Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33701409)

Taf 18-09-2015 15:15

The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-34291815

Combat low inflation? I thought the game all along was to keep inflation down? :dunce:

denphone 18-09-2015 15:18

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
What you have to watch is the risk of deflation which is no good for no one.

Hugh 18-09-2015 16:02

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Andy Haldane appears to be a lone voice in saying that...

Osem 18-09-2015 16:24

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
I was only hearing the other day how wage inflation is on the way up with the risk of an overheating economy... :shrug:

Chrysalis 18-09-2015 16:28

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
deflation is good for the poor who often dont get increases in income.

I personally certainly prefer deflation to inflation.

Does seem daft when they been trying for years to get inflation down.

Basically tho it depends on your situation.

If you got piles of debt then high inflation is heaven, it devalues your debt. In particular its great for those with a mortgage.
If on the other hand you have lots of savings, then high inflation is bad, it devalues your savings.
If you have a static income such as benefit claimants or a dead end job, then inflation is likewise bad.

Chris 18-09-2015 17:04

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35798796)
deflation is good for the poor who often dont get increases in income.

I personally certainly prefer deflation to inflation.

Why am I not surprised ...

Deflation is not good for anyone. When people think the price of a new car, TV or computer will be lower in six months because of deflation, then they are more likely not to buy one because they want to wait for the lower price. Multiply that across a whole economy and you get the mother of all recessions, risk an all-out depression, and watch businesses lay off staff to cut their costs. That works wonders for the poor.

Like it or not, our economic system requires an element of inflation in order to function correctly. There is no reason why this should be bad for people who are on benefits or pensions because, under normal economic conditions, a government should be able to uprate payments annually in order to preserve the real-terms value of the benefit.

Don't think for one second that they would not cut payments in cash terms, if we became mired in long-term deflation, using the argument that the measure was real-terms neutral.

Chrysalis 19-09-2015 01:12

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Thats a valid point I guess, although ultimately waiting to see if something gets cheaper is always a gamble.

Take smartphones as an example, its a very high chance they will go down in price when waiting for a while after release day, yet they get pre orders in the 10s of millions and most people buy specific models within a month or two of release.

So whilst I agree "some people who are addicted to always getting the best value may wait, I dont think it will apply to a majority.

As a reference JSA would be at least £15 higher a week if it followed inflation in recent years. Public sector workers are fighting for 1% rise in wages never mind inflation matching rises.

Chris 19-09-2015 09:03

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrysalis (Post 35798851)
Thats a valid point I guess, although ultimately waiting to see if something gets cheaper is always a gamble.

Take smartphones as an example, its a very high chance they will go down in price when waiting for a while after release day, yet they get pre orders in the 10s of millions and most people buy specific models within a month or two of release.

So whilst I agree "some people who are addicted to always getting the best value may wait, I dont think it will apply to a majority.

As a reference JSA would be at least £15 higher a week if it followed inflation in recent years. Public sector workers are fighting for 1% rise in wages never mind inflation matching rises.

Newly released, high-end tech isn't a very good example in this case. Such items are always going to be more highly priced in their first few months of release as manufacturers try to recoup their development costs at the expense of early adopters who are more willing to pay a premium for the latest toy.

Deflation, remember, works across the economy, and it is the affect on expensive commodity goods like computers, Hi Fis, TVs, watches, cars etc, and even certain services like holidays, that overall, has a depressing effect on economic activity.

Re benefits, I did qualify my earlier post with "in normal economic times" - most of the last decade has not been normal, and compared to historic averages, inflation and interest rates are still far from normal.

If public sector workers achieve a 1pc pay rise then that would be an above-inflation settlement, on current figures.

Kursk 19-09-2015 09:14

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35798875)
If public sector workers achieve a 1pc pay rise then that would be an above-inflation settlement, on current figures.

An accurate statement but for completeness it should be qualified against the backdrop of a 4-year public sector pay freeze.

Public sector pay is way behind the private sector, on current figures.

Hugh 19-09-2015 09:26

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
This report from the IFS last October contradicts that statement.

http://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/public.../comms/r97.pdf

Chris 19-09-2015 09:31

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35798881)
This report from the IFS last October contradicts that statement.

http://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/public.../comms/r97.pdf

Yes, let's all sit down and read through 51 pages to find the bit you're referring to ... :p:

Taf 19-09-2015 10:00

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Well I get the idea that the Conservative "Living Wage" is going to do several things: push up prices (and therefore inflation) and push up unemployment. Therefore the increase in wages that the low paid will see, will soon be swallowed up by inflation. And then comes the next increase in the "Living Wage".....

And then the Bank of England might put up interest rates, which could stifle investment in business.

Osem 19-09-2015 13:01

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Anyone for a rock or a hard place?

Hugh 19-09-2015 13:53

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35798884)
Yes, let's all sit down and read through 51 pages to find the bit you're referring to ... :p:

Executive Summary, page 1 and 2 ;)

To summarise the summary -

In raw terms, pay levels are higher in the public sector than in the private sector. However, after accounting for differences in education, age and where workers live, the differences are much smaller. Among men, the average public sector pay differential in 2013–14 was close to zero, while among women it was around 8%.

Which contradicts the previous statement

Public sector pay is way behind the private sector, on current figures.

Kursk 20-09-2015 10:24

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
That report is a year old and can't be regarded as current.

Hugh 20-09-2015 12:20

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Yes, because private sector pay has surged in the last year.....

Kursk 20-09-2015 17:51

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
The report is over a year old; the information compiled within it is even older.

Hugh 20-09-2015 18:08

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
The data is up to March 2014, and the report is October 2014.

I provided evidence - perhaps you could provide some to back up your assertion....

nomadking 20-09-2015 18:30

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35799152)
I provided evidence - perhaps you could provide some to back up your assertion....

Evidence of what? It refers to pay differentials, NOT pay levels or increases. It even says that public sector pay is HIGHER. Do the massaged figures have a valid comparison with all areas of the private sector or just things like cleaners.

Hugh 20-09-2015 18:57

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
The poster stated
Quote:

Public sector pay is way behind the private sector, on current figures.
I disagreed, using the latest figures I could find to support what I stated - I was just asking him to do the same for his assertion that Public Sector pay was way behind Private Sector pay.

The report also discusses average pay levels, as well as differentials - including Section 2.4 in page 15
Quote:

In this chapter, we have sought to understand the differences in the average pay levels of public and private sector workers, and how these differences have changed over time. In raw terms, hourly pay is higher in the public sector. This partly reflects the fact that the public sector workforce includes a greater proportion of highly educated workers. After controlling for differences in education and other factors, the differences in the hourly pay of public and private sector workers are much smaller, on average, and larger for women than for men.

Maggy 20-09-2015 19:09

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
So what does this means for those of us with savings?:erm:

Hugh 20-09-2015 20:31

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
If you're lucky, you get 2% on a 3 year cash ISA....

Pierre 20-09-2015 20:59

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Cut rates? From what to what?

Not really that much room for manoeuvre.

I'll be happy for rates to stay where they are for the next few years, I'm really making a dent in the mortgage.

Osem 20-09-2015 21:09

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35799171)
If you're lucky, you get 2% on a 3 year cash ISA....

Not exactly an inducement for people to save for a rainy day which is what we're told HMG wants us all to be doing... :spin:

Ignitionnet 20-09-2015 22:15

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35799180)
Not exactly an inducement for people to save for a rainy day which is what we're told HMG wants us all to be doing... :spin:

Only the retired get taxpayer subsidised savings for right now.

Kursk 20-09-2015 23:27

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35799152)
The data is up to March 2014, and the report is October 2014.

I provided evidence - perhaps you could provide some to back up your assertion....

Your source of 'evidence' is old. Its content is the personal view of its 3 authors and whose personal view is no more relevant than mine.

It was indirectly funded by a Government seeking to reduce its wage bill but it is no doubt impartial if irrelevant to current figures.

Since its compilation circumstances have imho changed.

Chris 21-09-2015 07:47

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35799201)
Your source of 'evidence' is old. Its content is the personal view of its 3 authors and whose personal view is no more relevant than mine.

It was indirectly funded by a Government seeking to reduce its wage bill but it is no doubt impartial if irrelevant to current figures.

Since its compilation circumstances have imho changed.

Your attempt to create equivalence between your opinion and that of the report's authors is faulty. There is no automatic equivalence between opinions. Everyone has a right to be heard, but they do not have the right to be equally correct. The views in the report linked by Hugh are backed by rigorous research and use of evidence. The contrary view, which you seem to hold, is backed by ... What?

Kursk 21-09-2015 09:17

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35799240)
Your attempt to create equivalence between your opinion and that of the report's authors is faulty. There is no automatic equivalence between opinions. Everyone has a right to be heard, but they do not have the right to be equally correct. The views in the report linked by Hugh are backed by rigorous research and use of evidence. The contrary view, which you seem to hold, is backed by ... What?

I did not say there was equivalence. I said there was difference and holding a different view is a democratic right.

A layman does not have the resources or Government funding to definitively validate a view but it doesn't make that view wrong, especially when it hasn't been disproved.

The 'rigorous' research offered as 'evidence' is nothing more than a personally held opinion (as is mine) dressed up in a fancy report with implied association to the IFS; it is out-of-date and arguably tainted with deference to its paymaster.

The figures it presents have ceased to be relevant to the current position; in my view of course.

It seems neither opinion is backed by anything substantive nor can it be until an official, government-prepared or funded report is available and that will be unbiased too...:D

Hugh 21-09-2015 10:07

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Erm, no - people don't have to disprove views, otherwise anyone could make up any old crap and say 'but you can't prove me wrong'.

Informed, intelligent discussion is based on facts - saying you don't have any facts, but that your opinion is as equally valid as those who base their opinions on evidence, is a viewpoint also shared by creationists, anti-vaxxers, 9/11 Truthers, and UFOologists.

Nice try in calling extensive research compiled and presented by Britain’s leading independent microeconomic research institute as a personally held opinion just like yours.....;)

Quote:

The Institute for Fiscal Studies is a not for profit institution, a registered charity and a company limited by guarantee. The aims of the Institute are to "advance education for the benefit of the public by promoting on a non-political basis the study and discussion of and the exchange and dissemination of information and knowledge concerning the economic and social effects and influences of existing taxes, proposed changes in fiscal systems and other aspects of public policy, in each case whether in the United Kingdom or elsewhere in the world".

The Institute employs directly some sixty staff based at its offices in London. Research staff are divided into sectors and a small core of administrative and secretarial staff provides support facilities. In addition, around twenty senior academic staff are seconded by the Institute from UK universities on a part-time basis. Other academics from both UK and overseas institutions work with the staff as Research Fellows and Research Associates on an ad-hoc collaborative basis.

Chris 21-09-2015 10:25

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35799264)

The 'rigorous' research offered as 'evidence' is nothing more than a personally held opinion (as is mine)

This is the central point of contention. The evidence-based conclusions in the report are *not* merely a personal opinion. Re-phrase it as much as you like, your personal opinion does not weigh the same as evidence-based conclusions.

You may exercise your democratic right to be heard, however you have no democratic right to have your personal opinions taken seriously. That must be earned.

Kursk 23-09-2015 13:08

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35799274)
Informed, intelligent discussion is based on facts

Informed, intelligent discussion is based on current facts, not old, out-of-date reports.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35799283)
This is the central point of contention. The evidence-based conclusions in the report are *not* merely a personal opinion. Re-phrase it as much as you like, your personal opinion does not weigh the same as evidence-based conclusions.

Quote:

Preface

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation has supported this project as part of its programme of research and innovative development projects, which it hopes will be of value to policymakers, practitioners and service users. The facts presented and views expressed in this report are, however, those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Foundation. Neither are the views expressed necessarily those of the other individuals or institutions mentioned here, including the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), which has no corporate view. Co-funding fromthe ESRC-funded Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy at IFS (grant number RES-544-28-0001) is also gratefully acknowledged.
No need for re-phrasing; it's there in black and white.

Hugh 23-09-2015 13:53

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35799743)
Informed, intelligent discussion is based on current facts , not old, out-of-date reports.

I look forward to you presenting some, as you haven't so far...




Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35799743)
No need for re-phrasing; it's there in black and white.

Yes it is - it states "The facts presented ", not opinions....

Chris 23-09-2015 14:22

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35799743)
No need for re-phrasing; it's there in black and white.

That's a statement of attribution. It tells us the statements are the views of the author, not their employer. It is not an attempt to equate their researched, considered conclusions with the ill-informed opinions of a random internet user.

Kursk 23-09-2015 15:44

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35799756)
I look forward to you presenting some, as you haven't so far...

In relation to current figures, nor have you ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35799773)
It tells us the statements are the views of the author

And the statement I have made is the view of the author ;)

Hugh 23-09-2015 15:59

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35799802)
In relation to current figures, nor have you ;)



And the statement I have made is the view of the author ;)

You made the initial assertion, up to you to back it up.... ;)

Chris 23-09-2015 16:16

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35799802)
And the statement I have made is the view of the author ;)

You can go on avoiding the issue as long as you like - we have proof that the views of Cribb, Emerton and Simieta are based on thorough analysis of available data. We have no proof of what yours are based on.

Thus far, we are entitled to defer to the hard work and expertise of the authors, whilst treating your views as the random, ill-informed opinion of an internet user.

Unless, of course, you are about to impress us with the as-yet unrevealed research material that has informed your opinion?

Kursk 23-09-2015 16:33

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35799811)
You made the initial assertion, up to you to back it up.... ;)

And you countered that assertion with, erm, nothing of relevance. :erm:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35799823)
You can go on avoiding the issue as long as you like - we have proof that the views of Cribb, Emerton and Simieta are based on thorough analysis of available data.

The available data is no evidence of current figures. That report is useless for informing today's debate and/or today's political decisions. It is the official form of used chip paper. :D

Chris 23-09-2015 16:40

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
You may hold that to be the case - I suspect most people who know anything about the subject, consider it to be current enough to be useful.

Kursk 23-09-2015 17:43

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
A week is a long time in politics. Data in this context that has an ephemeral nature is positively archaic.

People who know anything about the subject of shopping will check their purse just before they buy, not 2 years sooner :)

Chris 23-09-2015 17:44

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
So many posts, so little proof ... ;)

Kursk 23-09-2015 22:41

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35799880)
So many posts, so little proof ... ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35705179)
Absolutely. It's all gash, in the end. :D

And FWIW, I agree with you! :)

Hugh 23-09-2015 22:57

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35798879)
An accurate statement but for completeness it should be qualified against the backdrop of a 4-year public sector pay freeze.

Public sector pay is way behind the private sector, on current figures.

I am glad you agree your proposition regarding "current figures" cannot be substantiated, as you have not provided any.... ;)

Kursk 24-09-2015 01:12

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35799954)
I am glad you agree your proposition regarding "current figures" cannot be substantiated, as you have not provided any.... ;)

Oh for goodness sake Dick and Dom, you win by attrition, now leave me alone already :p:

Hugh 24-09-2015 09:12

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Actually, I wasn't trying to win, I was looking for any later figures than the ones I found (as I couldn't find any)...

Kursk 24-09-2015 10:31

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
It's not currently in the public domain (if there is any that is :D).

Anecdotal evidence would of course be shot down by you and your evil twin. Also, I've learned not to antagonise too much and on that note...

I'm done :)

Hugh 24-09-2015 14:28

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Some evidence to support your statement.

Grauniad
Quote:

UK average earnings have been growing at the fastest rate since 2009, official figures have estimated.

Between May and July, average earnings excluding bonuses grew 2.9% compared with the same period last year, the Office for National Statistics said....

....Private sector pay rose by 4.4%, comparing the three months to July to the same period a year earlier, while public sector pay edged up by just 0.6%.

Kursk 24-09-2015 14:49

Re: The Bank of England may have to cut rates to combat low inflation
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35800028)
Some evidence to support your statement.

Grauniad

Thanks, I am touched by your magnanimity :); now, where has that rebellious Scot gone? :D


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:23.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum