Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’ (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33703553)

Maggy 31-08-2016 11:00

Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
http://www.disabledgo.com/blog/2016/...lity-vehicles/

Quote:

Paralympians heading to Rio next week have lost their Motability vehicles after being reassessed as part of the government’s programme of benefit cuts and reforms, a member of the ParalympicsGB team has revealed.

Some Paralympians have spoken previously of the importance of the support they receive from the benefits system, particularly through disability living allowance (DLA), but this is the first confirmation that any of them have lost that support as a result of the government’s austerity programme.
Surely this is another unintended consequence? :erm:

nomadking 31-08-2016 11:24

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Asked how removing a Motability vehicle from a Paralympian training for Rio would have helped their medal efforts, a Department for Work and Pensions spokeswoman said: “This question is unfounded. “Decisions on Motability are made based on claimants’ individual needs and after consideration of all the evidence, including an assessment and information provided by the claimant and their GP.
Nothing to do with whether they are a Paralympian or not.

Hugh 31-08-2016 11:32

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
From the link...
Quote:

The 20-year-old said he knew of fellow Paralympians who have already lost their Motability cars after being reassessed for PIP.

He said: “There have been Paralympians who have been told that they are too able to claim Motability and they have had to fight to get the cars back because they have been taken off them.

“I don’t know too much about it, I haven’t spoken to them about it because that’s a personal matter for them, but it’s something I’m a little bit concerned about.”

He said he was not comfortable providing further details about colleagues, and could not say how many fellow team-members had lost their Motability vehicles, but added: “All I know is anyone with disabilities is getting assessed at the moment, so it’s a possibility for any of us.”

Maggy 31-08-2016 12:37

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35856909)
Nothing to do with whether they are a Paralympian or not.

That's why I said unintended consequences..I'm pretty sure the government wants us to shine at the Paralympics as well as at the Olympics..

pip08456 31-08-2016 12:40

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35856909)
Nothing to do with whether they are a Paralympian or not.

I agree, there are other disabled people being re-assessed for entitlement to PIP. Paralypians are not being singled out and yes there will be some who do lose their mobility cars just the same as the rest.

denphone 31-08-2016 12:54

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35856921)
I agree, there are other disabled people being re-assessed for entitlement to PIP. Paralypians are not being singled out and yes there will be some who do lose their mobility cars just the same as the rest.

The rest of those who are still on DLA will be re-assessed for PIP over the next 24 to 36 months according to the latest information.

pip08456 31-08-2016 15:13

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35856925)
The rest of those who are still on DLA will be re-assessed for PIP over the next 24 to 36 months according to the latest information.

Of course, that was my point. It is happening to all on PIP not just paralympians. I don't say I agree with it but no disabled people are being treated any different.

Maggy 31-08-2016 15:23

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35856953)
Of course, that was my point. It is happening to all on PIP not just paralympians. I don't say I agree with it but no disabled people are being treated any different.

I don't think I even argued that..I'm just suggesting that not every situation has been thought about.

Either we want everyone to be part of our society,contributing in whatever manner they can and perhaps actually adding to the society they reside in or we don't.Just treating any group as one homogeneous mass won't work. There has to be some way to help them but I guess it's going to be left to some charitable organisation or sponsorship but how much is available to provide mobility like a specially adapted transport I'm not sure. It's not like I see a lot of wheelchair users on public transport.

rogerdraig 31-08-2016 18:17

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
the re assessment process ( i have just been through it ) is daft and a lot of it depends on how you fill out the form and that's not as simple as it sounds as you have think about answering the question that should have been asked and not the one printed on the form and then on at interview doing the same thing ignoring the questions and answering what the rules as set out in the legislation ask of you. faliure to do that will end up with loss of part or whole of the allowance.

just for example and i expect what is happening a lot of the time your are asked how far you can walk

a simple thing you would assume but if you say you can go over 20 meters you will lose the car but that is not the real question the real question is can you walk over 20 meters reliably consistently and in a safe manner and with out pain

i expect a lot either because they are not aware of the above answer yes and then try and explain or because they don't want to look weak ( you would be suprised ) answer yes

its not a fair system as it is intentionally deceptive only those who really look though the legislation or have access to good help get through it of course the very very few who intend to cheat know all the right answers so i doubt many of them are affected at all

dilli-theclaw 31-08-2016 19:45

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35856955)
I don't think I even argued that..I'm just suggesting that not every situation has been thought about.

Either we want everyone to be part of our society,contributing in whatever manner they can and perhaps actually adding to the society they reside in or we don't.Just treating any group as one homogeneous mass won't work. There has to be some way to help them but I guess it's going to be left to some charitable organisation or sponsorship but how much is available to provide mobility like a specially adapted transport I'm not sure. It's not like I see a lot of wheelchair users on public transport.

Before I was in a wheelchair and was on the bus it would often just drive by wheelchair users on the side of the road as they didn't want to get the ramp out.

Since I've been in the chair I don't even try public transport.

denphone 31-08-2016 20:05

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
And another thing is many bus drivers won't tell people who are in the disabled wheelchair spaces to move as well when these places are meant for disabled wheelchair users.

Kursk 31-08-2016 20:13

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Do the CF members here who are in receipt of the higher rate mobility component of DLA feel that paralympians, athletes, should qualify for the same benefit as they do?

Is it relevant that by definition, they are very mobile, possibly already receive UK Sport, Lottery and sponsored funding to enable them to participate in a chosen career whilst many young ambulant people are scrambling around to get a job, to buy a car, buy a home and raise a family?

martyh 31-08-2016 20:19

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
I've never seen anyone actually able to get a wheelchair on a bus ,even the buses that lower to the pavement ,all seems highly impractical to me .

dilli-theclaw 31-08-2016 20:21

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35857051)
I've never seen anyone actually able to get a wheelchair on a bus ,even the buses that lower to the pavement ,all seems highly impractical to me .

I have done it on a bus just not a public transport bus. I have seen wheelchairs get on / off too but as I said the main objection (from the driver) was the amount of time it took.

martyh 31-08-2016 20:25

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35857048)
Do the CF members here who are in receipt of the higher rate mobility component of DLA feel that paralympians, athletes, should qualify for the same benefit as they do?

Is it relevant that by definition, they are very mobile, possibly already receive UK Sport, Lottery and sponsored funding to enable them to participate in a chosen career whilst many young ambulant people are scrambling around to get a job, to buy a car, buy a home and raise a family?

Yes ,because many people on DLA do work .As i understand the payment it is to aid with expenses incurred due to a specific disability to enable recipients to go out to work or live something approaching a normal life

Paul 31-08-2016 20:38

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35857048)
Do the CF members here who are in receipt of the higher rate mobility component of DLA feel that paralympians, athletes, should qualify for the same benefit as they do?

If they qualify for it according to the rules, yes, if they don't, no.

They should not be treated any differently because they happen to be a paralympian.

Kursk 31-08-2016 20:42

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35857055)
Yes ,because many people on DLA do work .As i understand the payment it is to aid with expenses incurred due to a specific disability to enable recipients to go out to work or live something approaching a normal life

Ok, all contributions welcome although the question was specifically for those who receive the allowance.

martyh 31-08-2016 20:50

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35857065)
Ok, all contributions welcome although the question was specifically for those who receive the allowance.

Apologies ,didn't realise that non recipients where not allowed an opinion

Kursk 31-08-2016 21:09

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35857067)
Apologies ,didn't realise that non recipients where not allowed an opinion

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35857065)
Ok, all contributions welcome

I award you an allowance for word blindness :rolleyes:

rogerdraig 31-08-2016 22:15

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35857048)
Do the CF members here who are in receipt of the higher rate mobility component of DLA feel that paralympians, athletes, should qualify for the same benefit as they do?

Is it relevant that by definition, they are very mobile, possibly already receive UK Sport, Lottery and sponsored funding to enable them to participate in a chosen career whilst many young ambulant people are scrambling around to get a job, to buy a car, buy a home and raise a family?

yes just because they get around doesn't mean they are not in pain or that it makes doing everyday stuff difficult the whole point of this award was to enable people to live a fairly normal life

Just because they are fitter and maybe healthier than me doesn't mean that they are still not disadvantaged being mobile

Kursk 31-08-2016 22:42

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rogerdraig (Post 35857095)
yes just because they get around doesn't mean they are not in pain or that it makes doing everyday stuff difficult the whole point of this award was to enable people to live a fairly normal life

Just because they are fitter and maybe healthier than me doesn't mean that they are still not disadvantaged being mobile

But if you are in a position to fund your mobility and indeed have a career that literally celebrates your mobility, why do you need DLA?

The silence is deafening in here :sleep:.

rogerdraig 01-09-2016 00:01

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
it was never a means tested benefit it just levels the playing ground and just because they are para Olympians doesn't mean they have a great deal of money

the adaptations and wear and tear on a car can up to thousands a year extra that an able bodied well person doesnt have to cope with so whether they earn £5k or £50k a year it gives them a chance to compete work etc

Maggy 01-09-2016 08:18

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35857101)
But if you are in a position to fund your mobility and indeed have a career that literally celebrates your mobility, why do you need DLA?

The silence is deafening in here :sleep:.

I suspect most Paralympians don't get the sponsorship some of their more well known number in more high visibility Paralympic sport do. In fact according to a BBC report I saw on TV the Paralympics get half the sponsorship that the Olympics does..and sorry I just can't find a link to it due to the really weird search engine they have on their site..

Pierre 01-09-2016 08:35

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
OK

Quote:

Paralympians heading to Rio next week have lost their Motability vehicles after being reassessed as part of the government’s programme of benefit cuts and reforms, a member of the ParalympicsGB team has revealed.
So this guy has revealed this scandal, he must have some juicy evidence and detail to break such a story as must the journalist to write about it.

Quote:

Some Paralympians have spoken previously of the importance of the support they receive from the benefits system, particularly through disability living allowance (DLA), but this is the first confirmation that any of them have lost that support as a result of the government’s austerity programme.
Confirmation from whom, I can't see any confirmation

Quote:

The 20-year-old said he knew of fellow Paralympians who have already lost their Motability cars after being reassessed for PIP

He said: “There have been Paralympians who have been told that they are too able to claim Motability and they have had to fight to get the cars back because they have been taken off them..
OK so he does know, no doubt he'll tell us who, how many, how big is this issue

Quote:

“I don’t know too much about it
Hold on, this whole story is based on your knowledge

Quote:

I haven’t spoken to them about it because that’s a personal matter for them, but it’s something I’m a little bit concerned about.”
So you don't know, you may have heard something maybe.

Good fact finding bit of journalism there.

Quote:

He said he was not comfortable providing further details about colleagues, and could not say how many fellow team-members had lost their Motability vehicles, but added: “All I know is anyone with disabilities is getting assessed at the moment, so it’s a possibility for any of us.”
Pah!

Maggy 01-09-2016 08:46

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Fair enough..you don't believe it..but I do.

Kursk 01-09-2016 10:27

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Pierre does have a point. Is this another case of the slightest mention of the word [whisper]allowance[/whisper] and containment ensues? Just in case.

dilli-theclaw 01-09-2016 10:54

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35857147)
Fair enough..you don't believe it..but I do.

I believe it, I know several people who have lost their cars so I've no reason to assume Paralympians are any different.

martyh 01-09-2016 18:06

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35857147)
Fair enough..you don't believe it..but I do.


I don't understand why paralympians are even mentioned ,the reassessment applies to all disable claimants on DLA.One has nothing to do with the other

Paul 01-09-2016 19:10

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
I suspect its just a way to sensationalise it.

'Government has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles' is just a bit more of a headline than 'DLA reassessment means some claimants lose their car benefit'.

Kursk 01-09-2016 19:26

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Does reassessment include means-testing or is it a physical capability reassessment only?

rogerdraig 01-09-2016 21:35

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35857283)
Does reassessment include means-testing or is it a physical capability reassessment only?

no means testing just a testing of whether you can answer the unasked questions

RichardCoulter 02-09-2016 14:59

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dilli-theclaw (Post 35857163)
I believe it, I know several people who have lost their cars so I've no reason to assume Paralympians are any different.

Indeed. Lots of disabled people are having their mobility component reduced or stopped, leading to many losing their Motability vehicle.

In some cases this has led to people having to give up work and/or becoming housebound.

Between 400 and 500 motability cars are said to be being taken away from disabled people every week.

It is estimated that 40% of people will lose their cars, down from 1 million to 600,000.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35857283)
Does reassessment include means-testing or is it a physical capability reassessment only?

There were plans mooted to tax or means test the benefit, but thus far nothing concrete has surfaced.

They have basically changed the goalposts in order to justify these benefit cuts.

On DLA a 50 yard test was the norm, with PIP it's been reduced to 20 metres (nearly 22 yards), enabling the Government to say how they are rooting out people who shouldn't have ever been on the benefit.

Maggy 07-10-2016 12:19

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35857101)
But if you are in a position to fund your mobility and indeed have a career that literally celebrates your mobility, why do you need DLA?

The silence is deafening in here :sleep:.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/disability-sport/37544372

Quote:

In 2014, I raced 53 times and won a total of £6,000 in prize money. That's not a lot. I am fortunate I get National Lottery funding, which is fantastic and an amazing help, but that just about covers my annual sporting costs. That's partly why I still live with my mum and dad.

Luckily, I've also got great sponsors, something all athletes really struggle to find and many don't have, but I wouldn't say I make money - mostly it goes on fuel, hotels, equipment, and by the end of the year I just about break even.


Kursk 08-10-2016 01:53

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35862343)

So Hannah likes her chosen career, gets enabling lottery funding, sponsorship and allowances, but feels she should be paid more?

There are plenty of young people living with mum and dad who have low paid jobs, no supplementary funding, no chance of their own home, no personal transport, and no shiny medals to boot.

As Hannah says herself, she is not hard done by.

Pierre 08-10-2016 07:45

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35862343)

What's your point?

Maggy 08-10-2016 08:09

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35862487)
What's your point?

I think you understand very well what the point is..

Kursk 08-10-2016 08:59

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35862489)
I think you understand very well what the point is..

Actually, I didn't get the point either so made a comment that was just a polite opportunity for you to elaborate. As Toyah once sang...it's a mystery, it's a mystery... :).

Pierre 08-10-2016 09:51

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35862489)
I think you understand very well what the point is..

I didn't otherwise I wouldn't be asking.

So I ask again, what point are you trying to make with that post.

RichardCoulter 08-10-2016 13:18

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35857101)
But if you are in a position to fund your mobility and indeed have a career that literally celebrates your mobility, why do you need DLA?

The silence is deafening in here :sleep:.

The whole premise of DLA etc is that wider society should help towards the extra costs incurred because some people are unfortunate enough to have become disabled in some way- regardless of a person's income.

To ensure that this contribution was not eroded, it was made tax free and ignored as income for the purposes of calculating means tested benefits.

Apart from the considerations of the previous Cameron Government, this has always had the support of every Government of every colour since it's introduction in the seventies.

Most people in society will benefit from this as most people will either become disabled themselves or know someone close to them that will.

Statistics show that most of us will become disabled at some point in our lives through attack, disease, accident or old age.

Paul 08-10-2016 13:55

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35862489)
I think you understand very well what the point is..

Please explain it to me.

As far as I can see, she has nothing to complain about at all, and is better off than many young people. My daughter had to move back home because she could not "break even". She works hard in her job, but rent these days is just stupid.

Pierre 08-10-2016 14:55

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35862516)
The whole premise of DLA etc is that wider society should help towards the extra costs incurred because some people are unfortunate enough to have become disabled in some way- regardless of a person's income.

Bollocks.

If you're wealthy enough that you can afford the extra expense, why should I pay towards it.

Ken W 08-10-2016 15:34

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35862529)
Bollocks.

If you're wealthy enough that you can afford the extra expense, why should I pay towards it.



I assume that you are not disabled.

Pierre 08-10-2016 17:01

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
You assume correctly, but what has that got to do with it.

If you are disabled, but wealthy, why should you get more money from state?

Answer me that.

peanut 08-10-2016 17:07

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35862540)
You assume correctly, but what has that got to do with it.

If you are disabled, but wealthy, why should you get more money from state?

Answer me that.



Ask David Cameron, he claimed DLA for his son.

nomadking 08-10-2016 17:08

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 35862541)
Ask David Cameron, he claimed DLA for his son.

He claimed the Blue Badge that comes with it.

peanut 08-10-2016 17:12

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Why do people on £50k claim child benefit, why should childless couples pay for other people's children. Does it all really matter either way, if you meet a criteria then you are entitled. It's down to the individual if you want to put a claim in or not.

Pierre 08-10-2016 17:16

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 35862541)
Ask David Cameron, he claimed DLA for his son.

I don't have Dave's contact details and I don't think he's on this forum, so I'm asking Ken.

---------- Post added at 18:16 ---------- Previous post was at 18:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 35862543)
Why do people on £50k claim child benefit, why should childless couples pay for other people's children.

I agree.

Quote:

Does it all really matter either way, if you meet a criteria then you are entitled. It's down to the individual if you want to put a claim in or not.
True, as usual it is the system that is wrong. Another reason why our social security budget is sky high because of benefits such as this being dished out to people that don't need them.

denphone 08-10-2016 17:26

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35862542)
He claimed the Blue Badge that comes with it.

To get the blue badge one needs to get the higher rate of the mobility component of Disability Living Allowance (DLA).

nomadking 08-10-2016 17:47

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35862548)
To get the blue badge one needs to get the higher rate of the mobility component of Disability Living Allowance (DLA).

As the child was severely lacking in mobility. IIRC They had to be carried around, so that is what they would have got.

denphone 08-10-2016 18:03

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35862553)
As the child was severely lacking in mobility. IIRC They had to be carried around, so that is what they would have got.

Yes l have just done some research and l gather that was the case with their very young disabled child as generally apart from certain cases the usual criteria would apply.

Ken W 08-10-2016 18:12

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35862548)
To get the blue badge one needs to get the higher rate of the mobility component of Disability Living Allowance (DLA).



That requirement was not on my Blue Badge application form.

peanut 08-10-2016 18:12

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35862542)
He claimed the Blue Badge that comes with it.



Maybe or maybe not, he would have been eligible for the Blue badge even without a DLA award.

denphone 08-10-2016 18:29

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken W (Post 35862560)
That requirement was not on my Blue Badge application form.

It was certainly on mine Ken as they stated that l had to send in proof that l was on the higher mobility rate.

Ken W 08-10-2016 20:26

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35862565)
It was certainly on mine Ken as they stated that l had to send in proof that l was on the higher mobility rate.




I think that if you are in receipt of higher mobility rate you qualify for a Blue Badge, if you are not in receipt of higher mobility rate and have severe walking problems and pass a walking assessment you can be issued with a Blue Badge.

rogerdraig 08-10-2016 21:34

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
higher rate gets you a blue badge with out checks but you can still get one with out it you sometimes will need to be assessed though often they will go with a doctors opinion. it does vary from area to area. there was a consultation deciding if they should issue temporary ones for things that wont last long but are temporarily disabling. https://www.gov.uk/government/consul...r-a-blue-badge

Kursk 09-10-2016 00:11

Re: Government ‘has stripped Paralympians of their Motability vehicles’
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35862516)
Statistics show that most of us will become disabled at some point in our lives through attack, disease, accident or old age.

Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital (Professor Aaron Levenstein).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 35862489)
I think you understand very well what the point is..

Cryptic statements are like bikinis ;).


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:00.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum