorithm were known. This was in the hands of the Government. The correct response was to accept teachers' predictions and this happened in Scotland. In England, the government doubled down for four days before accepting teachers' predictions.

OLD BOY 18-08-2020 17:52

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36046970)
Ofqual, Civil Service ?? Make your mind up ! The beauty of public servants for politicians is that they can't answer back. Just like PHE are to blame for Coronavirus, any scapegoat will do, to detract from Government incompetence.

However, who is in charge, formulates policy and creates these organisations ? The buck stops with the Govt, they are responsible for the for the layers of bureaucracy who are just carrying out Gov. policy.

You mean they are expected to take care of the detail of public policy. The government set out what's required and the government expect them to do it correctly.

Are you saying the government should not be relying on these people to get it right?

Ofqual is a quango, those employed there are public servants, just like those employed in government departments. They are mostly as bad as each other.

The buck might well stop at the government, but the officers are actually responsible for the cock-ups.

---------- Post added at 17:48 ---------- Previous post was at 17:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36046972)
I've been digging into the way the algorithm was tested.

https://unherd.com/2020/08/how-ofqua...lgorithm-test/



Remember, the politicians called the algorithm "robust" when they either had no idea of its robustness or they were lying - most likely the former in which case someone must resign on grounds of incompetence.



Or maybe, that's how Ofqual officials described it to ministers - robust. However you look at this, our Ofqual 'experts' should have known better.

---------- Post added at 17:52 ---------- Previous post was at 17:48 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36046973)
It's not about who designed the algorithm, it's how the situation was handled once the implications of the algorithm were known. This was in the hands of the Government. The correct response was to accept teachers' predictions and this happened in Scotland. In England, the government doubled down for four days before accepting teachers' predictions.

The government was conflicted, because it did not want to devalue the qualifications allocated this year. So it took them four days to work out a solution, big deal. I'm glad to see that out of all the options they had before them, they took the right one. Now they just need to make sure that the universities make allowances for this and agree to take on those who would have unfairly missed out.

Hugh 18-08-2020 19:01

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36046976)
You mean they are expected to take care of the detail of public policy. The government set out what's required and the government expect them to do it correctly.

Are you saying the government should not be relying on these people to get it right?

Ofqual is a quango, those employed there are public servants, just like those employed in government departments. They are mostly as bad as each other.

The buck might well stop at the government, but the officers are actually responsible for the cock-ups.

---------- Post added at 17:48 ---------- Previous post was at 17:44 ----------



Or maybe, that's how Ofqual officials described it to ministers - robust. However you look at this, our Ofqual 'experts' should have known better.

---------- Post added at 17:52 ---------- Previous post was at 17:48 ----------



The government was conflicted, because it did not want to devalue the qualifications allocated this year. So it took them four days to work out a solution, big deal. I'm glad to see that out of all the options they had before them, they took the right one. Now they just need to make sure that the universities make allowances for this and agree to take on those who would have unfairly missed out.

I see - make it somebody else's problem...

The Unis can't suddenly make extra labs, including lab equipment, or workshops available (in the case of science, medical, veterinary, engineering, etc. degrees), or suddenly find thousands of extra accommodation rooms in under a month, or get extra textbooks at short notice (they are often limited print runs), or get extra lecturers quickly, or upgrade the network infrastructure at short notice.

Maggy 18-08-2020 19:57

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36046902)
It’s a fact. Which is the whole reason behind the fiasco, teachers should look on the mirror rather than blame Gov.

The grades submitted by teachers were 40% higher than previous years averages. One teacher even submitted all their class for A & A* for two subjects.

The grades for Just A & A* would have been 12.5% Higher than 2019

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/g...r-england-2020

So yes, that’s exactly what is being said.

And yet you completely missed this.

Quote:

Our analyses show that the majority of the grades awarded to students are the same or within one grade of the centre estimates – 96.4% at A level and 91.5% at AS – reflecting the care and professionalism with which schools and colleges have approached the task.


Pierre 18-08-2020 20:28

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36046986)
And yet you completely missed this.

I didn’t miss, it didn’t seem like something that mitigated the situation to me.


Quote:

within one grade
Is still a grade too high or a grade too low, but mainly high it would appear.

Within one grade still makes 4 B’s into 4 A’s and A’s into A*’s.

Hugh 18-08-2020 21:23

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36046987)
I didn’t miss, it didn’t seem like something that mitigated the situation to me.




Is still a grade too high or a grade too low, but mainly high it would appear.

Within one grade still makes 4 B’s into 4 A’s and A’s into A*’s.

Any evidence to support that position?

Pierre 18-08-2020 21:49

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36046993)
Any evidence to support that position?

Hugh, if you’re going to debate, don’t be an arse about it.

Results were downgraded 39%

And upgraded by 2%

What way round do you think it was?

Damien 18-08-2020 22:04

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
There is no way this was going to end well.

The teachers grades caused an historic improvement in scores. Obviously not true. That isn't teachers giving nonsense grades to make themselves look good but seeing what they consider the true capacity of their students, at least as they see it, but exams don't test the true capacity of students. They're a one-shot moment. Some students do better than expected though talent, last moment cramming or a fortunate set of questions. More often students fall short due to stress, a bad day or a unfortunate set of questions.

The teachers grades are a best-case scenario for each students. They would therefore be inflated.

But to judge them by an algorithm is unfair too. It may in the aggregate prove to be more accurate but in doing that they ignore the individual. Students who outperform their cohort are smacked right back into line. You come from an area with underperforming students and therefore you underperformed and we do not care about your own work.

The only way to do this would be to give those children their months of education back. Then let them take the exams this winter. Bail out the Universities to miss one year of intake. Maybe do the same for the years underneath as well, offset the school year to allow everyone to catch up.

Because next year we have another problem. Another cohort of students taking their GCSEs/A-Levels having missed a large part of that education. Are we about to see the biggest drop in results in our recorded history?

The 2020 cohort are going to have great results. The 2021 will record a massive drop. This is not fair.

And every year underneath them have also missed months of education. You can't replace that with an algorithm and pretend it didn't happen.

Maggy 18-08-2020 22:54

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36046995)
There is no way this was going to end well.

The teachers grades caused an historic improvement in scores. Obviously not true. That isn't teachers giving nonsense grades to make themselves look good but seeing what they consider the true capacity of their students, at least as they see it, but exams don't test the true capacity of students. They're a one-shot moment. Some students do better than expected though talent, last moment cramming or a fortunate set of questions. More often students fall short due to stress, a bad day or a unfortunate set of questions.

The teachers grades are a best-case scenario for each students. They would therefore be inflated.

But to judge them by an algorithm is unfair too. It may in the aggregate prove to be more accurate but in doing that they ignore the individual. Students who outperform their cohort are smacked right back into line. You come from an area with underperforming students and therefore you underperformed and we do not care about your own work.

The only way to do this would be to give those children their months of education back. Then let them take the exams this winter. Bail out the Universities to miss one year of intake. Maybe do the same for the years underneath as well, offset the school year to allow everyone to catch up.

Because next year we have another problem. Another cohort of students taking their GCSEs/A-Levels having missed a large part of that education. Are we about to see the biggest drop in results in our recorded history?

The 2020 cohort are going to have great results. The 2021 will record a massive drop. This is not fair.

And every year underneath them have also missed months of education. You can't replace that with an algorithm and pretend it didn't happen.

:clap:

Pierre 18-08-2020 23:06

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

The only way to do this would be to give those children their months of education back. Then let them take the exams this winter. Bail out the Universities to miss one year of intake. Maybe do the same for the years underneath as well, offset the school year to allow everyone to catch up.
But that would never be viable so.................

It’s all a mess, no one is really at fault, things could have been done better, hindsight is always 20:20, it was never going to please everyone, teachers are as much to blame as anyone, the Government got it wrong and then capitulated...........so why are people still whinging?

Any way, why isn’t the government ensuring the weather stays nice? They’ve had enough notice the weather was going to change and they’ve done nothing about it.

1andrew1 18-08-2020 23:40

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36047004)
But that would never be viable so.................

It’s all a mess, no one is really at fault, things could have been done better, hindsight is always 20:20, it was never going to please everyone, teachers are as much to blame as anyone, the Government got it wrong and then capitulated...........so why are people still whinging?

Any way, why isn’t the government ensuring the weather stays nice? They’ve had enough notice the weather was going to change and they’ve done nothing about it.

I'm not sure that whinging is an accurate term. The issues seem to be:
- Some people whose grades have now been revised upwards cannot get onto the courses they want to because they are full.
- Universities who have increased their uptake on courses will face increased costs not fully covered by fees. Who will cover this?
- Gavin Williamson has tried to pretend that the situation came as a surprise. This is adding insult to injury. The situation was predicted back in July both in The Times Education Supplement https://www.tes.com/news/exclusive-w...des-may-change and the Commons Education Committee warned him as well.
Quote:

And it was more than a month after the Commons Education Committee warned about the algorithm on July 10 - saying it risked "inaccuracy and bias against young people from disadvantaged backgrounds".
The damning report warned on July 10: "Ofqual’s standardisation model aims to adjust grades to ensure they are broadly in line with previous years.
"However, there are concerns about the risks of using historic data, which might not be fair for newer schools, or for improving and turnaround schools which are on an upward trajectory."
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politi...-only-22538255

Hugh 18-08-2020 23:56

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36046994)
Hugh, if you’re going to debate, don’t be an arse about it.

Results were downgraded 39%

And upgraded by 2%

What way round do you think it was?

By a crappy algorithm that "risked inaccuracy and bias against young people from disadvantaged backgrounds"

So your evidence is something was was shown to be crap -it may be you who is being an arse...

Paul 19-08-2020 00:08

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Time for both of you to stop with the snide or insulting remarks.

Pierre 19-08-2020 08:29

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36047007)
By a crappy algorithm

Irrespective of the method, they were downgraded Because compared to other years the marks given were inordinately high.

papa smurf 19-08-2020 08:50

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36047005)
I'm not sure that whinging is an accurate term. The issues seem to be:
- Some people whose grades have now been revised upwards cannot get onto the courses they want to because they are full.
- Universities who have increased their uptake on courses will face increased costs not fully covered by fees. Who will cover this?
- Gavin Williamson has tried to pretend that the situation came as a surprise. This is adding insult to injury. The situation was predicted back in July both in The Times Education Supplement https://www.tes.com/news/exclusive-w...des-may-change and the Commons Education Committee warned him as well.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politi...-only-22538255

Full of privileged kids who got their marks upgraded,this whole thing stinks ,they should rip it up and start again.

Mr K 19-08-2020 08:50

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Been thinking.

The EU are vaguely competent, maybe we should outsource things like health and education to them ;)

papa smurf 19-08-2020 08:54

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36047022)
Been thinking.

The EU are vaguely competent, maybe we should outsource things like health and education to them ;)

Well i guess you have to try everything once:D

1andrew1 19-08-2020 13:39

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36047021)
Full of privileged kids who got their marks upgraded,this whole thing stinks ,they should rip it up and start again.

The privileged kids at private schools already had the grades that their teachers said they would as the smaller schools were excluded from the algorithm. This just gives kids at state schools the same treatment.

Damien 19-08-2020 14:58

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36047004)
But that would never be viable so.................

It’s all a mess, no one is really at fault, things could have been done better, hindsight is always 20:20, it was never going to please everyone, teachers are as much to blame as anyone, the Government got it wrong and then capitulated...........so why are people still whinging?

Any way, why isn’t the government ensuring the weather stays nice? They’ve had enough notice the weather was going to change and they’ve done nothing about it.

But the Government have had to do this a number of times already: PPE, Testing, NHS contract tracing app and their approach to education. It's not out of line to ask them to get it right the first time.

Paul 19-08-2020 15:26

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Unless you are perfect and get everything right first time, then you are not in a position to criticize others.

No one has ever had to do this before, so of course mistakes are made, at least they are then corrected (if necessary).

Mad Max 19-08-2020 15:32

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36047051)
Unless you are perfect and get everything right first time, then you are not in a position to criticize others.

No one has ever had to do this before, so of course mistakes are made, at least they are then corrected (if necessary).

Yup, it's dead easy with hindsight.

1andrew1 19-08-2020 16:29

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36047051)
Unless you are perfect and get everything right first time, then you are not in a position to criticize others.

No one has ever had to do this before, so of course mistakes are made, at least they are then corrected (if necessary).

No one's asking them to predict the lottery numbers but the exams situation was warned a month and a half beforehand. So, plenty of times to get things right. The Chancellor has shown how to do things properly but he's head and shoulders above some of the clowns in Government.

Damien 19-08-2020 16:37

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36047051)
Unless you are perfect and get everything right first time, then you are not in a position to criticize others..

Well it's our Government. We're entirely in a position to criticise them on their performance.

And I don't think they need to get everything right. I am quite forgiving of their late lockdown because it made sense to me at the time, it's hard to get right and a small delay can have drastic impacts.

But time and time again if the show a failure to plan that we can object. The NHS app was pathetic. We all knew that would not work and they pushed ahead for months. There was no excuse for that level of incompetence. Same with exams and schools. This didn't happen in March or April but June/July. They had the time. They got it wrong.

In isolation these things happen but if it keeps happening then why can't we criticise? This is the Government.

Mr K 19-08-2020 17:05

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36047062)
Well it's our Government. We're entirely in a position to criticise them on their performance.

Not on this forum you're not ! ;)

denphone 20-08-2020 06:27

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36047066)
Not on this forum you're not ! ;)

Strange how some are quick out of the blocks to criticise other political parties but quckly develop convenient amnesia when its the government.;)

Pierre 20-08-2020 07:57

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
I’ve said from the start that the government have handled it badly, and should have just let every thing slide for one year.

But let’s also remember why they took the moderating action ( that they royally screwed up)

If teachers hadn’t given out grades like Corbyn gave spending promises they wouldn’t have felt compelled to intervene.

Maggy 20-08-2020 08:17

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36047106)
I’ve said from the start that the government have handled it badly, and should have just let every thing slide for one year.

But let’s also remember why they took the moderating action ( that they royally screwed up)

If teachers hadn’t given out grades like Corbyn gave spending promises they wouldn’t have felt compelled to intervene.

Always got to find the entirely innocent to blame. Just like this government.

papa smurf 20-08-2020 08:18

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36047106)
I’ve said from the start that the government have handled it badly, and should have just let every thing slide for one year.

But let’s also remember why they took the moderating action ( that they royally screwed up)

If teachers hadn’t given out grades like Corbyn gave spending promises they wouldn’t have felt compelled to intervene.



If teachers had given lesser grades it would have reflected badly on their teaching abilities,it's human nature to make yourself look better at your job than you actually are,problem is it's the kids that have suffered because of this.

Hugh 20-08-2020 08:44

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/g...c7d03fa8c2c77b

Readable link...

Quote:

Gavin Williamson was warned about risk of exam fiasco

Education secretary informed six weeks ago


Gavin Williamson was warned directly that the A-level and GCSE grading system could lead to hundreds of thousands of students being given the wrong results but decided to push ahead, The Times can reveal.

A senior source at the Department for Education disclosed that Sir Jon Coles, a former director-general there, wrote to Mr Williamson early last month to express concerns about the algorithm used by Ofqual.

He said that, at best, the model being applied to A-level and GCSE grading would be only 75 per cent accurate, meaning that hundreds of thousands of students would get the wrong grades. In the event Ofqual’s own tests on its algorithm, which were published last week, found that it was 60 per cent accurate.

In his letter, Sir Jon also raised particular concerns about using teachers’ predicted grades for small groups of pupils but leaving larger groups reliant on the algorithm. He said that this would lead to unfairness in the system.

The issue proved one of the central problems as it meant that private schools, which typically can afford to have smaller classes, saw their results improve significantly more than state schools.

1andrew1 20-08-2020 09:07

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36047111)

Pretending that it only just came to light when he had a report on his desk on 10th July is really bad form. It won't do the government long-term good if BoJo keeps Gavin Williamson in his current role, his reputation is in tatters.

There's now an issue with BTEC
Quote:

Students expecting their BTEC results this morning will be left disappointed after a last-minute decision to delay their release.

Last night, exam board Pearson asked schools and colleges not to publish level one and two results for vocational courses.

The board wants more time to recalculate grades following the fiasco over A-level results...

The delay comes after education unions and the Labour Party called on the government to provide clarity on why BTEC students had been left out of Monday's grading U-turn.
https://news.sky.com/story/btec-resu...inute-12052706

Pierre 20-08-2020 09:46

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
This years 16yr olds are 40% cleverer than last year too!

Carth 20-08-2020 09:50

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Here it comes, the next cabinet reshuffle ;)

I'd suggest Fisheries to Transport, Education to Public Health (or whatever it's called now), Transport moves to Foreign Policy, and Jfman to Business & Commerce.

That should sort things quite nicely, leaving those who miss out on a new role the freedom to post their "I could do better" rants on Twitter & Facebook :p:


*smirks and goes off to listen to 'Kaiser Chiefs - I Predict A Riot' *

1andrew1 20-08-2020 09:52

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36047121)
Here it comes, the next cabinet reshuffle ;)

I'd suggest Fisheries to Transport, Education to Public Health (or whatever it's called now), Transport moves to Foreign Policy, and Jfman to Business & Commerce.

That should sort things quite nicely, leaving those who miss out on a new role the freedom to post their "I could do better" rants on Twitter & Facebook :p:


*smirks and goes off to listen to 'Kaiser Chiefs - I Predict A Riot' *

And maybe creating a Minister of Streaming too. :D

Sephiroth 20-08-2020 09:59

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36047121)
Here it comes, the next cabinet reshuffle ;)

I'd suggest Fisheries to Transport, Education to Public Health (or whatever it's called now), Transport moves to Foreign Policy, and Jfman to Business & Commerce.

That should sort things quite nicely, leaving those who miss out on a new role the freedom to post their "I could do better" rants on Twitter & Facebook :p:


*smirks and goes off to listen to 'Kaiser Chiefs - I Predict A Riot' *

Complete lack of balance, Squire.

OB to International Trade.

Hugh? Hmmm.

1andrew1 20-08-2020 10:07

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36047123)

Hugh? Hmmm.

Defence or Education.

papa smurf 20-08-2020 10:15

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36047120)
This years 16yr olds are 40% cleverer than last year too!

Wonder if teachers will get a pay rise on the back of these results.

Maggy 20-08-2020 10:28

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36047126)
Wonder if teachers will get a pay rise on the back of these results.

I doubt it..:rolleyes: After all blame has to be apportioned somewhere by this government.

papa smurf 20-08-2020 10:29

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36047123)
Complete lack of balance, Squire.

OB to International Trade.

Hugh? Hmmm.

Something to do with booze and eating out :)

1andrew1 20-08-2020 11:12

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
No words.
Quote:

A company run by long–term associates of Michael Gove and Dominic Cummings has been working behind the scenes with the exams agency Ofqual on its disastrous strategy for determining A-level results, the Guardian can reveal.

Public First, a policy and research firm owned by James Frayne and Rachel Wolf, who both formerly worked for Gove, has been involved on the project with Ofqual since June after being granted a contract that was not put out to competitive tender.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...?ocid=msedgntp

Sephiroth 20-08-2020 11:23

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36047131)

If the Guvmin needs to do something in a hurry, then the competitive tender process probably hinders that. No idea if that's the case in this instance, but from my past responsibilities in local government, and having regard for contract value thresholds and/or any available derogations, I know how important that degree of freedom can be.

Carth 20-08-2020 11:24

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Touch of jealousy because your firm didn't get the contract Andrew? ;)

We all know, and have for years, that they're all 'in it together' whether it's Conservative, Labour, Lib Dems, SNP etc. I find it surprising that people are still surprised by this :D

Hugh 20-08-2020 11:34

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36047125)
Defence or Education.

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36047129)
Something to do with booze and eating out :)

Why not both? :D

Anyhoo, I have been pleasantly surprised by the positive messages of support on this forum towards the students who are going through a very stressful time in their lives, and through no fault of their own, have had a very important part of their education banjaxed, which could affect a reasonable number of their futures.

I thought some of our posters were cynical, cold-hearted, and unfeeling, but the deep understanding, compasssion, empathy, and sympathy shown to these teenagers in this very difficult time, and the warm messages of support, just showed me I was wrong...

1andrew1 20-08-2020 12:37

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36047133)
Touch of jealousy because your firm didn't get the contract Andrew? ;)

We all know, and have for years, that they're all 'in it together' whether it's Conservative, Labour, Lib Dems, SNP etc. I find it surprising that people are still surprised by this :D

Not my line of business but I'm left speechless that yet another uncontracted tender fails and now we learn it's Gove's mates. The country seems to be going backwards in terms of transparency. We're becoming more the English Patient and less Great Britain. False equivalence should not trump democratic scrutiny.

---------- Post added at 11:43 ---------- Previous post was at 11:36 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36047136)
Why not both? :D

Anyhoo, I have been pleasantly surprised by the positive messages of support on this forum towards the students who are going through a very stressful time in their lives, and through no fault of their own, have had a very important part of their education banjaxed, which could affect a reasonable number of their futures.

I thought some of our posters were cynical, cold-hearted, and unfeeling, but the deep understanding, compasssion, empathy, and sympathy shown to these teenagers in this very difficult time, and the warm messages of support, just showed me I was wrong...

;)

---------- Post added at 12:37 ---------- Previous post was at 11:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36047132)
If the Guvmin needs to do something in a hurry, then the competitive tender process probably hinders that. No idea if that's the case in this instance, but from my past responsibilities in local government, and having regard for contract value thresholds and/or any available derogations, I know how important that degree of freedom can be.

In which case, don't pick up the phone to your mates so that there are no suspicions of corruption.

Maggy 20-08-2020 13:31

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36047136)
Why not both? :D

Anyhoo, I have been pleasantly surprised by the positive messages of support on this forum towards the students who are going through a very stressful time in their lives, and through no fault of their own, have had a very important part of their education banjaxed, which could affect a reasonable number of their futures.

I thought some of our posters were cynical, cold-hearted, and unfeeling, but the deep understanding, compasssion, empathy, and sympathy shown to these teenagers in this very difficult time, and the warm messages of support, just showed me I was wrong...

:clap::rofl:

Pierre 20-08-2020 22:13

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36047128)
I doubt it..:rolleyes: After all blame has to be apportioned somewhere by this government.

I wouldn’t expect a pay rise either if I’d caused a national embarrassment by handing out A’s like fortune cookies at A and GCSE level.

http://news.sky.com/story/gcse-resul...rades-12052904

Quote:

And there's been a 40% increase in the number of grade 9's awarded. That's the very top mark.
. Must be great to mark your own work and reassure yourself at how good a teacher you are. Like loving the smell of your own farts.

jfman 21-08-2020 00:42

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
The good news is we can definitively prove the young are more intelligent than the old. All those bitter folk professing their “wisdom”. Well, lads, we’ve the cleverest ever teenagers going.

Mr K 21-08-2020 07:29

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36047194)
The good news is we can definitively prove the young are more intelligent than the old. All those bitter folk professing their “wisdom”. Well, lads, we’ve the cleverest ever teenagers going.

Yes well done the young people. They'll need their wits about them to cope with the legacy this generation is leaving:- climate change, Brexit, massive debt and nasty viruses...
Tbh I do have a bit of hope, they seem a lot more sensible than we are.

heero_yuy 21-08-2020 09:02

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
I'm sure prospective employers will know how to apply moderation to these inflated grades.

papa smurf 21-08-2020 09:11

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 36047199)
I'm sure prospective employers will know how to apply moderation to these inflated grades.

Probably employ an older person ;)

Carth 21-08-2020 10:00

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36047200)
Probably employ an older person ;)


. . . or one of the many 20 year old economic migrants that have - amazingly - the full 'skill set' required for the role . . . (will work for peanuts) ;)

papa smurf 21-08-2020 10:19

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
I can't see what all the fuss is about, i left school with 3 f's and 2 off's and never looked back ;)

Hugh 21-08-2020 15:44

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36047212)
I can't see what all the fuss is about, i left school with 3 f's and 2 off's and never looked back ;)

We are often amused by your erudition and shining wit... ;)

Sephiroth 21-08-2020 16:25

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36047242)
We are often amused by your erudition and shining wit... ;)

Trouble is distinguishing between Hugh's sincerity and Hugh's sarcasm!

To be clear, shining wit is the clarion call from me.

1andrew1 21-08-2020 17:05

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36047245)


To be clear, shining wit is the clarion call from me.

I suspect that many posters perceive themselves to be shining wits or similar. ;)

Hugh 21-08-2020 17:49

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36047245)
Trouble is distinguishing between Hugh's sincerity and Hugh's sarcasm!

To be clear, shining wit is the clarion call from me.

;)

https://media.tenor.com/images/14ab9...a9d8/tenor.gif

Sephiroth 21-08-2020 17:53

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36047255)
;)

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Thought so.

Hugh 21-08-2020 18:11

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36047257)
Thought so.

I know, it’s difficult - I read some of your posts, and think "he can’t be being serious...". ;)

Sephiroth 21-08-2020 18:41

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36047262)
I know, it’s difficult - I read some of your posts, and think "he can’t be being serious...". ;)

Just shows how far apart we are. Most of your posts are simply pot stirrers.

Hugh 21-08-2020 19:29

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36047274)
Just shows how far apart we are. Most of your posts are simply pot stirrers.

<someone who posts things I disagree with, or questions the basis for my propositions> ≠ <pot stirrer>

hth...

Maggy 21-08-2020 20:02

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Behave all of you..Stick to the topic.

Mad Max 21-08-2020 20:32

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Yes miss......:hyper:

Damien 25-08-2020 15:27

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Head have rolled: https://www.theguardian.com/educatio...r-exams-fiasco

Quote:

The head of England’s exam regulator, Sally Collier, has resigned over the exams fiasco that has engulfed schools and universities.

Maggy 25-08-2020 22:35

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Pushed or jumped?Sacrificial offering?

Carth 25-08-2020 22:38

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Probably the Sacrificial offering.

Give it a few months and she'll turn up somewhere else :D

Mad Max 26-08-2020 00:17

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36047777)
Pushed or jumped?Sacrificial offering?



Nah, she just made a complete arse of it...

denphone 26-08-2020 05:27

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36047787)
Nah, she just made a complete arse of it...

Just like her boss then...

Maggy 26-08-2020 08:42

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36047790)
Just like her boss then...

:tu:

OLD BOY 26-08-2020 09:26

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36047787)
Nah, she just made a complete arse of it...

Agreed. Did she not think to tell her staff to actually test the algorithm before approving it? Very careless and unprofessional. Ofqual assured ministers that the algorithm was robust. Were they supposed to disbelieve their advisors? Of course not. She had to go.

Hugh 26-08-2020 09:40

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36047799)
Agreed. Did she not think to tell her staff to actually test the algorithm before approving it? Very careless and unprofessional. Ofqual assured ministers that the algorithm was robust. Were they supposed to disbelieve their advisors? Of course not. She had to go.

Quote:

Gavin Williamson was personally told in JULY that the exam grade system was flawed but carried on anyway - as minister insists algorithm did NOT unfairly downgrade poorer pupils despite it being scrapped...

... Sir Jon is also reported to have written to Mr Williamson, the Education Secretary, in July to warn that the Ofqual algorithm, would only be 75 per cent accurate at best when applied to GCSE and A-Level grading.

In his letter Sir Jon also said that using predicted grades for some small groups of students while using the algorithm for large groups would cause unfairness.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-warnings.html

Julian 26-08-2020 09:42

Re: A-level and GCSE results fiasco.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36047790)
Just like her boss then...

Which person is her " Boss " ?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:54.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum