![]() |
latency (Ping )
hi anyone thats a gamer knows high ping sucks for all games and crappy upload is worse i have both issues upload is 2.2 mbps and download on ps4 is 224mbps games like call of duty are unplayable as i get kicked from lobbies and games like fortnite i can play but its laggy my friend that stays 20 mins away is in a bt only area and has sky broadband and gets 10 ping on a 30mbps connection i happy with virgin i want to keep it its just this issue needs to be resolved and virgin dont know what the isssue is they sent my hub fresh signals i can now play call of duty but fortnite my ping has went from 30 to 36+ any ideas on what can be done to help this issue ??
|
Re: latency (Ping )
|
Re: latency (Ping )
upload isn't the cause of high latency unless someone on your network is using the upload or saturating it causing your latency to increase. It's most likely your local area is congested for upstream and you are suffering latency/ping spikes because of this.
If gaming is a must for you a 80/20 VDSL2 connection usually performs better ping/latency wise than VM. especially with jitter. Pinging bbc.co.uk [151.101.0.81] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 151.101.0.81: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=58 Reply from 151.101.0.81: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=58 Reply from 151.101.0.81: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=58 Reply from 151.101.0.81: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=58 Ping statistics for 151.101.0.81: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 14ms, Maximum = 15ms, Average = 14ms Tracing route to bbc.co.uk [151.101.0.81] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms dsldevice.lan [192.168.1.1] 2 15 ms 14 ms 14 ms lns6.inx.dsl.enta.net [78.33.253.8] 3 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms 100.bundle-ether2.inx.dsl.enta.net [78.33.253.1] 4 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms bundle-ether1.interxion3.core.enta.net [188.39.127.242] 5 15 ms 16 ms 15 ms bundle-ether100.telehouse-east4.core.enta.net [188.39.127.102] 6 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms ip81-59.fastly-gw1.lonap.net [5.57.81.59] 7 15 ms 15 ms 14 ms 151.101.0.81 This is my Aquiss 80/20 VDSL2 Connection. My VM 350/36 connection is allover the place with ping anywhere between 18-80 in peak hours only gets plugged in for big downloads/used for wifi. |
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
|
Re: latency (Ping )
200+ bufferbloat? You're lucky, I just got 2662mS! And that is about typical...
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
|
Re: latency (Ping )
I love my first person shooters like the best of them but if you need a guaranteed ping under 30 all the time then you are going to have to look to a non-VM connection for it.
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Not every VM connection is bad
Pinging bbc.co.uk [151.101.64.81] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 151.101.64.81: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=58 Reply from 151.101.64.81: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=58 Reply from 151.101.64.81: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58 Reply from 151.101.64.81: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=58 Ping statistics for 151.101.64.81: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 10ms, Maximum = 13ms, Average = 11ms http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/51662486.png |
Re: latency (Ping )
Mine's not "Bad" but not as good as some here, lowest ping i see to UK stuff is about 20ms but it's never caused my any issues gaming etc
https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2019/07/1.png |
Re: latency (Ping )
would a SamKnows white box cause my issues ?
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
|
Re: latency (Ping )
This is pretty typical for my connection.
Pinging bbc.co.uk [151.101.0.81] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 151.101.0.81: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=57 Reply from 151.101.0.81: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=57 Reply from 151.101.0.81: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=57 Reply from 151.101.0.81: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=57 Ping statistics for 151.101.0.81: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 13ms, Maximum = 16ms, Average = 14ms https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2019/07/2.png |
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
edit.... guess you used CMD ping -t 151.101.0.81 .... had to google that never tried it before. |
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
UDP: 3478, 3479 ? |
Re: latency (Ping )
80 and 443 will be open otherwise your web traffic would grind to a halt
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
Yep CMD. Command = ping BBC.co.uk |
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Web traffic http on port 80 and https on port 443. Without these you would have no web access.
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
Carrier grade firewalls such as juniper/PA but you don’t need to do this at home Crazy stuff |
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
At least that's my understanding, as I've always used Modem mode and my own Routers. |
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
|
Re: latency (Ping )
i guess this is something that will hopefully be fixed with the hub 4
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
https://www.viavisolutions.com/en-uk/docsis-31-speeds |
Re: latency (Ping )
from the sounds of that (10gbps per channel and god knows how many bonded channels) they should easily be able to offer 1gbit/100mbits as the launching tier for the product and they are going to want to do it for the wow factor. Advertising a 1gbit connection is going to sound amazing plus offering 100mbits up is finally going to give them the push they need to get ahead of Openreach/fttc where they have been behind for so many years.
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
I have also spoken to Councillor Richard Brown in Coventry. He has been the key driver of the Vodaphone / City Fibre initiative here, but is also driving the city's bid to receive full coverage of 5G asap. Ironically, 5G has the potential, security issues notwithstanding, to make cable, twisted pair, fibre and modems obsolete, ushering in 'the internet of things'. Such is the potential bandwidth and efficiency of delivery, that 5G may become the service of choice for most people more quickly than envisaged so far... ... or maybe not. https://www.ericsson.com/en/blog/201...otential-study |
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
Yes, WTG. So much can be got, including freesat, without resorting to the Full Kahoona Back on topic. Virgin will really have to up its game regarding latency and connection symmetry. This affects gaming, but also applications like remote surgery and manufacture where instant response is vital. Not only will the competition soon beat them on speed, but also on connection quality. |
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
I believe there's an option to DMZ on the SHUB3 (not 100% as mine is in modem mode only) this could possibly solve some issues |
Re: latency (Ping )
1 Attachment(s)
I think this connection is suffering some packet loss...
|
Re: latency (Ping )
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:13. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum