Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   General : Upstream traffic management scrapped (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33706404)

cje85 23-05-2018 18:32

Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
As of today, it appears that VM have scrapped upstream traffic management on all packages.

http://virginmedia.com/trafficmanagement

cje85 23-05-2018 23:27

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Apologies, the correct link is: http://www.virginmedia.com/traffic

SirThomas 23-05-2018 23:38

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Now that's interesting...

How handy, I'm up for renewal on my contract soon, I guess I can safely move off the 'Gamer' plan, now!

Tom

SnoopZ 23-05-2018 23:41

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
So there is no shaping on newsgroups either?

Paul 24-05-2018 01:25

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
According to that link, it would appear not.

alanbjames 24-05-2018 08:30

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
If they have done this on the uploads then i cant see any chance now of getting an upstream upgrade soon on any packages.

Kushan 24-05-2018 10:32

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by alanbjames (Post 35947794)
If they have done this on the uploads then i cant see any chance now of getting an upstream upgrade soon on any packages.

I'm actually surprised they didn't keep traffic management and up upload speeds to keep things in check.

From what I remember when they removed download STM, it was actually cost-saving - it was cheaper to just add capacity than run and maintain the infrastructure required to monitor and reduce people's speeds. It's probably a similar thing on the upload side of things.

rtho782 24-05-2018 10:37

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
I think a big part of the removal of traffic management will be the changes to broadband advertising rules.

Kushan 24-05-2018 10:39

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtho782 (Post 35947802)
I think a big part of the removal of traffic management will be the changes to broadband advertising rules.

I was wondering about this as well. However you don't really see upload speeds mentioned much anyway - so perhaps also a sign of Virgin increasing theirs?

rtho782 24-05-2018 10:47

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Other ISPs are apparently publicising their upload figures:

https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.ph...nd-speeds.html

I guess if Virgin do nothing, they run the risk of others running adverts saying "2x faster than Virgin Media's average upload so you can post more pictures online" or whatever, also if VM want to advertise upload speeds in the near future, they need to remove the traffic management now so that they can get a few months of test data at the better speed.

batchain 24-05-2018 12:22

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rtho782 (Post 35947804)
Other ISPs are apparently publicising their upload figures:

https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.ph...nd-speeds.html

I guess if Virgin do nothing, they run the risk of others running adverts saying "2x faster than Virgin Media's average upload so you can post more pictures online" or whatever, also if VM want to advertise upload speeds in the near future, they need to remove the traffic management now so that they can get a few months of test data at the better speed.

Unlike all major rivals, the Virgin website clearly states the average upload speed on all broadband products

http://www.virginmedia.com/shop/broa...band-only.html

The 'other ISPs' in that article apparently being Plusnet/John Lewis. Can't seem to find any mention of the upload speed for the 10Mb offering though. Indeed looking at the Plusnet and John Lewis websites the upload speed isn't clearly mentioned for any product. This also seems to be the case for other ISPs too with Sky relegating upload speeds to the small print.


Virgin
54Mb/3Mb
108Mb/6Mb
213Mb/12Mb
362Mb/21Mb

Plusnet
10Mb/?
36Mb/ 9Mb
66Mb/ 18Mb

Sky
10Mb/0.7Mb
36Mb/9Mb
58Mb/18Mb

Taf 24-05-2018 14:04

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
With other ISp's offering around six times the upload speed on their lowest speed tiers, I think VM should seriously think about a major increase.

alanbjames 24-05-2018 18:29

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 35947829)
With other ISp's offering around six times the upload speed on their lowest speed tiers, I think VM should seriously think about a major increase.

Taf exactly, i really think 30mb should be a minimum on the 362mb tarrif.

General Maximus 24-05-2018 18:32

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
well they are continuously moving in the direction with capacity upgrades, speed upgrades and stm removal so who knows, maybe upload speed increase will be next and everyone will be realigned to 10:1. It would make sense once everyone is on 4 upstreams running qam64.

Paul 24-05-2018 18:39

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 35947829)
With other ISp's offering around six times the upload speed on their lowest speed tiers, I think VM should seriously think about a major increase.

Who is offering 6 x upload (so 6 x 20 = 120M) ?

alanbjames 24-05-2018 19:04

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
I think he meant 6 x on lowest tiers compared to Virgins lowest tiers.

batchain 24-05-2018 19:46

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by alanbjames (Post 35947875)
I think he meant 6 x on lowest tiers compared to Virgins lowest tiers.

If 6x the upload at entry level, Sky, BT etc. would be offering a 10Mb connection with 18Mb to 36Mb upload


Entry level - Virgin 3Mb to 6Mb, Sky 0.7Mb
Mid tier - Virgin 12Mb, Sky 9Mb
Top tier - Virgin 21Mb, Sky 18Mb

SnoopZ 24-05-2018 19:59

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by General Maximus (Post 35947863)
well they are continuously moving in the direction with capacity upgrades, speed upgrades and stm removal so who knows, maybe upload speed increase will be next and everyone will be realigned to 10:1. It would make sense once everyone is on 4 upstreams running qam64.

I don't think I will ever see qam64 because I have never had it on 2 upstreams.

ruddock08 12-06-2018 16:44

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Perfect timing! Now to upload 4.5TB of data to Backblaze.. will only take 45 days now! :)

Synthetic 13-06-2018 09:40

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Any whisperings about an upload increase?

Can't imagine Virgin are adding more channels for shits and giggles

General Maximus 13-06-2018 10:23

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
It will be to provide the extra capacity required for when they announce the docsis 3.1 rollout later this year and a 500/35 tier

Synthetic 14-06-2018 09:58

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
500 seems a bit unnecessary, but 35 would be nice, shame they don't let you pick and choose the up/downstream speeds.

JordanTheToaster 14-06-2018 17:43

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Nothing is ever unnecessary in the name of advancement.

General Maximus 15-06-2018 20:11

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Synthetic (Post 35950506)
500 seems a bit unnecessary, but 35 would be nice, shame they don't let you pick and choose the up/downstream speeds.

it is only unneccessary if they offer a speed which you cant really benefit from but I think these days most people will be pleasantly surprised. I like to get things downloaded asap even if it means my connection being idle 99% of the time and I love Steam purely for the speed when I get a new game. I would love to have 500mbits now just to see what Steam gives me.

JordanTheToaster 15-06-2018 22:04

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
I'd take 500 in a heartbeat if it went up on sale anytime soon having stuff download faster would be great.

RainmakerRaw 15-06-2018 23:38

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
I'd take proper gigabit any day of the week. It's laughable that we pay a relative fortune here for a couple of hundred megs, and my friends and colleagues in Romania pay €9 a month for unmetered symmetrical gigabit FTTP. By the time VM do roll out gigabit (let alone with any kind of decent upstream) it's going to be mainstream and 'meh' already, a bit like being told you qualify for 100Mbps today. Hopefully DOCSIS 3.1 rolling out lets them run away a little bit, rather than miserly stringing out the incremental updates.

In the meantime at least, I can finally say our local nodes are getting to where they should have been all along. I get the advertised speeds almost all the time (sometimes with troughs between 9pm and 11pm), and now the STM and upload caps / NNTP and other protocol throttling has gone, miraculously my VPN speed cap issues that are definitely-nothing-to-do-with-us-Sir have disappeared at exactly the same time. Funny, that.

General Maximus 16-06-2018 08:58

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RainmakerRaw (Post 35950742)
Hopefully DOCSIS 3.1 rolling out lets them run away a little bit, rather than miserly stringing out the incremental updates.

The problem is that unless you are one of the relatively few that can have fttp atm, nobody who is serviced by Openreach can come close to VM's speeds so as far as VM are concerned they are well ahead of the game. The most I can get through fttc is 53/13 yet I am on 400/20 with VM. Although you can argue it is the wrong attitude, there is such a difference between the tiers already that I am sure VM would look at it as they have already pulled all the customers who want the fastest speed so increasing it to 500, 750 or 1gbit atm is only going to cost more without providing any extra revenue.

SnoopZ 16-06-2018 11:05

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JordanTheToaster (Post 35950731)
I'd take 500 in a heartbeat if it went up on sale anytime soon having stuff download faster would be great.


I used to be like you many years ago back in my dark ages but then as life goes i realised i had different priorities, so when the speed hit 100mbit i was happy with that especially now i don't really need to download much as i stream most of my stuff using Kodi Amazon Prime or Netflix, but IF the monthly cost really didn't matter to me and i didn't need to save that money for the future i would agree and get the fastest possible even if i didn't need it really. :)

JordanTheToaster 16-06-2018 11:10

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
I only pay £41 for 350 so it's not a burden on me.

SnoopZ 16-06-2018 11:31

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JordanTheToaster (Post 35950776)
I only pay £41 for 350 so it's not a burden on me.


My point being though is you're only 20 so in the future your priorities could easily change and i am sure you would have a financial limit of how high you would go before you think to yourself i should really be doing something else with this money and i can easily make do with xxx speed. :)

broadbandking 17-06-2018 06:44

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Speeds aren't as important to me as they used to be and my uploads has never been hit by the STM but nice to see VM changing their rules

Aye Up 17-06-2018 20:46

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
I have been on either the Gamer 200 or 300 meg package throughout my time so was never really affected by STM. That said it is a good thing, I hope they boost the upload on their top package to 35Mb at some point in the future.

dragon 17-06-2018 22:57

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by General Maximus (Post 35950708)
it is only unneccessary if they offer a speed which you cant really benefit from but I think these days most people will be pleasantly surprised. I like to get things downloaded asap even if it means my connection being idle 99% of the time and I love Steam purely for the speed when I get a new game. I would love to have 500mbits now just to see what Steam gives me.

I've found with some games that start to decompress the files as the download occurs that my CPU becomes the bottleneck. Maybe i'm due an upgrade :erm:

General Maximus 18-06-2018 18:44

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
back in 2014 I went from a dual core athlon which I had had for donkeys years (and was starting to become an issue) to an i7 and the difference was phenomenal. I won't pretend that I use it to its capacity now but on the odd occasion that I do you can see where it makes a difference. It just churns through stuff which you expect to takes ages and it is because it has 4 physical cores and 8 virtual.

dragon 18-06-2018 20:06

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by General Maximus (Post 35951020)
back in 2014 I went from a dual core athlon which I had had for donkeys years (and was starting to become an issue) to an i7 and the difference was phenomenal. I won't pretend that I use it to its capacity now but on the odd occasion that I do you can see where it makes a difference. It just churns through stuff which you expect to takes ages and it is because it has 4 physical cores and 8 virtual.

Mines a i7-4770 so whilst 3+yrs old now it's not exactly a slouch.
Problem is upgrading it means going to DDR4 and 16GB isn't exactly cheap at the moment.

General Maximus 18-06-2018 22:12

Re: Upstream traffic management scrapped
 
Snap, although when i got mine it came with 16gb


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:54.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum