![]() |
The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
errr?
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
That link took me to some Brazilian video so nothing to do with the nhs.
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
---------- Post added at 13:10 ---------- Previous post was at 13:10 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 13:11 ---------- Previous post was at 13:10 ---------- I sent the link to several national newspaper, SIX have contacted me asking for more info. |
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Disgraceful ... thanks for the find ..
Has TM just given Jeremy more ammunition? |
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
An INDEPENDENT report with SUGGESTIONS, published 2 months ago. |
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Though the government often says we are spending more money than previously on the NHS perhaps we need to ask how we are spending it and if there are better ways to get value for money.
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
The NHS is like all government departments wasting vast sums of money that could be better spent and should be better spent but it's been going on so long it's become an unquestioned culture.
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
And cash going to private PFI companies as well as virgin healthcare taking huge amounts of cash as sercives are privatised,still at least the private sector does not waste cash right.? And a vast increase on people needing social care farmed out to the oh so efficient private sector paid for out of public sector funding . |
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
fyi: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b087rx6b |
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
How about the issuing of wholly unnecessary appointments generate an solely to achieve targets? Then there's all that purchasing which is ridiculously expensive and should be centralised to achieve economies or scale. In an organisation the size of the NHS it's as ridiculous to assume that there's no scope for efficiencies as it is to claim that certain areas such as social care aren't a huge problem and extra cost for the NHS. Agency nursing costs would be another huge area of waste.
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Worth reading this fact-checking piece https://fullfact.org/health/what-is-naylor-review/
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
Presenter: Louise Cooper Producer: Rosamund Jones.… Doing more for less is something I am familier with the trust I work for sometimes only has two HCAs on for a ward of 26 people , getting them up fed,washed,dressed and out,and the patients sometimes have dementia as well as there are not enough beds in mental health units for them. Lots of trusts such as University NHS trusts get one pot of money a year from the government and no more if they run out, efficiencies in these trusts as nearly reaching optimum level believe me. We as the article says are already doing our best to do more for much less. ---------- Post added at 15:41 ---------- Previous post was at 15:39 ---------- Quote:
But agency Nurses are only needed as they cannot fill nursing roles in many trusts. |
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
I also think there's a big problem with unnecessary testing. Both myself and a near neighbour were treated at the same hospital and after having been assessed for surgery were told at the last minute that we needed to have MRI scans. There'd been no change to our conditions and neither scan revealed anything the quacks didn't already know but would have cost the NHS hundreds no doubt. Were they done for the sake of it or to avoid missing targets or was it just a case of excessive caution? I think we're getting to the point of overkill when it comes to certain tests and whatever the reason for it, unnecessary and duplicated tests cost a lot of money.
Yes of course clinical judgement is a factor and qualified people are required to make judgements but I have a feeling fear of litigation is a factor in this also and is imposing huge direct and indirect costs on the NHS. What needs to happen is not spending more money all the time, it's ensuring we get value for the money we spend and avoiding the situation in which costly hospital beds are blocked up because a form filler somewhere didn't get around to ordering a basic household aid in good time. Saving pennies but costing pounds comes to mind in NHS land. Reforming social care would go a long way to easing the NHS's problems but unless the fundamentals change that problem will just be replaced by another. |
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
And your right trusts have a great fear of "Blames r us Lawyers" . Also bed blocking is rife in some areas as social care packages need to be arranged via county councils,and money is tight there too. Yes the fundamemtals need to change as do our reluctance to finance social care properly. |
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
And the trend was going to continue until Nursing Bursaries were stopped. Now many are paying their way to train, then going directly to the private sector. |
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
The agencies pay better rates with the 7 year virtual freeze on NHS wages thanks go to Jeremy hunt for that guess what we call him. ---------- Post added at 19:15 ---------- Previous post was at 19:14 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
But what I can say is this a staff Nurse who is skilled earns about £34000 a year a train driver who is also skilled gets £52000 a year. When it comes to skilled NHS staff there is a market we have had staff go to Saudi Arabia ,and Australia both countries have regular jobs fairs here. Hunts 1% pay rises mean more are choosing to work privately or go elsewhere. Those that do not work in the NHS and only repeat what they hear not you don't help ,the reality is for a lot of us these days its a real graft to fill in the missing gaps.:) |
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
https://www.rcn.org.uk/employment-an...scales-2017-18 Staff nurses top pay is just over 28k and a junior sister gets around 35k while the ward managers are around 41k It does take around 7/8 years to get to this top pay band |
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
There are plenty of public sector and private sector workers who deserve more than they get but who's going to pay for it and what impact will that have on costs in the case of the NHS and prices in the case of for example, retail staff? Just for information my eldest son has just been offered his first job in teaching from September. He could have done something else and quite probably earned more but he hasn't chosen to do so, he's also in debt to the tune of over £25k as a result of his choice to pursue that chosen career. If we're going to pay everyone what we think they deserve and pay for their training, we'd better accept we're going to have to pay a lot more in tax and prices because an awful lot of people deserve more than they get. Who's going to vote for that? |
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The Naylor Report... selling NHS assets ASAP
Quote:
The use of agency staff is itself inefficient when used to the extent that it is, and you can hardly blame the private sector for capitalising on that. Instead of demonising the private sector, we should use it as appropriate where it is best to do so. It shouldn't matter whether any service is provided by the public or private sector, as long as it achieves value for money. Unfortunately, the Labour Party has this ideological view that if people have to go on a waiting list to be treated by NHS doctors, then so be it, even though they could be treated more quickly if they used private sector provision. That's just nuts! As long as the patient isn't paying more for the privilege, why should it even matter? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:15. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum