![]() |
OFCOM Speed report
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Most of the report is stating the obvious (A 120Mbit is faster than a 76Mbit connection, who would have thought that? ;)), but there is some good info in there too. At least they look at upload speeds now and show that a 76Mbit FTTC is faster than the 120Mbit cable in that respect.
Interesting to see that Virgin Media are the only ones who have a significant percentage drop in speed in the evenings between 8pm and 10pm. Even the adsl suppliers seem to have an insignificant change from the average 24 hour or maximum speeds. I thought all the upgrade work VM was supposed to be doing was going to do away with evening congestion? |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Really?
VM 120 drops to 106, and FTTC 76 drops to 61. That works out to - VM drop of 13% FTTC drop of 20% |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Yes, really :)
Virgins percentage difference is much larger than the others when you look at the maximum speed and average speed numbers quoted and then compare that to the evening peak time hours. You are just comparing the headline speed of both services with the evening speed. If you go by the highest maximum average of the services and then the same at peak times, Virgin slows down almost 12% compared to FTTC of 6%. Similar results if you take those values from the 24 hour average too. |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
Remember the posts saying once BT rolled fibre out, VM would be in trouble, looks like they were wrong and with the financial clout of LGI there will be far more innovation to come from what I have heard. Watch this space. |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Simply pointing out a fact always seems to get some people so butthurt, as if someone has insulted the love of their life :rolleyes:
Put your skimpy red VM cheerleading costumes back in the closet you two, they are not needed. |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
im on VM 152mb package and the slowest ive seen it drop when doing speed tests is to 141mb down and 10.6mb up.
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
This threads gone in a predictable direction !!!!!!
Am I the only one who's glad to see the UK average increasing ? We can argue and brag all we want but the fact is the majority still don't take the top tier services. |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
Perhaps my needs are not typical as there are only two of us in the family unless the grandkids are visiting. The only thing we stream is the tennis as I can't justify Sky's price for sports. The rest of our activity is well served by TiVo with its modest 10Mb connection to the internet. |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
For the majority of homes I still think 20Mbits is more than enough. Even busy family homes don't really need faster than 30 or so at this moment in time when you consider that would handle a family of 6 all browsing, gaming and streaming a video each all at the same time.
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
I haven't looked at this report in detail yet but the last one did show VM's drops getting less severe over the last few years... Quote:
FTTC 76 drops from an average of 61.6-68.0 to 60.8-67.2, a drop of 1.0-1.0%. Incidentally, it remains, as I pointed out last year, that VM 30Mb is slower than FTTC 38Mb, as is VM60 vs FTTC 76, despite VM having originally positioned and claimed both to be faster. I'm guessing the uplift to 50/100 was to fix that mistake... Disappointingly, VM 120 is still only averaging around 85-88% of it's provisioned speed, though FTTC seems to be getting worse - or just more variable - my own recent congestion issues on BT FTTC being a great example... |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
So if FTTC is sold as 76, but only provides 65 on average, that makes it better than something that is sold as 120, but provides 115 on average?
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
I never said anything about marketed speeds, what it's "sold as", or which is "better", nor do I care.
Only from a technical point of view, something that's provisioned at 77.43Mbps vs. something provisioned at 133Mbps. We were talking about the effects of congestion after all, and congestion is a function of the underlying technology, not a function of what marketing choose to call something... You have to look at the underlying sync and payload rates to get any meaningful comparison. As an example, is a service that runs at 10Mbps and drops to 5Mbps at peak times, averaging 7.5Mbps more congested than one that runs at 20Mbps and drops to 1Mbps, averaging 11Mbps? Is it "better"? What if the first was marketed as Upto 20Mb and the second was marketed as Up to 10Mb? Cause that's what you're asking. And frankly, answering a question like that is a minefield. |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
You also are the biggest "doomsayer" in every Sky thread. I think it's time you stopped now and you should grow up! Be positive and others will follow. ---------- Post added at 23:14 ---------- Previous post was at 23:04 ---------- Quote:
On the other hand BT/Sky ect sell up to 76mb and a lot only get around 50mb. But the network could handle all customers using their connection between 11am-11pm. Truth is networks only offer 50mb+ speeds because they can price them higher. Sky and Talktalk are now about to launch a 1Gb FTTH connection in york, no one needs it. But they will be able to say they have the fastest connection when compared to VM. |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2014/04/13.png |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Mine does what i want it to which is download via the newsgroups quickly, Was streaming top gear in HD on netflicks whilst i did that test :)
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2014/04/5.png |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
My Virginmedia connection its supercharged upto 50Mb, its good for downloading but god awful for gaming/Skype/ and the like.
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2014/04/4.png |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
I've been supercharged also and get the full 54Mb, even wirelessly. http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/i/829992982 |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
Reference upload, even 3Mb is too much for me as I rarely do any. |
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
The nerd-o-sterone count is high on this thread.
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
---------- Post added at 14:08 ---------- Previous post was at 14:06 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: OFCOM Speed report
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum