Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33704106)

denphone 09-12-2016 17:32

Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Rupert Murdoch's Fox agrees deal to buy Sky.

https://www.theguardian.com/business...eal-to-buy-sky

Dave42 09-12-2016 18:30

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35874806)
Rupert Murdoch's Fox agrees deal to buy Sky.

https://www.theguardian.com/business...eal-to-buy-sky

more reason to never ever go to sky

denphone 09-12-2016 18:53

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35874817)
more reason to never ever go to sky

It was sadly inevitable that this nefarious man would get his full hands on Sky sooner rather then later.:(

pip08456 09-12-2016 19:07

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35874821)
It was sadly inevitable that this nefarious man would get his full hands on Sky sooner rather then later.:(

Surely you mean "get his full hands back on SKY"

denphone 09-12-2016 19:13

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35874824)
Surely you mean "get his full hands back on SKY"

Yes teacher.;):D

heero_yuy 09-12-2016 19:15

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
I wonder if somebody could explain to me why this is a problem? :shrug:

Damien 09-12-2016 19:22

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Not especially a problem. One person owning so much of the media can obviously be a problem but Sky is much more of a entertainment company and there are restrictions on television news here. We also have the BBC as a counterweight.

Kursk 09-12-2016 19:27

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35874830)
We also have the BBC as a counterweight.

And Cable Forum :).

heero_yuy 09-12-2016 19:31

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35874830)
We also have the BBC as a counterweight.

Well some would say that the BBC is far too powerful in the news department and needs a real counterweight. Murdoch could provide that balance.

pip08456 09-12-2016 19:34

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35874833)
Well some would say that the BBC is far too powerful in the news department and needs a real counterweight. Murdoch could provide that balance.

Are we talking about the unbiased left wing leaning BBC news department?

heero_yuy 09-12-2016 19:36

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35874834)
Are we talking about the unbiased left wing leaning BBC news department?

They deserve Fox news. :D

denphone 09-12-2016 19:54

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35874833)
Well some would say that the BBC is far too powerful in the news department and needs a real counterweight. Murdoch could provide that balance.

Perhaps one should remind you that this is the man who was owner of News International who were deeply involved in the phone hacking scandal as the odorous stench from that and what he clearly knew and let happen for many many years is still very very clear in my mind.

heero_yuy 09-12-2016 19:55

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35874843)
Perhaps one should remind you that this is the man who was owner of News International who were deeply involved in the phone hacking scandal as the odorous stench from that and what he clearly knew and let happen for many many years is still very very clear in my mind.

I will remind you that NO successful prosecutions resulted.

denphone 09-12-2016 19:58

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35874844)
I will remind you that NO successful prosecutions resulted.

Indeed but the odorous stench and nefariousness of this man has not gone away old bean.

pip08456 09-12-2016 20:03

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35874843)
Perhaps one should remind you that this is the man who was owner of News International who were deeply involved in the phone hacking scandal as the odorous stench from that and what he clearly knew and let happen for many many years is still very very clear in my mind.


Are you really so naive that you think that the then owner of News International actually knew what each individual Editor of each newspaper was doing to generate income for each one?

Owners of multi facted newspapers look at one thing only, just like heads of multi corporations. The headline figures provided by the bean counters.

If it ain't making a profit, get rid of it!

Damien 09-12-2016 20:36

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Newspapers aren't a fanastically profitable industry to be in. Influence is the bigger motivation for owning a newspaper than money. Even the relatively profitable ones aren't that profitable in the terms Murdoch will be used too. He owns them for the influence and the romance of journalism.

denphone 09-12-2016 20:36

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35874846)
Are you really so naive that you think that the then owner of News International actually knew what each individual Editor of each newspaper was doing to generate income for each one?

Owners of multi facted newspapers look at one thing only, just like heads of multi corporations. The headline figures provided by the bean counters.

If it ain't making a profit, get rid of it!

Are you equally so naive to believe that Rupert Murdoch does not play a part in what is happening at all his companies past and present or whether they are big or small as he would know exactly what his trusted editors and lieutenants were up to at all his companies.

So if you was the owners of these companies you would not know what was going on??

pip08456 09-12-2016 21:59

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35874855)
Are you equally so naive to believe that Rupert Murdoch does not play a part in what is happening at all his companies past and present or whether they are big or small as he would know exactly what his trusted editors and lieutenants were up to at all his companies.

So if you was the owners of these companies you would not know what was going on??

What's the point of having a dog and barking yourself? I'd have better things to do.

1andrew1 09-12-2016 22:15

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35874863)
What's the point of having a dog and barking yourself? I'd have better things to do.

He's a hands-on, highly successful proprietor who phones his editors frequently.
It's a shame that another hugely successful British company has been taken over by a foreign owner but it was always on the cards and I don't have a problem with it. At the last bid, Fox agreed to spin-off Sky News. I doubt they will have to do this again as the newspapers are held in a different company (News Corp) and the power of traditional media is weaker today.

pip08456 09-12-2016 22:56

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35874864)
He's a hands-on, highly successful proprietor who phones his editors frequently.
It's a shame that another hugely successful British company has been taken over by a foreign owner but it was always on the cards and I don't have a problem with it. At the last bid, Fox agreed to spin-off Sky News. I doubt they will have to do this again as the newspapers are held in a different company (News Corp) and the power of traditional media is weaker today.

All SKY have done is taken back control since they merged into BSB.

"On 8 July 1988 rival tycoon Rupert Murdoch, having failed to gain regulatory approval for his own satellite service, and failing to become part of the BSB consortium announced that his pan-European television station, Sky Channel, would be relaunched as a four channel UK-based service called Sky Television, using the Astra system and broadcast in PAL with analogue sound.

In October 1990, an enterprising manufacturer came up with a dual satellite dish that could be used to receive both Sky and BSB services, although separate receivers would still be required - the following month this technology became effectively obsolete.

Both companies had begun to struggle with the burden of huge losses, rapidly increasing debts and ongoing startup costs. In November 1990, a 50:50 merger was announced to form a single company, operating as British Sky Broadcasting (BSkyB), but marketed as Sky. The merger may have saved Sky financially as it had very few major advertisers at the time, so acquiring BSB's healthier advertising contracts and equipment helped to solve the company's problem."

A good move by Murdoch.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britis...e_Broadcasting

1andrew1 09-12-2016 23:38

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35874866)
All SKY have done is taken back control since they merged into BSB.

"On 8 July 1988 rival tycoon Rupert Murdoch, having failed to gain regulatory approval for his own satellite service, and failing to become part of the BSB consortium announced that his pan-European television station, Sky Channel, would be relaunched as a four channel UK-based service called Sky Television, using the Astra system and broadcast in PAL with analogue sound.

In October 1990, an enterprising manufacturer came up with a dual satellite dish that could be used to receive both Sky and BSB services, although separate receivers would still be required - the following month this technology became effectively obsolete.

Both companies had begun to struggle with the burden of huge losses, rapidly increasing debts and ongoing startup costs. In November 1990, a 50:50 merger was announced to form a single company, operating as British Sky Broadcasting (BSkyB), but marketed as Sky. The merger may have saved Sky financially as it had very few major advertisers at the time, so acquiring BSB's healthier advertising contracts and equipment helped to solve the company's problem."

A good move by Murdoch.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britis...e_Broadcasting

Sure, what you have pasted complements but does not contradict what I have said. It's important to note that the Sky of today is far different from the small British company back in 1990.

pip08456 10-12-2016 00:52

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35874870)
Sure, what you have pasted complements but does not contradict what I have said. It's important to note that the Sky of today is far different from the small British company back in 1990.

But SKY back then was owned by Murdoch. All he's done is sit back and wait until the time was right and Hey Presto, he's back in control. In the meantime he has been reaping rewards for his initial investment.

1andrew1 10-12-2016 01:19

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35874877)
But SKY back then was owned by Murdoch. All he's done is sit back and wait until the time was right and Hey Presto, he's back in control. In the meantime he has been reaping rewards for his initial investment.

Sky would not have survived had News Corp not merged it with BSB to form BSkyB. BSkyB was built upon sport and that came from BSB's The Sports Channel; the merger formed a new company.
BSkyB and latterly Sky plc has always been significantly influenced by News Corp with family connections on the board and close working relationships. Recently, Sky News took space in News UK's premises. This is a tidying-up exercise executed now thanks to the weaker Pound and phone-hacking no longer being an issue.

pip08456 10-12-2016 01:37

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35874880)
Sky would not have survived had News Corp not merged it with BSB to form BSkyB. BSkyB was built upon sport and that came from BSB's The Sports Channel; the merger formed a new company.
BSkyB and latterly Sky plc has always been significantly influenced by News Corp with family connections on the board and close working relationships. Recently, Sky News took space in News UK's premises. This is a tidying-up exercise executed now thanks to the weaker Pound and phone-hacking no longer being an issue.

Well bugger me, explain then how Murdoch got back control.

1andrew1 10-12-2016 01:55

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35874881)
Well bugger me, explain then how Murdoch got back control.

With a 40% stake in a business and with the remainder owned by small shareholders, the Murdoch family never really lost control. Unless they did something obviously daft, they would not be opposed.
What the Murdochs are now getting is ownership and absolute control.

TheDaddy 10-12-2016 08:51

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
I think he should be stopped from owning it on general principle. For no other reason than its him and imo he's not a nice individual.

Maggy 10-12-2016 10:35

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35874854)
Newspapers aren't a fanastically profitable industry to be in. Influence is the bigger motivation for owning a newspaper than money. Even the relatively profitable ones aren't that profitable in the terms Murdoch will be used too. He owns them for the influence and the romance of journalism.

:tu: Exactly! :clap:

This increases Murdoch's ability to influence the government to dance to his current tune.He's not a the sit back and do nothing boss he made himself out to be at the Leveson Inquiry.

martyh 10-12-2016 11:02

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
It's not a done deal yet though ,even though the newspapers are a separate company Sky have taken over all the European Sky branded companies so the European commision that cleared the previous bids may block this one


Quote:

The European commission, which cleared the previous bids, is also likely to look at the new deal. In 2014, Sky took full control of Sky-branded services in Germany, Austria and Italy, meaning any UK takeover has a European dimension that did not exist before.

muppetman11 10-12-2016 11:58

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
I'm pretty sure it will happen this time.

1andrew1 10-12-2016 12:06

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muppetman11 (Post 35874909)
I'm pretty sure it will happen this time.

I agree. I don't see any real competition grounds for it to be blocked. There is a Fox Sports channel in Italy but it's now exclusive to Sky Italia anyway.

Damien 10-12-2016 12:08

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35874900)
:tu: Exactly! :clap:

This increases Murdoch's ability to influence the government to dance to his current tune.He's not a the sit back and do nothing boss he made himself out to be at the Leveson Inquiry.

It's clear he influences The Sun. Several times his clear personal influences are shown in the paper.

It's complicated though because he seems to be far less interested in imposing a line on The Times which is a very good paper. Also anyone who funds proper journalism instead of the clickbait nonsense we're seeing from the Independent and increasingly The Telegraph is doing some good.

1andrew1 10-12-2016 12:13

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35874900)
:tu: Exactly! :clap:

This increases Murdoch's ability to influence the government to dance to his current tune.He's not a the sit back and do nothing boss he made himself out to be at the Leveson Inquiry.

He is 85 so I'm sure he won't be asserting his influence as much as he's done in the past though. But I agree with you about his performance at the Leveson Enquiry.

Scary 15-12-2016 14:20

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
i love this guy well done Rupert

Mr K 15-12-2016 17:13

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Nobody has seen Jerry Hall for several months, rumours are she's done a runner... Poor Rupert, let him have his tv stations I say; they're full of US **** anyway.

Maggy 15-12-2016 17:44

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Gloom.

papa smurf 15-12-2016 19:23

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35874913)
He is 85 so I'm sure he won't be asserting his influence as much as he's done in the past though. But I agree with you about his performance at the Leveson Enquiry.

don't forget he has spawned offspring

Children: James Murdoch, Lachlan Murdoch, Elisabeth Murdoch, Prudence Murdoch, Chloe Murdoch, Grace Helen Murdoch

gloom indeed

Dave42 15-12-2016 21:03

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35875934)
Gloom.

exactly Maggy

heero_yuy 16-12-2016 09:59

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
If you want not-for-profit TV there's always the BBC.

Murdoch will do whatever turns a profit as with Sky before his takeover. I don't expect to see much change unlike the doom mongers here.

Maggy 16-12-2016 11:37

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35876046)
If you want not-for-profit TV there's always the BBC.

Murdoch will do whatever turns a profit as with Sky before his takeover. I don't expect to see much change unlike the doom mongers here.

Really? Murdoch really wants to see the back of the BBC and he now has the influence to bring it about and when he's done that then he really will be the power behind the government..

It's not about profit for him as he's already wealthier than most.It's influence and power by the back door. Something that should worry anyone who truly wishes to live in a democracy.

denphone 16-12-2016 11:47

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35876049)
Really? Murdoch really wants to see the back of the BBC and he now has the influence to bring it about and when he's done that then he really will be the power behind the government..

It's not about profit for him as he's already wealthier than most.It's influence and power by the back door. Something that should worry anyone who truly wishes to live in a democracy.

It will be interesting on how the government approaches this as the prime minister said on the door of Downing Street when she became PM to the people of this country that 'when we take the big calls, we'll think not of the powerful, but you'.

OLD BOY 16-12-2016 14:21

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35876046)
If you want not-for-profit TV there's always the BBC.

Murdoch will do whatever turns a profit as with Sky before his takeover. I don't expect to see much change unlike the doom mongers here.

I really don't see what profit has to do with it. Without profit, multi-channel TV in this country wouldn't have appeared for many years.

The BBC is widely regarded as politically neutral, but it very plainly is not. We do need a counterbalance to that left leaning organisation and Sky News is well placed to deliver this.

There are rules in this country about political balance and additional safeguards can be introduced by having the independent editorial team that was offered last time around.

I don't like the Murdochs an awful lot myself, but that doesn't mean that they shouldn't be allowed to run the businesses that they are actually pretty good at running. They have done a very good job at bringing all those TV channels to us, with so much entertainment including films and sport. Shame about the cost, but I dare say the costs are not a long way off from what they are in the US.

---------- Post added at 13:16 ---------- Previous post was at 13:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35874897)
I think he should be stopped from owning it on general principle. For no other reason than its him and imo he's not a nice individual.

H'mm. So in your world, you would ban people from conducting business because you didn't like them.

Obviously you have lots of friends yourself and would not be hoisted by your own petard. ;)

---------- Post added at 13:21 ---------- Previous post was at 13:16 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35876050)
It will be interesting on how the government approaches this as the prime minister said on the door of Downing Street when she became PM to the people of this country that 'when we take the big calls, we'll think not of the powerful, but you'.

And, no doubt, our Theresa would conclude that we all benefit from his multi channel offerings and he should be left alone to deliver the programmes we love to watch!

Maggy 16-12-2016 16:04

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
It's not about the programmes..it's about influence.

denphone 16-12-2016 16:21

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
And sadly Rupert Murdoch has too much influence and power and his political lapdogs be them from whatever party as they have been in the past are cosying up to him again.

Hugh 16-12-2016 18:16

Re: Rupert Murdoch's finally gets his hand on Sky
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35876065)
I really don't see what profit has to do with it. Without profit, multi-channel TV in this country wouldn't have appeared for many years.

The BBC is widely regarded as politically neutral, but it very plainly is not. We do need a counterbalance to that left leaning organisation and Sky News is well placed to deliver this.

There are rules in this country about political balance and additional safeguards can be introduced by having the independent editorial team that was offered last time around.

I don't like the Murdochs an awful lot myself, but that doesn't mean that they shouldn't be allowed to run the businesses that they are actually pretty good at running. They have done a very good job at bringing all those TV channels to us, with so much entertainment including films and sport. Shame about the cost, but I dare say the costs are not a long way off from what they are in the US.

---------- Post added at 13:16 ---------- Previous post was at 13:12 ----------

H'mm. So in your world, you would ban people from conducting business because you didn't like them.

Obviously you have lots of friends yourself and would not be hoisted by your own petard. ;)

---------- Post added at 13:21 ---------- Previous post was at 13:16 ----------



And, no doubt, our Theresa would conclude that we all benefit from his multi channel offerings and he should be left alone to deliver the programmes we love to watch!

Strange how right-wingers think the BBC is left wing, and left-wingers think that it is right wing...;)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:04.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum