![]() |
Minimum Tobacco Pricing
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-42081019
NHS Health Scotland and the Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy (SCPHRP) at the University of Edinburgh have put forward the ideas as part of a new national tobacco strategy. Now that the drink industry has finally accepted the minimum alcohol pricing (albeit after 5 yrs of protestation) here's hoping the Scottish Government will now move onto the next big killer. |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
Coronary heart disease due to an excessive poor diet? Oh, you mean the ones that they can tax and profit from.... before considering a Deep Fried Mars Bar Tax? |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
There are no really cheap brands, compared with the alcohol situation, eg cheap cider. It is the retailers/suppliers who profit from any minimum pricing. The manufacturers can up their prices and make more profit and that profit won't even be made in the UK, as there doesn't seem to be any cigarette factories in the UK.
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
The UK already has a Minimum Excise Tax, an amount equal to the higher of the following alternatives, either £217.23 per 1,000 cigarettes plus 16.5% of retail price or £280.15 per 1,000 cigarettes (Duty rate from 6pm 22 November 2017).
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...cco-duty-rates |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
Price goes up, less duty raised no decrease in the number of smokers. Good strategy by ASH and the anti smoking lobbying. |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
A bit surprised tobacco pouches haven't increased more over the years. I know they did away with the small pouches but it's still only ~£20 for 50g of Golden Virginia, when i used to smoke that was a good 1-2 weeks worth at 20-30 per day. That's not a prohibitive cost in the slightest.
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Good to see my thread has sparked a dialogue.
It certainly makes sense to look at dementia and obesity as these conditions are on the rise. However by focussing on one issue at a time scarce resources can be used to best effect. |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
I read somewhere of the increasing costs to the NHS by sporting injuries and illnesses. During my time in the RAF sporting injuries of many types began to be classed as "self-inflicted" meaning you could be put on charge and fined if you suffered one.
Should the NHS start charging for dealing with sports injuries? |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
I was in 74-80, and was a member of the station Athletics and Volleyball teams, and know lots of friends in the Rugby, Hockey, Judo, and Football teams, and none of us were ever charged when we got injured playing sports. |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
I've just had a word with a friend who was on the RAF boxing team, he's never heard of it either. He's said those involved in sports were given extra privileges not fined for being injured.
---------- Post added at 15:02 ---------- Previous post was at 14:58 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
My opinion on smoking is that, as long as adults are fully aware of the health risks and other people aren't affected, they have a right to do so. I argued against a unilateral smoking ban in pubs. Smoking rooms with a warning on the door or smoking & smoke free pubs at the discretion of the licence holder would have been a better idea. Also, I believe that other taxpayers shouldn't bear the cost of others smoking and they don't. Only about 20% of taxation on tabacco is needed to compensate the NHS, the rest is pure profit for the treasury. If everyone stopped smoking tomorrow, the Government would face a financial hole in its finances and could mean an increase in income tax for the rest of us. |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
I doubt very much that "50% of smokers" use the black market. Maybe in an anecdotal bubble.
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
June 2017 Link
Quote:
IMO licensing of sales of alcohol and tobacco should be linked. Transgress on one and you lose the license to sell the other. |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
Of course more and more people will look to other means as prices rise but saying things like 50% of the country use the black market for fags is nonsense. |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
My wife and I don't smoke shop bought cigs anymore, but if we did we would definitely be looking at the cheaper black market stuff.
We now both roll our own, and although it took some getting used to it's much cheaper than anything else out there. And I'd estimate that 50% of smokers buying from the black market is a pretty close ball park figure. Trying to force a stop on something like this simply drives it underground. |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
Also worthy of note, I never mentioned Fags or 50%. |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
Tax evasion... ;) |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
As I'm not a nonsmoker what do I know. As a smoker I do know that the black market tobacco is readily available anywhere I go. Ex smokers quite often come across worse than born again Christians! They know everything! |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
1 Attachment(s)
any hoo what fags what baccy ;)
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
I'm still pretty sure that I did read that about 50% of smokers use the black market, but do agree that this seems very high.
I can't remember the full details (or find anything online), maybe it referred to 50% of smokers ever buying contraband tobacco (but buying legitimate supplies too). It might have only have referring to poor inner city areas?? I'm surprised that drug dealers deal in drugs, they say that the return is higher for cigarettes and the punishments if caught are less severe. |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
:) |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2017/11/14.jpg |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Loads of people where I work are giving up most through vaping.
1 decided to just stop and go full cold turkey. Another guy stopped because he caught legionnaires disease, and nearly died, and so after spending about 4 months in hospital sevreal in ICU he no longer as the graving nor inclination to start up again. |
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Quote:
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
This may be the thread that needs deleting to fix the "Alcohol and Tobacco" Sophos categorization
|
Re: Minimum Tobacco Pricing
Everyone i know that smokes is using illegal cigarettes and rolling tobacco only on the odd occasion they run out will they buy from a shop or as is more likely whenever the lorry is delayed and they run out. I'm glad i switched to vaping nowhere near as much hassle as tobacco was and the health benefits have also been great. A large proportion of former smokers are now vaping cost being the biggest reason for the change i know I'm a lot better off now.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:03. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum