Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Welsh 16 year olds get the vote (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33708438)

Taf 27-11-2019 18:34

Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
16 and 17-year-olds, plus 33,000 foreign nationals, will be able to vote in the 2021 Welsh Assembly election.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-50561883

Sephiroth 30-11-2019 09:42

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
They’d better all learn that funny language then!

But more seriously (and it is good to preserve ancient languages), 16 year olds have no basis of worldly experience on which to make valid judgements. It is a very dangerous thing to give kids the vote. Even 18 is questionable seeing how those idiots seem to be flocking to Corbyn.

At that age, I too voted Labour just because I couldn’t see why toffs should be so rich. It quickly became apparent when I got my first mortgage why we should strive to better ourselves financially and why the Unions needed bringing under control - hence I switched to Conservative where I have remained.


Mr K 30-11-2019 09:53

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36018713)
They’d better all learn that funny language then!

But more seriously (and it is good to preserve ancient languages), 16 year olds have no basis of worldly experience on which to make valid judgements. It is a very dangerous thing to give kids the vote. Even 18 is questionable seeing how those idiots seem to be flocking to Corbyn.

At that age, I too voted Labour just because I couldn’t see why toffs should be so rich. It quickly became apparent when I got my first mortgage why we should strive to better ourselves financially and why the Unions needed bringing under control - hence I switched to Conservative where I have remained.


A new Govt. will take a 16 year old, up to the age of 21. Arguably the most important time of their lives? Why shouldn't they have a say? Give them a bit of credit, they are your future.

denphone 30-11-2019 09:59

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36018716)
A new Govt. will take a 16 year old, up to the age of 21. Arguably the most important time of their lives? Why shouldn't they have a say? Give them a bit of credit, they are your future.

Of course they should be able to vote at 16 as its pretty condescending to say they don't know enough to be able to come to a informed decision before they vote.

OLD BOY 30-11-2019 10:01

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36018716)
A new Govt. will take a 16 year old, up to the age of 21. Arguably the most important time of their lives? Why shouldn't they have a say? Give them a bit of credit, they are your future.

Seph answered your question in his last post. Young people still in full time education have little experience of the world and have an idealistic sense of the world. They also tend to believe what their left-wing teachers tell them.

You are expecting them to vote when they have only very recently woken up to politics and what is happening around the world.

Sephiroth 30-11-2019 10:04

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36018716)
A new Govt. will take a 16 year old, up to the age of 21. Arguably the most important time of their lives? Why shouldn't they have a say? Give them a bit of credit, they are your future.

Give them credit for what? Understanding how things work, how wheels turn, how judgements should be made in the context of history and extant situations? Wisdom comes with age.

Maybe a youth Parliament with one elected representative to the Welsh assembly? But votes at 16 is a ridiculous proposition - I fear that it will take hold in the UK. Next it’ll be they can be MPs, too young to buy alcohol, too young to drive but allowed to legislate there on. Quite ridiculous.

Taf 30-11-2019 11:13

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Labour was the driving force behind this, backed by the Welsh nationalists. Desperate for votes I suspect.

Not so long ago they argued that a jihadi bride should be allowed to return to the UK as she probably did not understand what she was doing at age 16 when she left. But she understands enough to vote?

papa smurf 30-11-2019 11:32

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36018725)
Labour was the driving force behind this, backed by the Welsh nationalists. Desperate for votes I suspect.

Not so long ago they argued that a jihadi bride should be allowed to return to the UK as she probably did not understand what she was doing at age 16 when she left. But she understands enough to vote?

She'll understand enough to vote Labour the terrorists best friend.

jfman 30-11-2019 11:48

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36018719)
Give them credit for what? Understanding how things work, how wheels turn, how judgements should be made in the context of history and extant situations? Wisdom comes with age.



Exactly, look at Stanley Johnson, so old and wise he got on TV and told the British public just what idiots they are!

Quote:

Maybe a youth Parliament with one elected representative to the Welsh assembly? But votes at 16 is a ridiculous proposition - I fear that it will take hold in the UK. Next it’ll be they can be MPs, too young to buy alcohol, too young to drive but allowed to legislate there on. Quite ridiculous.
Old enough to pay tax.

At least you’ve been honest enough that when you were young you were more left wing/less right wing, so merely see it as a function to gerrymander election results by restricting the franchise.

The real fear of course is that 16-17 year olds vote for their economic interests much like pensioners do.

nomadking 30-11-2019 12:11

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018732)
Exactly, look at Stanley Johnson, so old and wise he got on TV and told the British public just what idiots they are!

Old enough to pay tax.

At least you’ve been honest enough that when you were young you were more left wing/less right wing, so merely see it as a function to gerrymander election results by restricting the franchise.

The real fear of course is that 16-17 year olds vote for their economic interests much like pensioners do.

I remember being potentially liable for tax when I was just 14 years old(Summer holiday job).

jfman 30-11-2019 14:16

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36018734)
I remember being potentially liable for tax when I was just 14 years old(Summer holiday job).

Potentially.

Hom3r 30-11-2019 22:18

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Personally I'd raise the voting age to 21. Along with Drinking, smoking, gambling.

nomadking 30-11-2019 22:29

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018753)
Potentially.

Wouldn't have reached the tax allowance. I was still "assessed".

Child showbiz stars must pay tax. Don't know how it works nowadays, but back then it was added to a parents tax. My father had to declare it.

jonbxx 02-12-2019 09:14

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Here's the Conservative case for extending the vote to 16 and 17 year olds - https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/...-at-16-and-17/

In a worst case, with the voting age being 18, you could be essentially disenfranchised until you are nearly 23 under the Fixed Term Parliaments Act. In this time, you could have been working for 6 years or studied for A Levels, got a Degree and be 2/3 of the way through a Ph.D. at the other end of things.

I would suggest that the years from 16 to 23 years old are some of the years that will have the largest impact on your life. There are other life events of course but those years are certainly up there and the breadth of opportunity is never wider than at this point. Not being able to have an influence in how the country is run seems unfair to me.

mrmistoffelees 02-12-2019 10:14

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36018900)
Here's the Conservative case for extending the vote to 16 and 17 year olds - https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/...-at-16-and-17/

In a worst case, with the voting age being 18, you could be essentially disenfranchised until you are nearly 23 under the Fixed Term Parliaments Act. In this time, you could have been working for 6 years or studied for A Levels, got a Degree and be 2/3 of the way through a Ph.D. at the other end of things.

I would suggest that the years from 16 to 23 years old are some of the years that will have the largest impact on your life. There are other life events of course but those years are certainly up there and the breadth of opportunity is never wider than at this point. Not being able to have an influence in how the country is run seems unfair to me.


Indeed, a sixteen year old can choose to defend their country, yet is denied a voice in how that country should be run.

papa smurf 02-12-2019 10:38

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36018906)
Indeed, a sixteen year old can choose to defend their country, yet is denied a voice in how that country should be run.

They can't fight on the front line until they are adults,and that is aged 18.

mrmistoffelees 02-12-2019 10:51

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36018909)
They can't fight on the front line until they are adults,and that is aged 18.

I know, but you don't have to be on a front line to be at risk. Although of course the risk increases significantly.

papa smurf 02-12-2019 11:28

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36018910)
I know, but you don't have to be on a front line to be at risk. Although of course the risk increases significantly.

What do they do that puts them at risk?

mrmistoffelees 02-12-2019 11:33

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36018916)
What do they do that puts them at risk?

I dont know off hand, but I'm sure there are some... even the training they would undertake puts them at a degree of risk both physically and mentally?


'Thanks very much for your service you're grown up enough for that, but not to decide who should run our country' ?

pip08456 02-12-2019 12:09

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36018917)
I dont know off hand, but I'm sure there are some... even the training they would undertake puts them at a degree of risk both physically and mentally?


'Thanks very much for your service you're grown up enough for that, but not to decide who should run our country' ?

Nor to fight for it.

Carth 02-12-2019 12:09

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
If the government . . whoever that turns out to be . . gives 16yr olds the vote, then they'd better start treating them as adults and pay them the benefits they currently aren't allowed until they reach 18.

I'm sure there will be more age related anomalies, but this one is a starter.


edit:
oh, and stop giving them anonymity in court too

mrmistoffelees 02-12-2019 12:36

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36018926)
Nor to fight for it.

OK, so service to country isn't enough?
Paying tax isn't enough?

jfman 02-12-2019 12:43

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36018935)
OK, so service to country isn't enough?
Paying tax isn't enough?

Would be a different story if they had a greater propensity to vote Conservative.

The generation who have squandered this countries wealth for the last 40 years want to pull up the drawbridge and cling onto this failed model for their lives.

Adding more younger voters who can see the obvious disparities in the system would go against that.

Sephiroth 02-12-2019 12:45

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36018935)
OK, so service to country isn't enough?
Paying tax isn't enough?

They are kids.

mrmistoffelees 02-12-2019 12:49

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36018941)

They are kids.


They are kids who are providing service to their country. Additionally they are paying taxes into this country that are then spent by people who they have no choice in selecting.

Damien 02-12-2019 14:17

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
I think the voting age should be lowered to 16. I don't think the arguments about their lack of knowledge are convincing because we don't apply a mental capacity test before people are entitled to vote. People at 18 don't become suddenly able to make an informed judgment and neither are all adults making an 'informed' decision. People vote for all sorts of reasons and it's a bad path to go down for others to decide if those reasons are valid or not.

They are deemed wise enough to be tried as an adult for crimes, to join (if not fight) the army and to pay taxes. If we think they are able to make these decisions for themselves and to pay for the services the government provides then they should be able to vote.

In the end voting is a right, not a privilege, and so you need a very good reason to deny people that right.

nomadking 02-12-2019 14:32

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
They don't suddenly become more knowledgeable and mature at 16. Children can be in a situation where they pay tax, then again if you're going to use that argument, what happens to those who don't pay tax, or incorrectly declare it(eg Jeremy Corbyn).

mrmistoffelees 02-12-2019 15:00

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36018962)
They don't suddenly become more knowledgeable and mature at 16. Children can be in a situation where they pay tax, then again if you're going to use that argument, what happens to those who don't pay tax, or incorrectly declare it(eg Jeremy Corbyn).

Fair enough, then exclude anyone under the age of eighteen from paying tax ? and don't allow them to enlist in the armed forces.


Sound reasonable?

---------- Post added at 15:00 ---------- Previous post was at 14:59 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36018962)
They don't suddenly become more knowledgeable and mature at 16. Children can be in a situation where they pay tax, then again if you're going to use that argument, what happens to those who don't pay tax, or incorrectly declare it(eg Jeremy Corbyn).

As with everything there's balance required. there will be a proportion of sixteen year olds with a lot wiser heads then those over the age of eighteen.

denphone 02-12-2019 15:19

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36018960)
I think the voting age should be lowered to 16. I don't think the arguments about their lack of knowledge are convincing because we don't apply a mental capacity test before people are entitled to vote. People at 18 don't become suddenly able to make an informed judgment and neither are all adults making an 'informed' decision. People vote for all sorts of reasons and it's a bad path to go down for others to decide if those reasons are valid or not.

They are deemed wise enough to be tried as an adult for crimes, to join (if not fight) the army and to pay taxes. If we think they are able to make these decisions for themselves and to pay for the services the government provides then they should be able to vote.

In the end voting is a right, not a privilege, and so you need a very good reason to deny people that right.

The post of the last few weeks need l say more..:tu:

jfman 02-12-2019 15:20

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36018962)
They don't suddenly become more knowledgeable and mature at 16. Children can be in a situation where they pay tax, then again if you're going to use that argument, what happens to those who don't pay tax, or incorrectly declare it(eg Jeremy Corbyn).

It’s an arbitrary line at 16 just as much as it is 18. People go on about “world wisdom” achieved by 16 and 17 year olds without any real evidence for it.

Why don’t we restrict the franchise to the well educated? Property owners? Landed gentry? They’re all obviously ridiculous ideas. However so is the notion that someone is so much wiser simply because they are older.

Sephiroth 03-12-2019 10:24

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018968)
It’s an arbitrary line at 16 just as much as it is 18. People go on about “world wisdom” achieved by 16 and 17 year olds without any real evidence for it.

Why don’t we restrict the franchise to the well educated? Property owners? Landed gentry? They’re all obviously ridiculous ideas. However so is the notion that someone is so much wiser simply because they are older.

Don’t be silly. It’s an axiom that the older you are the greater wisdom you have gathered. From that flows the valid hypothesis that you have very much less wisdom at 16 or 18. Hence the debate about giving the vote to impressionable youth who cannot fully exercise sound political judgement.

I know what bits of the above you’ll pick out to challenge, but most people know that you are being uselessly provocative.

Shall we meet for a curry some day?

jfman 03-12-2019 11:41

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
One could equally argue that the media coverage of many issues indicates just how impressionable the entire electorate is - with minor issues inflated in the absence of evidence.

Even outwith the political sphere - the MMR vaccine is one example of the people being influenced against the evidence.

Hugh 03-12-2019 12:02

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36019039)
Don’t be silly. It’s an axiom that the older you are the greater wisdom you have gathered. From that flows the valid hypothesis that you have very much less wisdom at 16 or 18. Hence the debate about giving the vote to impressionable youth who cannot fully exercise sound political judgement.

I know what bits of the above you’ll pick out to challenge, but most people know that you are being uselessly provocative.

Shall we meet for a curry some day?

It's only an axiom if it's true, otherwise it's circular reasoning...

I know quite a few older people who seem to get less wise as they get older, who refuse to entertain new ideas or thoughts or approaches, and are quite fixed and rigid in their thinking - wisdom is experience, knowledge, and good judgement, not just having lived longer.

Sephiroth 03-12-2019 12:46

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
So, you can cho off at each end and you have the rump which matches the axiom.

Hugh 03-12-2019 16:08

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36019052)
So, you can cho off at each end and you have the rump which matches the axiom.

Again, only if you take your initial premise as true (which I don't), and then accept your secondary premise (which, again, I don't).

I believe that wisdom comes from self-insight (the ability to understand that you don't know everything), and anything you do know could be proven incorrect by different information and understandings, self-awareness of yourself in the context of the era you live in and and your family history (as we are all shaped by our experiences), understanding that priorities and values(including your own) are not absolute, and an awareness of life’s ambiguities.

tl:dr - we don't know everything, we should realise we don't know everything, we should try to always learn more, and try not to think in absolutes.

ymmv ;)

Damien 03-12-2019 18:38

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
You should be much more suspicious of someone who thinks they have everything figured out than those who openly admit ignorance. ;)

(I, of course, do know everything but that's a coincidence)

Sephiroth 03-12-2019 18:46

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019068)
Again, only if you take your initial premise as true (which I don't), and then accept your secondary premise (which, again, I don't).

I believe that wisdom comes from self-insight (the ability to understand that you don't know everything), and anything you do know could be proven incorrect by different information and understandings, self-awareness of yourself in the context of the era you live in and and your family history (as we are all shaped by our experiences), understanding that priorities and values(including your own) are not absolute, and an awareness of life’s ambiguities.

tl:dr - we don't know everything, we should realise we don't know everything, we should try to always learn more, and try not to think in absolutes.

ymmv ;)

.... and there we have it: wisdom.

papa smurf 03-12-2019 19:19

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36019086)
You should be much more suspicious of someone who thinks they have everything figured out than those who openly admit ignorance. ;)

(I, of course, do know everything but that's a coincidence)

“Any fool can know. The point is to understand.”
― Albert Einstein ;)

Pierre 03-12-2019 22:00

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Well it wasn’t so long ago they were down ‘pit so why not?

denphone 04-12-2019 05:20

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36019136)
Well it wasn’t so long ago they were down ‘pit so why not?

At the age of 7 in some cases until later it became illegal for a boy under 12 to work down a mine.

OLD BOY 04-12-2019 10:00

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36019149)
At the age of 7 in some cases until later it became illegal for a boy under 12 to work down a mine.

Just as well jfman wasn't around then as he would have been campaigning for 7-year-olds to have the vote! :D

denphone 04-12-2019 10:05

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36019170)
Just as well jfman wasn't around then as he would have been campaigning for 7-year-olds to have the vote! :D

l somehow doubt it OB.;)

papa smurf 04-12-2019 10:41

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36019149)
At the age of 7 in some cases until later it became illegal for a boy under 12 to work down a mine.

Once Arthur Scargill got involved no one was actually working down the mines;)

Gavin78 04-12-2019 22:33

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
16 year olds can be easily influenced as well

Hugh 05-12-2019 21:00

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gavin78 (Post 36019241)
16 year olds can be easily influenced as well

So can 65 year olds.

Sephiroth 05-12-2019 21:15

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019324)
So can 65 year olds.

Evidence? Will you suddenly turn influencible in two years?

jonbxx 06-12-2019 09:41

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Influence is an interesting argument. A big factor is how different age groups get their information and what they do with it. This paper is quite interesting - https://www.researchgate.net/publica...ion_as_leveler

Unsurprisingly, it shows that social media is a large influencer with the young while traditional print and TV media has a greater impact in older groups. There is a definite 'push' vs.'pull' effect here. Good social media advertising will be well targeted tote receiver and the parties who are good at this will have some success. In this case, information is 'pushed' to the receiver. In print media, we tend to buy papers which reflect us and our values and so to an extent confirms what we think already - the recipient 'pulls' the information.

This works to the extent where groups of people with certain political alignments are almost defined by the media they consume such as centre left 'Guardianistas'.

So, are the young more easily influenced than the old? By influenced, I mean more likely to change their mind on who to vote for. Probably yes but the question is why? I can think of a few reasons;
  • Using a broader church of media reduces confirmation bias
  • Use of the resources such as the internet allows a deeper level of fact checking
  • Interaction with a broader demographic (see this forum as a good example)
  • Political advertising can be targeted or 'pushed' to the audience

Carth 06-12-2019 11:32

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36019359)

So, are the young more easily influenced than the old? By influenced, I mean more likely to change their mind on who to vote for. Probably yes but the question is why? I can think of a few reasons;
  • Using a broader church of media reduces confirmation bias
  • Use of the resources such as the internet allows a deeper level of fact checking
  • Interaction with a broader demographic (see this forum as a good example)
  • Political advertising can be targeted or 'pushed' to the audience

Influencing has become so much easier and far reaching due to the magic of the internet and TV.

We are all targeted by influencing all day long, but the 'older' generation have learned (by experience) that much of it is just a con job.

Political influencing is no different to the bombardment of product advertising that hits us whenever we turn something on, they're just trying to 'sell' you a person/promise/idea instead of a product . . actually no, most political parties are now a product too ;)

It's up to the individual and their mindset, coupled with prior experience, which is usually the factor in deciding whether a 'product' is worth all the hype thrown at you about it.

Younger people - in my opinion - are more easily swayed by bull pooh than those who have experienced treading in it a few times :D


edit: see sig below :Yes:

jonbxx 06-12-2019 12:18

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36019371)
It's up to the individual and their mindset, coupled with prior experience, which is usually the factor in deciding whether a 'product' is worth all the hype thrown at you about it.

Younger people - in my opinion - are more easily swayed by bull pooh than those who have experienced treading in it a few times :D


edit: see sig below :Yes:

Or, to put it another way, the young are more open minded that the old.

The number of times I have heard older people recite what they have been told by the Express and Mail which are, at best half truths and at worst lies suggests that they are influenced.

Carth 06-12-2019 12:55

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36019376)
Or, to put it another way, the young are more open minded that the old.

The number of times I have heard older people recite what they have been told by the Express and Mail which are, at best half truths and at worst lies suggests that they are influenced.

Oh I'm not saying the older generation aren't influenced, but I think the younger ones are more 'open' to being influenced.

There are people of both generations that are easily led (as the saying goes) but it's only life experiences that allow people to judge and trust the information delivered to them . . if they can be bothered to do so ;)

papa smurf 06-12-2019 13:34

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36019378)
Oh I'm not saying the older generation aren't influenced, but I think the younger ones are more 'open' to being influenced.

There are people of both generations that are easily led (as the saying goes) but it's only life experiences that allow people to judge and trust the information delivered to them . . if they can be bothered to do so ;)

A fresh sponge soaks up more syrup,but the syrup just runs off an old sponge;)

Sephiroth 06-12-2019 16:35

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36019359)
Influence is an interesting argument. A big factor is how different age groups get their information and what they do with it. This paper is quite interesting - https://www.researchgate.net/publica...ion_as_leveler

Unsurprisingly, it shows that social media is a large influencer with the young while traditional print and TV media has a greater impact in older groups. There is a definite 'push' vs.'pull' effect here. Good social media advertising will be well targeted tote receiver and the parties who are good at this will have some success. In this case, information is 'pushed' to the receiver. In print media, we tend to buy papers which reflect us and our values and so to an extent confirms what we think already - the recipient 'pulls' the information.

This works to the extent where groups of people with certain political alignments are almost defined by the media they consume such as centre left 'Guardianistas'.

So, are the young more easily influenced than the old? By influenced, I mean more likely to change their mind on who to vote for. Probably yes but the question is why? I can think of a few reasons;
  • Using a broader church of media reduces confirmation bias
  • Use of the resources such as the internet allows a deeper level of fact checking
  • Interaction with a broader demographic (see this forum as a good example)
  • Political advertising can be targeted or 'pushed' to the audience

Well argued.

---------- Post added at 16:33 ---------- Previous post was at 16:31 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36019376)
Or, to put it another way, the young are more open minded that the old.

The number of times I have heard older people recite what they have been told by the Express and Mail which are, at best half truths and at worst lies suggests that they are influenced.

Now you've gone and spoiled it!

The young are more open minded - yes; ability to properly digest what's pushed to them - less likely until they've got a lot older.


---------- Post added at 16:35 ---------- Previous post was at 16:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36019380)
A fresh sponge soaks up more syrup,but the syrup just runs off an old sponge;)

A fresh sponge is unlikley to know the difference between proper syrup and fake syrup.

OLD BOY 07-12-2019 10:07

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Most of us were idealists when we were young. Then reality got in the way and we realised that things were not so cut and dried.

Experience of life changes that innocent perspective.

Taf 07-12-2019 11:26

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

The Jeremy Corbyn-supporting group (momentum) claims it has identified a loophole in Electoral Commission rules allowing it unlimited spending.
Quote:

Momentum incurred the biggest-ever election fine in 2017 for failing to provide enough information about its spending.
Quote:

In an email to supporters on Thursday, it said it had realised something 'huge' – that there was 'no limit' on spending to get young people to vote.

It said: '£100k was the target for our social media ad blitz. Why? That's how much 'regulated spend' we have left for social media ads according to electoral rules.

'But we've realised something huge. Although our ad spend promoting Labour is capped – there is no limit on how much we can spend targeting hard-to-reach young people and making sure they vote.
Quote:

'This is a game changer – and with no cap we're aiming sky high. Nearly 2.4 million young people live in marginals. If we can raise £300k in the next six days we can reach every single one of them.'

But strict Electoral Commission rules state that non-party campaigners can run a campaign with the intention of 'encouraging people to vote, but not for anyone in particular'. They add: 'The primary intention of your campaign may not be to influence voters.'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...outh-vote.html

Carth 07-12-2019 12:02

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Nearly 2.4 million young people live in marginals. If we can raise £300k in the next six days we can reach every single one of them.'


If they could raise £300k in the next six days it would pay for 10 extra nurses this year ;)

Hugh 07-12-2019 13:35

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36019480)
If they could raise £300k in the next six days it would pay for 10 extra nurses this year ;)

tbf, they only need to pay for 6 of them, as 4 would be staying on, but still count as new nurses, apparently... ;)

Sephiroth 07-12-2019 15:02

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019484)
tbf, they only need to pay for 6 of them, as 4 would be staying on, but still count as new nurses, apparently... ;)

Did you miss the obvious? Staying on means being paid; leaving means new nurses who also have to be paid. Doh.

TheDaddy 07-12-2019 15:58

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36019493)
Did you miss the obvious? Staying on means being paid; leaving means new nurses who also have to be paid. Doh.

I'd say Hugh spotted the obvious and wasn't fooled by the shysters, if you omit to mention certain key facts in an attempt to gain greater political capital out of it you're still a lying piece of crap not worthy of the office held

Sephiroth 07-12-2019 16:11

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36019495)
I'd say Hugh spotted the obvious and wasn't fooled by the shysters, if you omit to mention certain key facts in an attempt to gain greater political capital out of it you're still a lying piece of crap not worthy of the office held

Thing is, much as I don't like Boris, the maths stacks up for the reasons I gave.

However, if it's interpretation, namely that Boris has offered 50,000 additional nurses, after replacing those who leave, then the other side will complain.

papa smurf 07-12-2019 16:13

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36019495)
I'd say Hugh spotted the obvious and wasn't fooled by the shysters, if you omit to mention certain key facts in an attempt to gain greater political capital out of it you're still a lying piece of crap not worthy of the office held

Like not mentioning the Kremlin slipped jezza a dodgy dossier.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...nhs-documents/

Hugh 07-12-2019 16:32

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36019493)
Did you miss the obvious? Staying on means being paid; leaving means new nurses who also have to be paid. Doh.

So now the definition of "more" includes those who aren't additional, but are already there.

"Darling, I've bought one more shirt"

"But you have had that shirt for five years"

"Ah, but instead of throwing the shirt out because the collar was frayed, I had it repaired, so now I have one more shirt than I had before..."
*

Or if you want to use your "logic"...

"Darling, I've bought one more house"

"But we're still in the same house!"

"Ah, but if we are still paying for the house, it's a new house..."
*

OK, then... :confused:

*analogy

Sephiroth 07-12-2019 17:16

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019498)
So now the definition of "more" includes those who aren't additional, but are already there.

"Darling, I've bought one more shirt"

"But you have had that shirt for five years"

"Ah, but instead of throwing the shirt out because the collar was frayed, I had it repaired, so now I have one more shirt than I had before..."
*

Or if you want to use your "logic"...

"Darling, I've bought one more house"

"But we're still in the same house!"

"Ah, but if we are still paying for the house, it's a new house..."
*

OK, then... :confused:

*analogy

Don't be ridiculous. None of your analogies stack up. My logic is simple and totally aligned to the nurses maths..

If you have 5 shirts and a budget to buy 3 more, but one of them is to be retired you will be buying 4 shirts. (EDIT: 4 shirts not 5 - typo)


Carth 07-12-2019 17:31

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36019499)
If you have 5 shirts and a budget to buy 3 more, but one of them is to be retired you will be buying 5 shirts.

:spin:

My mathematical education didn't reach much beyond algebra, so the quantum physics above has completely bamboozled me, sorry :shrug:

OLD BOY 07-12-2019 17:36

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019498)
So now the definition of "more" includes those who aren't additional, but are already there.

"Darling, I've bought one more shirt"

"But you have had that shirt for five years"

"Ah, but instead of throwing the shirt out because the collar was frayed, I had it repaired, so now I have one more shirt than I had before..."
*

Or if you want to use your "logic"...

"Darling, I've bought one more house"

"But we're still in the same house!"

"Ah, but if we are still paying for the house, it's a new house..."
*

OK, then... :confused:

*analogy

Did you attend the Diane Abbott School of Mathematics?

---------- Post added at 17:36 ---------- Previous post was at 17:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36019499)
Don't be ridiculous. None of your analogies stack up. My logic is simple and totally aligned to the nurses maths..

If you have 5 shirts and a budget to buy 3 more, but one of them is to be retired you will be buying 5 shirts.


Er, Seth, would you mind explaining that to me?

Sephiroth 07-12-2019 17:43

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36019500)
:spin:

My mathematical education didn't reach much beyond algebra, so the quantum physics above has completely bamboozled me, sorry :shrug:

LOL Carth. The fifth shirt disappeared into the quantum world.
It's 4 shirts now.


---------- Post added at 17:43 ---------- Previous post was at 17:42 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36019501)
Did you attend the Diane Abbott School of Mathematics?

---------- Post added at 17:36 ---------- Previous post was at 17:33 ----------



Er, Seth, would you mind explaining that to me?

Now corrected in my post, OB.

OLD BOY 07-12-2019 18:47

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36019503)
LOL Carth. The fifth shirt disappeared into the quantum world.
It's 4 shirts now.


---------- Post added at 17:43 ---------- Previous post was at 17:42 ----------



Now corrected in my post, OB.

Thank you for explaining your logic, Seph, but I must point out that this has blown your budget and you are now overdrawn!

Sephiroth 07-12-2019 18:51

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36019511)
Thank you for explaining your logic, Seph, but I must point out that this has blown your budget and you are now overdrawn!

From you, OB, I can take that.

From H... and J.... I can't/won't. One seems to be the argumentative morph of the other.

Hugh 07-12-2019 19:38

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36019499)
Don't be ridiculous. None of your analogies stack up. My logic is simple and totally aligned to the nurses maths..

If you have 5 shirts and a budget to buy 3 more, but one of them is to be retired you will be buying 4 shirts. (EDIT: 4 shirts not 5 - typo)


But in the real world, the shirt/nurse isn’t retiring and being replaced, they’re being retained/staying on...

From the Nursing Times

Quote:

The Conservative manifesto could have been a positive one for nursing if the party had been upfront from the start about its recruitment targets, nursing academics have said.

The Tories have continued to face a backlash over their general election pledge for “50,000 more nurses”, after it emerged that up to 18,500 of those would be retained nurses already in the workforce....

... A spokesman for the Conservative Party provided Nursing Times with a breakdown of the 50,000-figure. By 2024-25, the Tories are pledging:

14,000 nursing undergraduates and postgraduates;
5,000 nurse apprentices through an “expanded” apprenticeship scheme;
12,500 internationally recruited nurses;
18,500 nurses either remaining in the profession or convinced to return to practice.
I apologise for the fact that reality, and the Tory Party spokesman, does not reflect your opinion...

Sephiroth 07-12-2019 19:43

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019526)
But in the real world, the shirt/nurse isn’t retiring and being replaced, they’re being retained/staying on...

.... and you still have to pay them instead of recruiting new nurses. Doh.

Hugh 07-12-2019 19:46

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36019528)
.... and you still have to pay them instead of recruiting new nurses. Doh.

And you still have to wash and iron your old shirt - that doesn’t make it a new shirt.

Anyway, please fell free to disagree with the Tory Party spokesman (I can explain it to you, I can’t understand it for you)...

Sephiroth 07-12-2019 19:51

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019529)
And you still have to wash and iron your old shirt - that doesn’t make it a new shirt.

Anyway, please fell free to disagree with the Tory Party spokesman (I can explain it to you, I can’t understand it for you)...

But it makes it more nurses because the other one would not have been retained. Very simples.

Hugh 08-12-2019 10:13

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/election-2019-50701104
Quote:

Sophy Ridge asks this of the prime minister as they move on to two of his most contentious promises - the "50,000 more nurses" and "40 new hospitals".

The PM concedes that there will actually only be 31,000 new nurses, while the others are those who - he says - "who would leave the system unless we put the investment in now".

"When you’re talking about delivering more nurses most people would not accept that people who are already working in the NHS are new nurses," the interviewer points out.
In the same interview
Quote:

In regard to the seed funding for hospitals that we mentioned a couple of posts ago, Mr Johnson says: "You don’t put seed funding into schemes that have no merit. We’re talking about tens of millions of pounds to start architects’ drawings, to start business cases, to start planning permission to get these things going, that’s what you need to do and that’s what we are doing.This is a very dynamic and very ambitious government."
He must have forgotten about the £53 million seed money spent on the London Garden Bridge...

Mick 08-12-2019 12:38

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36019528)
.... and you still have to pay them instead of recruiting new nurses. Doh.

I do not want to see this kind of tone and talk, “Doh”, at the end of your reply.

Mr K 08-12-2019 14:22

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
How about a compromise? 17? Old enough to take responsibility for a car, then old enough to vote.
Young people are our future and we shouldn't be so down on them all the time.

Sephiroth 08-12-2019 16:41

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019569)
How about a compromise? 17? Old enough to take responsibility for a car, then old enough to vote.
Young people are our future and we shouldn't be so down on them all the time.

Not old enough to buy alcohol & cigarettes.

Mr K 08-12-2019 16:59

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36019613)
Not old enough to buy alcohol & cigarettes.

But old enough to get married/procreate. It's for 5 years ahead which takes them into their 20's, the most important time of their lives, where the Govt. Of the day could influence many things for them. There's only one reason why the Govt. don't want young people to vote and we know what that is.

We could equally say anyone over 75 shouldn't vote as mentally they maybe aren't up to it, they probably aren't paying much tax, and don't have much of a stake in the future. It'd be wrong, but more of a case than denying 16/17 year olds a say in their future.

TheDaddy 09-12-2019 09:34

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36019613)
Not old enough to buy alcohol & cigarettes.

Both things detrimental to health, are you saying being having a say politically is as detrimental to health or something?

Carth 09-12-2019 14:56

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Lets face it, anyone with a definite interest and understanding of politics at the age of 16 probably leads a very uninteresting life.

At that age I was only interested in music, my guitar, football, girls, and my new job . . not necessarily in that order. Politics (and religion) was something old people talked about :p:


to be fair, not much has changed :D

OLD BOY 09-12-2019 16:51

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019619)
But old enough to get married/procreate. It's for 5 years ahead which takes them into their 20's, the most important time of their lives, where the Govt. Of the day could influence many things for them. There's only one reason why the Govt. don't want young people to vote and we know what that is.

We could equally say anyone over 75 shouldn't vote as mentally they maybe aren't up to it, they probably aren't paying much tax, and don't have much of a stake in the future. It'd be wrong, but more of a case than denying 16/17 year olds a say in their future.

Yes, procreate so many children that you can't afford to raise them without relying on huge payments from the State. Common sense is not much in abundance for the majority of 16-year-olds. The minimum voting age should be 25. Most people have at least a degree of maturity by then.

Damien 09-12-2019 20:16

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
I love how many 'democrats' are for limiting the franchise to those they deem worthy.

Hugh 09-12-2019 20:43

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36019738)
I love how many 'democrats' are for limiting the franchise to those they deem worthy.

In Afghanistan, the average age of British Forces casualties is 22 - two hundred soldiers have been killed in their twenties and 31 teenagers are among the death toll.

But sure, let’s propose taking away their right to vote...

OLD BOY 09-12-2019 21:30

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019742)
In Afghanistan, the average age of British Forces casualties is 22 - two hundred soldiers have been killed in their twenties and 31 teenagers are among the death toll.

But sure, let’s propose taking away their right to vote...

I know - let's make an exception for those serving in the Armed Forces. :D

Hugh 09-12-2019 21:56

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36019754)
I know - let's make an exception for those serving in the Armed Forces. :D

They fight to defend democracy, not to be an exception to it.

Mick 09-12-2019 22:15

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019764)
They fight to defend democracy, not to be an exception to it.

Wrong actually - they choose to fight because they have volunteered to do so, this should not give them automatic right to do something just because they opted to join the military.

Hugh 10-12-2019 08:37

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36019774)
Wrong actually - they choose to fight because they have volunteered to do so, this should not give them automatic right to do something just because they opted to join the military.

I think we’re in agreement about this - they should not be an exception.

OLD BOY 10-12-2019 10:08

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019790)
I think we’re in agreement about this - they should not be an exception.

I agree, my post was tongue in cheek, as most will have realised. But nor should they have the vote as most are not mature enough to understand the context of the things they see. A few years away from academia and into the real world generally starts to make them question what they once believed.

Maggy 10-12-2019 13:20

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
If someone is deemed old enough to fight for their country then they are old enough to vote.

papa smurf 10-12-2019 13:32

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36019804)
If someone is deemed old enough to fight for their country then they are old enough to vote.

Exactly and that is 18 years old as 16 year olds don't fight.

Maggy 10-12-2019 14:46

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Also if someone fights for this country then they should automatically become citizens but that's a whole other can of worms.

OLD BOY 10-12-2019 16:40

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36019804)
If someone is deemed old enough to fight for their country then they are old enough to vote.

No, they are not. They may be physically strong, but mentally they would not have fully developed.

Choosing who runs the country is an important matter and we cannot afford for young people to have the vote when they can so easily be influenced by adults close to them.

If there is an issue here, it should be the minimum age at which you can fight for your country that is raised, not the voting age that is lowered.

Mr K 10-12-2019 17:19

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36019835)
No, they are not. They may be physically strong, but mentally they would not have fully developed.

Choosing who runs the country is an important matter and we cannot afford for young people to have the vote when they can so easily be influenced by adults close to them.

If there is an issue here, it should be the minimum age at which you can fight for your country that is raised, not the voting age that is lowered.

Lol, you can't afford them to have a vote when they might not vote the way you want them to more like!

Youngsters today are better educated and more informed than ever. I'm afraid it's older generation that tend to be more bigoted and influenced by tabloids. There should definitely be an IQ test before you're allowed to vote, age should be irrelevant.

papa smurf 10-12-2019 17:27

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019843)
Lol, you can't afford them to have a vote when they might not vote the way you want them to more like!

Youngsters today are better educated and more informed than ever. I'm afraid it's older generation that tend to be more bigoted and influenced by tabloids. There should definitely be an IQ test before you're allowed to vote, age should be irrelevant.

You should stop doing yourself down,i'm sure if you try you can actually listen to others points of view.

Hugh 10-12-2019 19:18

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36019835)
No, they are not. They may be physically strong, but mentally they would not have fully developed.

Choosing who runs the country is an important matter and we cannot afford for young people to have the vote when they can so easily be influenced by adults close to them.

If there is an issue here, it should be the minimum age at which you can fight for your country that is raised, not the voting age that is lowered.

Best think about taking the vote from over-65s, then, as their cognitive functions can decline by 10% from that age...
Quote:

The study found a 9.6% decline in mental reasoning in men aged 65-70 and a 7.4% decline for women of the same age.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16425522

Carth 10-12-2019 19:33

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019858)
Best think about taking the vote from over-65s, then, as their cognitive functions can decline by 10% from that age...

Does that also apply in the case of Judges, MPs, Musicians etc etc? ;)

Maggy 10-12-2019 20:39

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36019835)
No, they are not. They may be physically strong, but mentally they would not have fully developed.

Choosing who runs the country is an important matter and we cannot afford for young people to have the vote when they can so easily be influenced by adults close to them.

If there is an issue here, it should be the minimum age at which you can fight for your country that is raised, not the voting age that is lowered.

Excuse me but that's my area of expertise being a retired secondary teacher..My experience is most teenagers will ignore their parents.

Hugh 10-12-2019 21:39

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36019859)
Does that also apply in the case of Judges, MPs, Musicians etc etc? ;)

Judges and MPs, yes - why musicians?

TheDaddy 14-12-2019 19:37

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36019835)
No, they are not. They may be physically strong, but mentally they would not have fully developed.

Choosing who runs the country is an important matter and we cannot afford for young people to have the vote when they can so easily be influenced by adults close to them.

If there is an issue here, it should be the minimum age at which you can fight for your country that is raised, not the voting age that is lowered.

What raised from 18? The UK doesn't use child soldiers. That said I think the voting age should be lowered, people bang on about young people not voting and being disenfranchised, wonder if being told they can't participate when they're enthusiastic ish about it has anything to do with it

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019866)
Judges and MPs, yes - why musicians?

Because nearly always a musician is more creative and produces their best work when they're young er

OLD BOY 14-12-2019 20:27

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36019843)
Lol, you can't afford them to have a vote when they might not vote the way you want them to more like!

Youngsters today are better educated and more informed than ever. I'm afraid it's older generation that tend to be more bigoted and influenced by tabloids. There should definitely be an IQ test before you're allowed to vote, age should be irrelevant.

I don't care about how they vote. What concerns me is that most young people are unduly influenced by their teachers and lecturers, and do not have sufficient life experience to understand that views of Utopia are just fairy tales.

This is too important to muck about with. I am prepared to accept 18-year olds having the vote (despite my instinct, which tells me that 21 is more appropriate), but 16 is one step too far.

---------- Post added at 20:23 ---------- Previous post was at 20:19 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36019858)
Best think about taking the vote from over-65s, then, as their cognitive functions can decline by 10% from that age...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16425522

But despite some elderly people suffering mental decline, most still have sufficient experience of life to make better choices than those with no real experience of life.

I shouldn't think that there are many people with dementia would want to vote, let alone remember to do so.

---------- Post added at 20:27 ---------- Previous post was at 20:23 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36019863)
Excuse me but that's my area of expertise being a retired secondary teacher..My experience is most teenagers will ignore their parents.

As a parent, I was always careful not to influence the political views of my children, something they have thanked me for since they became adults.

Unfortunately, parents are powerless to influence the crap that they are fed by teaching staff. And students are more influenced by them than their parents.

I am sure that you would never have fed these hungry minds with your political views, Maggie, but could you honestly say the same of your colleagues?

mrmistoffelees 17-12-2019 10:23

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
`So here's a thought/question

To those who believe a sixteen year old is not wise or experienced enough to be able to vote, is a twenty six year old wise or experienced enough to be an MP?

Carth 17-12-2019 10:51

Re: Welsh 16 year olds get the vote
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36020531)
`So here's a thought/question

To those who believe a sixteen year old is not wise or experienced enough to be able to vote, is a twenty six year old wise or experienced enough to be an MP?



Come back and ask in 3 months, when he/she finds that everything they ever put on facebook/twitter has been thoroughly looked at by those who do such things :D

Personally I don't give a hoot, the constituents must have seen potential there.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:59.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum