![]() |
Getting minus errors
I'm 95% sure it shouldn't be going backwards
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2016/01/6.jpg |
Re: Getting minus errors
I'm pretty sure that if there are no issues with your connection or speed, then I think the negative values are nothing to worry about. Someone else may be able to clarify this better than I have.
|
Re: Getting minus errors
Quote:
|
Re: Getting minus errors
Roll over of an "int" data-type? The coder probably never contemplated pre and post RS errors in the 100,000's
|
Re: Getting minus errors
Quote:
|
Re: Getting minus errors
Quote:
The going to -1 immediately on resetting may be interesting but probably not. |
Re: Getting minus errors
Quote:
|
Re: Getting minus errors
What do VM say? I would phone
|
Re: Getting minus errors
Quote:
|
Re: Getting minus errors
Quote:
|
Re: Getting minus errors
Quote:
Disconnections can cause a high number of RS errors, while it's trying to resync and reconnect. You should always reset the RS errors after a reconnection (assuming your GUI has that feature). |
Re: Getting minus errors
A feature, eh - Muddie!
Maybe a 10dB forward Path Attenuator would annul the post-RS errors. |
Re: Getting minus errors
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Getting minus errors
It's popcorn time, Muddie!
When an integer goes negative, it's because of the integer type when the value overflows. Is that what you mean by a "feature"? i.e. a nice piece of sarcasm? In which case I've been a bit of a thicko! Thge power level on this cheap equipment is very close to maximum in range value that VM recommend. So there could well be something overdriven which might account for the errors. |
Re: Getting minus errors
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2016/01/3.jpg |
Re: Getting minus errors
Quote:
|
Re: Getting minus errors
Quote:
In the particular case, I see little difference between 9.9 and 10.1, the latter being one where the technician should fit an attenuator according to the Field Service Guide. An the SH range is cheap kit. So I'm suggesting that to remove that element of doubt an attenuator should be fitted. That said, I notice that the post-RS errors are zero on the latest shown data. Btw, it is always a good idea to post the Upstream data at the same time because if it's behaving correctly, that power should be lower than "normal". |
Re: Getting minus errors
Quote:
Here you go, speaking of which its gotten real cold here it was -7c last night if i remember correctly |
Re: Getting minus errors
Thanks. Well it does appear to be behaving correctly now. The upstream shows completely normal.
Thinking about it, the post-RS registers don't tell you WHEN the climb in numbers occurred. Say it went down for an hour to -10C and power downstream rose even further such that the errors occurred, you'd be tempted to think you have a problem. In any case I would fit one of the Forward Path Attenuators I always happen to have. |
Re: Getting minus errors
Quote:
|
Re: Getting minus errors
|
Re: Getting minus errors
Quote:
|
Re: Getting minus errors
|
Re: Getting minus errors
My levels go up and down! :erm: ... just bunged a 6db FPA on and left em around 5! :)
I get - errors aswell .... The superhub2ac is abit weird like that but I still get 200mbps 24/7 :cool: |
Re: Getting minus errors
What does that mean "my levels go up & down"? Which levels, exactly? And by what sort of number change?
|
Re: Getting minus errors
My Downloads were originally on about 5 (without the 6db FPA attached) then shot upto 11 about a month ago... being going up & down slightly ever since!... :)
My upload power has been about 30 for years! :) |
Re: Getting minus errors
The "slightly" is totally normal. By that I mean e.g. 5.5 to 5.6 or 5.7 or 5.4.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:05. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum