Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Election 2019 - Week 5 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33708465)

Chris 06-12-2019 08:50

Election 2019 - Week 5
 
OK folks, we’re on the final straight. This time next week we should be waking up to an almost complete result and we will probably know who has won.

In the meantime, discussion and polling continues in this shiny new thread.

Number Five is alive!


(Week 4 thread for reference: https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...9#post36019349 )

GrimUpNorth 06-12-2019 11:20

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
So that's it. Postal vote duly completed and posted back to the council. Knowing how swamped with postal votes they are I thought I'd get it back ASAP so they can get it verified and processed. I think we're going to have a descent turn out this time, and the weather forecast for next Thursday doesn't look too bad in this part of the world.

Mr K 06-12-2019 12:02

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
https://mobile.twitter.com/davidschn...71785219395584
Quote:

JOHNSON GUIDE TO AVOIDING SCRUTINY
Prorogue Parliament✔️
Have fake Queen’s Speech✔️
Hide Russia report✔️
Hide from Andrew Neil✔️
Avoid leaders debate✔️
Avoid climate debate✔️
Avoid Julie Etchingham interview✔️
Selfie with Philip and Holly✔️

But democracy is safe with the Tories.

Carth 06-12-2019 12:42

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
As the weeks roll by, I'm becoming more and more convinced that the 'political' side of Twitter consists of tweets from unemployed farm workers that miss driving their muck spreaders :D

Mr K 06-12-2019 16:30

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...y_to_clipboard
Quote:

Former Tory MP John Major urges people to vote tactically to deny Boris Johnson majority
Major is formally endorsing three former Tories who are now running as independents because they had the whip withdrawn after voting to facilitate the Benn Act, the legislation that ruled out a no-deal Brexit on 31 October. According to the news release issued in advance, he is backing David Gauke, Dominic Grieve and Anne Milton.

Commenting on them, Major will say in a video message:

"Let me make one thing absolutely clear: none of them has left the Conservative party, the Conservative party has left them. Without such talent on its benches, parliament will be the poorer, which is why – if I were resident in any one of their constituencies – they would have my vote."

But Major is also going to back calls for a second referendum. Addressing young people directly (the rally has been jointly organised with For Our Future’s Sake, a second referendum campaign focusing on young people), he will describe Brexit as “the worst foreign policy decision in my lifetime”. He will go on:

"It will affect nearly every single aspect of our lives for many decades to come. It will make our country poorer and weaker. It will hurt most those who have least. Never have the stakes been higher, especially for the young. Brexit may even break up our historic United Kingdom.'
Well said sir !

papa smurf 06-12-2019 16:45

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019387)



Great video here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kK-TDfempwY

nomadking 06-12-2019 17:35

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Getting ridiculously tedious. When are people going to get it into their thick skulls that "deal" is basically(apart from whatever form the backstop takes) the same as "no deal", but instead it just happens at the end of next year. Any of these claimed negative impacts will still happen. So trying to claim the moral high ground by supposedly claiming to fight for a "deal" is a complete and utter load of tosh. The fervour for "deal" is simply a fraudulent backdoor attempt at Remain.

Sephiroth 06-12-2019 17:37

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019367)

.... but defo safer with the Tories than with Corbyn's thugs.

Mr K 06-12-2019 17:48

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Oops....

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a9236151.html

Quote:

The lead Brexit envoy in the UK's embassy in Washington has resigned, saying she can no longer "peddle half-truths" on behalf of political leaders she does not trust.
Alexandra Hall Hall sent a resignation letter earlier this week, warning that there were increasing demands being placed on civil servants not to be "fully honest" with the public.
"I have been increasingly dismayed by the way in which our political leaders have tried to deliver Brexit, with reluctance to address honestly, even with our own citizens, the challenges and trade-offs which Brexit involves; the use of misleading or disingenuous arguments about the implications of the various options before us; and some behaviour towards our institutions, which, were it happening in another country, we would almost certainly as diplomats have received instructions to register our concern," she wrote in her letter, dated December 3.
"It makes our job to promote democracy and the rule of law that much harder, if we are not seen to be upholding these core values at home."
Bozza trying to mislead people over Brexit? Who'd have thunk it? he's such an honest guy... :rolleyes:

Chris 06-12-2019 17:56

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019403)
Oops....

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a9236151.html



Bozza trying to mislead people over Brexit? Who'd have thunk it? he's such an honest guy... :rolleyes:

On the contrary, he’s a liar, a chancer, a philanderer, and seems to be instinctively contemptuous of those whose background or experiences are much different than his.

On the other hand, the only other person who could conceivably be prime minister this time next week is a clear national security risk, propped up by ideological thugs, and he poses a serious socioeconomic risk with his desire to re-run statist experiments that were tried, and failed, a generation ago.

That’s the calculation everyone has to make this week. “Who’s a nice man?” Doesn’t come into it. “Who’s a liar?” doesn’t either, sadly. Which one of them is more or less likely to keep the country on an even keel and move our government forwards? That’s what everyone has to grapple with.

I’m voting conservative because so far as I can see it’s the only viable choice.

Sephiroth 06-12-2019 18:02

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
I'm voting Conservative because John Redwood's my mate, Corbyn is pure poison and Brexit must be followed through.

Btw - I think Farage is a great man. (and not racist).

RichardCoulter 06-12-2019 18:28

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Burger King have been trolling Johnson :D

https://voxpoliticalonline.com/2019/...side-of-a-bus/

It's never a good idea for those in business to get involved in politics though as, whilst it might amuse some, it could alienate other customers.

Sephiroth 06-12-2019 18:32

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36019409)
Burger King have been trolling Johnson :D

https://voxpoliticalonline.com/2019/...side-of-a-bus/

It's never a good idea for those in business to get involved in politics though as, whilst it might amuse some, it could alienate other customers.

I love it! Still want Conservatives to win.

Mr K 06-12-2019 18:38

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36019405)
On the contrary, he’s a liar, a chancer, a philanderer, and seems to be instinctively contemptuous of those whose background or experiences are much different than his.

On the other hand, the only other person who could conceivably be prime minister this time next week is a clear national security risk, propped up by ideological thugs, and he poses a serious socioeconomic risk with his desire to re-run statist experiments that were tried, and failed, a generation ago.

That’s the calculation everyone has to make this week. “Who’s a nice man?” Doesn’t come into it. “Who’s a liar?” doesn’t either, sadly. Which one of them is more or less likely to keep the country on an even keel and move our government forwards? That’s what everyone has to grapple with.

I’m voting conservative because so far as I can see it’s the only viable choice.

You don't seem that enthusiastic about it ! The only reason he's PM is because of Brexit, which he doesn't actually believe in at all. Took ages to decide which side he was going to be on; what was best for his political career being the deciding factor. I have a feeling even if he does win, the Tories are those that are going to be most disappointed with him. He'll be hounded out within a year when he's still failed to sort Brexit out, and the country disintegrates into a second rate Poland.

Sephiroth 06-12-2019 18:41

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019411)
You don't seem that enthusiastic about it ! The only reason he's PM is because of Brexit, which he doesn't actually believe in at all. Took ages to decide which side he was going to be on; what was best for his political career being the deciding factor. I have a feeling even if he does win, the Tories are those that are going to be most disappointed with him. He'll be hounded out within a year when he's still failed to sort Brexit out, and the country disintegrates into a second rate Poland.

Poland? Why Poland?

nomadking 06-12-2019 18:55

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019411)
You don't seem that enthusiastic about it ! The only reason he's PM is because of Brexit, which he doesn't actually believe in at all. Took ages to decide which side he was going to be on; what was best for his political career being the deciding factor. I have a feeling even if he does win, the Tories are those that are going to be most disappointed with him. He'll be hounded out within a year when he's still failed to sort Brexit out, and the country disintegrates into a second rate Poland.

You mean the EU will give us 9bn euros a year.:D Yep, that's how much they get.

Mr K 06-12-2019 21:55

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36019413)
You mean the EU will give us 9bn euros a year.:D Yep, that's how much they get.

There are going to be an awful lot of disappointed people when reality hits. A guaranteed socialist govt for 20 years will be the fall out; no wonder Corbyn is keen on Brexit. Think on...

nomadking 06-12-2019 22:04

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Corbyn likes the EU in that it can tell a Conservative government what it can and can't do, on the other hand he hates it because they can also tell a Labour government what they can and can't do.

Damien 06-12-2019 23:25

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Reddit have said the NHS documents which were leaked to the platform are suspected to be from a targeted Russian campaign: https://www.reddit.com/r/redditsecur...sia_on_reddit/

Sephiroth 06-12-2019 23:50

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
The Debate

Corbyn just about had the debating edge but he got let off lightly on antisemitism.

Boris didn't bumble too much and thus got his message across.

The applause, small though it was, just about went to Boris. The questions were tame, there was reasonable debate, they both repeated their core messages and managed to work them into the question being asked.

I think people have already made up their minds.



Hugh 07-12-2019 00:16

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
What a rousing acclamation for a leader of a Party and Prime Minister - "didn’t bumble too much".

Can you imagine the conversation?

"How was the operation? "

"Oh, it was OK - the surgeon didn’t bumble too much".

What has become of our country and our political parties when this is seen as normal?

Sephiroth 07-12-2019 00:24

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019450)
What a rousing acclamation for a leader of a Party and Prime Minister - "didn’t bumble too much".

Can you imagine the conversation?

"How was the operation? "

"Oh, it was OK - the surgeon didn’t bumble too much".

What has become of our country and our political parties when this is seen as normal?

You are being silly again, just trying to seize on something to discredit Boris. What's a surgeon/operation got to do with this.

Actually, Boris hardly bumbled, but his technique (if you can call it that) was there, which is why Corbyn (may he rot somewhere) had the debating edge.

Mick 07-12-2019 03:26

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Off-topic post removed, the thread is about the election and not about previous team instructions.

Hugh 07-12-2019 09:49

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36019451)
You are being silly again, just trying to seize on something to discredit Boris. What's a surgeon/operation got to do with this.

Actually, Boris hardly bumbled, but his technique (if you can call it that) was there, which is why Corbyn (may he rot somewhere) had the debating edge.

You said he "didn’t bumble too much", not me, so any "discrediting" is on you...

btw, look up "analogy"... ;)

Mr K 07-12-2019 10:25

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
'Get Brexit Done' - I wonder how many really believe that a vote in parliament actually does that? Or that we'll still be paying in and following EU rules, with no voting rights, for perhaps many years. That on top of the lies about new hospitals, nurses and police, plus tax cuts, which we can't possibly afford. We'll lose N Ireland and Scotland, RIP UK, and welcome to Little backward England.

Even if the Tories win this election, Johnson's lies could end up destroying them as a party and the UK as a country, the public will be unforgiving.

Try doing some long term 'thinking' is my advice, and not fall for the bumbling, not so loveable clown act and his simplistic 'get Brexit done' cobblers....

papa smurf 07-12-2019 10:35

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019459)
'Get Brexit Done' - I wonder how many really believe that a vote in parliament actually does that? Or that we'll still be paying in and following EU rules, with no voting rights, for perhaps many years. That on top of the lies about new hospitals, nurses and police, plus tax cuts, which we can't possibly afford. We'll lose N Ireland and Scotland, RIP UK, and welcome to Little backward England.

Even if the Tories win this election, Johnson's lies could end up destroying them as a party and the UK as a country, the public will be unforgiving.

Try doing some long term 'thinking' is my advice, and not fall for the bumbling, not so loveable clown act and his simplistic 'get Brexit done' cobblers....

Corbyn's hand in everyone's pocket,ruined economy, failed nationalisation projects, constant strikes,£10,000,000 for a loaf of bread,pensioners committing suicide to escape poverty.

Mick 07-12-2019 10:50

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019459)
'Get Brexit Done' - I wonder how many really believe that a vote in parliament actually does that? Or that we'll still be paying in and following EU rules, with no voting rights, for perhaps many years. That on top of the lies about new hospitals, nurses and police, plus tax cuts, which we can't possibly afford. We'll lose N Ireland and Scotland, RIP UK, and welcome to Little backward England.

Even if the Tories win this election, Johnson's lies could end up destroying them as a party and the UK as a country, the public will be unforgiving.

Try doing some long term 'thinking' is my advice, and not fall for the bumbling, not so loveable clown act and his simplistic 'get Brexit done' cobblers....

The problem with your advice, is that it is flawed. It’s tinged with typical negative Brexit mantra. Anti-Tory rhetoric.

As usual. But no mention of the dire fantasies of the Labour Party, who are now, as the news was Breaking last night, they’re now embroiled in sharing Russian Fake News, a disinformation campaign directly emanating from Russia, regarding the NHS is for sale bollocks. It should ring alarm bells that Corbyn is willing to do Russia’s bidding.

Labour would be a disaster for the UK. Socialism does not work, tried and tested and that is what really needs to be thought about!

nomadking 07-12-2019 10:56

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
To be fair, I don't think anybody is saying that the leaked discussion document is false, just that the meaning of it's content is being wilfully misrepresented by Labour, not by whoever leaked it. Just another in the long line of mere discussion documents that are wilfully misrepresented by Labour as being Government intentions.

OLD BOY 07-12-2019 10:57

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019459)
'Get Brexit Done' - I wonder how many really believe that a vote in parliament actually does that? Or that we'll still be paying in and following EU rules, with no voting rights, for perhaps many years. That on top of the lies about new hospitals, nurses and police, plus tax cuts, which we can't possibly afford. We'll lose N Ireland and Scotland, RIP UK, and welcome to Little backward England.

Even if the Tories win this election, Johnson's lies could end up destroying them as a party and the UK as a country, the public will be unforgiving.

Try doing some long term 'thinking' is my advice, and not fall for the bumbling, not so loveable clown act and his simplistic 'get Brexit done' cobblers....

Man, you seem to be getting desperate with your posts - you must be worried.

By 'Get Brexit Done', you know very well that Boris means that he wants us out of Europe by this January. The trade deal negotiation comes next, which he reckons he can have dealt with in a year. To my mind, that is not an impossible task, particularly as we already meet the standards of the EU.

As for your doom and gloom scenario about the impact of Brexit, I don't buy it. As I've said before, trade with the EU will continue and in addition we will open up new markets elsewhere in the world, which means more, not less income. The stubborn sect of remainers will be deeply shocked when they realise that Brexit has happened and the world keeps on turning.

You might like to paint Boris in the worst possible light, but no matter what you say about him, what I could say about terrorist-lover and Britain-hater Corbyn is infinitely worse.

Angua 07-12-2019 19:47

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019459)
'Get Brexit Done' - I wonder how many really believe that a vote in parliament actually does that? Or that we'll still be paying in and following EU rules, with no voting rights, for perhaps many years. That on top of the lies about new hospitals, nurses and police, plus tax cuts, which we can't possibly afford. We'll lose N Ireland and Scotland, RIP UK, and welcome to Little backward England.

Even if the Tories win this election, Johnson's lies could end up destroying them as a party and the UK as a country, the public will be unforgiving.

Try doing some long term 'thinking' is my advice, and not fall for the bumbling, not so loveable clown act and his simplistic 'get Brexit done' cobblers....

Not sure even the EU are likely to support Johnsons deal as it stands. However, I suspect they do not want the electorate knowing that "Get Brexit Done" means anything up to 10 years before we see the back of it.

Damien 07-12-2019 19:53

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 36019510)
Not sure even the EU are likely to support Johnsons deal as it stands. However, I suspect they do not want the electorate knowing that "Get Brexit Done" means anything up to 10 years before we see the back of it.

The EU have already approved it, hence that it's a 'deal'.....

Sephiroth 07-12-2019 19:53

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 36019510)
Not sure even the EU are likely to support Johnsons deal as it stands. However, I suspect they do not want the electorate knowing that "Get Brexit Done" means anything up to 10 years before we see the back of it.

Iirc, Juncker said it takes years to negotiate a free trade deal.


OLD BOY 07-12-2019 20:04

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 36019510)
Not sure even the EU are likely to support Johnsons deal as it stands. However, I suspect they do not want the electorate knowing that "Get Brexit Done" means anything up to 10 years before we see the back of it.

The Withdrawal Agreement as amended by Boris is as good as agreed and will be rubber stamped by EU leaders at the next summit.

The trade deal will most definitely not take 10 years to get done - how do you make that out? Boris reckons he can do the deal within 12 months and I think that is perfectly do-able, just as he was able to get rid of the backstop in a matter of weeks.

It will, however, take a few years to get the other deals outside the EU signed off, and they will enhance the opportunities available to us. This, the free ports, our escape from the suffocating EU which charges countries high tariff rates, and the 'no tariff' policy that the government will introduce are just some of the advantages that we will be able to secure in future years.

The trade deals we strike will be much more relevant to this country's needs (rather than diluted to the lowest common denominator of all 28 countries of the EU) and we will be able to shake free of the debilitating and disincentivising employment legislation of the EU.

---------- Post added at 19:04 ---------- Previous post was at 19:01 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36019514)
Iirc, Juncker said it takes tears to negotiate a free trade deal.


Juncker is old news now, Seph. It won't take anywhere near as long for us to get a trade deal with the EU since we are already aligned with them.

Pierre 07-12-2019 20:05

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36019405)
On the contrary, he’s a liar, a chancer, a philanderer, and seems to be instinctively contemptuous of those whose background or experiences are much different than his.

On the other hand, the only other person who could conceivably be prime minister this time next week is a clear national security risk, propped up by ideological thugs, and he poses a serious socioeconomic risk with his desire to re-run statist experiments that were tried, and failed, a generation ago.

That’s the calculation everyone has to make this week. “Who’s a nice man?” Doesn’t come into it. “Who’s a liar?” doesn’t either, sadly. Which one of them is more or less likely to keep the country on an even keel and move our government forwards? That’s what everyone has to grapple with.

I’m voting conservative because so far as I can see it’s the only viable choice.

This is it.

He’s not great, but most importantly h3’s not Corbyn. Johnson won’t be there for ever, but at least him winning may see the end of Corbyn as leader and hopefully an internal revolution within Labour to produce a party that is something electable.

OLD BOY 07-12-2019 20:09

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36019517)
This is it.

He’s not great, but most importantly h3’s not Corbyn. Johnson won’t be there for ever, but at least him winning may see the end of Corbyn as leader and hopefully an internal revolution within Labour to produce a party that is something electable.

That's right. And although many of us have reservations over Boris, he may yet surprise.

Sephiroth 07-12-2019 20:22

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36019515)
The Withdrawal Agreement as amended by Boris is as good as agreed and will be rubber stamped by EU leaders at the next summit.

The trade deal will most definitely not take 10 years to get done - how do you make that out? Boris reckons he can do the deal within 12 months and I think that is perfectly do-able, just as he was able to get rid of the backstop in a matter of weeks.

It will, however, take a few years to get the other deals outside the EU signed off, and they will enhance the opportunities available to us. This, the free ports, our escape from the suffocating EU which charges countries high tariff rates, and the 'no tariff' policy that the government will introduce are just some of the advantages that we will be able to secure in future years.

The trade deals we strike will be much more relevant to this country's needs (rather than diluted to the lowest common denominator of all 28 countries of the EU) and we will be able to shake free of the debilitating and disincentivising employment legislation of the EU.

---------- Post added at 19:04 ---------- Previous post was at 19:01 ----------



Juncker is old news now, Seph. It won't take anywhere near as long for us to get a trade deal with the EU since we are already aligned with them.

Unfortunately, OB, the 27 are likely to get rough. There's fishing rights (a totemic issue), competitive advantage that they don't want us to have through our less restrictive practices and so on. In that respect, John Redwood is right - we don't want our hands and whatsit all strapped behind our backs because France is scared stiff of us.

Mr K 07-12-2019 20:26

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 36019510)
Not sure even the EU are likely to support Johnsons deal as it stands. However, I suspect they do not want the electorate knowing that "Get Brexit Done" means anything up to 10 years before we see the back of it.

You're right most of the public don't realise that Brexit won't be sorted by this Election and a vote in Parliament. It won't be 'oven ready' as Mr Blobby claims. He assumes the public are fools and he may be right. However the 'Get Brexit done' lie will come back to haunt the Tories big time when they realise they've been had and we're still effectively tied to the EU for years.

---------- Post added at 19:26 ---------- Previous post was at 19:22 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36019517)
This is it.

He’s not great, but most importantly h3’s not Corbyn. Johnson won’t be there for ever, but at least him winning may see the end of Corbyn as leader and hopefully an internal revolution within Labour to produce a party that is something electable.

So Corbyns and Johnsons main attractions are at least they aren't each other, and they won't be there forever :D
God help us....

OLD BOY 07-12-2019 20:34

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019521)
You're right most of the public don't realise that Brexit won't be sorted by this Election and a vote in Parliament. It won't be 'oven ready' as Mr Blobby claims. He assumes the public are fools and he may be right. However the 'Get Brexit done' lie will come back to haunt the Tories big time when they realise they've been had and we're still effectively tied to the EU for years.

Brexit will happen in January 2020, Mr K, provided that Boris gets a working majority.

The trade deal is another matter, but if any of our friends in the EU think they can snatch our fish, they've got another think coming.

Boris is made of sterner stuff than entering into a deal that does not benefit us. And those fish are ours once outside the EU.

Canada didn't have to give away its fishing rights to secure its deal with the EU, so why should we? Out means out. Brexit means Brexit. Free movement, Common Agricultural Policy and all that other rubbish will be a thing of the past for us, and about time, too.

Sephiroth 07-12-2019 20:41

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36019525)
Brexit will happen in January 2020, Mr K, provided that Boris gets a working majority.

The trade deal is another matter, but if any of our friends in the EU think they can snatch our fish, they've got another think coming.

Boris is made of sterner stuff than entering into a deal that does not benefit us. And those fish are ours once outside the EU.

Canada didn't have to give away its fishing rights to secure its deal with the EU, so why should we? Out means out. Brexit means Brexit. Free movement, Common Agricultural Policy and all that other rubbish will be a thing of the past for us, and about time, too.

I don't think the EU will see it that way.

Mr K 07-12-2019 20:47

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36019525)
Brexit will happen in January 2020, Mr K, provided that Boris gets a working majority.

The trade deal is another matter, but if any of our friends in the EU think they can snatch our fish, they've got another think coming.

Boris is made of sterner stuff than entering into a deal that does not benefit us. And those fish are ours once outside the EU.

Canada didn't have to give away its fishing rights to secure its deal with the EU, so why should we? Out means out. Brexit means Brexit. Free movement, Common Agricultural Policy and all that other rubbish will be a thing of the past for us, and about time, too.

Brexit won't happen in January OB; we will still be paying into the EU, following EU rules, with no say. Is that Brexit? You just proved my point about the public's lack of understanding.. it'll go on for years as No deal is an empty bluff, for any politician that wants to stay in power, as Mr Blobby certainly will....

As for him being made of stern stuff; he's certainly full of something but it's not that.. :D

( P.s. love the 'Brexit means Brexit' line, made me laugh a lot !)

papa smurf 08-12-2019 10:13

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Labour rank top of the world's top 10.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/politi...hreat-to-jews/

OLD BOY 08-12-2019 10:46

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019530)
Brexit won't happen in January OB; we will still be paying into the EU, following EU rules, with no say. Is that Brexit? You just proved my point about the public's lack of understanding.. it'll go on for years as No deal is an empty bluff, for any politician that wants to stay in power, as Mr Blobby certainly will....

As for him being made of stern stuff; he's certainly full of something but it's not that.. :D

( P.s. love the 'Brexit means Brexit' line, made me laugh a lot !)

I think everyone knows by now that the withdrawal agreement keeps us following EU rules, etc, but we will be out of the EU, so we will have 'Brexited'. Most people wanted this transitional arrangement to smooth the way to our new relationship with the EU.

I do not think, for one moment, that the trade deal will take years to agree. The EU has a lot to lose without one, don't forget.

I seem to recall that you didn't expect Theresa May to get anywhere with a withdrawal agreement, and nor did you expect Boris to get rid of the backstop. Why do you think you are right this time?

Parliament has been our biggest problem in getting stuff through, not the EU. That little problem should be sorted once the election is out of the way.

Mr K 08-12-2019 12:23

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36019552)
I think everyone knows by now that the withdrawal agreement keeps us following EU rules, etc, but we will be out of the EU, so we will have 'Brexited'. Most people wanted this transitional arrangement to smooth the way to our new relationship with the EU.

I do not think, for one moment, that the trade deal will take years to agree. The EU has a lot to lose without one, don't forget.

I seem to recall that you didn't expect Theresa May to get anywhere with a withdrawal agreement, and nor did you expect Boris to get rid of the backstop. Why do you think you are right this time?

Parliament has been our biggest problem in getting stuff through, not the EU. That little problem should be sorted once the election is out of the way.

Errm, TM didn't get anywhere with her withdrawal agreement..... As for the backstop, ask the DUP what they think to the current proposal. - they've been sold down the river to save political careers and face in Little England. Let's hope Bozza doesn't need them in s hung parliament... He's going to be leading a very disunited kingdom..

Angua 08-12-2019 13:14

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019554)
Errm, TM didn't get anywhere with her withdrawal agreement..... As for the backstop, ask the DUP what they think to the current proposal. - they've been sold down the river to save political careers and face in Little England. Let's hope Bozza doesn't need them in s hung parliament... He's going to be leading a very disunited kingdom..

Think even the EU are getting twitchy over Johnson's deal, as it is not in the spirit of the GFA.

OLD BOY 08-12-2019 14:19

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019554)
Errm, TM didn't get anywhere with her withdrawal agreement..... As for the backstop, ask the DUP what they think to the current proposal. - they've been sold down the river to save political careers and face in Little England. Let's hope Bozza doesn't need them in s hung parliament... He's going to be leading a very disunited kingdom..

Actually, you are wrong again. Theresa May did get the EU's agreement to her deal and Juncker said these negotiations were at an end. It was the dead hand of Parliament that wouldn't let it through.

Then Boris came along and against all the naysayers, negotiated away the backstop. Again, it was Parliament that resisted, but then having got a vote through for the Second Reading, then failed to agree the timetable.

While the DUP may not be prepared to give the ok to Boris's deal, it will still get through a Conservative majority Parliament. Unless something goes badly wrong between now and Thursday, he should at least get a working majority this time.

---------- Post added at 13:19 ---------- Previous post was at 13:16 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 36019557)
Think even the EU are getting twitchy over Johnson's deal, as it is not in the spirit of the GFA.

Juncker and Barnier were happy with it, so it should be rubber stamped at the summit. I've not read anything from any reliable sources to suggest it won't be.

Mr K 08-12-2019 15:19

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
The only consolation about next week if it goes the way the polls are suggesting, is that the lies will quickly be exposed from Friday onwards. Those in working class communities that vote for the Tories will feel the worst effects, just a shame for those that don't. When Brexit doesn't deliver all the promised goodies, but quite the opposite, there's only one party that will take the blame. 5 years of the Tories to have them out if power for a generation might just be worth it. Just hope we still have a united country that is possible to save by then..
Happy Christmas everyone :)

Chris 08-12-2019 16:14

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019567)
The only consolation about next week if it goes the way the polls are suggesting, is that the lies will quickly be exposed from Friday onwards. Those in working class communities that vote for the Tories will feel the worst effects, just a shame for those that don't. When Brexit doesn't deliver all the promised goodies, but quite the opposite, there's only one party that will take the blame. 5 years of the Tories to have them out if power for a generation might just be worth it. Just hope we still have a united country that is possible to save by then..
Happy Christmas everyone :)

To quote Greg Lake ...

Hallelujah, Noel, be it Heaven or Hell,
the Christmas we get, we deserve. ;)

Mick 08-12-2019 16:30

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019567)
The only consolation about next week if it goes the way the polls are suggesting, is that the lies will quickly be exposed from Friday onwards. Those in working class communities that vote for the Tories will feel the worst effects, just a shame for those that don't. When Brexit doesn't deliver all the promised goodies, but quite the opposite, there's only one party that will take the blame. 5 years of the Tories to have them out if power for a generation might just be worth it. Just hope we still have a united country that is possible to save by then..
Happy Christmas everyone :)

What is utterly laughable about everything you've posted so far in these threads is that you think Labour has all the answers. Clue they certainly do not!

What an utter joke that is not even remotely funny.

Mr K 08-12-2019 16:52

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36019585)
What is utterly laughable about everything you've posted so far in these threads is that you think Labour has all the answers. Clue they certainly do not!

What an utter joke that is not even remotely funny.

As you know Mick I've never voted Labour ( unlike OB! ;)), Given the muppets on offer a hung parliament would be the best result. 5 years of the Tories with carte blanche will be a disaster for the country and perhaps the end of the UK.

Mick 08-12-2019 17:17

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019590)
As you know Mick I've never voted Labour ( unlike OB! ;)), Given the muppets on offer a hung parliament would be the best result. 5 years of the Tories with carte blanche will be a disaster for the country and perhaps the end of the UK.

But you're still suggesting if Labour wins, everything will be fine...

Just seen a video of Boris Johnson campaigning in a Jewish community in North London, several people, in a big crowd, are seen and heard asking to be saved from "that man", meaning Corbyn, yet 10 people on this forum want a Racist Anti-Semitic fool, IRA loving terrorist sympathiser running the show...

Makes absolutely no sense to me why 10 people on here want Labour to run this country and "that man, Corbyn" who would definitely ruin it with his Socialist Marxist agenda.

OLD BOY 08-12-2019 17:54

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019567)
The only consolation about next week if it goes the way the polls are suggesting, is that the lies will quickly be exposed from Friday onwards. Those in working class communities that vote for the Tories will feel the worst effects, just a shame for those that don't. When Brexit doesn't deliver all the promised goodies, but quite the opposite, there's only one party that will take the blame. 5 years of the Tories to have them out if power for a generation might just be worth it. Just hope we still have a united country that is possible to save by then..
Happy Christmas everyone :)

What lies? You really do have a vivid imagination, Mr K.

Brexit will be done. It's what the majority of the electorate voted for and the Conservatives will have delivered it. They are already getting the credit for ensuring that the will of the electorate is honoured.

I think it is you who will be disillusioned. This period of Conservative government will be appreciated as finally shaking off austerity, and hopefully making clear that another socialist government would not be worth the risk in the eyes of the majority.

Mick 08-12-2019 20:30

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Westminster voting intention:

CON: 41% (+2)
LAB: 32% (-1)
LDEM: 14% (+1)
GRN: 4% (-1)
BREX: 4% (-)

via
@BMGResearch
, 04 - 06 Dec
Chgs. w/ 29 Nov

Quick, Jezza, promise a new swimming pool for every house...

Mr K 08-12-2019 22:07

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

.Amazon has been given free access to healthcare information collected by the NHS as part of a contract with the government.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/...y_to_clipboard

The shape of things to come....

nomadking 08-12-2019 22:18

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019641)

Quote:

The material, which excludes patient data, could allow the multinational technology company to make, advertise and sell its own products.

Quote:

In July the health secretary, Matt Hancock, said a partnership with the NHS that allowed Amazon Alexa devices to offer expert health advice to users would reduce pressure on “our hard-working GPs and pharmacists”.
But responses to freedom of information requests, published by the Sunday Times, showed the contract will also allow the company access to information on symptoms, causes and definitions of conditions, and “all related copyrightable content and data and other materials”.
Just sounds like an uncontroversial structured database of medical conditions.


Quote:

Third parties, such as local authorities, can reuse information from the NHS website, but standard agreements only permit this to be used in the UK. The contract with Amazon states that the licence applies around the world.
What's the problem? Just provides another platform for getting medical advice.


NHS website Health conditions

Mr K 08-12-2019 22:28

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36019642)
Just sounds like an uncontroversial structured database of medical conditions.


What's the problem? Just provides another platform for getting medical advice.


NHS website Health conditions

Quote:

. Amazon, which is worth $863bn and is run by the world’s richest person, Jeff Bezos, can then create “new products, applications, cloud-based services and/or distributed software”, which the NHS would not benefit from financially. It can also share the information with third parties.
They aren't in it for charity.

Mick 08-12-2019 22:36

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
And as the article stipulates, not after Patient Data.

It's a non story being peddled a by a pathetic, Corbynista left wing rag.

Hugh 08-12-2019 22:45

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36019647)
And as the article stipulates, not after Patient Data.

It's a non story being peddled a by a pathetic, Corbynista left wing rag.

The Sunday Times?

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/a...data-bbzp52n5m
Quote:

Amazon has been handed the keys to a trove of NHS data it can use to develop products to sell internationally without paying a penny to the UK.

A government contract, revealed under freedom of information laws, shows the partnership goes far beyond the tie-up with Amazon’s Alexa voice assistant announced in July.

The health secretary, Matt Hancock, said at the time the NHS should “embrace” the technology, saying it would cut pressure on GPs and pharmacists. But the contract shows the American tech giant could access more than just NHS website data.

The $863bn company can access “all healthcare information” gathered by the NHS at the UK taxpayers’ expense, including “symptoms, causes and definitions”. It also gets “all related copyrightable content and data and other materials”, excluding patient data. Amazon can use the information to make, advertise and sell “new products, applications, cloud-based services and/or distributed software” and can share it with third parties.

The NHS will not benefit if Amazon creates a lucrative new health app. A commercial lawyer who analysed the contract said: “The most alarming thing is that Amazon isn’t paying anything for this and the data is very valuable. The NHS is one of the leaders in the world in collecting this data, so it’s incredible really that it is not charging for it.”

nomadking 08-12-2019 22:54

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019644)
They aren't in it for charity.

It's called providing a service. They're just buying access to copyrighted material to use in a different form. Ie If somebody seeks medical advice using an Alexa device, that advice has come from the NHS. Better to have come from there than who knows where. The general public can access the same database via the link I gave. I should imagine these sort of voice activated devices have various external databases to call upon, eg weather.

---------- Post added at 21:54 ---------- Previous post was at 21:45 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019650)

As your quote says, ", excluding patient data.".:rolleyes:
Has any other company asked for the same info and been refused?


Quote:

Amazon told the Sunday Times the content it had access to was already on the NHS website. “Amazon does not build customer health profiles based on interactions with nhs.uk content or use such requests for marketing purposes,” it added.

1andrew1 08-12-2019 23:01

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019650)

Oops!

Mick 08-12-2019 23:26

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019650)

No, the guardian like I said originally! :mad:

Chris 09-12-2019 01:37

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36019636)
Westminster voting intention:

CON: 41% (+2)
LAB: 32% (-1)
LDEM: 14% (+1)
GRN: 4% (-1)
BREX: 4% (-)

via
@BMGResearch
, 04 - 06 Dec
Chgs. w/ 29 Nov

Quick, Jezza, promise a new swimming pool for every house...

And another one:

Westminster voting intention:

CON: 45% (+3)
LAB: 31% (-2)
LDEM: 11% (-)
BREX: 4% (+1)
GRN: 2% (-2)

via Survation, 05 - 07 Dec
Chgs. w/ 30 Nov

What happened to that Labour surge? :scratch:

Hugh 09-12-2019 09:49

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36019656)
No, the guardian like I said originally! :mad:

The Guardian article was based on the Times information - from Mr K’s link.
Quote:

But responses to freedom of information requests, published by the Sunday Times

Damien 09-12-2019 09:52

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
The good thing for the Tories is Labour won't learn. They won't think it was their inability to reach out beyond their base but that the BBC/Tabloid Press/establishment cost them the win despite their unquestionable goodness and continue down the same path.

1andrew1 09-12-2019 09:58

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019674)
The Guardian article was based on the Times information - from Mr K’s link.

It may be inconvenient for some. But to its credit, it looks like the Murdoch-owned The Sunday Times was first off the mark here.

---------- Post added at 08:58 ---------- Previous post was at 08:54 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36019676)
The good thing for the Tories is Labour won't learn. They won't think it was their inability to reach out beyond their base but that the BBC/Tabloid Press/establishment cost them the win despite their unquestionable goodness and continue down the same path.

The election was Labour's to lose. Thanks to no-win Corbyn it is likely they will lose it. Will Corbyn lose his leadership role? I can only seeing this happening if he does so of his own volition.

Hugh 09-12-2019 10:07

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Article from a Tech site (in October).

https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/24/al...y-health-data/
Quote:

In another section of the blog post, responding to questions about what Amazon will do with the data and “what about privacy”, it further asserted there would be no health profiling of customers — writing:

We have worked with the Amazon team to ensure that we can be totally confident that Amazon is not sharing any of this information with third parties. Amazon has been very clear that it is not selling products or making product recommendations based on this health information, nor is it building a health profile on customers. All information is treated with high confidentiality. Amazon restrict access through multi-factor authentication, services are all encrypted, and regular audits run on their control environment to protect it.
Yet it turns out the contract DHSC signed with Amazon is just a content licensing agreement. There are no terms contained in it concerning what can or can’t be done with the medical voice query data Alexa is collecting with the help of “NHS-verified” information.

Per the contract terms, Amazon is required to attribute content to the NHS when Alexa responds to a query with information from the service’s website. (Though the company says Alexa also makes use of medical content from the Mayo Clinic and Wikipedia.) So, from the user’s point of view, they will at times feel like they’re talking to an NHS-branded service (i.e. when they hear Alexa serving them information attributed to the NHS’ website.).

But without any legally binding confidentiality clauses around what can be done with their medical voice queries it’s not clear how NHS Digital can confidently assert that Amazon isn’t creating health profiles. The situation seems to sum to, er, trust Amazon. (NHS Digital wouldn’t comment; saying it’s only responsible for delivery not policy setting, and referring us to the DHSC.)

Asked what it does with medical voice query data generated as a result of the NHS collaboration an Amazon spokesperson told us: “We do not build customer health profiles based on interactions with nhs.uk content or use such requests for marketing purposes.”

But the spokesperson could not point to any legally binding contract clauses in the licensing agreement that restrict what Amazon can do with people’s medical queries.

Ramrod 09-12-2019 15:54

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
I still can't get my head around the fact that there are 31% who would vote for Labour!
Quote:

What will happen if Jeremy Corbyn wins? France provides a useful parallel of what prime minister Jeremy Corbyn might mean for Britain. And it doesn’t make happy reading for the Labour leader.

It’s Spring 1981 and France, the fifth largest economy in the world, elects the most left-wing administration since before the Second World War following eight years of conservative rule. The government immediately begins implementing its radical manifesto: nationalisation of 11 industrial conglomerates and most private banks, higher tax-rates at the upper levels and a special wealth tax. There is also a 15 per cent rise in the minimum wage and a 25 per cent boost for social benefits. A 39-hour working week is introduced. So, too, are five weeks’ paid holidays as standard and retirement at 60, increased old age pensions, greater workers’ rights, free prescription charges and regularisation of illegal immigrants.

And, of course, massive government borrowing. The country’s new socialist leader lays flowers on the tomb of a great socialist hero. Culture minister Jack Lang proclaims the country to have ‘moved from the shadows into light.’

Fast forward to Spring 1983. Two years of spiralling budget deficits, uncontrolled national debt, three currency devaluations, falling exports and a dramatic increase in unemployment have left the economy in a parlous state.

Bowing to the European communities’ demands for financial rigour, the country’s socialist leader implements an austerity policy. Economic difficulties and cuts provoke cabinet divisions, key ministerial resignations and widespread anger at the left’s betrayal of its electorate. The reshuffled socialist government suffers badly in the 1983 local and 1984 European elections. That socialist government is finally defeated in the 1986 general elections when a conservative prime minister is elected.
link

Chris 09-12-2019 17:36

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Some people will vote for a monkey so long as it's in a red rosette, so the saying goes. As it happens I think a troop of chimpanzees would be less likely to run the country into the ground than Comrade Corbyn.

That said, by this time in 2017 the polls were tightening alarmingly, and that is not happening this time. The closet lefties at the BBC were very quick to declare the Tories' campaign had stalled last weekend when a couple of polls came in suggesting the gap was narrowing, but they have had to row back on that this weekend as polling for the Sunday papers and then again this morning shows the Tories' lead is stubbornly around the 10-point mark. Electoral Calculus reckons this to be worth a 40-plus majority. YouGov will issue its own seat projection later in the week, and then we will have the joys of Prof. Curtice and his massive exit poll on Thursday night.

I absolutely love John Curtice, and not just because Scottish Nationalists hate him (apparently his correct predictions about the outcome of the 2014 referendum were biased in some way, and they've never forgiven him). There are few things more entertaining than watching a Nat blow a gasket. But I digress.

OLD BOY 09-12-2019 17:46

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36019722)
Some people will vote for a monkey so long as it's in a red rosette, so the saying goes. As it happens I think a troop of chimpanzees would be less likely to run the country into the ground than Comrade Corbyn.

That said, by this time in 2017 the polls were tightening alarmingly, and that is not happening this time. The closet lefties at the BBC were very quick to declare the Tories' campaign had stalled last weekend when a couple of polls came in suggesting the gap was narrowing, but they have had to row back on that this weekend as polling for the Sunday papers and then again this morning shows the Tories' lead is stubbornly around the 10-point mark. Electoral Calculus reckons this to be worth a 40-plus majority. YouGov will issue its own seat projection later in the week, and then we will have the joys of Prof. Curtice and his massive exit poll on Thursday night.

I absolutely love John Curtice, and not just because Scottish Nationalists hate him (apparently his correct predictions about the outcome of the 2014 referendum were biased in some way, and they've never forgiven him). There are few things more entertaining than watching a Nat blow a gasket. But I digress.

I understand that the Scottish Conservative vote appears to be holding up well, so with luck Nicola Sturgeon will get a black eye come Thursday.

It'll be interesting to see how many former Labour strongholds move to the Conservatives on Thursday. I expect to see a fair few surprises here.

Chris 09-12-2019 18:07

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36019725)
I understand that the Scottish Conservative vote appears to be holding up well, so with luck Nicola Sturgeon will get a black eye come Thursday.

It'll be interesting to see how many former Labour strongholds move to the Conservatives on Thursday. I expect to see a fair few surprises here.

The most recent poll in Scotland:

Scottish Westminster voting intention:

SNP: 39% (-1)
CON: 29% (+1)
LAB: 21% (+1)
LDEM: 10% (-1)

via Panelbase, 03 - 06 Dec
Chgs. w/ 22 Nov

A month ago, most people expected the SNP to retake almost every seat in Scotland (where they were after 2015), but on these figures nothing much will change at all. They may take one off the Tories and one off Labour. With one final push it is possible the Tories could even increase their vote. I am hearing anecdotally that many SNP candidates aren't even mentioning Scottish independence on their local leaflets, despite Sturgeon trying to turn this election into a referendum on a referendum.

The Tories, however, are being absolutely explicit about it. I have had three Tory leaflets in the last week to 10 days, all of them warning that voters should vote Tory to stop the SNP and so-called "Indyref 2". The one I got this morning has more photos of Nicola Sturgeon on it than of the actual Tory candidate.

tweetiepooh 09-12-2019 18:47

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Pork pies with integrity unlike those emanating from those who want to run the country.

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2019/12/2.jpg

pip08456 09-12-2019 18:58

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36019730)
Pork pies with integrity unlike those emanating from those who want to run the country.

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2019/12/2.jpg

Pretenders!

This is the pork pie with integrity!

Chris 09-12-2019 19:22

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36019730)
Pork pies with integrity unlike those emanating from those who want to run the country.

At £3.50 a throw, those are pork pies for the few, not the many ...

Damien 09-12-2019 20:32

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Pretty bad story developing for the BBC. BBC (and some others including ITV) reporters tweeted that a Labour activist punched a Conservative staffer outside a hospital. They were apparently told this by Senior Tory sources.

However it turned out there was a video of the incident showing a Tory staffer walking into someone's arm: https://metro.co.uk/2019/12/09/labou...iser-11583590/

https://twitter.com/Peston/status/1204100056762265600

Quote:

It is completely clear from video footage that
@MattHancock
's adviser was not whacked by a protestor, as I was told by senior Tories, but that he inadvertently walked into a protestor's hand. I apologise for getting this wrong.

The question is why did the BBC and ITV reporters just happily report this as if it were fact?

The Tories, for their part, seem to have planted the lie to deflect from this video: https://www.itv.com/news/2019-12-09/...ospital-floor/

But that political parties will lie is almost a given - reporters taking them for their word them isn't.

Chris 09-12-2019 21:21

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Wales, Westminster voting intention:

LAB: 40% (+2)
CON: 37% (+5)
PC: 10% (-1)
LDEM: 6% (-3)
BREX: 5% (-3)
GRN: 1% (-)

via YouGov, 06 - 09 Dec
Chgs. w/ 25 Nov

Source: https://t.co/vWAkZbIcOF

Labour has almost succeeded in turning Wales Tory. :rofl:

Mr K 09-12-2019 21:29

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36019734)
Pretty bad story developing for the BBC. BBC (and some others including ITV) reporters tweeted that a Labour activist punched a Conservative staffer outside a hospital. They were apparently told this by Senior Tory sources.

However it turned out there was a video of the incident showing a Tory staffer walking into someone's arm: https://metro.co.uk/2019/12/09/labou...iser-11583590/

https://twitter.com/Peston/status/1204100056762265600




The question is why did the BBC and ITV reporters just happily report this as if it were fact?

The Tories, for their part, seem to have planted the lie to deflect from this video: https://www.itv.com/news/2019-12-09/...ospital-floor/

But that political parties will lie is almost a given - reporters taking them for their word them isn't.

More to the point who in the Tory party planted the lies? The least the inept reporters can do is name and shame the sources (bet one of their initials is DC...).

All to try and deflect from pictures of a kid getting treatment for pneumonia on a hospital floor, and Boris not wanting to know about it. A sick party and anyone that votes for them isn't much better.

Mick 09-12-2019 21:51

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019741)
More to the point who in the Tory party planted the lies? The least the inept reporters can do is name and shame the sources (bet one of their initials is DC...).

All to try and deflect from pictures of a kid getting treatment for pneumonia on a hospital floor, and Boris not wanting to know about it. A sick party and anyone that votes for them isn't much better.

You mean the staged picture of what appears to be a kid on the floor, I know plenty of nurses have come out attacking this picture saying no nurse would ever put a kid on the floor under any circumstances.

Also, the last part of your post - You have got no right to say that so you better retract that statement Mr K or it will be your last contribution to this thread, sick of your attitude on here. :mad:

Damien 09-12-2019 21:57

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Is there any evidence to suggest the photo was staged? It was his mother who posted it and wasn't happy with the wide circulation of the photo.

Mick 09-12-2019 22:09

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36019744)
Is there any evidence to suggest the photo was staged? It was his mother who posted it and wasn't happy with the wide circulation of the photo.

Well for a start it looks like the kid is actually in a bay, bed to the right of him, cupboard to the left. Since when did patients share bays?

Also, why did she give it to the Anti-Tory Daily Mirror?

No decent parent has a supposedly sick child, put on the floor, a decent parent would hold them on their lap, the photo looks staged, pure and simple for pure Labour bullshit propaganda.

nomadking 09-12-2019 22:16

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
1) The Labour supporters were there to cause trouble.

2) Technically he WAS hit in the face by a Labour supporter, just that it seems to be accidental. Not necessarily a lie, just a lack of full communication to others of the actual events. If events are always that obvious in real time, why do football and other sports need to rely on things like VAR?

3) The incident happened because of the harassment by Labour supporters.

Quote:

A video of the incident shows Mr Chatterton gesticulating wildly with his arm accidentally striking Mr Njoku-Goodwin.
Quote:

Jack was taken into Leeds General Infirmary last week after being ill for six days, his mother told the Mirror.

His mother said he had been seen as soon as he arrived and given a bed and oxygen, but a few hours later the bed had to be given to another patient and Jack was left without one for more than four hours.
Quote:

'One of the good things about what is happening at the Leeds General is they had already identified the problems on this unit and the fact that there wasn't enough space and they have got a plan, a funded plan, to make sure – in fact they are trebling the size of the unit next year.


---------- Post added at 21:16 ---------- Previous post was at 21:14 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36019743)
You mean the staged picture of what appears to be a kid on the floor, I know plenty of nurses have come out attacking this picture saying no nurse would ever put a kid on the floor under any circumstances.

Also, the last part of your post - You have got no right to say that so you better retract that statement Mr K or it will be your last contribution to this thread, sick of your attitude on here. :mad:

The nurses didn't.
Quote:

His mother said she then made a makeshift bed for her son with coats and took the picture.

Mick 09-12-2019 22:22

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36019748)
1) The Labour supporters were there to cause trouble.

2) Technically he WAS hit in the face by a Labour supporter, just that it seems to be accidental. Not necessarily a lie, just a lack of full communication to others of the actual events. If events are always that obvious in real time, why do football and other sports need to rely on things like VAR?

3) The incident happened because of the harassment by Labour supporters.



---------- Post added at 21:16 ---------- Previous post was at 21:14 ----------


The nurses didn't.

Quote:

Joseph
@jsphfstr89
I work in a very busy London A+E. We don’t let anybody lie on the floor as a general rule let alone a child with an o2 mask. Even if it is busy you prioritise beds for those that need them. This is sick @UKLabour propaganda.

You might ask why we don’t let people lie on the floor?
1) infection control: the floor is filthy.
2) health and safety: A&E is busy with heavy trolleys moving everywhere all the time. Also a person on the floor is a trip hazard and impedes emergency response to other pts.

The Nurse in charge of that child should be ashamed. The child should’ve (at the very least) been given a chair.


OLD BOY 09-12-2019 22:27

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
It's called 'weaponising the NHS', I believe.

Let us not forget that sick patients were drinking water out of vases under Labour, and rather than address it, Labour tried to bury bad news.

Labour is not the panacea they claim to be where the NHS is concerned.

Mick 09-12-2019 22:40

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36019753)
It's called 'weaponising the NHS', I believe.

Let us not forget that sick patients were drinking water out of vases under Labour, and rather than address it, Labour tried to bury bad news.

Labour is not the panacea they claim to be where the NHS is concerned.

One only has to look at the dire NHS issues in Wales, today, which is run by Labour.

---------- Post added at 21:40 ---------- Previous post was at 21:33 ----------

Quote:

anthea
@glasterlaw1
I worked as a nurse for 20years and no nurse would let a 4 yr old sick child lie on the floor...Labour propaganda

Damien 09-12-2019 22:49

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
I can see the grounds for suspicion but I don't think Twitter accounts are evidence of much.

papa smurf 09-12-2019 22:53

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36019745)
Well for a start it looks like the kid is actually in a bay, bed to the right of him, cupboard to the left. Since when did patients share bays?

Also, why did she give it to the Anti-Tory Daily Mirror?

No decent parent has a supposedly sick child, put on the floor, a decent parent would hold them on their lap, the photo looks staged, pure and simple for pure Labour bullshit propaganda.

This reminds me of when jezza was photographed sitting on the floor of a train that was supposed to be standing room only,and turned out to be an almost empty train and nothing but a stunt.

Mick 09-12-2019 22:54

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36019760)
I can see the grounds for suspicion but I don't think Twitter accounts are evidence of much.

Neither is a series of photographs that can be concocted to appear as bad than they actually are.

Testimonials of professional NHS Staff should be.

Here is another....

https://twitter.com/peter25674/statu...54883810758658

nomadking 09-12-2019 22:56

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36019760)
I can see the grounds for suspicion but I don't think Twitter accounts are evidence of much.

How likely is it that nurses would allow somebody to lie on the floor?:rolleyes:
His mother put him there, and then just happened to take a photo and sent it to the press.

Hugh 09-12-2019 22:59

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36019763)
How likely is it that nurses would allow somebody to lie on the floor?:rolleyes:
His mother put him there, and then just happened to take a photo and sent it to the press.

The Chief Medical Officer at the LGI must be mistaken, then?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-50713236

Quote:

Dr Yvette Oade, chief medical officer at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, said: "Our hospitals are extremely busy at the moment and we are very sorry that Jack's family had a long wait in our Emergency Department."
She added: "We are extremely sorry that there were only chairs available in the treatment room, and no bed. This falls below our usual high standards, and for this we would like to sincerely apologise to Jack and his family."

papa smurf 09-12-2019 23:02

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019766)
The Chief Medical Officer at the LGI must be mistaken, then?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-50713236

So his mother must have put him on the floor if a seat was provided.

Pierre 09-12-2019 23:09

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Regardless, as unfortunate the situation, using it for a stunt, is just using it for a stunt.

There are bad stories and photos to be has for any PM or wannabe PM.

How many photos of dead Iraqi children could we have shown Blair?

We could shove photos of children in abject poverty in the face of any of the last 6 or more PM’s

It smacks of desperation. God I Hope Labour lose, and lose big.

Hugh 09-12-2019 23:09

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36019767)
So his mother must have put him on the floor if a seat was provided.

Hard to lay down and sleep on a chair...

https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/le...-four-17385357

Quote:

Jack and his worried mum were ‘blue-lighted’ to Leeds General Infirmary after she returned to the doctors as Jack had not improved.

He was seen “very quickly” and given a bed and oxygen in A&E.

A few hours later she was told the bed was needed for another patient.

“A doctor rushed in and said they needed Jack’s bed and literally within a minute all of his stuff was pulled out of the bed," she said.

"The doctor unplugged his oxygen, picked him up and moved us into what I would describe as a cupboard.

"They call it a treatment room. It was a room without a bed."

"He kept asking to lay down. He was without a bed for four-and-a-half hours.

“He needed to go to sleep and he needed to lay down. He started falling asleep and he ended up going to sleep on a pile of coats.

“There was no bed for him in A&E and there was no bed for him on the ward, so he just had to sleep on the floor.

“The room was full of medical supplies. Doctors and nurses were coming in constantly saying ‘sorry, can I just take this, can I just take that.

“I don’t have any issues with the doctors and the nurses, they were really lovely people and I want to make that clear.

“I was just feeling despair. He was so ill and I didn’t know why he was ill.

"I thought if he has got pneumonia, laying on a cold floor is not going to do him any good. He was so grey, he looked so ill.”

Mick 09-12-2019 23:11

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36019767)
So his mother must have put him on the floor if a seat was provided.

Exactly, then took a photo and then went straight to the Mirror with it, for Labour Propaganda.

---------- Post added at 22:11 ---------- Previous post was at 22:10 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019770)
Hard to lay down and sleep on a chair...

https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/le...-four-17385357

Then simple, you put them on your lap, it's not hard Hugh! :dozey:

nomadking 09-12-2019 23:13

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019766)
The Chief Medical Officer at the LGI must be mistaken, then?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-50713236

He WAS put in a bed, but somebody who had an actual need was put in it instead.
It was the mother who put him on the floor.
Link

Quote:

Jack was taken into Leeds General Infirmary last week after being ill for six days, his mother told the Mirror.
His mother said he had been seen as soon as he arrived and given a bed and oxygen, but a few hours later the bed had to be given to another patient and Jack was left without one for more than four hours.
His mother said she then made a makeshift bed for her son with coats and took the picture.

Pierre 09-12-2019 23:25

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019770)
Hard to lay down and sleep on a chair...

https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/le...-four-17385357

That would suggest he was triaged. Found not to be at risk and moved. Where he was, was needed for someone more in need so he was moved.

This just smacks of the usual bollocks come election time.

Damien 10-12-2019 08:54

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
It's worth pointing out the hospital isn't confirming or even suggesting it's fake, instead they've apologized and seem to have accepted it's happened.

There is a load of Facebook and Twitter accounts - none of whom seem to be verified NHS staff - flooding those respective networks with the suggestions it's fake. Many of whom claim to have 'friends' working in the hospital who are making these accusations.

Pierre 10-12-2019 09:31

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Indeed, there is a lot of social media chatter about it.

https://trending-uk.com/hashtag/leedshospital

And the activists organising a rabble

https://order-order.com/2019/12/09/h...ospital-visit/

It seems to me, that the boy was taken to A&E, he was seen and triaged and found to be neither an accident or an emergency. Whether he was initially given a bed or not, who knows. Rather than being held by his mother he was laid on the floor, not ideal, but if he didn’t “need” a bed then he didn’t need one.

This has been seized upon by a Labour activist, all power to the, as it has worked. But I think you’ll find this story disappears quickly as it is found to be fake.

What was real, and very poor, was Johnson’s handling of it.

Hugh 10-12-2019 09:41

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36019785)
It's worth pointing out the hospital isn't confirming or even suggesting it's fake, instead they've apologized and seem to have accepted it's happened.

There is a load of Facebook and Twitter accounts - none of whom seem to be verified NHS staff - flooding those respective networks with the suggestions it's fake. Many of whom claim to have 'friends' working in the hospital who are making these accusations.

Apparently there are a couple of hundred twitter/FB users who have a good friend who is a nursing sister at the LGI, and all used exactly the same words when they posted...

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...009262592.html

btw, another reason for doubting the validity of the "good friend who's a nursing sister at Leeds Hospital" is that no one in Leeds calls it "Leeds Hospital" - it's the LGI (or Jimmy's for the other main hospital, St James).

OLD BOY 10-12-2019 11:04

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36019789)
Indeed, there is a lot of social media chatter about it.

https://trending-uk.com/hashtag/leedshospital

And the activists organising a rabble

https://order-order.com/2019/12/09/h...ospital-visit/

It seems to me, that the boy was taken to A&E, he was seen and triaged and found to be neither an accident or an emergency. Whether he was initially given a bed or not, who knows. Rather than being held by his mother he was laid on the floor, not ideal, but if he didn’t “need” a bed then he didn’t need one.

This has been seized upon by a Labour activist, all power to the, as it has worked. But I think you’ll find this story disappears quickly as it is found to be fake.

What was real, and very poor, was Johnson’s handling of it.

Having seen the footage, it looks like Boris froze because he realised he was being pulled into a trap. He wanted to explain what he was doing about the NHS before looking at the photograph. I think most people will see through this for what it was - a political stunt, and shame on the mother for using her son in this way.

A nurse appeared on Radio 5 Live this morning to report that through her contacts with other nurses at the hospital, the staff were furious about this and said they would never place the child on the floor- that is not how they were trained. The child was not on a bed, in line with the claim made, but was on a trolley. The mother took him off the trolley, laid him on a pile of coats on the floor and took a photo, then put it out there.

How cynical can you get? Judging by the calls to the radio station that I heard (I had to turn off after 5 minutes), the public have sussed this out for what it is. Clearly, the Labour Party is getting desperate now.

jonbxx 10-12-2019 12:23

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
So the photo on the front of The Mirror yesterday was pretty bad press for the government so it looks like the right thing was done by sending Matt Hancock there to look into it. If, as people are saying this was a hoax and would never have happened and staff were furious about it, I would have imagined he would have found that out and be alerting the world to how low people would sink to make a political point. We have heard nothing...

So, what are the possibilities?;
  • The photo was real and a shocking indictment of the state of the NHS
  • Matt Hancock didn't get to the bottom of what happened and failed in his job
  • This situation somehow benefits the Conservative cause

I wouldn't rely on a large number of people who have a good friend who is a senior nursing sister and Leeds Hospital to refute the claim

papa smurf 10-12-2019 13:54

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Woops it's an own goal
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/politi...-stand-corbyn/

A LABOUR bigwig has been caught out saying voters “can’t stand” Jeremy Corbyn and revealing his fears for national security under him in a bombshell leaked tape.

Shadow Health Secretary Jon Ashworth admitted Labour’s chances of winning seats in the North were “abysmal” and that he “can’t see” Mr Corbyn getting to No10.

Chris 10-12-2019 14:42

Re: Election 2019 - Week 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36019803)
Woops it's an own goal
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/politi...-stand-corbyn/

A LABOUR bigwig has been caught out saying voters “can’t stand” Jeremy Corbyn and revealing his fears for national security under him in a bombshell leaked tape.

Shadow Health Secretary Jon Ashworth admitted Labour’s chances of winning seats in the North were “abysmal” and that he “can’t see” Mr Corbyn getting to No10.

You can see him trying to squirm out of it in a live TV interview this morning:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50726592

And during the BBC’s Daily Politics this lunchtime, which played back the recording to him live on air:

https://order-order.com/2019/12/10/a...politics-live/

Ashworth is smug even for a Labour MP. This really couldn’t have happened to a nicer person.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:15.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum