Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33704727)

Mick 10-04-2017 19:05

United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
I am absolutely appalled at the treatment of this Asian Doctor who was randomly selected with 3 other passengers, when the airline overbooked the flight. They tried to get some volunteers to fly the day after, after first offering $400, no one volunteered, so they doubled it to $800 and no passengers still volunteered so a manager had apparently said a computer would randomly select 4 people.

Two people who had been selected initially, got off the plane without protest but the doctor passenger refused saying he needed to be back home as he had patients booked to see him the next day.

In a video of the incident that has emerged, you can see security personnel violently remove him. He ended up blooded and bruised.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39554421

Damien 10-04-2017 19:46

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
They completely assaulted him! As well as United being in trouble someone needs to look into the actions of the security officers.

---------- Post added at 18:46 ---------- Previous post was at 18:42 ----------

Video of the guy still on the plane here, bloody and clearly very traumatised. Warning the video shows those things, it's not nice: https://twitter.com/kaylyn_davis/sta...71574385307648

pip08456 10-04-2017 19:52

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Bottom line, it should not be possible to overbook passengers. Once the plane is full no more bookings should be accepted.

If a passenger doesn't turn up then it is a bonus for the airline as they can then sell on the seat which has already been paid for.

I know of several friends that have been the victim of overbooking.

adzii_nufc 10-04-2017 19:57

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Non justifiable force, this is not how you deal with someone that won't move. If I could get people out of doors without knocking them unconscious then these three can surely move one man off a plane. Just pure aggression, no form of proper restraint shown at all, no attempt to use reasonable force (known techniques) to move him, just plainly and clearly dragged him without mentioning what's occurring before that.

All three should be arrested on Assault charges, United whilst not being entirely to blame here will likely end up settling in the next few days as this blows over in an attempt to avoid seeing a court room. Overbooked flights are incredibly common. It's the follow up to these three idiots that will be the actual case to watch.

---------- Post added at 18:57 ---------- Previous post was at 18:55 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35894028)
Bottom line, it should not be possible to overbook passengers. Once the plane is full no more bookings should be accepted.

If a passenger doesn't turn up then it is a bonus for the airline as they can then sell on the seat which has already been paid for.

I know of several friends that have been the victim of overbooking.

Sadly that's the exact reason they overbook them, using yearly statistics to actually make assumptions 'X%' of people won't show up for their flight.

It's a pretty stupid system and I can't imagine it pans out in their favour in all the time given they have to compensate those that get chucked off or leave voluntarily.

Mick 10-04-2017 20:00

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
I think the CEO of United Airlines has now aged 10 years and aware by now that this is totally bad for them.

But I was so mad when I saw this that I felt compelled and emailed UA's CEO to inform him of my disgust.

I think United Airlines, are in damage limitation mode right now because this is all over Twitter and on all news networks in the US and here. They ought to be ashamed of their conduct and I'm convinced they have acted illegally.

papa smurf 10-04-2017 20:02

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
lawyers will be queuing up for this

adzii_nufc 10-04-2017 20:05

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35894032)
I think the CEO of United Airlines has now aged 10 years and aware by now that this is totally bad for them.

But I was so mad when I saw this that I felt compelled and emailed UA's CEO to inform him of my disgust.

I think United Airlines, are in damage limitation mode right now because this is all over Twitter and on all news networks in the US and here. They ought to be ashamed of their conduct and I'm convinced they have acted illegally.

United Airlines haven't acted illegally as far as I'm aware, they called authorities who in turn acted illegally. You have to separate the difference before a witch hunt sets off in the wrong direction.

United Airlines should be getting flak because they consistently overbook flights using a hilarious percentage statistical model each year and actively assume X% of people won't show up. In this scenario, it was their own staff that couldn't board.

Again in this case, I don't believe it is illegal to select people at random if no volunteers have arisen. That being said, given his profession and the fact he's evidently stated it's essential for him to be on that flight, it would have made more sense to prioritize him rather than send for security to remove him.

United Airlines- Could've handled this situation far better, they'll settle with the guy given the media outcry but they seriously need to reconsider their policy.

pip08456 10-04-2017 20:07

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by adzii_nufc (Post 35894029)
It's a pretty stupid system and I can't imagine it pans out in their favour in all the time given they have to compensate those that get chucked off or leave voluntarily.

Actually it's not. If a person has booked a seat and paid for it, if they don't arrive at the required time before flight then they lose it. The airline can then sell it on to anyone waiting for a cancellation.

Unfortunately in this case the flight has simply been overbooked, something United do all too frequently.

adzii_nufc 10-04-2017 20:11

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35894035)
Actually it's not. If a person has booked a seat and paid for it, if they don't arrive at the required time before flight then they lose it. The airline can then sell it on to anyone waiting for a cancellation.

Unfortunately in this case the flight has simply been overbooked, something United do all too frequently.

Yeah, derp moment when I'm not factoring in the money they then keep for those that didn't show. Not sure why I didn't consider that, which of course makes perfect sense from a business point of view and shows that Overbooking isn't just a game of chance.

Unfortunately for UA, a google of their overbooking practices only leads to 8 pages of searches for this news story. They have to settle Asap.

Incoming lifetime free flying pass.

Mick 10-04-2017 20:19

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by adzii_nufc (Post 35894036)
Yeah, derp moment when I'm not factoring in the money they then keep for those that didn't show. Not sure why I didn't consider that. Thus essentially getting to sell that same ticket twice.

Unfortunately for UA, a google of their overbooking practices only leads to 8 pages of searches for this news story. They have to settle Asap.

Incoming lifetime free flying pass.

Would you say the passengers who witnessed this also become eligible for compensation as they looked physically distressed ?

Paul 10-04-2017 20:20

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Well if its the US, I'm sure a bunch of Lawers will try that one as well.

adzii_nufc 10-04-2017 20:26

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35894038)
Would you say the passengers who witnessed this also become eligible for compensation as they looked physically distressed ?

Everyone that was inconvenienced deserves something from this. Make no mistake, United Airlines set the events in motion with their shoddy practices. There were several better ways out of this, starting with their overbooking policies, moving onto higher compensation before calling in the 'repo men' or simply just prioritising this man because he was a doctor that had hospital schedules he couldn't fulfill if he left the flight. If you upped that benefit for getting off, someone will have eventually jumped. Job done, far cheaper than what it's going to cost them now. This wasn't a direct result of simply overbooking though, everyone had a seat, they wanted their own staff on the plane to occupy those seats for their scheduled employment at the destination and AFAIK they refused to take off until four people had given up their seats. It's the fact that is legal that's annoying.

There needs to be two battles here though, the one against UA that caused this, and the one against three men that illegally assaulted a man on a plane. I have a feeling the latter will just vanish if UA put up compensation and everybody accepts it as case closed, those three still want arrested and charged with assault.

Seems to be no solid confirmation whether these lot were Police or Security Officers, it makes no difference of course, it's still unjust force, it's just that the Police tend to get away with it more often than not.

Obviously failed to mention, Police or Security's employers will also be dragged into this now. I'd expect the three to be instantly dismissed if they're Security and suspended if Police.

If they actually removed the guy without assaulting him, the most we'd have right now is disgruntled passenger ejected from flight, something that sadly occurs daily thanks to overbooking practices. It only takes one incident to blow that all up and that's happened.

Mick 10-04-2017 20:38

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
I just read a woman traveller on Delta Airlines, agreed to give up her placement, twice this weekend, she has netted $11,000 for doing so though.

adzii_nufc 10-04-2017 20:41

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Yeah, there's sometimes a hefty incentive for doing so, obviously $800 wasn't enough in this case but it's going to cost far more now. :erm:

It just made more sense to keep upping that 800 until someone volunteered. I'm sure in 99% of case they can have someone removed safely, sadly the other 1% where the security you've called in are overly aggressive have then caused a major news storm painting your company in bad light.

Be certain that UA are working with their legal team writing up non disclosure and essentially gagging orders for him to sign in return for some decent Wonga. As for the three thugs, we have to wait and see now as UA are dominating the story.

pip08456 10-04-2017 20:50

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
So you agree that if you've paid for a seat you should then give it up? To me it matters not the reason, it's paid for and should be available. There is no excuse for overbooking except to make the company more money.

Don't forget UA would have been paid for the seat, if the person didn't turn up on time then they have a genuine reason to sell it on but to deliberately overbook in the beginning is wrong IMHO.

adzii_nufc 10-04-2017 20:57

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Morally I don't agree, I think it's a silly practice. I just term everything based on their official contracts so as to not confuse what's legal and illegal. It's a shoddy practice that they can get away with 99% of the time by offering incentives which legally they have to do, but it doesn't bother them because they've already made bank. This is the 1% where the thugs they've called have made a pigs arse of it and now they look like idiots too.

Quote:

All of UA’s flights are subject to overbooking which could result in UA’s inability to provide previously confirmed reserved space for a given flight or for the class of service reserved. In that event, UA’s obligation to the Passenger is governed by Rule 25.
https://www.united.com/web/en-US/con...iage.aspx#sec5
Section 5G

If people stand for it the majority of time, UA couldn't give a toss. We don't oversell football stadiums because we can.

Mick 10-04-2017 20:58

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35894053)
So you agree that if you've paid for a seat you should then give it up? To me it matters not the reason, it's paid for and should be available. There is no excuse for overbooking except to make the company more money.

Don't forget UA would have been paid for the seat, if the person didn't turn up on time then they have a genuine reason to sell it on but to deliberately overbook in the beginning is wrong IMHO.

It's a weird system but it is purely there to make as little amount of loss as possible. I was first aware of it years ago and all Airlines do it I guess. I was sat in the departure lounge at McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas waiting to board a Virgin Atlantic flight, their boarding team then offered upgraded flights and another nights stay at 5 star hotel to give up their seats.

Stephen 10-04-2017 21:27

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
I flew Untied to the USA last month and would not fly them again, even before this.

pip08456 10-04-2017 21:38

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by adzii_nufc (Post 35894055)
Morally I don't agree, I think it's a silly practice. I just term everything based on their official contracts so as to not confuse what's legal and illegal. It's a shoddy practice that they can get away with 99% of the time by offering incentives which legally they have to do, but it doesn't bother them because they've already made bank. This is the 1% where the thugs they've called have made a pigs arse of it and now they look like idiots too.



https://www.united.com/web/en-US/con...iage.aspx#sec5
Section 5G

If people stand for it the majority of time, UA couldn't give a toss. We don't oversell football stadiums because we can.

Looks like they broke their own rules.

Rule 25 paragraph 2.
Quote:

Boarding Priorities - If a flight is Oversold, no one may be denied boarding against his/her will until UA or other carrier personnel first ask for volunteers who will give up their reservations willingly in exchange for compensation as determined by UA. If there are not enough volunteers, other Passengers may be denied boarding involuntarily in accordance with UA’s boarding priority:
The passenger had clearly boarded.

Mick 10-04-2017 23:18

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Just thought this is not technically an over booking. The seats needed were for United Staff.

I'm wondering though how 4 United Airlines staff were needed more than a Doctor.

Paul 10-04-2017 23:19

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
.... or why the United staff could not just be transferred to another plane.

1andrew1 11-04-2017 01:05

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
The twist in this sad tale is that investors seem to like the company's approach!
Quote:

Financial Times Traders responded to the brutality and miserliness of United by bidding up United’s share price against the broader market index, and especially against direct competitor Delta Airlines. Pundits might think the episode was a public relations disaster — and obviously the cruelty towards this passenger was unconscionable — but investors seem impressed by the sadistic commitment to cost control.
https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2017/04/...iency-targets/ or Google "Traders appreciate United Airlines’s commitment to “cost efficiency targets”"

pip08456 11-04-2017 01:11

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35894106)
The twist in this sad tale is that investors seem to like the company's approach!

https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2017/04/...iency-targets/ or Google "Traders appreciate United Airlines’s commitment to “cost efficiency targets”"

In yet another twist he apparently fell causing his injuries. He should sue and I'm sure there will be law firms begging him to do so.

Link

adzii_nufc 11-04-2017 01:48

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
So we can confirm it was Police and not private security. Just another ordinary example of Police brutality. It's alright, he fell though, then he slid down the aisle. It's a good thing he slid down the aisle on his back then, if it was exposed they might have shot him.

Obviously going off multiple sources and included in that link

Quote:

At one point, the cops dropped him, he hit his head on an arm rest
This is actually what happened according to witnesses. Don't stop there though, you can see exactly that in the video, they pull him over the first armrest and he gets dragged face first into the next one.

So back to the earlier. UA should compensate him for the absolute embarrassment of all of this which I'm sure they're going to do along with a statement distancing themselves from the model police officers. Noting had they not insisted their staff board the plane, none of this would've happened.

He should sue regarding the Police issue, all three should be instantly suspended pending assault investigations, people have pointed out elsewhere that he and his lawyer are likely trying to get both in court at the same time on the same lawsuit. Noting that this could've been avoided had UA either upped their offer or just you know like Paul said, made other arrangements for their staff. This might make headway into absolutely stopping airlines forcibly removing people from planes, as earlier, that happens all the time, mostly without a fracas like this one, but it's still bs in all cases.


Again from the above article:

[img][/img]

They're setting up to literally deny the entire thing despite a video showing they're complete liars. What a broken system they have.
Also, he re-appeared 10 minutes later? They dragged him off and then just walked off? or what? Top blokes these lot, real professionals.

Whilst we're at it, we can use technicalities like the flight not actually being oversold at all, I wonder if there's anything in their bs contracts that protects UA from removing people for their own staff.

Witness account:

Quote:

I was on this flight and want to add a few things to give some extra context. This was extremely hard to watch and children were crying during and after the event.

When the manager came on the plane to start telling people to get off someone said they would take another flight (the next day at 2:55 in the afternoon) for $1600 and she laughed in their face.

The security part is accurate, but what you did not see is that after this initial incident they lost the man in the terminal. He ran back on to the plane covered in blood shaking and saying that he had to get home over and over. I wonder if he did not have a concussion at this point. They then kicked everybody off the plane to get him off a second time and clean the blood out of the plane. This took over an hour.

All in all the incident took about two and a half hours. The united employees who were on the plane to bump the gentleman were two hostesses and two pilots of some sort.

This was very poorly handled by United and I will definitely never be flying with them again.
So not only did they assault a 69 year old man, they then lost him, these guys are the real deal, Chicago's finest.

Turns out he was indeed suspended: https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/2017...icer-suspended

Mick 11-04-2017 02:45

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
So let me get this straight, I pay for a ticket, board my plane, take my seat and I am being told I have to get off to let on their staff instead and they expect me not to become irate?

They are out of their frigging minds! What's worse is, before this video went viral, United Airlines attempted to justify their actions.

I know it's not really a laughing matter, but seen lots of sarky comments that when it comes to the demonstration of putting on life jacket and emergency doors, on United flights, customers should be requesting one to defend against being assaulted and dragged off in the event of over booking.

Other passing comment that should hold true, 'They won't have a problem with over booking now at United Airlines.'

From the sounds of it, they were a mediocre Airline to begin with. But talk about completely sinking a brand over night.

pip08456 11-04-2017 02:57

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by adzii_nufc (Post 35894108)
So not only did they assault a 69 year old man, they then lost him, these guys are the real deal, Chicago's finest.

Turns out he was indeed suspended: https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/2017...icer-suspended

Not only that but they didn't take him to hospital the first time but must have done so when they got him off the second time.

Muppets!

TheDaddy 11-04-2017 04:25

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35894092)
Just thought this is not technically an over booking. The seats needed were for United Staff.

I'm wondering though how 4 United Airlines staff were needed more than a Doctor.

At a guess they might say other planes couldn't take of without those four staff and it'd inconvenience thousands of people rather than the four they boot of. Might be interesting to know exactly where the four were needed and why they weren't already there and was there an alternative like driving them there.

Quote:

Originally Posted by adzii_nufc (Post 35894108)
So we can confirm it was Police and not private security. Just another ordinary example of Police brutality. It's alright, he fell though, then he slid down the aisle. It's a good thing he slid down the aisle on his back then, if it was exposed they might have shot him.

Obviously going off multiple sources and included in that link

This is actually what happened according to witnesses. Don't stop there though, you can see exactly that in the video, they pull him over the first armrest and he gets dragged face first into the next one.

So back to the earlier. UA should compensate him for the absolute embarrassment of all of this which I'm sure they're going to do along with a statement distancing themselves from the model police officers. Noting had they not insisted their staff board the plane, none of this would've happened.

He should sue regarding the Police issue, all three should be instantly suspended pending assault investigations, people have pointed out elsewhere that he and his lawyer are likely trying to get both in court at the same time on the same lawsuit. Noting that this could've been avoided had UA either upped their offer or just you know like Paul said, made other arrangements for their staff. This might make headway into absolutely stopping airlines forcibly removing people from planes, as earlier, that happens all the time, mostly without a fracas like this one, but it's still bs in all cases.


Again from the above article:

[img][/img]

They're setting up to literally deny the entire thing despite a video showing they're complete liars. What a broken system they have.
Also, he re-appeared 10 minutes later? They dragged him off and then just walked off? or what? Top blokes these lot, real professionals.

Whilst we're at it, we can use technicalities like the flight not actually being oversold at all, I wonder if there's anything in their bs contracts that protects UA from removing people for their own staff.

Witness account:



So not only did they assault a 69 year old man, they then lost him, these guys are the real deal, Chicago's finest.

Turns out he was indeed suspended: https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/2017...icer-suspended

Wonder if the manager is still laughing, $1600 seems cheap at twice the price considering the bad publicly, cancellations and law suits this is bound to cause.

Mick 11-04-2017 05:58

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
United Airlines are digging their own grave. Apparently CEO has sent following internal email to their employees.

https://mobile.twitter.com/RyanRuggi...77150117425154

denphone 11-04-2017 06:38

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
l just saw it again this morning on the news and its utterly indefensible and it won't be long before he goes either especially given the latest revelations..

TheDaddy 11-04-2017 08:18

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35894119)
United Airlines are digging their own grave. Apparently CEO has sent following internal email to their employees.

https://mobile.twitter.com/RyanRuggi...77150117425154

If only he'd spent the time replying to your email rather than drafting that the situation wouldn't have escalated from catastrophic to horrific, send another Mick, we'll all sign it!

blackthorn 11-04-2017 08:54

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Simon Calder the travel guy has been on the radio this morning and he says, although United have mismanaged the whole thing, the one who is totally at fault is the passenger himself. He went on to say that under aviation law, when the captain says to any passenger for any reason, that they have to get off the plane, then they have to get off.
Blimey, I`m off to Egypt soon and I hope Thomas Cook dont use this policy.

Mick 11-04-2017 09:50

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthorn (Post 35894129)
Simon Calder the travel guy has been on the radio this morning and he says, although United have mismanaged the whole thing, the one who is totally at fault is the passenger himself. He went on to say that under aviation law, when the captain says to any passenger for any reason, that they have to get off the plane, then they have to get off.
Blimey, I`m off to Egypt soon and I hope Thomas Cook dont use this policy.

How can he be totally at fault when in the same sentence, Simon said UA have mismanaged the situation?

I'm siding with passenger here. It's not okay to mishandle a situation like this. This doctor is 69 years of age, therefore a pensioner.

Earlier I said the company is now in company damage limitation mode, but after reassessing their PR skills, I'm replacing limitation to overdrive.

Damien 11-04-2017 09:54

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Yeah he probably should have left when asked, however outrageous that demand was, but United are at fault for allowing the situation to develop where a passenger who had already boarded was being asked to leave to make way for United staff. United deserve to be boycotted over this, especially for the way they've handled it subsequently.

Mick 11-04-2017 10:03

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
1 Attachment(s)
US Department of Transport have said following:

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...1&d=1491897609

1andrew1 11-04-2017 11:35

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
So that statement from the DOT is just confirming that a flight ticket does not guarantee a flight and that passengers' rights are minimal.

Mick 11-04-2017 13:29

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35894159)
So that statement from the DOT is just confirming that a flight ticket does not guarantee a flight and that passengers' rights are minimal.

Something like that but I don't think it says, you are allowed to assault a passenger, drag them by the arms etc. It's outrageous to do this any person but the fact they did this to a 69 year old man is totally out of order and for the CEO to publicly apologise, in a pathetic manner by saying sorry that they had to re-accommodate these passengers and that they want to reach out to the passenger but then he sends an internal memo saying he is behind his staff.

Totally ridiculous. Only thing I can say is, I don't think I could have sat there and done nothing, I know there was passengers being vocal and outraged while it happened but I just don't think I could have sat there and allowed that abuse to happen.

---------- Post added at 12:29 ---------- Previous post was at 11:26 ----------

United Airlines is getting an absolute roasting online and are being absolutely trolled to death at the moment and I have absolutely no sympathy for them, here are a couple of newly invented company mottos that people are making up for them:

Quote:

You carry on, we carry off #NewUnitedAirlinesMottos
Quote:

Normal flights have cabin crews, here at United Airlines, we have bouncers! #NewUnitedAirlinesMottos
Quote:

Board as a doctor,
Leave as a patient. #NewUnitedAirlinesMottos
Quote:

#NewUnitedAirlinesMottos
Would you like a neck pillow?

Or a neck brace?
Quote:

If we overbook, you'll catch a right hook. #NewUnitedAirlinesMottos
Quote:

We have First Class, Business Class, and No Class #NewUnitedAirlinesMottos
Quote:

"We have Red Eye and Black Eye flights available!" #NewUnitedAirlinesMottos
Quote:

Flight: $400, checking a bag: $25, getting dragged down the aisle: priceless #NewUnitedAirlinesMottos
Quote:

You Are Now Free To Get Dragged Around The Cabin #NewUnitedAirlinesMottos

1andrew1 11-04-2017 13:32

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
That third tweet, "Board as a doctor, leave as a patient" is priceless. :D

papa smurf 11-04-2017 13:52

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
if i was a share holder in this company i would demand heads role over this

Kursk 11-04-2017 14:01

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
The security police were heavy-handed but:

1. Why didn't the bloke leave the plane when he was asked to?
2. Why was he screaming like a demented polecat?
3. Why did he run up the aisle mumbling "I have to get home, I have to get home"?
4. Who did he suppose was going to disembark because he wouldn't?

Just asking. Don't bite my head off!

papa smurf 11-04-2017 14:02

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894188)
The security police were heavy-handed but:

1. Why didn't the bloke leave the plane when he was asked to?
2. Why was he screaming like a demented polecat?
3. Why did he run up the aisle mumbling "I have to get home, I have to get home"?
4. Who did he suppose was going to disembark because he wouldn't?

Just asking. Don't bite my head off!

fear- which was justified he got a good hiding

Damien 11-04-2017 14:03

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
When he said he had to go home he appears to be traumatised. He should have gotten off when asked but the rest of it is the fault of the police and United.

Kursk 11-04-2017 14:05

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35894189)
fear- which was justified he got a good hiding

But didn't he bring it upon himself?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35894190)
When he said he had to go home he appears to be traumatised. He should have gotten off when asked but the rest of it is the fault of the police and United.

Traumatised at not being able to get his own way?

Mick 11-04-2017 14:13

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894192)
But didn't he bring it upon himself?



Traumatised at not being able to get his own way?

I think that is far fetched Kursk.

I think you're forgetting he did have his head rammed in to the arm rest in a seat next to him and he was manhandled out of the seat, so much so that he caused his head to bleed, another witness says he could possibly have been knocked out as he went limp.

Stressful incident.. can take it's toll on any body and they can react in any way.

I really do not think this is about getting his own way, he broke no laws, he paid for a ticket, got on a plane and the rest is incompetence by United Airlines.

papa smurf 11-04-2017 14:13

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894192)
But didn't he bring it upon himself?



Traumatised at not being able to get his own way?

i don't think there is any justifying this ,you can't treat people this way ,this will damage the airline if they try to justify this act .

Kursk 11-04-2017 14:17

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35894193)
I think that is far fetched Kursk.

I think you're forgetting he did have his head rammed in to the arm rest in a seat next to him and he was manhandled out of the seat, so much so that he caused his head to bleed, another witness says he could possibly have been knocked out as he went limp.

Stressful incident.. can take it's toll on any body and they can react in any way.

I really do not think this is about getting his own way, he broke no laws, he paid for a ticket, got on a plane and the rest is incompetence by United Airlines.

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35894194)
i don't think there is any justifying this ,you can't treat people this way ,this will damage the airline if they try to justify this act .

Valid points. But he should have just left the plane like an adult (I think his wife already had) and there wouldn't have been the unfortunate escalation.

Given that someone had to get off, would you have given him your seat?

Damien 11-04-2017 14:19

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894192)

Traumatised at not being able to get his own way?

He has been aggressively dragged off a flight, his his head on the way to the extent it's quite bloody. I am not a Doctor, I don't know his condition, but he seems very disturbed.

papa smurf 11-04-2017 14:21

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
'I want to commend you for continuing to go above and beyond': Defiant United Airlines CEO pens 'tone deaf' email defending staff after 'belligerent' passenger was viciously dragged from overbooked flight

CEO needs sacking imo

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ing-staff.html

Kursk 11-04-2017 14:23

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35894196)
He has been aggressively dragged off a flight, his his head on the way to the extent it's quite bloody. I am not a Doctor, I don't know his condition, but he seems very disturbed.

Resisting is also aggression. Would you have acted in this manner? I think not.

Mick 11-04-2017 14:26

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35894196)
He has been aggressively dragged off a flight, his his head on the way to the extent it's quite bloody. I am not a Doctor, I don't know his condition, but he seems very disturbed.

I have been trained first aid by St John's Ambulance and I have worked in the healthcare sector for 25 years, even though I am not medically qualified to give a legal diagnosis, I can safely say that he has the classic symptoms of someone in shock. (Dazed, confused, walking wounded).

Initial testimony from other passengers said he received no medical assistance until he was escorted off the plane a second time, this was said to be well over an hour later. They neglected their duty of care to this man, in my professional opinion.

Kursk 11-04-2017 14:29

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Well, no-one appeared concerned enough to offer their seat. Would you give up yours? No, really?

Mick 11-04-2017 14:42

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894201)
Well, no-one appeared concerned enough to offer their seat. Would you give up yours? No, really?

Well, as I commented earlier on, a woman gave up her seat twice on a Delta Airlines flight somewhere in the US and netted $11,000 in total for doing so. I would do that everyday no problem. So yes, I would do it and make sure it was worth my while.

Kursk 11-04-2017 14:46

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35894202)
Well, as I commented earlier on, a woman gave up her seat twice on a Delta Airlines flight somewhere in the US and netted $11,000 in total for doing so. I would do that everyday no problem. So yes, I would do it and make sure it was worth my while.

With respect Mick, getting a nice pay day is just a little bit different from giving up your seat altruistically.

I suspect most people here would take the view that they too, "have to get home". I think the way he handled himself was demeaning for a man of his obvious intellect.

papa smurf 11-04-2017 14:47

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894198)
Resisting is also aggression. Would you have acted in this manner? I think not.

what would you say if this old fellow was your dad -would it be ok to manhandle your old pappy out of his seat and drag him bloodied down the isle

Mick 11-04-2017 14:53

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894204)
With respect Mick, getting a nice pay day is just a little bit different from giving up your seat altruistically.

I suspect most people here would take the view that they too, "have to get home". I think the way he handled himself was demeaning for a man of his obvious intellect.

If similar circumstances were to happen again, on any airline, I might now do what this man has done, what they going to do? Drag me off as well, I am sure it will make Youtube within 10 minutes, I do not think any reasonable carrier would want to behave and have their brand tarnished in such a manner.

I would say me protesting my stay, gives me the upper hand, they want me off, they can compensate me and not just a couple of hundred quid!

Kursk 11-04-2017 15:01

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35894205)
what would you say if this old fellow was your dad -would it be ok to manhandle your old pappy out of his seat and drag him bloodied down the isle

I started by saying the security staff were heavy-handed. What I'm discussing is the pre-escalation which the Doctor has some responsibility for. I do not condone his poor treatment; but whose old pappy would act in such a belligerent manner that it required physical removal?

I also think his apparently unconscious removal saw him firmly grasping his apple iphone...
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35894208)
If similar circumstances were to happen again, on any airline, I might now do what this man has done, what they going to do? Drag me off as well, I am sure it will make Youtube within 10 minutes, I do not think any reasonable carrier would want to behave and have their brand tarnished in such a manner.

I would say me protesting my stay, gives me the upper hand, they want me off, they can compensate me and not just a couple of hundred quid!

I don't believe you would have acted in the manner of this man. Besides, we know you can be bought off :)

Julian 11-04-2017 15:02

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
The whole story is borne out of incompetence by the airline.

Why did they issue boarding cards to all passengers if they needed 4 seats for staff.

Dealt with at check-in, there would have been none of this.

Kursk 11-04-2017 15:11

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 35894210)
The whole story is borne out of incompetence by the airline.

Why did they issue boarding cards to all passengers if they needed 4 seats for staff.

Dealt with at check-in, there would have been none of this.

I think they needed seats for their staff to rv elsewhere as an unpredicted change. Circumstances change in huge organisations. We are used to it all running like clockwork; when things alter (like flight delays) we just have to suck it up.

We don't all have the screaming ab dabs. I am waiting for the Nazis to be mentioned.

papa smurf 11-04-2017 15:14

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894213)
I think they needed seats for their staff to rv elsewhere as an unpredicted change. Circumstances change in huge organisations. We are used to it all running like clockwork; when things alter (like flight delays) we just have to suck it up.

We don't all have the screaming ab dabs. I am waiting for the Nazis to be mentioned.

you just did

Julian 11-04-2017 15:14

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894213)
I think they needed seats for their staff to rv elsewhere as an unpredicted change. Circumstances change in huge organisations. We are used to it all running like clockwork; when things alter (like flight delays) we just have to suck it up.

We don't all have the screaming ab dabs. I am waiting for the Nazis to be mentioned.

Werent the security team from the SS? ;)

Kursk 11-04-2017 15:16

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35894214)
you just did

Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 35894215)
Werent the security team from the SS? ;)

Godwins Law. End of discussion :D

papa smurf 11-04-2017 15:24

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
United Airlines' shares seen sliding after passenger was dragged from overbooked flight
The slump could wipe as much as $1bn off the group's total market value


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/bu...-a7678051.html

Mick 11-04-2017 15:30

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894213)
I think they needed seats for their staff to rv elsewhere as an unpredicted change. Circumstances change in huge organisations. We are used to it all running like clockwork; when things alter (like flight delays) we just have to suck it up.

We don't all have the screaming ab dabs. I am waiting for the Nazis to be mentioned.

Sorry Kursk but you are making sorry arse excuses up for them, they are completely in the wrong here on every level. To how they got him off the flight, the fact they neglected their duty of care while he was walking around dazed and blooded from their assault and then the PR disaster that followed with the CEO publicly saying sorry but saying privately to his staff, jolly good job well done.

denphone 11-04-2017 15:42

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35894205)
what would you say if this old fellow was your dad -would it be ok to manhandle your old pappy out of his seat and drag him bloodied down the isle

No doubt his view of things would be very much different then one imagines.;)

Mick 11-04-2017 16:20

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
I have just seen another angle of the incident where he he saying 'Just kill me', 'Just kill me', I have only seen two vids, the one where he is removed from his seat and dragged and another where he is walking up and down saying I want to go home and he is repeating it over and over. That man clearly did not just suffer physical pain. :(

---------- Post added at 15:20 ---------- Previous post was at 14:57 ----------

Just seen this:

https://www.change.org/p/united-airl...o-oscar-munoz?

Over 11K signatures already.

Damien 11-04-2017 16:26

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2017/04/15.png

Mick 11-04-2017 16:37

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35894228)

:eek: :eeek:

blackthorn 11-04-2017 16:44

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
I see they are trying to find something on this guy now but to me his past is irrelevant. I reckon the ceo has said, find something, anything to make out its his fault.
http://www.courier-journal.com/story...0839c4936d4285

Mick 11-04-2017 16:51

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
I think this is a very interesting read... What United's CEO should have done...

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/wha...ry_top_stories

Quote:

United Airlines CEO Oscar Munoz woke up Monday morning to a massive leadership test.

And he flunked — big time.

Munoz had to respond to the shocking video footage of a passenger being violently ejected from one of his flights Sunday night. The video, shot by two passengers on their cellphones and shared on Twitter, went viral. The passenger was thrown off the plane simply because United had overbooked.

Munoz’s public response was a piece of pusillanimous lawyer-crafted claptrap that was pitiful, inadequate and insulting.

<snip>

Here’s what Munoz should have said instead on Monday morning:

“I have just seen the video from Flight 3411, and like all of you I am shocked. I have immediately cleared my calendar of all other commitments, and I am going to our company’s facilities at O’Hare to conduct a personal inquiry. All personnel involved in this incident will be reporting to me in person immediately. I am going to find out how this happened, who did what and why. I notice that the passenger’s violent removal was conducted by law enforcement personnel, not by United staff, and I am going to demand a full explanation from the relevant authorities as well. Meanwhile, I apologize personally to the passenger, to all others on the flight, to our customers and to the American public. I expect to issue a further report within 72 hours.”

(I initially wrote 36 hours, but on reflection, 72 hours — 3 days — makes more sense.)

If Munoz’s lawyers think that statement opens them up to — eek! — “legal liabilities,” I have some news for them.

The video is all the evidence an attorney is going to need. You’re going to be writing a big fat check anyway. Showing good faith now is going to help more than it could hurt.

Kursk 11-04-2017 21:50

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35894219)
Sorry Kursk but you are making sorry arse excuses up for them, they are completely in the wrong here on every level. To how they got him off the flight, the fact they neglected their duty of care while he was walking around dazed and blooded from their assault and then the PR disaster that followed with the CEO publicly saying sorry but saying privately to his staff, jolly good job well done.

I don't mean to be making excuses for anybody but when I saw the word 'Oscar' in your link I thought, fair play, the doc deserves one. I realised later it's the CEO's first name ;)

Predictably, a petition has appeared; we're going to be cursed if petitions are set up everytime there's an incident in society. Ho hum.

And, as mentioned earlier, he was 'removed' by law enforcement, not UA staff. Shouldn't every responsible citizen follow the instructions of the law without all the frenzied histrionics? I'll get me coat :sulk:

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthorn (Post 35894230)
I see they are trying to find something on this guy now but to me his past is irrelevant. I reckon the ceo has said, find something, anything to make out its his fault.
http://www.courier-journal.com/story...0839c4936d4285

Trying to find something? Well, they certainly did. I think your link throws another light on all of this.

nomadking 11-04-2017 21:52

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35894137)
Yeah he probably should have left when asked, however outrageous that demand was, but United are at fault for allowing the situation to develop where a passenger who had already boarded was being asked to leave to make way for United staff. United deserve to be boycotted over this, especially for the way they've handled it subsequently.

Was the need for the staff to travel an unexpected and unplanned thing? If staff suddenly report in sick, replacements have to come from somewhere.

Damien 11-04-2017 21:56

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Found on Reddit:

http://i.imgur.com/99dgkTs.mp4

Hom3r 11-04-2017 22:03

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2017/04/6.jpg
Why when I read that do I think of Blackadder

He accidental and brutally cut his heat off while combing his hair.

Kursk 11-04-2017 22:07

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35894273)

So apt. Note the good guy is the one effecting the removal :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35894271)
Was the need for the staff to travel an unexpected and unplanned thing? If staff suddenly report in sick, replacements have to come from somewhere.

Can you imagine the furore if a flight was cancelled because UA didn't make arrangements for the transfer of personnel?

Julian 11-04-2017 23:24

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894277)
So apt. Note the good guy is the one effecting the removal :D



Can you imagine the furore if a flight was cancelled because UA didn't make arrangements for the transfer of personnel?

Tbf if united had made proper arrangements none of this would have happened. ;)

Kursk 12-04-2017 00:18

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to over booking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 35894286)
Tbf if united had made proper arrangements none of this would have happened. ;)

Overbooking is so commonplace it's regarded as usual practise; if seats were kept vacant routinely just in case staff need redeployment at short notice, who would end up funding the fare 'loss'? :erm:

Mick 12-04-2017 01:41

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894270)

And, as mentioned earlier, he was 'removed' by law enforcement, not UA staff. Shouldn't every responsible citizen follow the instructions of the law without all the frenzied histrionics? I'll get me coat :sulk:

Don't care who he was removed by : It was still wrong. You do no go about assaulting innocent people and causing them to bleed. You said you do not mean to make excuses, but you still are and I think you are being unreasonable on the passenger himself. If the man wants scream holy hell, he should be allowed to, he is being removed with unreasonable force, against his will.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk
Trying to find something? Well, they certainly did. I think your link throws another light on all of this.

Rubbish. It shows no such thing. No other light to shine on this other than an Airline ballsed up. A police officer ballsed up. United Airlines ballsed up with their PR skills, it has taken their share price to drop significantly to say sorry and that to me is unforgivable.

Kursk 12-04-2017 12:56

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35894298)
Don't care who he was removed by : It was still wrong. You do no go about assaulting innocent people and causing them to bleed. You said you do not mean to make excuses, but you still are and I think you are being unreasonable on the passenger himself. If the man wants scream holy hell, he should be allowed to, he is being removed with unreasonable force, against his will.

I have repeatedly said the removal itself was heavy-handed (although security staff/police deal regularly with people who refuse to accept the law and a certain amount of physical persuasion is unavoidable and justified imo). Much like the forced grounding of drunk/drugged drivers who won't accept hand restraints.

It might just be me but I find the Doctor's "I want to go home", "just kill me" snivelling, just a little irrational. Who acts like that? But I suppose as you say, if he wants to scream like a cornered polecat, he can; my view is that most, rational adults don't behave that way. He could have left voluntarily, and unassisted, as asked, been escorted off with a hand on his shoulder or screamed blue murder until he had to be dragged off. He invoked the latter (but held on to his iphone when 'unconscious') which was then carried out over-enthusiastically.

Mick 12-04-2017 13:19

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894330)
I have repeatedly said the removal itself was heavy-handed (although security staff/police deal regularly with people who refuse to accept the law

It might just be me but I find the Doctor's "I want to go home", "just kill me" snivelling, just a little irrational. Who acts like that? But I suppose as you say, if he

As already said, he had his head rammed in to an arm rest. Causing him to bleed. He is clearly in shock. People in shock act in irrational ways. That's just how it goes so I do not agree with this character assassination. It does not remove any wrong doing on United Airlines or the aviation authorities part.

Damien 12-04-2017 13:26

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894330)

You don't think that a Doctor who writes prescriptions for a male patient in return for sex and whose practice was limited due to felony is no way indicative of character? I do. There is something not quite right about him and it showed in his reaction to authority.

Feel free to be outraged on behalf of all those who abuse the rules by which decent people live and conduct themselves. The Doctor will make a killing thanks to the "oh my God, what are you doing to him" do-goody goods who just don't understand that being nice just won't cut it with some people.

That may not be true. http://claireconnelly.com.au/hello-h...-its-mistakes/

Kursk 12-04-2017 13:30

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35894333)
As already said, he had his head rammed in to an arm rest. Causing him to bleed. He is clearly in shock. People in shock act in irrational ways. That's just how it goes so I do not agree with this character assassination. It does not remove any wrong doing on United Airlines or the aviation authorities part.

Imho there is culpability on both sides, which is an entirely different status to a petition-inducing one-sided big-bully airline beating up on a little feller.

It remains no-one gave up their seat even though by his actions that was the outcome he wanted.

I wonder how many of those silent on the plane were thinking "just get off mate ffs" none of which shows up in the video punctuated with cries of Oh my Gaarrrd" ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35894335)

Fair enough; withdrawn!:)

nomadking 12-04-2017 13:36

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
His wife volunteered and went quietly.

If you try and get into a tug of war with somebody, you will likely go backwards if you break free. Your intended direction of movement is backwards in an uncontrollable manner. Inevitable in that situation to get injured. No attacking involved from the other person. The more somebody struggles, the more likely they are going to injure THEMSELVES.

Osem 12-04-2017 13:42

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35894196)
He has been aggressively dragged off a flight, his his head on the way to the extent it's quite bloody. I am not a Doctor, I don't know his condition, but he seems very disturbed.

Not defending anyone here because I haven't seen how it happened but head cuts tend to bleed profusely, even small ones, which often makes them look far worse than they are.

nomadking 12-04-2017 13:54

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35894335)

The letter from the Kentucky board, ie NOT New Orleans, refers to a David A Dao, ie NOT David Thanh Duc Dao. The letter is from June of last year, less than a year ago.Looks like it's referring to this one, not the other.

Now that didn't take long to trample all over this supposedly journalist nonsense.

Mick 12-04-2017 14:33

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35894342)
Not defending anyone here because I haven't seen how it happened but head cuts tend to bleed profusely, even small ones, which often makes them look far worse than they are.

No, but you are still dealing with a potential head trauma, his head hitting the arm rest and I am sure I read it was hit with such force that it knocked him out briefly. He could have had a bleed on the brain for all we know, we cannot see that without scans/x-rays.

In any case, you do not pay for a service and expect to get assaulted when you have done nothing wrong.

Anyway, CEO has come out and now said that they will not use any force to remove passengers in future and I am pretty sure all other Airlines will not go down this route either but I am sure all others would have managed their overbooking issues better.

This now gives the upper hand to passengers because the BUMP offer, in cases of overbooking will now have to be so lucrative to encourage being BUMPED from that specific flight.

heero_yuy 12-04-2017 14:45

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
It's interesting to see how mobile phone footage and social media have totally wrong footed the PR department and CEO. No longer can company's that deal badly with people hide these actions from the public and stage manage the media.

Mr K 12-04-2017 14:48

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35894340)
His wife volunteered and went quietly.


Not sure she volunteered; she just wisely didn't physically resist like her husband. Just as well for the airline or it would have looked worse. Just wonder how they were picked ? Not sure I believe the airline that it was random. They seems to have been telling a lot of porkies.

To partly get themselves out of this they could make a declaration never to overbook flights again. This would set the cat amongst the pigeons in the airline industry, others would have to follow suit. Never understood overbooking anyway if you've paid in advance, surely they don't lose anything if you don't turn up. Its obscene profiteering. Happened to us once with a hotel in Spain where we'd booked and paid for months in advance; Mrs K kicked up a public fuss, they very wisely found a room suddenly...

Osem 12-04-2017 14:49

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35894353)
No, but you are still dealing with a potential head trauma, his head hitting the arm rest and I am sure I read it was hit with such force that it knocked him out briefly. He could have had a bleed on the brain for all we know, we cannot see that without scans/x-rays.

In any case, you do not pay for a service and expect to get assaulted when you have done nothing wrong.

Anyway, CEO has come out and now said that they will not use any force to remove passengers in future and I am pretty sure all other Airlines will not go down this route either but I am sure all others would have managed their overbooking issues better.

This now gives the upper hand to passengers because the BUMP offer, in cases of overbooking will now have to be so lucrative to encourage being BUMPED from that specific flight.

As I said, just making the point that head injuries frequently look far worse than they are. Of course other injuries are quite possible, including internal ones nothing to do with his head. Time will tell what injuries he has and how they were caused.

Damien 12-04-2017 14:51

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35894353)
This now gives the upper hand to passengers because the BUMP offer, in cases of overbooking will now have to be so lucrative to encourage being BUMPED from that specific flight.

Although they're not meant to do this anyway. Overbooking has to be caught at the gate, if they've allowed people to board it's their seat. Obviously they would still have to get out if asked but the airline has broken it's contract and the regulation at that point. Even if they do try to beat the customer into submission.

adzii_nufc 12-04-2017 15:06

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
You cannot physically assault someone for trespassing without a justifiable reason. It's as simple as refusing to leave does not justify assault. There's no ifs or buts in this scenario its literally that simple.

By law if a complaint is made all three can be arrested. In a court room they'd lose over failure to justify their actions.

UA saying they'll never call for physical removals is great and all but it's dodging the point that this was law enforcement failing too. The witch hunt can't just be directed at one company. These officers absolutely failed.

I know the topics moving on now but reading posts in my absence i felt like this wasn't even debatable. It's literally open and shut.

denphone 12-04-2017 15:56

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35894359)
It's interesting to see how mobile phone footage and social media have totally wrong footed the PR department and CEO. No longer can company's that deal badly with people hide these actions from the public and stage manage the media.

Yep social media reveals everything and l am not sure a lot of companies have realised that how much of a Pandora's box it is when things go viral online.

Kursk 12-04-2017 17:53

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
What would have been the best way to resolve the situation?

TheDaddy 12-04-2017 18:02

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35894361)
Not sure she volunteered; she just wisely didn't physically resist like her husband. Just as well for the airline or it would have looked worse. Just wonder how they were picked ? Not sure I believe the airline that it was random. They seems to have been telling a lot of porkies.

To partly get themselves out of this they could make a declaration never to overbook flights again. This would set the cat amongst the pigeons in the airline industry, others would have to follow suit. Never understood overbooking anyway if you've paid in advance, surely they don't lose anything if you don't turn up. Its obscene profiteering. Happened to us once with a hotel in Spain where we'd booked and paid for months in advance; Mrs K kicked up a public fuss, they very wisely found a room suddenly...

He volunteered to go to originally, he wanted the 800 credits, it was only when he was told the next flight wasn't until the next day he wasn't happy and withdrew his offer

---------- Post added at 17:02 ---------- Previous post was at 17:01 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894386)
What would have been the best way to resolve the situation?

Pay someone, anyone, someone would've accepted an offer eventually

denphone 12-04-2017 18:07

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894386)
What would have been the best way to resolve the situation?

Give them a offer which they won't refuse.

adzii_nufc 12-04-2017 18:13

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Best way via hindsight of course.

Option 1, simply do not remove passengers for your staff or in other cases, do not allow overbooking of flights.

Option 2, given that it seems clear this gentleman was prioritising getting back to his place of work over monetary compensation I'd have continually upped the offer until someone else accepted. In hindsight you can guarantee they wish they'd done this.

Option 3 if both are not applicable, removal of the gentleman by reasonable means, You literally apply a clamp manoeuvre with either one or two officers to either arm, meaning you can lift without causing massive distress to the receiving party, if the passenger then insists on struggling you can then bind his legs with the third officer if required, at this point you still have absolutely no justifiable way to inflict damage on a person, you then merely carry or escort the man off the plane, it's literally that simple assuming he hasn't retaliated with assault. Assuming he does retaliate with assault then you'd have the legal justification to drag him the way they did if they can provide evidence it was required for the situation, which it would be at that point.

Given the tight space on the plane, it may be necessary for one person to lift the gentleman out of the seat before trying to apply various manoeuvres.

It's easy enough me saying option 3 but there's multiple factors, heat of the moment (aggression in this case as we seen) training (Whether they've even been effectively trained for both non physical and physical removal) which of course you'd think they should be, but it's whether they even remember it. So it's not just a case of saying what they should've done but pointing out everything wrong with what they did do and aggression is right at the forefront. Aggression is absolutely useless in security or policing and serves no usefulness to anyone. Assertiveness is the one.

If you remove the plane equation from this, I dealt with something very similar at the 2012 Olympics whilst on VIP detail for the event. A guy with a ticket in a place I didn't want him to be despite the fact he had a reason to be exactly where he was. We solved it using aspects of option 2.

If Option 3 is a success though, the headline changes from Passenger assaulted to either no headline with minimal coverage or Passenger ejected. That's an absolutely massive change for both the company and the police.

Damien 12-04-2017 18:24

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35894389)
Give them a offer which they won't refuse.

Well they did do that to be fair.

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2017/04/3.gif

denphone 12-04-2017 18:35

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35894392)

There is a right way and a wrong way as we know and of course they chose the way to damnation one could say.

Kursk 12-04-2017 18:36

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35894387)
Pay someone, anyone, someone would've accepted an offer eventually

True enough (especially if that money-grabber Mick is on board ;)) but I do like option 3 below :devsmoke:.

Quote:

Originally Posted by adzii_nufc (Post 35894391)
Option 3 if both are not applicable, removal of the gentleman by reasonable means, You literally apply a clamp manoeuvre with either one or two officers to either arm, meaning you can lift without causing massive distress to the receiving party, if the passenger then insists on struggling you can then bind his legs with the third officer if required, at this point you still have absolutely no justifiable way to inflict damage on a person, you then merely carry or escort the man off the plane, it's literally that simple assuming he hasn't retaliated with assault. Assuming he does retaliate with assault then you'd have the legal justification to drag him the way they did if they can provide evidence it was required for the situation, which it would be at that point.


Mick 12-04-2017 19:02

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35894394)
True enough (especially if that money-grabber Mick is on board ;)) but I do like option 3 below :devsmoke:.

Option 3 would lead to where we are now : it's bad and it's wrong.

And yes I would grab what I can : They are inconveniencing me remember so they can pay up accordingly. And now that I know removal by force would damage them more than them moving me, they'd better make the offer worthwhile.

1andrew1 12-04-2017 19:29

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
You would have thought $1,000 would be enough to get someone.
Elsewhere, someone has said you can drive between the two airports in 4 hours. Not perfect, but could the staff have got there by car instead or be booked onto a competitor's flight?

Edit: Here's a great chart showing what the airline might have done.
https://qz.com/955853/flowchart-of-n...tm_source=qzfb

adzii_nufc 12-04-2017 20:18

Re: United Airlines: Passenger violently removed due to overbooking
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35894400)
Option 3 would lead to where we are now : it's bad and it's wrong.

And yes I would grab what I can : They are inconveniencing me remember so they can pay up accordingly. And now that I know removal by force would damage them more than them moving me, they'd better make the offer worthwhile.

Option 3 If done correctly. They legally remove him from the plane on account of trespass and he has absolutely no case in court except for a punt at the airline for kicking him off. As soon as you've refused to leave you've also committed a separate offence relating to refusal to leave an aircraft when asked by law enforcement. People can record it and circulate it but by law these men and the airline would have nothing to answer for.

We know its morally wrong. I'm just trying to explain the legal way to remove someone in this scenario.

It's up to the airline to exhaust every available option before having to call for a verbal or physical removal, that's something i don't believe they did.

I'm absolutely certain scenarios like this unfold all the time and because we're not hearing about them it's because they're being dealt with properly and legally. Just in this case you've accidentally called Mr Angry to remove the passenger and Mr Angry isn't very good at his job. He can't remove a 69 year old man off a plane safely. So why is Mr Angry in law enforcement because he's evidendly unable to protect and serve. Even when physically removing someone, they're in your care and you have a duty of care. He failed. Not only did he assault him, he then lost this man.

Again this is all in relation to legal removal and not the practices of United Airlines which are morally wrong.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:58.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum